If Fords testimony is true...

Sniffles may make it to the scotus because Donnie limited the FBI investigation to four people who had already spoken, but the many people who could corroborate Kavanaugh's lies were left out. Criminals take notice, just contact the pussy grabber he'll help you out. Just support his businesses.

Yale roommate says Kavanaugh lied under oath about drinking and yearbook - CNNPolitics

Trump's FBI, ask four people who would actually indict themselves and you get what answer. Every criminal should take notice, but judge my fellow bank robber agrees, we didn't do it. No problem then Sniffles you are free to serve on the highest court in America and help the corporations and the wealthy while hurting the working class, carry on.

Injustices: The Supreme Court's History of Comforting the Comfortable and Afflicting the Afflicted by Ian Millhiser

Right, because if his roommate said it, it must be true, just like what Ford said must be true.

You people on the left don't know the difference between evidence and accusations. Anybody can make an accusation, but cold hard evidence is impossible to refute.
 
She said she would turn them over. Ford hasn’t hid from anything, she’s answered all the questions asked.

Why isn’t the FBI interviewing her ?

Why would you interview somebody that was questioned so long during a Senate Committee?

What more could the FBI ask that hasn't already been answered?

Ford and her attorneys have been calling the shots too much in all this. Grassley should have said we do X and then we'll do Y, and that's it. Take it or leave it.

Now they want to keep calling the shots by saying they won't cooperate unless they do it her way. F-her.

Fine with Grassley and the Republicans. Keep your stupid phony polygraph test. We don't need it now. We have everything we need to know.
 
If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?


She should have been questioned by the FBI.
 
In 2002, Manuel Miranda, a Republican staff member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, stole thousands of documents belonging to committee Democrats…In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 5, 2018 and September 6, 2018 related to his confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States, Kavanaugh falsely testified under oath that he had no knowledge that Miranda had infiltrated Democratic files, concealed the fact that he knowingly received and read information about the stolen documents and concealed his prior false testimony to the Senate in 2004 and 2006. The July 28, 2002 email from Miranda to Kavanaugh and other emails recently released to the public establish that Kavanaugh gave false testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee…



After detailing an email Kavanaugh received from former Republican senate staffer Manny Miranda which contained text “obviously taken from my internal emails,” Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) asked, “did any of this raise a red flag in your mind?”


“It did not, Senator, because it all seemed consistent with the usual kind of discussions that happen,” he said. “And sometimes people do say things of, here’s what my boss is thinking, but don’t share it around.”

LIED UNDER OATH

END OF STORY


there ya go morons- Kavanaugh is out.
you must be the only one that thinks that. go with it and vote. oh wait do you vote on him?


a lying judge on the SC ?

pssssssssst- yo dipshit ......... I'm not the only one who will think Kavanaugh doesnt need to be on the bench.

Wild Bill lied to Congress under oath -

hint hint .....
he remained president wink wink.

This is fun.
 
lying under oath will be the end of Kavanaugh's sexual assault misery.
That is exactly what Ford did for Kavanaugh. By Lying Under Oath she completely exposed The DemNazi Party for the Lying Marxist Unethical, Evil Party that they are.

Expect to see Feinstein, McLean, Katz, and Ford investigated in the upcoming months. I expect Avanatti might also have The Bar look at his unscrupulous behavior as well as The IRS because he owes more back taxes than Al "Race Hustler" Sharpton.

If they look into a criminal investigation of Sweathog, she might spill the beans about how Avanatti conned her into doing all this, and he may wind up in jail.
 
If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

If somebody tried to rape you, why would you try to make friends with that person when you seen him working at a grocery store?
 
If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?


She should have been questioned by the FBI.
why? did she forget something from her testimony investigation under oath in the senate committee?
 
If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?


She should have been questioned by the FBI.
what a shame, she had all of those senators to hear her story and you're saying she didn't tell it? hmmmmmm I guess it sucks to be her.
 
You say she is a liar, let's catch her lying again. You got a problem with that? Because I would love for Kavvy to tell more lies to the FBI !
 
You say she is a liar, let's catch her lying again. You got a problem with that? Because I would love for Kavvy to tell more lies to the FBI !
why do they need to talk to her exactly?

If she feels guilty of something, she can turn herself in.
 
You say she is a liar, let's catch her lying again. You got a problem with that? Because I would love for Kavvy to tell more lies to the FBI !
why do they need to talk to her exactly?


To prove her lies and prosecute if necessary. Kavvy as well!

She's the accuser. Its on her to provide the evidence. She lied and couldnt produce anything.


Then let her lie to the FBI, if they can prove she lied prosecute her.
 
You say she is a liar, let's catch her lying again. You got a problem with that? Because I would love for Kavvy to tell more lies to the FBI !
why do they need to talk to her exactly?


To prove her lies and prosecute if necessary. Kavvy as well!

She's the accuser. Its on her to provide the evidence. She lied and couldnt produce anything.


Then let her lie to the FBI, if they can prove she lied prosecute her.

She lied. I don't care what she does.
 
You say she is a liar, let's catch her lying again. You got a problem with that? Because I would love for Kavvy to tell more lies to the FBI !
why do they need to talk to her exactly?


To prove her lies and prosecute if necessary. Kavvy as well!

She's the accuser. Its on her to provide the evidence. She lied and couldnt produce anything.


Then let her lie to the FBI, if they can prove she lied prosecute her.
go ahead, go to the fbi who is stopping her? What does the vote have to do with her talking to the fbi exactly?
 

Forum List

Back
Top