If the DNC election was "rigged" - how was it "rigged"?

[jc456]

"On May 5, DNC officials appeared to conspire to raise Sanders's faith as an issue and press on whether he was an atheist -- apparently in hopes of steering religious voters in Kentucky and West Virginia to Clinton. Sanders is Jewish but has previously indicated that he's not religious."

Here are the latest, most damaging things in the DNC’s leaked emails

Again, the DNC led by Schultz decided to play favorites which is a no-no for what is supposed to be a neutral organization.

Make sense?

Funny. "Conspiring" doesn't mean shit unless it's acted on. Did anyone within the DNC actually use Bernie's Jewish religion against him during the election process? BTW, dumbass, everyone does opposition research on everyone in politics - even within their own parties. It's called politics...

The DNC is not the opposition. They are the neutral body overseeing the process of selecting a democratic candidate. Why is this so difficult for you to grasp?

How did the DNC hurt Bernie during the election process?

I will assume that the Rolling Stone is a liberal enough publication for you to accept as a reliable source.

Matt Taibbi on How DNC Leak Shows Mechanics of a Slanted Campaign

So, what laws and/or rules were broken?

ask the ones that escorted wassermann out of the center.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Please explain exactly how it was supposedly "rigged" - with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact. Just because the DNC may have "favored" Hillary over Bernie doesn't mean it was "rigged". The DNC "favored" Obama over Hillary in 2008. Bernie wasn't "cheated" out of anything. The DNC election process never changed from beginning to end. Even Bernie said publicly that Hillary won fair and square - which she did. So, stop with the "rigged" shit or explain to us with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact exactly how it was supposedly "rigged".

Shitforbrains refuses to read the DNC emails.

 

[jc456]

Please explain exactly how it was supposedly "rigged" - with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact. Just because the DNC may have "favored" Hillary over Bernie doesn't mean it was "rigged". The DNC "favored" Obama over Hillary in 2008. Bernie wasn't "cheated" out of anything. The DNC election process never changed from beginning to end. Even Bernie said publicly that Hillary won fair and square - which she did. So, stop with the "rigged" shit or explain to us with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact exactly how it was supposedly "rigged".

Shitforbrains refuses to read the DNC emails.

an agitator

 

[Siete]

Please explain exactly how it was supposedly "rigged" - with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact. Just because the DNC may have "favored" Hillary over Bernie doesn't mean it was "rigged". The DNC "favored" Obama over Hillary in 2008. Bernie wasn't "cheated" out of anything. The DNC election process never changed from beginning to end. Even Bernie said publicly that Hillary won fair and square - which she did. So, stop with the "rigged" shit or explain to us with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact exactly how it was supposedly "rigged".

Shitforbrains refuses to read the DNC emails.

idiot RW's refuse to accept the fact the Democrats can run THEIR party any way they want to.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Please explain exactly how it was supposedly "rigged" - with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact. Just because the DNC may have "favored" Hillary over Bernie doesn't mean it was "rigged". The DNC "favored" Obama over Hillary in 2008. Bernie wasn't "cheated" out of anything. The DNC election process never changed from beginning to end. Even Bernie said publicly that Hillary won fair and square - which she did. So, stop with the "rigged" shit or explain to us with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact exactly how it was supposedly "rigged".

Shitforbrains refuses to read the DNC emails.

idiot RW's refuse to accept the fact the Democrats can run THEIR party any way they want to.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Please explain exactly how it was supposedly "rigged" - with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact. Just because the DNC may have "favored" Hillary over Bernie doesn't mean it was "rigged". The DNC "favored" Obama over Hillary in 2008. Bernie wasn't "cheated" out of anything. The DNC election process never changed from beginning to end. Even Bernie said publicly that Hillary won fair and square - which she did. So, stop with the "rigged" shit or explain to us with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact exactly how it was supposedly "rigged".

Read the emails. you fucking retard.

You call people retard but you obviously have no idea how Sanders was "screwed".
I guess they haven't handed out the talking points for that yet as no one can articulate how anything was rigged.

 

[deltex1]

Please explain exactly how it was supposedly "rigged" - with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact. Just because the DNC may have "favored" Hillary over Bernie doesn't mean it was "rigged". The DNC "favored" Obama over Hillary in 2008. Bernie wasn't "cheated" out of anything. The DNC election process never changed from beginning to end. Even Bernie said publicly that Hillary won fair and square - which she did. So, stop with the "rigged" shit or explain to us with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact exactly how it was supposedly "rigged".

One would have to understand the Ten Commandments to accept any explanation.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

When the DNC who are supposed to be neutral actively put together a strategy to knock down one of the candidates in favor of another, that's rigging the election.

Was the strategy employed? I'm sure we have a plan for the invasion of N Korea but that certainly doesn't mean we have invaded.

 

[Lakhota]

Please explain exactly how it was supposedly "rigged" - with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact. Just because the DNC may have "favored" Hillary over Bernie doesn't mean it was "rigged". The DNC "favored" Obama over Hillary in 2008. Bernie wasn't "cheated" out of anything. The DNC election process never changed from beginning to end. Even Bernie said publicly that Hillary won fair and square - which she did. So, stop with the "rigged" shit or explain to us with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact exactly how it was supposedly "rigged".

One would have to understand the ten commandment to accept any explanation.

Ten Commandments? Who wrote them?

 

[kwc57]

Where are the RNC internal emails? I want to see them! Why weren't they leaked?

They are intelligent enough to protect their systems unlike Hillary and the DNC.

 

[kwc57]

"On May 5, DNC officials appeared to conspire to raise Sanders's faith as an issue and press on whether he was an atheist -- apparently in hopes of steering religious voters in Kentucky and West Virginia to Clinton. Sanders is Jewish but has previously indicated that he's not religious."

Here are the latest, most damaging things in the DNC’s leaked emails

Again, the DNC led by Schultz decided to play favorites which is a no-no for what is supposed to be a neutral organization.

Make sense?

Funny. "Conspiring" doesn't mean shit unless it's acted on. Did anyone within the DNC actually use Bernie's Jewish religion against him during the election process? BTW, dumbass, everyone does opposition research on everyone in politics - even within their own parties. It's called politics...

The DNC is not the opposition. They are the neutral body overseeing the process of selecting a democratic candidate. Why is this so difficult for you to grasp?

How did the DNC hurt Bernie during the election process?

I will assume that the Rolling Stone is a liberal enough publication for you to accept as a reliable source.

Matt Taibbi on How DNC Leak Shows Mechanics of a Slanted Campaign

So, what laws and/or rules were broken?

Why are you so narrowly focused on laws broken. Have you ever heard of ethics?

 

[Seawytch]

I've been a Political junkie for about 20+ years now and have worked in an Election Office for 10...what IS constant is the losers thinking things are rigged.

I do know that when both the far left and the far right conspiracy theorists are screaming at you, you're doing okay.

 

[kwc57]

which is a no-no for what is supposed to be a neutral organization.

Says who? They are the Democratic National Committee. It's right in the name that they aren't "neutral".

So you are admitting that hillary was bought and paid for.

"Bought and paid for" by raising money for down ticket Democrats? Um...okay.

Raising money for down ticket? You guys will swallow anything won't you?

Matt Taibbi on How DNC Leak Shows Mechanics of a Slanted Campaign

 

[Lakhota]

In 2008, Hillary supporters (including me) were highly pissed at the DNC for seemingly favoring Obama over Hillary. However, as I recall we were more civil about it than Bernie supporters in 2016.

Some food for thought about 2008...and now...

Hillary Clinton's PUMAs, Once Die-Hard Supporters, Aren't Sold on 2016

 

[Hutch Starskey]

When the DNC who are supposed to be neutral actively put together a strategy to knock down one of the candidates in favor of another, that's rigging the election.

Well, please explain exactly what was supposedly done to "knock down one of the candidates in favor of another". How was Bernie cheated? What was taken away from him?

"On May 5, DNC officials appeared to conspire to raise Sanders's faith as an issue and press on whether he was an atheist -- apparently in hopes of steering religious voters in Kentucky and West Virginia to Clinton. Sanders is Jewish but has previously indicated that he's not religious."

Here are the latest, most damaging things in the DNC’s leaked emails

Again, the DNC led by Schultz decided to play favorites which is a no-no for what is supposed to be a neutral organization.

Make sense?

The DNC themselves say they are suppose to be neutral...

And if they were Bernie would still lose. Because guess what, DNC can't MAKE people vote for Clinton.

You're right, he would have still lost. Doesn't make it ok for the DNC to play favorites, which is what they did.

Well if he still would have lost then what in the hell was "rigged"?

 

[kwc57]

Please explain exactly how it was supposedly "rigged" - with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact. Just because the DNC may have "favored" Hillary over Bernie doesn't mean it was "rigged". The DNC "favored" Obama over Hillary in 2008. Bernie wasn't "cheated" out of anything. The DNC election process never changed from beginning to end. Even Bernie said publicly that Hillary won fair and square - which she did. So, stop with the "rigged" shit or explain to us with "credible" sources that can be verified as fact exactly how it was supposedly "rigged".

Shitforbrains refuses to read the DNC emails.

idiot RW's refuse to accept the fact the Democrats can run THEIR party any way they want to.

Idiot LW's believe the Democrats are running the party the way they claim to be when they aren't. Lie to you once, shame on them. Lie to you twice, shame on you.

 

[imawhosure]

which is a no-no for what is supposed to be a neutral organization.

Says who? They are the Democratic National Committee. It's right in the name that they aren't "neutral".

So you are admitting that hillary was bought and paid for.

"Bought and paid for" by raising money for down ticket Democrats? Um...okay.

Raising money for down ticket? You guys will swallow anything won't you?

Matt Taibbi on How DNC Leak Shows Mechanics of a Slanted Campaign

What they really mean is-------> were it not for Bernie and O"Malley, Hillary would have run unopposed, which is the only way she can win unless they rig the system, and that is only really a 50-50 proposition; she might lose to nobody.

 

[Lakhota]

which is a no-no for what is supposed to be a neutral organization.

Says who? They are the Democratic National Committee. It's right in the name that they aren't "neutral".

So you are admitting that hillary was bought and paid for.

"Bought and paid for" by raising money for down ticket Democrats? Um...okay.

Raising money for down ticket? You guys will swallow anything won't you?

Matt Taibbi on How DNC Leak Shows Mechanics of a Slanted Campaign

I used to enjoy Matt's stuff - but he's become too much of a sensationalist for me. Too much hyperbole.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

When the DNC who are supposed to be neutral actively put together a strategy to knock down one of the candidates in favor of another, that's rigging the election.

Who says the DNC is "supposed to be neutral"? Why wouldn't the Democratic National Committee promote the Democratic candidate over the independent candidate who would not register as a Democrat?

In many states you couldn't VOTE for either candidate unless you were registered as a Democrat, but Sanders didn't actually have to run as one? How does that make sense?

The DNC themselves say they are suppose to be neutral...

"On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email. These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not -- and will not -- tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates. Individual staffers have also rightfully apologized for their comments, and the DNC is taking appropriate action to ensure it never happens again."

Democrats.org

Please give it a rest already. They rigged it for her and now she's the nominee. Doesn't make it right or fair but the world isn't fair.

Okay, that's a post apology. That doesn't change my question. Where is it written that the Democratic National Committee must be neutral? Also, doesn't change the FACT that Sanders is not a registered Democrat, unlike many of the people going out to vote in primaries HAD TO BE where he was a Democratic candidate despite that fact.

I just quoted that their values include remaining neutral. That's neutrality within the party. Which part is not making sense? And call Bernie what you want, he was running on the democratic ticket and invited to democrat debates. He deserved the respect of neutrality from the DNC which he did not receive.

Did anything the DNC did cause Sanders to lose?

 

[Siete]

ever since Trump slobbered "rigged" the RW dopes have been doing the same.