If Negros Had Been Left To Their Own Devices...

In summation lets just cut to the quick. Whites had nothing to do with Black Africans developing the first amazing civilizations on the planet. Black people founded Egypt (Kmt), Sumer (Canaan), Nubia (Kush), and the Indus Valley civilization. Egypt especially was responsible for waking white people up from their semi cave people existence. They were the first authors and provided a number of things white copy to this day like practicing medicine. Blacks had the worlds first multi discipline genius in Imhotep. Blacks gave whites their alphabet. The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoneticians" and thats where whites got their alphabet. Later Black Africans founded the great west African civilizations that attracted scholars from europe to come study. In short, whites should be thanking their lucky stars Blacks educated them not questioning if Blacks could succeed without whites. The idea is ludicrous from the moment of conception that Blacks would even need whites to exist. :laugh:

So sorry to inform you but Ancient Egyptians were Mediterranean's, they were genetically most similar to people from the Near-East.

Mummy DNA shows that the ancients don’t have much in common with modern Egyptians

The team then compared the ancient mummy DNA to the DNA of both ancient and modern people in the same region. It turns out that, on a genetic level, the ancient Egyptians aren’t so different from modern people living in the Near East. In fact, they have more in common with those in the Near East than today’s Egyptians. For example, the mummies didn’t have any DNA from sub-Saharan Africa, whereas about 20 percent of today’s Egyptians have sub-Saharan genes.
You forgot to include this part like you did last time I busted you on this....

From your link...

"The team investigated a total of 151 mummies from a site about 100 kilometers south of Cairo. These mummies were excavated in the early 20th century, and radiocarbon dating showed that their lives spanned 1,300 years, or from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE."

151 mummies that could have been captured invaders for all you know. Not a very compelling sample size nor does it dispute what the Greeks that saw the Egyptians with their own eyes said about them being Black now does it?
laugh.gif



Haha, yeah spanning 1,300 years in 151 samples, all must have been invaders of Egypt.
Funny joke.

I think the Egyptian Copts who are not Arabs, shows us all we need to know.

Egyptian Copts below, direct descendants of Ancient Egyptians overall.


_63918772_63918771.jpg
Yeah before whites invaded light Arabs invaded. Its amazing you have no clue of Egypts history yet you keep posting pictures that pretty much discredit your previous post about the ancient Egyptians not being related to the Copts. Which claim are you standing behind this one or the one I already debunked. Here are some Black Copts.

68432.jpg


Modern_4.jpg


Modern-Black-Egyptians.jpg
 
In summation lets just cut to the quick. Whites had nothing to do with Black Africans developing the first amazing civilizations on the planet. Black people founded Egypt (Kmt), Sumer (Canaan), Nubia (Kush), and the Indus Valley civilization. Egypt especially was responsible for waking white people up from their semi cave people existence. They were the first authors and provided a number of things white copy to this day like practicing medicine. Blacks had the worlds first multi discipline genius in Imhotep. Blacks gave whites their alphabet. The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoneticians" and thats where whites got their alphabet. Later Black Africans founded the great west African civilizations that attracted scholars from europe to come study. In short, whites should be thanking their lucky stars Blacks educated them not questioning if Blacks could succeed without whites. The idea is ludicrous from the moment of conception that Blacks would even need whites to exist. :laugh:

So sorry to inform you but Ancient Egyptians were Mediterranean's, they were genetically most similar to people from the Near-East.

Mummy DNA shows that the ancients don’t have much in common with modern Egyptians

The team then compared the ancient mummy DNA to the DNA of both ancient and modern people in the same region. It turns out that, on a genetic level, the ancient Egyptians aren’t so different from modern people living in the Near East. In fact, they have more in common with those in the Near East than today’s Egyptians. For example, the mummies didn’t have any DNA from sub-Saharan Africa, whereas about 20 percent of today’s Egyptians have sub-Saharan genes.
You forgot to include this part like you did last time I busted you on this....

From your link...

"The team investigated a total of 151 mummies from a site about 100 kilometers south of Cairo. These mummies were excavated in the early 20th century, and radiocarbon dating showed that their lives spanned 1,300 years, or from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE."

151 mummies that could have been captured invaders for all you know. Not a very compelling sample size nor does it dispute what the Greeks that saw the Egyptians with their own eyes said about them being Black now does it?
laugh.gif

Yeah because Egyptians have a history of going to the trouble, and expense to mummify “captured invaders”... lol...

Very good point, it seems extremely unlikely that Egyptians would have mummified any invader, much less 100% of the invaders.
 
In summation lets just cut to the quick. Whites had nothing to do with Black Africans developing the first amazing civilizations on the planet. Black people founded Egypt (Kmt), Sumer (Canaan), Nubia (Kush), and the Indus Valley civilization. Egypt especially was responsible for waking white people up from their semi cave people existence. They were the first authors and provided a number of things white copy to this day like practicing medicine. Blacks had the worlds first multi discipline genius in Imhotep. Blacks gave whites their alphabet. The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoneticians" and thats where whites got their alphabet. Later Black Africans founded the great west African civilizations that attracted scholars from europe to come study. In short, whites should be thanking their lucky stars Blacks educated them not questioning if Blacks could succeed without whites. The idea is ludicrous from the moment of conception that Blacks would even need whites to exist. :laugh:

So sorry to inform you but Ancient Egyptians were Mediterranean's, they were genetically most similar to people from the Near-East.

Mummy DNA shows that the ancients don’t have much in common with modern Egyptians

The team then compared the ancient mummy DNA to the DNA of both ancient and modern people in the same region. It turns out that, on a genetic level, the ancient Egyptians aren’t so different from modern people living in the Near East. In fact, they have more in common with those in the Near East than today’s Egyptians. For example, the mummies didn’t have any DNA from sub-Saharan Africa, whereas about 20 percent of today’s Egyptians have sub-Saharan genes.
You forgot to include this part like you did last time I busted you on this....

From your link...

"The team investigated a total of 151 mummies from a site about 100 kilometers south of Cairo. These mummies were excavated in the early 20th century, and radiocarbon dating showed that their lives spanned 1,300 years, or from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE."

151 mummies that could have been captured invaders for all you know. Not a very compelling sample size nor does it dispute what the Greeks that saw the Egyptians with their own eyes said about them being Black now does it?
laugh.gif

Yeah because Egyptians have a history of going to the trouble, and expense to mummify “captured invaders”... lol...

Very good point, it seems extremely unlikely that Egyptians would have mummified any invader, much less 100% of the invaders.
:laugh:
 
In summation lets just cut to the quick. Whites had nothing to do with Black Africans developing the first amazing civilizations on the planet. Black people founded Egypt (Kmt), Sumer (Canaan), Nubia (Kush), and the Indus Valley civilization. Egypt especially was responsible for waking white people up from their semi cave people existence. They were the first authors and provided a number of things white copy to this day like practicing medicine. Blacks had the worlds first multi discipline genius in Imhotep. Blacks gave whites their alphabet. The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoneticians" and thats where whites got their alphabet. Later Black Africans founded the great west African civilizations that attracted scholars from europe to come study. In short, whites should be thanking their lucky stars Blacks educated them not questioning if Blacks could succeed without whites. The idea is ludicrous from the moment of conception that Blacks would even need whites to exist. :laugh:

So sorry to inform you but Ancient Egyptians were Mediterranean's, they were genetically most similar to people from the Near-East.

Mummy DNA shows that the ancients don’t have much in common with modern Egyptians

The team then compared the ancient mummy DNA to the DNA of both ancient and modern people in the same region. It turns out that, on a genetic level, the ancient Egyptians aren’t so different from modern people living in the Near East. In fact, they have more in common with those in the Near East than today’s Egyptians. For example, the mummies didn’t have any DNA from sub-Saharan Africa, whereas about 20 percent of today’s Egyptians have sub-Saharan genes.
You forgot to include this part like you did last time I busted you on this....

From your link...

"The team investigated a total of 151 mummies from a site about 100 kilometers south of Cairo. These mummies were excavated in the early 20th century, and radiocarbon dating showed that their lives spanned 1,300 years, or from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE."

151 mummies that could have been captured invaders for all you know. Not a very compelling sample size nor does it dispute what the Greeks that saw the Egyptians with their own eyes said about them being Black now does it?
laugh.gif

Yeah because Egyptians have a history of going to the trouble, and expense to mummify “captured invaders”... lol...
After they became citizens of Egypt I am pretty sure they were treated just like any other Egyptian. They probably lived in the same area much like people do today.
 
You are babbling again. The "white historians"? What "white historian"?
You must be drinking again if you think I am babbling. Herodotus for starters. You know. The Father of Western Civilization?

Herodotus was a GREEK-----for whom "pretty people" had blue eyes and blond hair-----like VENUS (actually Aphrodite---for the greeks) Herodotus lived in the fifth
century BC ---and based his impressions on traveling here and there---nothing close to a "scientific" study------he was no biologist. By the fifth Century BC----Nubians has already invaded Egypt and MIXED-----and the arab slave trade was already based in SUDAN----and had supplied sub-Saharan slaves to Egypt, Greece and even to Persia. Your insistence that there was anything close to a clear delineation of "RACES" by 500 BC is ludicrous-------it makes you seem insane

The entire quote is:
Too black a hue marks the coward, as witness Egyptians and Ethiopians, and so does also too white a complexion, as you may see from women. So the hue that makes for courage must be intermediate between these extremes. A tawny colour indicates a bold spirit, as in lions; but too ruddy a hue marks a rogue, as in the case of the fox. A pale mottled hue signifies cowardice, for that is the colour one turns in terror. The honey-pale are cold, and coldness means immobility, and an immobile body means slowness. A red hue indicates hastiness, for all parts of the body on being heated by movement turn red. A flaming skin, however, indicates madness, for it results from an overheated body, and extreme bodily heat is likely to mean madness.

Only a moron like Asclepias would consider that a reliable source of the general racial makeup of Egypt, especially compared to modern DNA evidence suggesting the opposite. The retarded shitskin thinks he can make blacks look good by going back thousands of years to when they were supposedly civilized and intelligent, but whenever he tries someone finds evidence contrary to his delusions. Maybe next time he'll go back 100,000,000 years and talk about space-traveling blacks. The further back, the less evidence, the "stronger" his argument.
Its a reliable source because they saw them. Just like Herodotus Try harder silly white boy. Must hurt huh? :laugh:

"the people of Colchis must be Egyptians because like them they are black-skinned and wooly-haired." (History, Book II.)
-Herodotus

Banqueting-Scene-Thebes-tomb-of-Nebamum-Ipuky-1400-BC.jpg
We know all paintings/sculptures/drawings are true to life.

1900s_Postcard-You_Doun_Want_None_of_My_Lip.jpg



You just can't handle the truth.
 
In summation lets just cut to the quick. Whites had nothing to do with Black Africans developing the first amazing civilizations on the planet. Black people founded Egypt (Kmt), Sumer (Canaan), Nubia (Kush), and the Indus Valley civilization. Egypt especially was responsible for waking white people up from their semi cave people existence. They were the first authors and provided a number of things white copy to this day like practicing medicine. Blacks had the worlds first multi discipline genius in Imhotep. Blacks gave whites their alphabet. The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoneticians" and thats where whites got their alphabet. Later Black Africans founded the great west African civilizations that attracted scholars from europe to come study. In short, whites should be thanking their lucky stars Blacks educated them not questioning if Blacks could succeed without whites. The idea is ludicrous from the moment of conception that Blacks would even need whites to exist. :laugh:

So sorry to inform you but Ancient Egyptians were Mediterranean's, they were genetically most similar to people from the Near-East.

Mummy DNA shows that the ancients don’t have much in common with modern Egyptians

The team then compared the ancient mummy DNA to the DNA of both ancient and modern people in the same region. It turns out that, on a genetic level, the ancient Egyptians aren’t so different from modern people living in the Near East. In fact, they have more in common with those in the Near East than today’s Egyptians. For example, the mummies didn’t have any DNA from sub-Saharan Africa, whereas about 20 percent of today’s Egyptians have sub-Saharan genes.
You forgot to include this part like you did last time I busted you on this....

From your link...

"The team investigated a total of 151 mummies from a site about 100 kilometers south of Cairo. These mummies were excavated in the early 20th century, and radiocarbon dating showed that their lives spanned 1,300 years, or from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE."

151 mummies that could have been captured invaders for all you know. Not a very compelling sample size nor does it dispute what the Greeks that saw the Egyptians with their own eyes said about them being Black now does it?
laugh.gif

Yeah because Egyptians have a history of going to the trouble, and expense to mummify “captured invaders”... lol...
After they became citizens of Egypt I am pretty sure they were treated just like any other Egyptian. They probably lived in the same area much like people do today.
Uh huh...
 
In summation lets just cut to the quick. Whites had nothing to do with Black Africans developing the first amazing civilizations on the planet. Black people founded Egypt (Kmt), Sumer (Canaan), Nubia (Kush), and the Indus Valley civilization. Egypt especially was responsible for waking white people up from their semi cave people existence. They were the first authors and provided a number of things white copy to this day like practicing medicine. Blacks had the worlds first multi discipline genius in Imhotep. Blacks gave whites their alphabet. The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoneticians" and thats where whites got their alphabet. Later Black Africans founded the great west African civilizations that attracted scholars from europe to come study. In short, whites should be thanking their lucky stars Blacks educated them not questioning if Blacks could succeed without whites. The idea is ludicrous from the moment of conception that Blacks would even need whites to exist. :laugh:

So sorry to inform you but Ancient Egyptians were Mediterranean's, they were genetically most similar to people from the Near-East.

Mummy DNA shows that the ancients don’t have much in common with modern Egyptians

The team then compared the ancient mummy DNA to the DNA of both ancient and modern people in the same region. It turns out that, on a genetic level, the ancient Egyptians aren’t so different from modern people living in the Near East. In fact, they have more in common with those in the Near East than today’s Egyptians. For example, the mummies didn’t have any DNA from sub-Saharan Africa, whereas about 20 percent of today’s Egyptians have sub-Saharan genes.
You forgot to include this part like you did last time I busted you on this....

From your link...

"The team investigated a total of 151 mummies from a site about 100 kilometers south of Cairo. These mummies were excavated in the early 20th century, and radiocarbon dating showed that their lives spanned 1,300 years, or from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE."

151 mummies that could have been captured invaders for all you know. Not a very compelling sample size nor does it dispute what the Greeks that saw the Egyptians with their own eyes said about them being Black now does it?
laugh.gif



Haha, yeah spanning 1,300 years in 151 samples, all must have been invaders of Egypt.
Funny joke.

I think the Egyptian Copts who are not Arabs, shows us all we need to know.

Egyptian Copts below, direct descendants of Ancient Egyptians overall.


_63918772_63918771.jpg
Yeah before whites invaded light Arabs invaded. Its amazing you have no clue of Egypts history yet you keep posting pictures that pretty much discredit your previous post about the ancient Egyptians not being related to the Copts. Which claim are you standing behind this one or the one I already debunked. Here are some Black Copts.

68432.jpg


Modern_4.jpg


Modern-Black-Egyptians.jpg

Are you sure those aren't Copts from Sudan?
 
In summation lets just cut to the quick. Whites had nothing to do with Black Africans developing the first amazing civilizations on the planet. Black people founded Egypt (Kmt), Sumer (Canaan), Nubia (Kush), and the Indus Valley civilization. Egypt especially was responsible for waking white people up from their semi cave people existence. They were the first authors and provided a number of things white copy to this day like practicing medicine. Blacks had the worlds first multi discipline genius in Imhotep. Blacks gave whites their alphabet. The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoneticians" and thats where whites got their alphabet. Later Black Africans founded the great west African civilizations that attracted scholars from europe to come study. In short, whites should be thanking their lucky stars Blacks educated them not questioning if Blacks could succeed without whites. The idea is ludicrous from the moment of conception that Blacks would even need whites to exist. :laugh:

So sorry to inform you but Ancient Egyptians were Mediterranean's, they were genetically most similar to people from the Near-East.

Mummy DNA shows that the ancients don’t have much in common with modern Egyptians

The team then compared the ancient mummy DNA to the DNA of both ancient and modern people in the same region. It turns out that, on a genetic level, the ancient Egyptians aren’t so different from modern people living in the Near East. In fact, they have more in common with those in the Near East than today’s Egyptians. For example, the mummies didn’t have any DNA from sub-Saharan Africa, whereas about 20 percent of today’s Egyptians have sub-Saharan genes.
You forgot to include this part like you did last time I busted you on this....

From your link...

"The team investigated a total of 151 mummies from a site about 100 kilometers south of Cairo. These mummies were excavated in the early 20th century, and radiocarbon dating showed that their lives spanned 1,300 years, or from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE."

151 mummies that could have been captured invaders for all you know. Not a very compelling sample size nor does it dispute what the Greeks that saw the Egyptians with their own eyes said about them being Black now does it?
laugh.gif



Haha, yeah spanning 1,300 years in 151 samples, all must have been invaders of Egypt.
Funny joke.

I think the Egyptian Copts who are not Arabs, shows us all we need to know.

Egyptian Copts below, direct descendants of Ancient Egyptians overall.


_63918772_63918771.jpg
Yeah before whites invaded light Arabs invaded. Its amazing you have no clue of Egypts history yet you keep posting pictures that pretty much discredit your previous post about the ancient Egyptians not being related to the Copts. Which claim are you standing behind this one or the one I already debunked. Here are some Black Copts.

68432.jpg


Modern_4.jpg


Modern-Black-Egyptians.jpg

Are you sure those aren't Copts from Sudan?
Are you sure you want to stick with your claim that ancient Egyptians are not related to the Copts?
 
So sorry to inform you but Ancient Egyptians were Mediterranean's, they were genetically most similar to people from the Near-East.

Mummy DNA shows that the ancients don’t have much in common with modern Egyptians

The team then compared the ancient mummy DNA to the DNA of both ancient and modern people in the same region. It turns out that, on a genetic level, the ancient Egyptians aren’t so different from modern people living in the Near East. In fact, they have more in common with those in the Near East than today’s Egyptians. For example, the mummies didn’t have any DNA from sub-Saharan Africa, whereas about 20 percent of today’s Egyptians have sub-Saharan genes.
You forgot to include this part like you did last time I busted you on this....

From your link...

"The team investigated a total of 151 mummies from a site about 100 kilometers south of Cairo. These mummies were excavated in the early 20th century, and radiocarbon dating showed that their lives spanned 1,300 years, or from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE."

151 mummies that could have been captured invaders for all you know. Not a very compelling sample size nor does it dispute what the Greeks that saw the Egyptians with their own eyes said about them being Black now does it?
laugh.gif



Haha, yeah spanning 1,300 years in 151 samples, all must have been invaders of Egypt.
Funny joke.

I think the Egyptian Copts who are not Arabs, shows us all we need to know.

Egyptian Copts below, direct descendants of Ancient Egyptians overall.


_63918772_63918771.jpg
Yeah before whites invaded light Arabs invaded. Its amazing you have no clue of Egypts history yet you keep posting pictures that pretty much discredit your previous post about the ancient Egyptians not being related to the Copts. Which claim are you standing behind this one or the one I already debunked. Here are some Black Copts.

68432.jpg


Modern_4.jpg


Modern-Black-Egyptians.jpg

Are you sure those aren't Copts from Sudan?
Are you sure you want to stick with your claim that ancient Egyptians are not related to the Copts?

Where did I say that?
I thought I had argued that on the whole Egyptian Copts came from Ancient Egyptians.


They could be twins. Damn!

akhenaten1.jpg

How long did it take you to find a person with African coloring, and hair texture to have such angular features?
 
You forgot to include this part like you did last time I busted you on this....

From your link...

"The team investigated a total of 151 mummies from a site about 100 kilometers south of Cairo. These mummies were excavated in the early 20th century, and radiocarbon dating showed that their lives spanned 1,300 years, or from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE."

151 mummies that could have been captured invaders for all you know. Not a very compelling sample size nor does it dispute what the Greeks that saw the Egyptians with their own eyes said about them being Black now does it?
laugh.gif



Haha, yeah spanning 1,300 years in 151 samples, all must have been invaders of Egypt.
Funny joke.

I think the Egyptian Copts who are not Arabs, shows us all we need to know.

Egyptian Copts below, direct descendants of Ancient Egyptians overall.


_63918772_63918771.jpg
Yeah before whites invaded light Arabs invaded. Its amazing you have no clue of Egypts history yet you keep posting pictures that pretty much discredit your previous post about the ancient Egyptians not being related to the Copts. Which claim are you standing behind this one or the one I already debunked. Here are some Black Copts.

68432.jpg


Modern_4.jpg


Modern-Black-Egyptians.jpg

Are you sure those aren't Copts from Sudan?
Are you sure you want to stick with your claim that ancient Egyptians are not related to the Copts?

Where did I say that?
I thought I had argued that on the whole Egyptian Copts came from Ancient Egyptians.


They could be twins. Damn!

akhenaten1.jpg

How long did it take you to find a person with African coloring, and hair texture to have such angular features?
The study you posted said the opposite. Did you forget you posted it? I know I didnt.
laugh.gif


It didnt take me anytime to find it because I wasnt looking for it.
 
Hmmm

Sidelock of youth - Wikipedia

"The sidelock of youth (also called a Horus lock, Prince's lock, Princess' lock, or side braid) was an identifying characteristic of the child in Ancient Egypt. It symbolically indicates that the wearer is a legitimate heir of Osiris. The sidelock was used as a divine attribute from at least as early as the Old Kingdom"

lock.jpg


hair14.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2

Forum List

Back
Top