If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

[excalibur]

Well?

Fair question, eh.

But Democrats, having very little to offer, pay not attention to the [wo]man behind the screen, will always fall back on 'muh, racism'.

Indeed: If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Well?

Fair question, eh.

But Democrats, having very little to offer, pay not attention to the [wo]man behind the screen, will always fall back on 'muh, racism'.

Indeed: If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

Because you all are using it as a slur.

Intentionally.

And because it doesn't have the meaning that racists and misogynists and others have assigned to it.

 

[Crepitus]

Well?

Fair question, eh.

But Democrats, having very little to offer, pay not attention to the [wo]man behind the screen, will always fall back on 'muh, racism'.

Indeed: If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

Are you really this dumb?

 

[petro]

It's legitimate criticism, screw liberals dog whistle.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Well?

Fair question, eh.

But Democrats, having very little to offer, pay not attention to the [wo]man behind the screen, will always fall back on 'muh, racism'.

Indeed: If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

It's not. Joe said he picked her strictly for her skin color and plumbing. Harris is a cackling moron. Even Dims know this.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Who was selected not elected

 

[Justin Richardson]

DEI is very bad for America! Just look at Disney (one of many woke businesses). Also how the Democrats "promotes" GROOMING.

I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want my kids being "groomed". It's down-right SICK.

Misusing the term ‘grooming’ is problematic, experts say

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ press secretary Christina Pushaw was not happy that critics had nicknamed a controversial Flo

www.politifact.com

 

[excalibur]

Because you all are using it as a slur.

Intentionally.

And because it doesn't have the meaning that racists and misogynists and others have assigned to it.

Too funny. You leftoids, such good cultists.

 

[Mac-7]

Because you all are using it as a slur.

Intentionally.

And because it doesn't have the meaning that racists and misogynists and others have assigned to it.

Yes, its intended as an insult

Just as libs calling MAGAs Nazis, racist, ect

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Too funny. You leftoids, such good cultists.

I don't have time to explain this again but it's explained here:
Do you think that in America major companies should have “minority” hiring quotas?

 

[el midgetron]

Never ever question the doctrine. That’s the first rule of woke club.

Seriously though, DEI is just like a weak and faggy version of Jim Crow.

 

[Foxfyre]

Well?

Fair question, eh.

But Democrats, having very little to offer, pay not attention to the [wo]man behind the screen, will always fall back on 'muh, racism'.

Indeed: If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

Good question. I wonder if any leftist will have a good answer for it?

 

[Foxfyre]

Because you all are using it as a slur.

Intentionally.

And because it doesn't have the meaning that racists and misogynists and others have assigned to it.

Really? We don't complain when you use MAGA as a slur. We just provide the correct definition of MAGA.

Is it that leftists are unable to provide a defensible definition of DEI?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Good question. I wonder if any leftist will have a good answer for it?

No.
This is just another irreconcilable dichotomy of the democrat party.
But that doesn’t matter to them as long as the objective of destroying American culture is achieved.

 

[Foxfyre]

No.
This is just another irreconcilable dichotomy of the democrat party.
But that doesn’t matter to them as long as the objective of destroying American culture is achieved.

We need to be aware of all the myriad steps used to accomplish that objective though. They claim to fight racism by accusing Patriots of racism while they use racism to do that. DEI is their objective even as they call Patriots racist, phobic, misogynist etc. if we point out that DEI is their objective.

It's nuts. But it's right out of Alinsky's Marxist rules for radicals.