Murf76
Senior Member
- Nov 11, 2008
- 2,464
- 593
- 48
The problem with giving all "social welfare" programs over to the states is that some will have better benefits than others and therefore see their populations rise from neighboring states whose benefits are not as great. I can't think of any governor who would encourage that.
You're only looking at half the equation. The other half is attracting citizens and businesses. Money coming in; money going out. That means, you have to make the most out of your revenues, because as we see in states like California and New York... people take their money and leave when you don't.
Each state would be forced by necessity to strike the best balance between attracting revenues and social spending. Some would do it better than others, but all would have the benefit of example in the other 49 microcosms.