Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
You mean democrats?No one?
I see major conflicts coming up under Hillary. Starting with Syria. Possibly Southern Africa and Russia
Do you also see dead people?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean democrats?No one?
I see major conflicts coming up under Hillary. Starting with Syria. Possibly Southern Africa and Russia
Do you also see dead people?
Alright dumbfuck let's play.did you just wake up this stupid? You do know you are on a forum asking for a discussion aka debate? Are you like Clinton and cant figure out what c on the top of a email means?This wasn't a debate it was a poll. You failed even that partWTF did you think debating was? I am not going to wallow in hyperbole . Hillary Clinton is so horrible I don't need to.Playing semantics is not my thing. Bye nowStill stupid because we are in a world war. There is no new wars now just different battlefields.
Quote the DEBATEABLE part of the op. You know, the part where I put forth one position that you can refute with a different opinion.
Keep in mind the op is comprised of one word. Thoughts
Or
Just vote like a normal person would in a poll
Probably about the same time you stop having sex with your dog?Alright dumbfuck let's play.did you just wake up this stupid? You do know you are on a forum asking for a discussion aka debate? Are you like Clinton and cant figure out what c on the top of a email means?This wasn't a debate it was a poll. You failed even that partWTF did you think debating was? I am not going to wallow in hyperbole . Hillary Clinton is so horrible I don't need to.Playing semantics is not my thing. Bye now
Quote the DEBATEABLE part of the op. You know, the part where I put forth one position that you can refute with a different opinion.
Keep in mind the op is comprised of one word. Thoughts
Or
Just vote like a normal person would in a poll
If Trump wins the election how long before he stops beating his wife?
You mean the way she started Iraq?Thoughts?
Yes! But this time she won't vote for it, she'll just do it.You mean the way she started Iraq?Thoughts?
The debatable part is that A. any war will be new for the foreseeable future and B. That Clinton will cause it. 8 years of Obama will be a reason for the escalation of the war. Clinton will make us less safe yes but I dont see how she will start a new conflict that hasnt already be going on for years now.Alright dumbfuck let's play.did you just wake up this stupid? You do know you are on a forum asking for a discussion aka debate? Are you like Clinton and cant figure out what c on the top of a email means?This wasn't a debate it was a poll. You failed even that partWTF did you think debating was? I am not going to wallow in hyperbole . Hillary Clinton is so horrible I don't need to.Playing semantics is not my thing. Bye nowStill stupid because we are in a world war. There is no new wars now just different battlefields.
Quote the DEBATEABLE part of the op. You know, the part where I put forth one position that you can refute with a different opinion.
Keep in mind the op is comprised of one word. Thoughts
Or
Just vote like a normal person would in a poll
Listen dumb fuck. All Democrats are Jew haters like you so please try to keep your ignorance to yourself because I am less for having to read your stupidity.She is owned by Zionists, especially DWS, because she wouldn't have won the nomination without DWS' Zionist cheating...
All the warmongering Zionist Jews and JDAACs are for her - including Lindsay Graham, Henry Paulsen and the Goldman Sachs crowd etc.
What did wiki say earlier about arming ISIS???
http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillar...or-israel-the-best-way-to-help-israel/5515741
"A newly-released Hilary Clinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has deliberately provoked the civil war in Syria as the “best way to help Israel.”
"
Then why is it that the majority of our wars started when a democrat was president?Thoughts?
Why would Clinton start a war? Just to act like a Republican President?
aww look at you fudge the dates the wars started.Then why is it that the majority of our wars started when a democrat was president?Thoughts?
Why would Clinton start a war? Just to act like a Republican President?
Zat true? Let's count 'em up.
1812 -- Madison (Democratic-Republican, unrelated to either contemporary party)
Mexican-American War 1846: Polk (Democrat) (Republicans did not yet exist)
Civil War 1865: Lincoln (Republican) (first one)
Spanish-American War 1898: McKinley (Republican)
WWI (not "our" war but we went in) 1918: Wilson (Democrat)
WWII (not "our" war but we were attacked and went in) 1941: FDR (Democrat)
Korea 1950: Truman (Democrat)
Vietnam 1954: Eisenhower (Republican)
Grenada 1983: Reagan (Republican)
Panama 1990: Bush I (Republican)
Iraq 1991: Bush I (Republican)
Afghanistan 2002: Bush II (Republican)
Iraq 2003 Bush II (Republican)
I get four Democrats, eight Republicans and one neither. What do you get?
Not that it amounts to a bucket of warm piss, as it pretends that "Democrat" and "Republican" are not only some kind of constant but some kind of "opposite", which is absurd.
The dates are for some off, but the Presidents are correct.
When Eisenhower agreed to take over the French load for South Vietnam, he in fact got us into the war there.
aww look at you fudge the dates the wars started.Then why is it that the majority of our wars started when a democrat was president?Thoughts?
Why would Clinton start a war? Just to act like a Republican President?
Zat true? Let's count 'em up.
1812 -- Madison (Democratic-Republican, unrelated to either contemporary party)
Mexican-American War 1846: Polk (Democrat) (Republicans did not yet exist)
Civil War 1865: Lincoln (Republican) (first one)
Spanish-American War 1898: McKinley (Republican)
WWI (not "our" war but we went in) 1918: Wilson (Democrat)
WWII (not "our" war but we were attacked and went in) 1941: FDR (Democrat)
Korea 1950: Truman (Democrat)
Vietnam 1954: Eisenhower (Republican)
Grenada 1983: Reagan (Republican)
Panama 1990: Bush I (Republican)
Iraq 1991: Bush I (Republican)
Afghanistan 2002: Bush II (Republican)
Iraq 2003 Bush II (Republican)
I get four Democrats, eight Republicans and one neither. What do you get?
Not that it amounts to a bucket of warm piss, as it pretends that "Democrat" and "Republican" are not only some kind of constant but some kind of "opposite", which is absurd.
Dulles was the great anti-communist. Eisenhower thought he could stabilize SVN similarly to Korea. What neither understood, being big war not little war guys, was that the VC and the NVN had sanctuaries that were very difficult for the Americans and allies to get at.The dates are for some off, but the Presidents are correct.
When Eisenhower agreed to take over the French load for South Vietnam, he in fact got us into the war there.
Yeah I didn't bother to look the dates up but a minor detail. WWI might have been 1917 but it's moot.
Eisenhower made a colossal blunder listening to Dulles and not asking questions about his approach -- a man (Dulles) who knew jack squat about Southeast Asia. It cost tens of thousands of American lives and untold numbers of Vietnamese ones.
No it isnt LOL It just shows you are dishonest as always.aww look at you fudge the dates the wars started.Then why is it that the majority of our wars started when a democrat was president?Thoughts?
Why would Clinton start a war? Just to act like a Republican President?
Zat true? Let's count 'em up.
1812 -- Madison (Democratic-Republican, unrelated to either contemporary party)
Mexican-American War 1846: Polk (Democrat) (Republicans did not yet exist)
Civil War 1865: Lincoln (Republican) (first one)
Spanish-American War 1898: McKinley (Republican)
WWI (not "our" war but we went in) 1918: Wilson (Democrat)
WWII (not "our" war but we were attacked and went in) 1941: FDR (Democrat)
Korea 1950: Truman (Democrat)
Vietnam 1954: Eisenhower (Republican)
Grenada 1983: Reagan (Republican)
Panama 1990: Bush I (Republican)
Iraq 1991: Bush I (Republican)
Afghanistan 2002: Bush II (Republican)
Iraq 2003 Bush II (Republican)
I get four Democrats, eight Republicans and one neither. What do you get?
Not that it amounts to a bucket of warm piss, as it pretends that "Democrat" and "Republican" are not only some kind of constant but some kind of "opposite", which is absurd.
Doesn't matter. Your pretend point is obliterated.
No it isnt LOL It just shows you are dishonest as always.aww look at you fudge the dates the wars started.Then why is it that the majority of our wars started when a democrat was president?Why would Clinton start a war? Just to act like a Republican President?
Zat true? Let's count 'em up.
1812 -- Madison (Democratic-Republican, unrelated to either contemporary party)
Mexican-American War 1846: Polk (Democrat) (Republicans did not yet exist)
Civil War 1865: Lincoln (Republican) (first one)
Spanish-American War 1898: McKinley (Republican)
WWI (not "our" war but we went in) 1918: Wilson (Democrat)
WWII (not "our" war but we were attacked and went in) 1941: FDR (Democrat)
Korea 1950: Truman (Democrat)
Vietnam 1954: Eisenhower (Republican)
Grenada 1983: Reagan (Republican)
Panama 1990: Bush I (Republican)
Iraq 1991: Bush I (Republican)
Afghanistan 2002: Bush II (Republican)
Iraq 2003 Bush II (Republican)
I get four Democrats, eight Republicans and one neither. What do you get?
Not that it amounts to a bucket of warm piss, as it pretends that "Democrat" and "Republican" are not only some kind of constant but some kind of "opposite", which is absurd.
Doesn't matter. Your pretend point is obliterated.
His major point is correct, and yours is wrong, than: you have to do far more than "nuh uh."No it isnt LOL It just shows you are dishonest as always.aww look at you fudge the dates the wars started.Then why is it that the majority of our wars started when a democrat was president?Why would Clinton start a war? Just to act like a Republican President?
Zat true? Let's count 'em up.
1812 -- Madison (Democratic-Republican, unrelated to either contemporary party)
Mexican-American War 1846: Polk (Democrat) (Republicans did not yet exist)
Civil War 1865: Lincoln (Republican) (first one)
Spanish-American War 1898: McKinley (Republican)
WWI (not "our" war but we went in) 1918: Wilson (Democrat)
WWII (not "our" war but we were attacked and went in) 1941: FDR (Democrat)
Korea 1950: Truman (Democrat)
Vietnam 1954: Eisenhower (Republican)
Grenada 1983: Reagan (Republican)
Panama 1990: Bush I (Republican)
Iraq 1991: Bush I (Republican)
Afghanistan 2002: Bush II (Republican)
Iraq 2003 Bush II (Republican)
I get four Democrats, eight Republicans and one neither. What do you get?
Not that it amounts to a bucket of warm piss, as it pretends that "Democrat" and "Republican" are not only some kind of constant but some kind of "opposite", which is absurd.
Doesn't matter. Your pretend point is obliterated.
Listen dumb fuck. All Democrats are Jew haters like you so please try to keep your ignorance to yourself because I am less for having to read your stupidity.
Listen dumb fuck. All Democrats are Jew haters y.She is owned by Zionists, especially DWS, because she wouldn't have won the nomination without DWS' Zionist cheating...
All the warmongering Zionist Jews and JDAACs are for her - including Lindsay Graham, Henry Paulsen and the Goldman Sachs crowd etc.
What did wiki say earlier about arming ISIS???
http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillar...or-israel-the-best-way-to-help-israel/5515741
"A newly-released Hilary Clinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has deliberately provoked the civil war in Syria as the “best way to help Israel.”
"