If the DNC election was "rigged" - how was it "rigged"?

[Sun Devil 92]

She got booted....because the emails show the rigging....take your blinders off...talk about brainwashed...jesus

So how did the emails show the rigging?

We've been asking for days and for pages, and just get hysterical weeping and cursing in response. The Little Trump Snowflakes seem to think that constitutes "evidence". Bizarre.

Love how you'll hang onto that word "rigging".

It's unfortunate that people have used that term because that is not what happened.

There is clear evidence that Debbie Wasserfatbutt Shultz and Co. pushed the nomination in Hillary's direction.

Or are you denying that too ?

She quit why ?

Mamooth plays a game. He demands to see the emails and if you can't produce the emails then he/she/it considers you fair game . If you produce the emails then he runs and tries to find someone else, usually on the right, and starts the process all over again.

Correct.

Why should Bernie supporters (I count myself as one...) have to work harder to get the nomination ?

That seems to be accepted.

 

[mamooth]

Mamooth plays a game. He demands to see the emails and if you can't produce the emails then he/she/it considers you fair game . If you produce the emails then he runs and tries to find someone else, usually on the right, and starts the process all over again.

No. Here's how it works.

You make loopy claims.

After endless prodding, I finally get someone to post the supposedly damning emails.

I point out the emails don't support your loopy claims. That is, the Hillary-haters are just making stupid crap up.

The Hillary-haters then cry at me, hard.

If you'd like, we can play again. I mean, I don't keep track of your every post, so if I missed you lying about an email, I'm sorry. Please present it and lie about it again.

 

[Disir]

She got booted....because the emails show the rigging....take your blinders off...talk about brainwashed...jesus

So how did the emails show the rigging?

We've been asking for days and for pages, and just get hysterical weeping and cursing in response. The Little Trump Snowflakes seem to think that constitutes "evidence". Bizarre.

Love how you'll hang onto that word "rigging".

It's unfortunate that people have used that term because that is not what happened.

There is clear evidence that Debbie Wasserfatbutt Shultz and Co. pushed the nomination in Hillary's direction.

Or are you denying that too ?

She quit why ?

Mamooth plays a game. He demands to see the emails and if you can't produce the emails then he/she/it considers you fair game . If you produce the emails then he runs and tries to find someone else, usually on the right, and starts the process all over again.

Correct.

Why should Bernie supporters (I count myself as one...) have to work harder to get the nomination ?

That seems to be accepted.

Yep. And now they want to pretend to be liberal when in fact they are neoliberal corporate whores.

 

[Disir]

Mamooth plays a game. He demands to see the emails and if you can't produce the emails then he/she/it considers you fair game . If you produce the emails then he runs and tries to find someone else, usually on the right, and starts the process all over again.

No. Here's how it works.

You make loopy claims.

After endless prodding, I finally get someone to post the supposedly damning emails.

I point out the emails don't support your loopy claims. That is, the Hillary-haters are just making stupid crap up.

The Hillary-haters then cry at me, hard.

If you'd like, we can play again. I mean, I don't keep track of your every post, so if I missed you lying about an email, I'm sorry. Please present it and lie about it again.

I've done it about 3 or 4 times now. You're a liar.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Gee whiz, still no proof yet...

How about I boot your dumb ass over the goal posts and stick your nose in Hillary's poop?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

She got booted....because the emails show the rigging....take your blinders off...talk about brainwashed...jesus

So how did the emails show the rigging?

We've been asking for days and for pages, and just get hysterical weeping and cursing in response. The Little Trump Snowflakes seem to think that constitutes "evidence". Bizarre.

Love how you'll hang onto that word "rigging".

It's unfortunate that people have used that term because that is not what happened.

There is clear evidence that Debbie Wasserfatbutt Shultz and Co. pushed the nomination in Hillary's direction.

Or are you denying that too ?

She quit why ?

Mamooth plays a game. He demands to see the emails and if you can't produce the emails then he/she/it considers you fair game . If you produce the emails then he runs and tries to find someone else, usually on the right, and starts the process all over again.

Correct.

Why should Bernie supporters (I count myself as one...) have to work harder to get the nomination ?

That seems to be accepted.

Yep. And now they want to pretend to be liberal when in fact they are neoliberal corporate whores.

Well, Hillary did get all her donations from the average Joe.....

Wait.....

 

[rdean]

Please explain exactly how it was supposedly "rigged" - with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact. Just because the DNC may have "favored" Hillary over Bernie doesn't mean it was "rigged". The DNC "favored" Obama over Hillary in 2008. Bernie wasn't "cheated" out of anything. The DNC election process never changed from beginning to end. Even Bernie said publicly that Hillary won fair and square - which she did. So, stop with the "rigged" shit or explain to us with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact exactly how it was supposedly "rigged".

It was rigged because the Democratic Party was supporting the Democratic Candidate. Bernie said he wasn't a Democrat. After the convention, he won't be a Democrat. And he refuses to support any Democrat.

He assumes his "revolution" and his "political ideas" are so wanted that entire nation must bow down before his superior knowledge.

Well, I didn't want him. I never wanted him. I think he doesn't even know enough. When asked by the New York post how big was to big to fail, he didn't know. When asked how he would divide up the banks, he said he would leave it to banks. Bernie, in my mind, is a fraud.

Even I know that to big to fail isn't about how big a bank is, but how much debt it accrues. Even I know banks should be divided up by whether their investments are conservative or risky and by what the investors expect.

And I'm not even a banker. Shame on Bernie.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[mamooth]

I've done it about 3 or 4 times now. You're a liar.

Then do it again. Shouldn't be a problem, if you're telling the truth. However, I've checked back to the beginning of our discussions. You've cried a lot, raged, hurled insults at me, but no, you've never quoted any emails to me. So, it appears you're not telling the truth there.

Now, it's possible you made such responses to someone else. If you did, I missed them, because your stuff is generally not worth reading, and I'll miss it if it's not addressed to me. Seriously, get over yourself. Nobody really cares if you're screeching incoherently about "corporate whores" or similarly elevating the discussion.

 

[Seawytch]

Sanders Calls for Wasserman Schultz to Resign After Email Leaks

Sen. Bernie Sanders said Sunday that in the wake of the leaked emails from the Democratic National Committee its chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, should step down.

"I think she should resign, period,” as chair of the DNC, Sanders said on ABC's "This Week."

“I told you long time ago that the DNC was not running a fair operation, that they were supporting Secretary Clinton,” Sanders told ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos Sunday on “This Week.” “So what I suggested to be true six months ago turned out to be true.”

Sanders says he is “disappointed” by what the leaked emails show but “not shocked.”

“Our campaign was about revitalizing American democracy. I want to see that incorporated into the Democratic Party,” Sanders said. “And I don't believe that Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the person to be able to do that.”

Sanders wanted her out before any emails. It was one of his "demands"


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thank you Captain Obvious. He and his supporters knew it a long time ago.

The e-mails just proved it.

No rigging.....

No level playing field.

How was the playing field not level? They both ran, they were both candidates on the ballot in all 50 states, voters got to choose one or the other. The candidate with the most popular votes won.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Wyatt earp]

Still no evidence. Did you think by crying at me even louder, people wouldn't notice?

You really like to say that don't you, you are like the OP facts and words have no meaning.

 

[Disir]

I've done it about 3 or 4 times now. You're a liar.

Then do it again. Shouldn't be a problem, if you're telling the truth. However, I've checked back to the beginning of our discussions. You've cried a lot, raged, hurled insults at me, but no, you've never quoted any emails to me. So, it appears you're not telling the truth there.

Now, it's possible you made such responses to someone else. If you did, I missed them, because your stuff is generally not worth reading, and I'll miss it if it's not addressed to me. Seriously, get over yourself. Nobody really cares if you're screeching incoherently about "corporate whores" or similarly elevating the discussion.

You ran here: Will Kicking Debbie To The Curb Prevent Bernie's Troops From Rioting?

No shit
From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2016-05-05 03:31 Subject: No shit
It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.

Re: No shit
From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2016-05-05 03:33 Subject: Re: No shit
It's these Jesus thing. > On May 5, 2016, at 1:31 AM, Brad Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > > It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.

Re: No shit
From[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2016-05-05 12:23 Subject: Re: No shit
AMEN Amy K. Dacey | Chief Executive Officer Democratic National Committee 430 S. Capitol Street, SE Washington, D.C. 20003 202-528-7492 (c) | 202-314-2263 (o) [email protected]

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2016-05-21 22:23 Subject: Bernie narrative
Wondering if there's a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess. Specifically, DWS had to call Bernie directly in order to get the campaign to do things because they'd either ignored or forgotten to something critical. She had to call Bernie after the data breach to make his staff to respond to our concerns. Even then they didn't get back to us, which is why we had to shut off their access in order to get them to finally let us know exactly how they snooped around HFA's data. Same was true with the standing committee appointments. They never got back to us with their names (HFA and even O'Malley got there's in six weeks earlier) for the committees. So, again, the chair had to call Bernie personally for his staff to finally get us critical information. So, they gave us an awful list just a few days before we had to make the announcements. It's not a DNC conspiracy, it's because they never had their act together.

No, you arrogant fuck. Get over yourself.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

She got booted....because the emails show the rigging....take your blinders off...talk about brainwashed...jesus

So how did the emails show the rigging?

We've been asking for days and for pages, and just get hysterical weeping and cursing in response. The Little Trump Snowflakes seem to think that constitutes "evidence". Bizarre.

Love how you'll hang onto that word "rigging".

It's unfortunate that people have used that term because that is not what happened.

There is clear evidence that Debbie Wasserfatbutt Shultz and Co. pushed the nomination in Hillary's direction.

Or are you denying that too ?

She quit why ?

Mamooth plays a game. He demands to see the emails and if you can't produce the emails then he/she/it considers you fair game . If you produce the emails then he runs and tries to find someone else, usually on the right, and starts the process all over again.

Correct.

Why should Bernie supporters (I count myself as one...) have to work harder to get the nomination ?

That seems to be accepted.

He naturally would have to work harder as he was not democrat. He was not as nationally known or supported by party die hards as Clinton. It never was or would be a level playing field. It was always going to be an uphill fight for Sanders.

 

[Disir]

Except it wasn't and he was viewed as a threat. All of the issues that he has worked for and presented were ones that the Democrats appeared to support or paid lip service to. When it comes down to it, the Democrats didn't really give a fuck. Now, the Democrats wanted Bernie's voters and thought they didn't have to work for it. Fuck 'em.

 

[Disir]

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I've done it about 3 or 4 times now. You're a liar.

Then do it again. Shouldn't be a problem, if you're telling the truth. However, I've checked back to the beginning of our discussions. You've cried a lot, raged, hurled insults at me, but no, you've never quoted any emails to me. So, it appears you're not telling the truth there.

Now, it's possible you made such responses to someone else. If you did, I missed them, because your stuff is generally not worth reading, and I'll miss it if it's not addressed to me. Seriously, get over yourself. Nobody really cares if you're screeching incoherently about "corporate whores" or similarly elevating the discussion.

You ran here: Will Kicking Debbie To The Curb Prevent Bernie's Troops From Rioting?

No shit
From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2016-05-05 03:31 Subject: No shit
It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.

Re: No shit
From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2016-05-05 03:33 Subject: Re: No shit
It's these Jesus thing. > On May 5, 2016, at 1:31 AM, Brad Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > > It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.

Re: No shit
From[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2016-05-05 12:23 Subject: Re: No shit
AMEN Amy K. Dacey | Chief Executive Officer Democratic National Committee 430 S. Capitol Street, SE Washington, D.C. 20003 202-528-7492 (c) | 202-314-2263 (o) [email protected]

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2016-05-21 22:23 Subject: Bernie narrative
Wondering if there's a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess. Specifically, DWS had to call Bernie directly in order to get the campaign to do things because they'd either ignored or forgotten to something critical. She had to call Bernie after the data breach to make his staff to respond to our concerns. Even then they didn't get back to us, which is why we had to shut off their access in order to get them to finally let us know exactly how they snooped around HFA's data. Same was true with the standing committee appointments. They never got back to us with their names (HFA and even O'Malley got there's in six weeks earlier) for the committees. So, again, the chair had to call Bernie personally for his staff to finally get us critical information. So, they gave us an awful list just a few days before we had to make the announcements. It's not a DNC conspiracy, it's because they never had their act together.

No, you arrogant fuck. Get over yourself.

Great, you posted what we've all read several times. Now please show how these discussions were ever implemented or "rigged" and caused Sanders to lose.
That, no one has done.

 

[Lakhota]

The DNC knew early on that Sanders was not a path to victory. Hell, he wasn't even a Democrat. His claim to socialism primarily consisted of renaming a couple post offices. He was nothing but hot air. I feel sorry for all the naive young people who bought into his socialist utopia.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Except it wasn't and he was viewed as a threat. All of the issues that he has worked for and presented were ones that the Democrats appeared to support or paid lip service to. When it comes down to it, the Democrats didn't really give a fuck. Now, the Democrats wanted Bernie's voters and thought they didn't have to work for it. Fuck 'em.

Sanders lost. He lost by 3.8 million votes.
He lost in the demographics.

How on Earth did the DNC manage that?

 

[Disir]

I've done it about 3 or 4 times now. You're a liar.

Then do it again. Shouldn't be a problem, if you're telling the truth. However, I've checked back to the beginning of our discussions. You've cried a lot, raged, hurled insults at me, but no, you've never quoted any emails to me. So, it appears you're not telling the truth there.

Now, it's possible you made such responses to someone else. If you did, I missed them, because your stuff is generally not worth reading, and I'll miss it if it's not addressed to me. Seriously, get over yourself. Nobody really cares if you're screeching incoherently about "corporate whores" or similarly elevating the discussion.

You ran here: Will Kicking Debbie To The Curb Prevent Bernie's Troops From Rioting?

No shit
From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2016-05-05 03:31 Subject: No shit
It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.

Re: No shit
From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2016-05-05 03:33 Subject: Re: No shit
It's these Jesus thing. > On May 5, 2016, at 1:31 AM, Brad Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > > It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.

Re: No shit
From[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2016-05-05 12:23 Subject: Re: No shit
AMEN Amy K. Dacey | Chief Executive Officer Democratic National Committee 430 S. Capitol Street, SE Washington, D.C. 20003 202-528-7492 (c) | 202-314-2263 (o) [email protected]

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2016-05-21 22:23 Subject: Bernie narrative
Wondering if there's a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess. Specifically, DWS had to call Bernie directly in order to get the campaign to do things because they'd either ignored or forgotten to something critical. She had to call Bernie after the data breach to make his staff to respond to our concerns. Even then they didn't get back to us, which is why we had to shut off their access in order to get them to finally let us know exactly how they snooped around HFA's data. Same was true with the standing committee appointments. They never got back to us with their names (HFA and even O'Malley got there's in six weeks earlier) for the committees. So, again, the chair had to call Bernie personally for his staff to finally get us critical information. So, they gave us an awful list just a few days before we had to make the announcements. It's not a DNC conspiracy, it's because they never had their act together.

No, you arrogant fuck. Get over yourself.

Great, you posted what we've all read several times. Now please show how these discussions were ever implement
From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2016-05-21 22:23 Subject: Bernie narrative
Wondering if there's a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess. Specifically, DWS had to call Bernie directly in order to get the campaign to do things because they'd either ignored or forgotten to something critical. She had to call Bernie after the data breach to make his staff to respond to our concerns. Even then they didn't get back to us, which is why we had to shut off their access in order to get them to finally let us know exactly how they snooped around HFA's data. Same was true with the standing committee appointments. They never got back to us with their names (HFA and even O'Malley got there's in six weeks earlier) for the committees. So, again, the chair had to call Bernie personally for his staff to finally get us critical information. So, they gave us an awful list just a few days before we had to make the announcements. It's not a DNC conspiracy, it's because they never had their act together.p
ed or "rigged" and caused Sanders to lose.
That, no one has done.

We knew that the DNC, led by DWS was only for Hillary back when the arguments focused on the debates, and it wasn't just against Sanders it was also against Martin O'Malley. Now, Debbie Wasserman Shultz can spin shit and attempted to push the narrative that Sander's supporters "had a penchant for violence" and this occurred in Nevada. The problem is that the person that initiated the violence was a Hillary supporter that attacked a Sander's supporter. Not the other way around. We already have a narrative that is being pushed. So, you guys can sit there and pretend not a damn thing occurred but I'm going to tell you point blank........it's more than that.

It's the Victory Fund.

You are aware of this:
Democratic Convention Hosted by Republican Donors, Anti-Obamacare Lobbyists




You aren't liberals. You're corporate whores. Can you explain why?

 

[Disir]

Except it wasn't and he was viewed as a threat. All of the issues that he has worked for and presented were ones that the Democrats appeared to support or paid lip service to. When it comes down to it, the Democrats didn't really give a fuck. Now, the Democrats wanted Bernie's voters and thought they didn't have to work for it. Fuck 'em.

Sanders lost. He lost by 3.8 million votes.
He lost in the demographics.
View attachment 83485

How on Earth did the DNC manage that?

Good luck.