If this isn't collusion what would you call it?

[Billiejeens]

March 21, 2016. Russian hackers from the GRU gain access to Podesta’s account and steal over 50,000 emails.

According to Papa's sworn confession, on April 26, 2016 he is told through Misfud that Russia has "dirt" on Hillary in the form of e-mails that are offered to the campaign.

If Misfud wasn't a Russian operative how did he know about the e-mails hacked from Podesta's account?


Trump lackeys and RWM have spent a lot of time trying to discredit these facts. Ask yourself why.

Literally none of that is true in the real world.

 

[bripat9643]

Anyone dumb enough to think Russia influenced the election of 2016 is a goddamn idiot.

Anyone naive enough to think the "sweeping and systematic" (Mueller's words) efforts by Russia to get Vlad's favorite candidate elected had no effect is likely to be a Trump cultist in denial.

Mueller is a liar and a senile old fool.

 

[LeftofLeft]

"A significant recent revelation in the Russia investigation has been largely overlooked in the rush of several breaking news stories over the past few days. A nugget of information is contained in the memo written by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee (the so-called Schiff Memo), which was released on Saturday morning.

Prior to the memo, we knew that a Russian agent told Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos of “Moscow possessing ‘dirt’” on Hillary Clinton “in the form of ‘thousands of emails,’” according to Papadopoulos’s plea statement. The memo went a legally significant step further. As Rep. Adam Schiff recently told Chris Hayes, “our memo discloses for the first time that the Russians preview to Papadopoulos that they could help with disseminating these stolen emails.” Rep. Schiff added, “When Donald Trump openly called on the Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails, they’d be richly rewarded if they released these to the press, his campaign had already been put on notice that the Russians were prepared to do just that and disseminate these stolen emails.” (The full transcript and video clip is below.)"

Russia "Previewed" Plan to Disseminate Emails with Trump Campaign

Goodman analyzes Schiff’s revelation that Russia gave preview to Trump campaign that the Kremlin could help disseminate stolen emails. Then he addresses the legally important question of what the Trump campaign did afterwards, which helps explain why Mueller’s team is asking former campaign...

www.justsecurity.org

.....................................................................................................................................................
Do we know all there is to know about the extent to which the Trump campaign was notified of, or involved in, the timing of Wikileaks' release of the hacked info given to them by the Russians? No.

Why is that? Most importantly, because Roger Stone was one of the Trump associates who either lied to or withheld truthful info from Mueller. He was the campaign's point man with respect to contacts with Wikileaks.

Trump campaign associates ‘materially impaired’ investigation by lying, Mueller says

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report about the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election said Trump campaign associates “materially impaired” the inves…

thehill.com

Trump talked to Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, Rick Gates says in testimony contradicting the president

Trump had told special counsel Robert Mueller last November in a written response, "I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with" Roger Stone.

www.cnbc.com

Are you sure this is not one of or part of the many conversations Schiffs manufactures in his head? He’s proven to reference conversations that never took place.

 

[Juicin]

You say that like you think polling data is equivalent to state secrets?

Some of the data was proprietary. Why would they share that, or anything, with a Russian operative with ties to the Kremlin?

I don't know, but it's certainly not a crime or collusion

I'm much more worried about Israeli influence than I am russian. Israeli colluders everywhere.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The latest dose of TDS

Feel free to comment on this. Relying on an idiotic meme just shows you are brain dead.

Of course, the matter of the collusion over the release of the material illegally stolen by Russia and given to Wikileaks was not the only example.

3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.

4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”
Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.
www.justsecurity.org
......................................................................................................................................

The contested swing states that Trump narrowly—and surprisingly—won, such as Michigan and Wisconsin, were also places where both the Trump campaign and Russia’s Internet Research Agency focussed their efforts. Herein lies at least one answer to the question of why Russia would want the Trump campaign’s polling data: it potentially offered demographic targets for Russia’s bots and propaganda.

Why Would Paul Manafort Share Polling Data with Russia?
At least one reason why Russia would want the Trump campaign’s polling data is that it potentially offered granular demographic targets for Russia’s bots and propaganda.

www.newyorker.com
.................................................................................................................................
What better way for Russia to make the best use of their efforts in swing states than to have some proprietary internal polling data from Trump's campaign to use to target voters who were potentially able to be persuaded to vote for the Bigot-in-Chief?

Even brain dead is better than being consumed with TDS

 

[Billiejeens]

There is absolutely NO evidence that RUSSIA! hacked the DNC server...This is a matter of sworn testimony from Shawn Henry

That is a total lie and not what he said. You are one gullible little goober.

Crowd strike testified that there was no evidence of external intrusion.

You should really educate yourself.

 

[Juicin]

You say that like you think polling data is equivalent to state secrets?

Some of the data was proprietary. Why would they share that, or anything, with a Russian operative with ties to the Kremlin?

To make your head explode. Worked.

Uh huh

As you remember your schooling, hahahaha

Remember your place in your class of 30.

 

[Oddball]

There is absolutely NO evidence that RUSSIA! hacked the DNC server...This is a matter of sworn testimony from Shawn Henry

That is a total lie and not what he said. You are one gullible little goober.

Crowd strike testified that there was no evidence of external intrusion.

You should really educate yourself.

He revels in his willful ignorance.

 

[easyt65]

I can only assume you are referring to the enormous pile of made up horseshit Trump, who can't explain specifically what he means by it, calls "Obamagate." It's a fiction based on nothing but lies.

You can 'assume' anything you like, but it still make you look like an ignorant TDS-suffering ass in the end.

You can also lie, deny, refuse to acknowledge the existing overwhelming evidence but it only destroys what little credibility you have left.

Let's just go over one small piece of the entire shit-pi Obama and his criminal administration 'baked' for the country.

FISA COURT ABUSES;

Former FBI Director Robert Mueller was called before the SECRET FISA Court almost a DOZEN times for FISA Court 'violations' (CRIMES), so committing FISA Court abuses is not a 1-time thing for the FBI - it is now par of its mode of operation, its CULTURE, passed along....as proven by the fact that his protégé James Comey and his FBI have been caught perpetrating FIUSA Court CRIMES several times as well.

New Mueller-clone Wray was called before the FISA Court and gave lip service to a FISA court that knew it has been compromised / criminally used again yet sought to save its own existence instead of doing the right thing -- shutting the court down until the process was fixed for the protection of nation and citizens. They asked Wray / the criminals (FBI) to come up with a plan to present that would ensure they would stop committing FISA Court Abuses like the more than a dozen they had perpetrated over DECADES.

Wray turned out to be a criminal POS, too, more interested in protecting the FBI than protecting the Constitution, law and American people. In the last several weeks the National Intel Agency Director (Grenell) and the DOJ has forced both D-Schiff and Director Wray to release newly declassified documents they have / had been HIDING.

But, as you know, Wray is still hiding juicy, criminal tidbits in an effort to protect the FBI and Barry's ass. Case in point - The FBI said it has 'lost' the original Flynn '302', that iut is 'gone forever'. YUH - Uh-Huh! Remember the last time the FBI said there had been a 'glitch, that files / evidence had been lost and 'is gone forever'? 1) The FBVI does not 'lose' anything unless the WANT to.....2) The evidence / documents that were 'Gone forever' remained lost for a total of 4 (FOUR) when computer experts were sent in and found all of the information within a couple of hours.


And that's just one small 'chunk of ice' on this whole glacier....


Now you can play 'stupid', you can refuse to accept all of the massive amounts of overwhelming, undeniable evidence , but that only makes you look like a complete, propaganda-pushing, TDSA-suffering, hade-driven, Obama administration crime-apologist...with little to no credibility.

If that's the way you want to go, you're doing a marvelous job. Good luck with that.

 

[Oddball]

A) wikileaks isn't a russian organization, that's all bullshit with no evidence to back it up

The intel agencies have indisputable forensic computer evidence that Russia transferred the material they stole to Wikileaks.

The DOJ report said there's no such evidence, moron. You need to quit listening to the congenital liar Adolph Schiffler.

The testimony of the CrowdStrike President, before their corrupt demigod Adam Schitt, was that there was no evidence of a hack.

 

[berg80]

The DOJ says there's no evidence that Russia had anything to do with the Wikileaks emails or with hacking the DNC computers.

That just isn't true. I find it disturbing that you believe that particular lie. Because it shows the extent to which, and the success in doing so, that RWM is going to convince gullible rubes that up is down.

 

[berg80]

The testimony of the CrowdStrike President, before their corrupt demigod Adam Schitt, was that there was no evidence of a hack.

That has become one of the go-to lies of Trumpleheads. It is factually inaccurate.

Our Work with the DNC: Setting the record straight

Get the key facts about CrowdStrike's work with the Democratic Natiional Committee in 2016 and debunk the false claims that have been made about our work.

www.crowdstrike.com

 

[berg80]

We are proud of our work and will remain focused on our mission of protecting our customers around the world from dangerous cyber threats.We are grateful that the media has debunked false claims about our work for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in 2016:

• The Washington Post, The Russians manipulated our elections. We helped.
  • An opinion piece by David Ignatius discussing the lessons from Thomas Rid’s new book, making the case that the 2016 election meddling was a proven example of Russia’s disinformation tenet.
• The New York Times, Republican-Led Review Backs Intelligence Findings on Russian Interference:
  • A three-year review by the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee unanimously found that the intelligence community assessment stating that Russia breached the DNC was fundamentally sound and untainted by politics.
• NBC News, Meet the Press 12/29/19:
  • Clint Watts and Chuck Todd discuss CrowdStrike and the conspiracy theory that has been debunked.
  • Transcript here: Meet the Press - December 29, 2019
• The Washington Post, In call to Ukraine’s president, Trump revived a favorite conspiracy theory about the DNC hack:
  • Discusses the CrowdStrike conspiracy theory and how it has been debunked.
• CNN Business, What is CrowdStrike and why is it part of the Trump whistleblower complaint?:
  • Gives background on CrowdStrike and debunks the conspiracy theory
• Wired, How Trump’s Ukraine Mess Entangled CrowdStrike:
  • Discusses the CrowdStrike theory and debunks the idea that there is a missing server.
• NBC News, Debunking The Crowdstrike Conspiracy Theory
  • Discusses the CrowdStrike theory and how it has been debunked.
• The Daily Beast, The Truth About Trump’s Insane Ukraine ‘Server’ Conspiracy:
  • Describes why Trump’s theories about Ukraine and CrowdStrike have been debunked.
• CNN, “Don’t miss the totally debunked conspiracy theory Donald Trump pushed in the Ukraine call”
  • Discusses the conspiracy theory and how it has been debunked.

 

[bripat9643]

The DOJ says there's no evidence that Russia had anything to do with the Wikileaks emails or with hacking the DNC computers.

That just isn't true. I find it disturbing that you believe that particular lie. Because it shows the extent to which, and the success in doing so, that RWM is going to convince gullible rubes that up is down.

It is true. The Crowdstrike CEO admitted it when testifying to the House Intelligence Committee. There is absolutely no evidence that Russia had anything to do with it.

 

[bripat9643]

We are proud of our work and will remain focused on our mission of protecting our customers around the world from dangerous cyber threats.We are grateful that the media has debunked false claims about our work for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in 2016:

• The Washington Post, The Russians manipulated our elections. We helped.
  • An opinion piece by David Ignatius discussing the lessons from Thomas Rid’s new book, making the case that the 2016 election meddling was a proven example of Russia’s disinformation tenet.
• The New York Times, Republican-Led Review Backs Intelligence Findings on Russian Interference:
  • A three-year review by the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee unanimously found that the intelligence community assessment stating that Russia breached the DNC was fundamentally sound and untainted by politics.
• NBC News, Meet the Press 12/29/19:
  • Clint Watts and Chuck Todd discuss CrowdStrike and the conspiracy theory that has been debunked.
  • Transcript here: Meet the Press - December 29, 2019
• The Washington Post, In call to Ukraine’s president, Trump revived a favorite conspiracy theory about the DNC hack:
  • Discusses the CrowdStrike conspiracy theory and how it has been debunked.
• CNN Business, What is CrowdStrike and why is it part of the Trump whistleblower complaint?:
  • Gives background on CrowdStrike and debunks the conspiracy theory
• Wired, How Trump’s Ukraine Mess Entangled CrowdStrike:
  • Discusses the CrowdStrike theory and debunks the idea that there is a missing server.
• NBC News, Debunking The Crowdstrike Conspiracy Theory
  • Discusses the CrowdStrike theory and how it has been debunked.
• The Daily Beast, The Truth About Trump’s Insane Ukraine ‘Server’ Conspiracy:
  • Describes why Trump’s theories about Ukraine and CrowdStrike have been debunked.
• CNN, “Don’t miss the totally debunked conspiracy theory Donald Trump pushed in the Ukraine call”
  • Discusses the conspiracy theory and how it has been debunked.

Opinion, lies and misinformation.

 

[berg80]

Literally none of that is true in the real world.

Your willful ignorance is a threat to our democracy.

 

[berg80]

Opinion, lies and misinformation.

Prove it.

 

[bripat9643]

The testimony of the CrowdStrike President, before their corrupt demigod Adam Schitt, was that there was no evidence of a hack.

That has become one of the go-to lies of Trumpleheads. It is factually inaccurate.

Our Work with the DNC: Setting the record straight

Get the key facts about CrowdStrike's work with the Democratic Natiional Committee in 2016 and debunk the false claims that have been made about our work.

www.crowdstrike.com

His testimony is on record. Please quote where he said Russia is responsible for hacking the DNC servers.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

"A significant recent revelation in the Russia investigation has been largely overlooked in the rush of several breaking news stories over the past few days. A nugget of information is contained in the memo written by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee (the so-called Schiff Memo), which was released on Saturday morning.

Prior to the memo, we knew that a Russian agent told Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos of “Moscow possessing ‘dirt’” on Hillary Clinton “in the form of ‘thousands of emails,’” according to Papadopoulos’s plea statement. The memo went a legally significant step further. As Rep. Adam Schiff recently told Chris Hayes, “our memo discloses for the first time that the Russians preview to Papadopoulos that they could help with disseminating these stolen emails.” Rep. Schiff added, “When Donald Trump openly called on the Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails, they’d be richly rewarded if they released these to the press, his campaign had already been put on notice that the Russians were prepared to do just that and disseminate these stolen emails.” (The full transcript and video clip is below.)"

Russia "Previewed" Plan to Disseminate Emails with Trump Campaign

Goodman analyzes Schiff’s revelation that Russia gave preview to Trump campaign that the Kremlin could help disseminate stolen emails. Then he addresses the legally important question of what the Trump campaign did afterwards, which helps explain why Mueller’s team is asking former campaign...

www.justsecurity.org

.....................................................................................................................................................
Do we know all there is to know about the extent to which the Trump campaign was notified of, or involved in, the timing of Wikileaks' release of the hacked info given to them by the Russians? No.

Why is that? Most importantly, because Roger Stone was one of the Trump associates who either lied to or withheld truthful info from Mueller. He was the campaign's point man with respect to contacts with Wikileaks.

Trump campaign associates ‘materially impaired’ investigation by lying, Mueller says

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report about the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election said Trump campaign associates “materially impaired” the inves…

thehill.com

Trump talked to Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, Rick Gates says in testimony contradicting the president

Trump had told special counsel Robert Mueller last November in a written response, "I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with" Roger Stone.

www.cnbc.com

Give it a rest. Russia Russia Russia was a hoax

 

[bripat9643]

Opinion, lies and misinformation.

Prove it.

I already have, moron. Refer to the testimnoy of the Crowdstrike CEO to the House Intelligence Committee.