If Fords testimony is true...

[Sun Devil 92]

lying under oath will be the end of Kavanaugh's sexual assault misery.

You mean they're gonna actually jail Ford ?

 

[dave p]

lying under oath will be the end of Kavanaugh's sexual assault misery.

Yes she did lie under oath

 

[dave p]

In 2002, Manuel Miranda, a Republican staff member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, stole thousands of documents belonging to committee Democrats…In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 5, 2018 and September 6, 2018 related to his confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States, Kavanaugh falsely testified under oath that he had no knowledge that Miranda had infiltrated Democratic files, concealed the fact that he knowingly received and read information about the stolen documents and concealed his prior false testimony to the Senate in 2004 and 2006. The July 28, 2002 email from Miranda to Kavanaugh and other emails recently released to the public establish that Kavanaugh gave false testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee…



After detailing an email Kavanaugh received from former Republican senate staffer Manny Miranda which contained text “obviously taken from my internal emails,” Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) asked, “did any of this raise a red flag in your mind?”


“It did not, Senator, because it all seemed consistent with the usual kind of discussions that happen,” he said. “And sometimes people do say things of, here’s what my boss is thinking, but don’t share it around.”

LIED UNDER OATH

END OF STORY


there ya go morons- Kavanaugh is out.

Kav is out. What are you smoking?

 

[dave p]

lying under oath will be the end of Kavanaugh's sexual assault misery.

That is exactly what Ford did for Kavanaugh. By Lying Under Oath she completely exposed The DemNazi Party for the Lying Marxist Unethical, Evil Party that they are.

Expect to see Feinstein, McLean, Katz, and Ford investigated in the upcoming months. I expect Avanatti might also have The Bar look at his unscrupulous behavior as well as The IRS because he owes more back taxes than Al "Race Hustler" Sharpton.

its not about ford - posted the entire scenario yesterday and it was totally ignored by RW's

hide and watch, you'll see.

It’s all about Ford and Feinstein. Jesus, you tucking people are dense.

 

[dave p]

She said she would turn them over. Ford hasn’t hid from anything, she’s answered all the questions asked.

Why isn’t the FBI interviewing her ?

She answered all the questions with fabrication. The fbi doesn’t need to ask her anything, her testimony is on record numnuts. You really can’t be this fucking stupid.

 

[Aldo Raine]

If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

She should have been questioned by the FBI.

Why? Did she not tell the whole story under oath?

Not the point I am making. You folks are so sure she is lying, have her lie to the FBI and se ez how it plays.

 

[Aldo Raine]

You say she is a liar, let's catch her lying again. You got a problem with that? Because I would love for Kavvy to tell more lies to the FBI !

Problem is he didn't tell any lies to the FBI.

Of course not, he wasn't questioned just like she wasn't.

 

[BS Filter]

If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

She should have been questioned by the FBI.

Why? Did she not tell the whole story under oath?

Not the point I am making. You folks are so sure she is lying, have her lie to the FBI and se ez how it plays.

Doesn't matter if she's lying or not because no one backs up her story. It's a classic she said, he said. Nothing. The judge is qualified. Vote.

 

[Aldo Raine]

You say she is a liar, let's catch her lying again. You got a problem with that? Because I would love for Kavvy to tell more lies to the FBI !

What lie did Kavanaugh say under oath?

-He admitted to drinking, he admitted to drinking in excess, he admitted to drinking on weekdays, he says he never blacked out. So the only “lie” you can get him for on purgery was that he never blacked out...how are you going to prove that?

-Boofing: is confirmed as slang for flatulence, from that region at the time. It’s also slang for soaking a tampon in alcohol and shoving it up your ass to get really drunk really fast without alcohol on your breath where I’m from. It also has a couple of other meanings in the urban dictionary, non of which involve anal sex...are you going to prove the intent of slang from 30 years back? Good luck

-Renata: are you going to prove the intent of a possible inside joke going off a year book from 30 years ago? Good luck

So what are you going to get him on purgary charges with? And since when did the left start caring about purgary so much? Holder, Clinton, former CIA director, all purgeuored themselves on waaaaaaaaaaaaaay more agreigious matters than slang, or inside jokes from a yearbook 36 years ago. Non of y’all care.

He did not admit to drinking to the excesses that he did. All he said was he liked beer and basketball.

 

[Aldo Raine]

If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

She should have been questioned by the FBI.

Why? Did she not tell the whole story under oath?

Not the point I am making. You folks are so sure she is lying, have her lie to the FBI and se ez how it plays.

Doesn't matter if she's lying or not because no one backs up her story. It's a classic she said, he said. Nothing. The judge is qualified. Vote.

It matters if you wish to prosecute her.

 

[BS Filter]

If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

She should have been questioned by the FBI.

Why? Did she not tell the whole story under oath?

Not the point I am making. You folks are so sure she is lying, have her lie to the FBI and se ez how it plays.

Doesn't matter if she's lying or not because no one backs up her story. It's a classic she said, he said. Nothing. The judge is qualified. Vote.

It matters if you wish to prosecute her.

If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

She should have been questioned by the FBI.

Why? Did she not tell the whole story under oath?

Not the point I am making. You folks are so sure she is lying, have her lie to the FBI and se ez how it plays.

Doesn't matter if she's lying or not because no one backs up her story. It's a classic she said, he said. Nothing. The judge is qualified. Vote.

It matters if you wish to prosecute her.

Not happening.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You say she is a liar, let's catch her lying again. You got a problem with that? Because I would love for Kavvy to tell more lies to the FBI !

Problem is he didn't tell any lies to the FBI.

Of course not, he wasn't questioned just like she wasn't.

He didn't lie in the hearing either. Now if you're talking about what others have said about his drinking, that's just as credible as his supposed attack on Ford; he said/ she said. Furthermore how one considers "to excess" is subjective. There is no legal definition of to excess. There is a limit while driving an automobile, but not what is considered drinking too much.

 

[hadit]

lying under oath will be the end of Kavanaugh's sexual assault misery.

You say that like you believe it.

 

[hazlnut]

If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

Senators are not trained investigators.

These jokers are shit, really.

 

[BS Filter]

If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

Senators are not trained investigators.

These jokers are shit, really.

What should be investigated?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

Senators are not trained investigators.

These jokers are shit, really.

The attorney is trained to ask such questions. And in fact, they hired an attorney that actually favored Ford.

 

[Aldo Raine]

You say she is a liar, let's catch her lying again. You got a problem with that? Because I would love for Kavvy to tell more lies to the FBI !

Problem is he didn't tell any lies to the FBI.

Of course not, he wasn't questioned just like she wasn't.

He didn't lie in the hearing either. Now if you're talking about what others have said about his drinking, that's just as credible as his supposed attack on Ford; he said/ she said. Furthermore how one considers "to excess" is subjective. There is no legal definition of to excess. There is a limit while driving an automobile, but not what is considered drinking too much.

Bart lied about his drinking plain and simple.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

She's a liar and we should stop talking about her unless it's in regard to Perjury charges.

 

[sakinago]

If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

She should have been questioned by the FBI.

Why? Did she not tell the whole story under oath?

Not the point I am making. You folks are so sure she is lying, have her lie to the FBI and se ez how it plays.

So your point is let her get interviewed by the FBI...we don’t give a fuck. The problem is this is a bunk request because there is nothing further to say to the FBI. The point of this thread is, if she wants to spread the truth, why not release her only evidence in its entirety? It’s not odd to you that if she’s sooo traumatized by kavanaugh, why is she withholding the only thing that could possibly stop him from becoming a justice?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You say she is a liar, let's catch her lying again. You got a problem with that? Because I would love for Kavvy to tell more lies to the FBI !

Problem is he didn't tell any lies to the FBI.

Of course not, he wasn't questioned just like she wasn't.

He didn't lie in the hearing either. Now if you're talking about what others have said about his drinking, that's just as credible as his supposed attack on Ford; he said/ she said. Furthermore how one considers "to excess" is subjective. There is no legal definition of to excess. There is a limit while driving an automobile, but not what is considered drinking too much.

Bart lied about his drinking plain and simple.

So Kavanaugh said he didn't drink to excess and another person said he did, so the other person is evidence that Kavanaugh is lying?

What if Kavanaugh said his roommate was into having sex with animals? Does that mean his roommate was?