If this isn't collusion what would you call it?

[easyt65]

"A significant recent revelation in the Russia investigation has been largely overlooked in the rush of several breaking news stories over the past few days. A nugget of information is contained in the memo written by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee (the so-called Schiff Memo), which was released on Saturday morning.

Prior to the memo, we knew that a Russian agent told Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos of “Moscow possessing ‘dirt’” on Hillary Clinton “in the form of ‘thousands of emails,’” according to Papadopoulos’s plea statement. The memo went a legally significant step further. As Rep. Adam Schiff recently told Chris Hayes, “our memo discloses for the first time that the Russians preview to Papadopoulos that they could help with disseminating these stolen emails.” Rep. Schiff added, “When Donald Trump openly called on the Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails, they’d be richly rewarded if they released these to the press, his campaign had already been put on notice that the Russians were prepared to do just that and disseminate these stolen emails.” (The full transcript and video clip is below.)"

Russia "Previewed" Plan to Disseminate Emails with Trump Campaign

Goodman analyzes Schiff’s revelation that Russia gave preview to Trump campaign that the Kremlin could help disseminate stolen emails. Then he addresses the legally important question of what the Trump campaign did afterwards, which helps explain why Mueller’s team is asking former campaign...

www.justsecurity.org

.....................................................................................................................................................
Do we know all there is to know about the extent to which the Trump campaign was notified of, or involved in, the timing of Wikileaks' release of the hacked info given to them by the Russians? No.

Why is that? Most importantly, because Roger Stone was one of the Trump associates who either lied to or withheld truthful info from Mueller. He was the campaign's point man with respect to contacts with Wikileaks.

Trump campaign associates ‘materially impaired’ investigation by lying, Mueller says

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report about the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election said Trump campaign associates “materially impaired” the inves…

thehill.com

Trump talked to Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, Rick Gates says in testimony contradicting the president

Trump had told special counsel Robert Mueller last November in a written response, "I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with" Roger Stone.

www.cnbc.com

I would call it stark-raving TDS...

All of this has been investigated....for 4 + years. It resulted in:

1. A Failed Coup Attempt.

2. Overwhelming, undeniable evidence of crimes committed by Obama & his administration and Democrats

3. An anti-Climactic Weismann-Mueller report that stated what was already known BEFORE an official investigation was opened and BEFORE Mueller was appointed Special Counsel: NO ILLRGAL COLLUSAION

4. FBI members being recommended for indictment for crimes committed by a US IG that identified how the FBI broke rules, regulations, and even laws

5. FISA Court violations and revealed violations of the Rule of Law, Constitution, Constitutional Rights, and Civil Rights

6 The on-going criminal investigation of the Russia Investigation


The more evidence against Barry and his conspirators, the closer it comes to when Durham will wrap up his investigation, the closer it comes to when Durham and the DOJ will begin indicting the traitors, snowflakes - like you - lose more and more of what's left of your minds....

Such great entertainment.....

 

[Nostra]

Of course, the matter of the collusion over the release of the material illegally stolen by Russia and given to Wikileaks was not the only example.

3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.

4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org

......................................................................................................................................

The contested swing states that Trump narrowly—and surprisingly—won, such as Michigan and Wisconsin, were also places where both the Trump campaign and Russia’s Internet Research Agency focussed their efforts. Herein lies at least one answer to the question of why Russia would want the Trump campaign’s polling data: it potentially offered demographic targets for Russia’s bots and propaganda.

Why Would Paul Manafort Share Polling Data with Russia?

At least one reason why Russia would want the Trump campaign’s polling data is that it potentially offered granular demographic targets for Russia’s bots and propaganda.

www.newyorker.com

.................................................................................................................................
What better way for Russia to make the best use of their efforts in swing states than to have some proprietary internal polling data from Trump's campaign to use to target voters who were potentially able to be persuaded to vote for the Bigot-in-Chief?

Mueller: NO TRUMP/RUSSIA COLLUSION.

 

[Dragonlady]

Schiff is a known liar. To quote anything from his memo is ludicrous in the extreme.

Well that’s a lovely but false excuse for denying the truth.

Donald Trump is a provable liar but you continue to believe him. You believe Trump’s lies but deny the Truth from Adam Schiff.

 

[Nostra]

Schiff is a known liar. To quote anything from his memo is ludicrous in the extreme.

Well that’s a lovely but false excuse for denying the truth.

Donald Trump is a provable liar but you continue to believe him. You believe Trump’s lies but deny the Truth from Adam Schiff.

the Truth from Adam Schiff.

Just when I thought you couldn't get any dumber.

 

[berg80]

Overwhelming, undeniable evidence of crimes committed by Obama & his administration and Democrats

I can only assume you are referring to the enormous pile of made up horseshit Trump, who can't explain specifically what he means by it, calls "Obamagate." It's a fiction based on nothing but lies.

 

[Dragonlady]

"A significant recent revelation in the Russia investigation has been largely overlooked in the rush of several breaking news stories over the past few days. A nugget of information is contained in the memo written by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee (the so-called Schiff Memo), which was released on Saturday morning.

Prior to the memo, we knew that a Russian agent told Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos of “Moscow possessing ‘dirt’” on Hillary Clinton “in the form of ‘thousands of emails,’” according to Papadopoulos’s plea statement. The memo went a legally significant step further. As Rep. Adam Schiff recently told Chris Hayes, “our memo discloses for the first time that the Russians preview to Papadopoulos that they could help with disseminating these stolen emails.” Rep. Schiff added, “When Donald Trump openly called on the Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails, they’d be richly rewarded if they released these to the press, his campaign had already been put on notice that the Russians were prepared to do just that and disseminate these stolen emails.” (The full transcript and video clip is below.)"

Russia "Previewed" Plan to Disseminate Emails with Trump Campaign

Goodman analyzes Schiff’s revelation that Russia gave preview to Trump campaign that the Kremlin could help disseminate stolen emails. Then he addresses the legally important question of what the Trump campaign did afterwards, which helps explain why Mueller’s team is asking former campaign...

www.justsecurity.org

.....................................................................................................................................................
Do we know all there is to know about the extent to which the Trump campaign was notified of, or involved in, the timing of Wikileaks' release of the hacked info given to them by the Russians? No.

Why is that? Most importantly, because Roger Stone was one of the Trump associates who either lied to or withheld truthful info from Mueller. He was the campaign's point man with respect to contacts with Wikileaks.

Trump campaign associates ‘materially impaired’ investigation by lying, Mueller says

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report about the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election said Trump campaign associates “materially impaired” the inves…

thehill.com

Trump talked to Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, Rick Gates says in testimony contradicting the president

Trump had told special counsel Robert Mueller last November in a written response, "I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with" Roger Stone.

www.cnbc.com

I would call it stark-raving TDS...

All of this has been investigated....for 4 + years. It resulted in:

1. A Failed Coup Attempt.

2. Overwhelming, undeniable evidence of crimes committed by Obama & his administration and Democrats

3. An anti-Climactic Weismann-Mueller report that stated what was already known BEFORE an official investigation was opened and BEFORE Mueller was appointed Special Counsel: NO ILLRGAL COLLUSAION

4. FBI members being recommended for indictment for crimes committed by a US IG that identified how the FBI broke rules, regulations, and even laws

5. FISA Court violations and revealed violations of the Rule of Law, Constitution, Constitutional Rights, and Civil Rights

6 The on-going criminal investigation of the Russia Investigation


The more evidence against Barry and his conspirators, the closer it comes to when Durham will wrap up his investigation, the closer it comes to when Durham and the DOJ will begin indicting the traitors, snowflakes - like you - lose more and more of what's left of your minds....

Such great entertainment.....

Im going to really enjoy your head exploding when nothing comes of Durham’s investigation. Two years now and not a single charge. Mueller charged and convicted 8 people in the same time frame.

That’s what happens when you have actual evidence and you’re not making up shit. People get charged. Trump hasn’t charged a single person with any crimes against him because nobody is doing any of the shit you claim.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

If this isn't collusion what would you call it?


The latest dose of TDS

 

[berg80]

You say that like you think polling data is equivalent to state secrets?

Some of the data was proprietary. Why would they share that, or anything, with a Russian operative with ties to the Kremlin?

 

[Nostra]

"A significant recent revelation in the Russia investigation has been largely overlooked in the rush of several breaking news stories over the past few days. A nugget of information is contained in the memo written by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee (the so-called Schiff Memo), which was released on Saturday morning.

Prior to the memo, we knew that a Russian agent told Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos of “Moscow possessing ‘dirt’” on Hillary Clinton “in the form of ‘thousands of emails,’” according to Papadopoulos’s plea statement. The memo went a legally significant step further. As Rep. Adam Schiff recently told Chris Hayes, “our memo discloses for the first time that the Russians preview to Papadopoulos that they could help with disseminating these stolen emails.” Rep. Schiff added, “When Donald Trump openly called on the Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails, they’d be richly rewarded if they released these to the press, his campaign had already been put on notice that the Russians were prepared to do just that and disseminate these stolen emails.” (The full transcript and video clip is below.)"

Russia "Previewed" Plan to Disseminate Emails with Trump Campaign

Goodman analyzes Schiff’s revelation that Russia gave preview to Trump campaign that the Kremlin could help disseminate stolen emails. Then he addresses the legally important question of what the Trump campaign did afterwards, which helps explain why Mueller’s team is asking former campaign...

www.justsecurity.org

.....................................................................................................................................................
Do we know all there is to know about the extent to which the Trump campaign was notified of, or involved in, the timing of Wikileaks' release of the hacked info given to them by the Russians? No.

Why is that? Most importantly, because Roger Stone was one of the Trump associates who either lied to or withheld truthful info from Mueller. He was the campaign's point man with respect to contacts with Wikileaks.

Trump campaign associates ‘materially impaired’ investigation by lying, Mueller says

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report about the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election said Trump campaign associates “materially impaired” the inves…

thehill.com

Trump talked to Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, Rick Gates says in testimony contradicting the president

Trump had told special counsel Robert Mueller last November in a written response, "I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with" Roger Stone.

www.cnbc.com

I would call it stark-raving TDS...

All of this has been investigated....for 4 + years. It resulted in:

1. A Failed Coup Attempt.

2. Overwhelming, undeniable evidence of crimes committed by Obama & his administration and Democrats

3. An anti-Climactic Weismann-Mueller report that stated what was already known BEFORE an official investigation was opened and BEFORE Mueller was appointed Special Counsel: NO ILLRGAL COLLUSAION

4. FBI members being recommended for indictment for crimes committed by a US IG that identified how the FBI broke rules, regulations, and even laws

5. FISA Court violations and revealed violations of the Rule of Law, Constitution, Constitutional Rights, and Civil Rights

6 The on-going criminal investigation of the Russia Investigation


The more evidence against Barry and his conspirators, the closer it comes to when Durham will wrap up his investigation, the closer it comes to when Durham and the DOJ will begin indicting the traitors, snowflakes - like you - lose more and more of what's left of your minds....

Such great entertainment.....

Im going to really enjoy your head exploding when nothing comes of Durham’s investigation. Two years now and not a single charge. Mueller charged and convicted 8 people in the same time frame.

That’s what happens when you have actual evidence and you’re not making up shit. People get charged. Trump hasn’t charged a single person with any crimes against him because nobody is doing any of the shit you claim.

. Two years now and not a single charge.

Durham was appointed about 1 year ago, you clueless lunatic. Man, you have to try hard to get everything wrong.

 

[Bush92]

Anyone dumb enough to think Russia influenced the election of 2016 is a goddamn idiot.

Anyone naive enough to think the "sweeping and systematic" (Mueller's words) efforts by Russia to get Vlad's favorite candidate elected had no effect is likely to be a Trump cultist in denial.

You are a raving lunatic. Trump won by carrying the "Rust Belt" states that Democratic Party took for granted for about 30 years. People got sick and tired of the rhetoric and their jobs going to foreign lands. How dumb are you? This is where Democratic Party lost itself. If all you're going to fight for is gay rights and social justice issues you have a pretty small voter base.

 

[berg80]

The latest dose of TDS

Feel free to comment on this. Relying on an idiotic meme just shows you are brain dead.

Of course, the matter of the collusion over the release of the material illegally stolen by Russia and given to Wikileaks was not the only example.

3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.

4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”
Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.
www.justsecurity.org
......................................................................................................................................

The contested swing states that Trump narrowly—and surprisingly—won, such as Michigan and Wisconsin, were also places where both the Trump campaign and Russia’s Internet Research Agency focussed their efforts. Herein lies at least one answer to the question of why Russia would want the Trump campaign’s polling data: it potentially offered demographic targets for Russia’s bots and propaganda.

Why Would Paul Manafort Share Polling Data with Russia?
At least one reason why Russia would want the Trump campaign’s polling data is that it potentially offered granular demographic targets for Russia’s bots and propaganda.

www.newyorker.com
.................................................................................................................................
What better way for Russia to make the best use of their efforts in swing states than to have some proprietary internal polling data from Trump's campaign to use to target voters who were potentially able to be persuaded to vote for the Bigot-in-Chief?

 

[berg80]

You are a raving lunatic.

That seems to be the standard reply from Trumpleheads who can't refute the evidence.

 

[hadit]

"A significant recent revelation in the Russia investigation has been largely overlooked in the rush of several breaking news stories over the past few days. A nugget of information is contained in the memo written by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee (the so-called Schiff Memo), which was released on Saturday morning.

Prior to the memo, we knew that a Russian agent told Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos of “Moscow possessing ‘dirt’” on Hillary Clinton “in the form of ‘thousands of emails,’” according to Papadopoulos’s plea statement. The memo went a legally significant step further. As Rep. Adam Schiff recently told Chris Hayes, “our memo discloses for the first time that the Russians preview to Papadopoulos that they could help with disseminating these stolen emails.” Rep. Schiff added, “When Donald Trump openly called on the Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails, they’d be richly rewarded if they released these to the press, his campaign had already been put on notice that the Russians were prepared to do just that and disseminate these stolen emails.” (The full transcript and video clip is below.)"

Russia "Previewed" Plan to Disseminate Emails with Trump Campaign

Goodman analyzes Schiff’s revelation that Russia gave preview to Trump campaign that the Kremlin could help disseminate stolen emails. Then he addresses the legally important question of what the Trump campaign did afterwards, which helps explain why Mueller’s team is asking former campaign...

www.justsecurity.org

.....................................................................................................................................................
Do we know all there is to know about the extent to which the Trump campaign was notified of, or involved in, the timing of Wikileaks' release of the hacked info given to them by the Russians? No.

Why is that? Most importantly, because Roger Stone was one of the Trump associates who either lied to or withheld truthful info from Mueller. He was the campaign's point man with respect to contacts with Wikileaks.

Trump campaign associates ‘materially impaired’ investigation by lying, Mueller says

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report about the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election said Trump campaign associates “materially impaired” the inves…

thehill.com

Trump talked to Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, Rick Gates says in testimony contradicting the president

Trump had told special counsel Robert Mueller last November in a written response, "I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with" Roger Stone.

www.cnbc.com

Why are you acting like this is some kind of a bomb shell when it's already been part of the entire investigation, which did not conclude there was collusion? It looks like you're just trying to deflect attention from the other stuff that's coming out.

 

[Billiejeens]

Mr. Papadopoulos didn't meet with any Russians at all. He met with Deep State Operatives masquerading as Russian agents trying to entrap him and "sting him", as well as to provide some kind of "justification" for all the FISA warrants that were drawn up to spy on the Trump Campaign.

Huh? He was bragging about Russians having "dirt" on Clinton

People who were only pretending to be Russians gave him that Disinformation, and then other Deep State operatives squeezed the information back out of him after getting him trashed in a bar. No real Russian agents were involved.

It is really beyond comprehension that there are people on Political Message Board that don't know that.

 

[Bush92]

You are a raving lunatic.

That seems to be the standard reply from Trumpleheads who can't refute the evidence.

Try winning an election from time-to-time it might help validate your argument.

 

[Bush92]

"A significant recent revelation in the Russia investigation has been largely overlooked in the rush of several breaking news stories over the past few days. A nugget of information is contained in the memo written by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee (the so-called Schiff Memo), which was released on Saturday morning.

Prior to the memo, we knew that a Russian agent told Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos of “Moscow possessing ‘dirt’” on Hillary Clinton “in the form of ‘thousands of emails,’” according to Papadopoulos’s plea statement. The memo went a legally significant step further. As Rep. Adam Schiff recently told Chris Hayes, “our memo discloses for the first time that the Russians preview to Papadopoulos that they could help with disseminating these stolen emails.” Rep. Schiff added, “When Donald Trump openly called on the Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails, they’d be richly rewarded if they released these to the press, his campaign had already been put on notice that the Russians were prepared to do just that and disseminate these stolen emails.” (The full transcript and video clip is below.)"

Russia "Previewed" Plan to Disseminate Emails with Trump Campaign

Goodman analyzes Schiff’s revelation that Russia gave preview to Trump campaign that the Kremlin could help disseminate stolen emails. Then he addresses the legally important question of what the Trump campaign did afterwards, which helps explain why Mueller’s team is asking former campaign...

www.justsecurity.org

.....................................................................................................................................................
Do we know all there is to know about the extent to which the Trump campaign was notified of, or involved in, the timing of Wikileaks' release of the hacked info given to them by the Russians? No.

Why is that? Most importantly, because Roger Stone was one of the Trump associates who either lied to or withheld truthful info from Mueller. He was the campaign's point man with respect to contacts with Wikileaks.

Trump campaign associates ‘materially impaired’ investigation by lying, Mueller says

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report about the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election said Trump campaign associates “materially impaired” the inves…

thehill.com

Trump talked to Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, Rick Gates says in testimony contradicting the president

Trump had told special counsel Robert Mueller last November in a written response, "I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with" Roger Stone.

www.cnbc.com

Why are you acting like this is some kind of a bomb shell when it's already been part of the entire investigation, which did not conclude there was collusion? It looks like you're just trying to deflect attention from the other stuff that's coming out.

Thank you. How long was the Mueller investstigation? Came up with jack shit.

 

[bripat9643]

If colluding with Russia causes an economic boon in the US, then collude on!

The ends justify the means Hillary and socialism lost.

At any cost liberalism must be stopped.

You people are fucking traitors to your country and you don't even try to hide it

Listen to the douche who supported a coup against the lawfully elected president of the United States.

 

[hadit]

What do you imagine you proved by quoting propaganda by some Obama hack?

That the Trump campaign was told Russia had "dirt" on Hillary early on. Dirt that was offered to the campaign. Dirt the campaign was told could be disseminated by Russia.
Dirt that later would be the reason Donnie J set up a meeting with a Russian operative he met with in order to procure. Dirt Donnie J was told was in the possession of the Russian government.
Dirt that Big Fat Don encouraged Russia to release.
Dirt about which Don spoke to Stone. Dirt Don told Gates Wikileaks would be releasing more of right after speaking to Stone.
Getting the picture or is this too complicated?

Man, if only Mueller had asked you. He could have saved so much time and money and not come up empty.

 

[bripat9643]

A) wikileaks isn't a russian organization, that's all bullshit with no evidence to back it up

The intel agencies have indisputable forensic computer evidence that Russia transferred the material they stole to Wikileaks.

A) there is no proof russians did anytihng, it's just simple IP tracing. I can make it look like my activity here is russian. means nothing. You have to trace IP's and kick down doors to know for sure who you're dealing with. And if peopel are clever it won't be possible.

B) even if russian agents did do all that, sending the info to wikileaks doens't mean anything. Americans have sent things to wikileaks, are they American backeD?

Makes no sense on teh face of it

The DOJ says there's no evidence that Russia had anything to do with the Wikileaks emails or with hacking the DNC computers.

 

[bripat9643]

A) wikileaks isn't a russian organization, that's all bullshit with no evidence to back it up

The intel agencies have indisputable forensic computer evidence that Russia transferred the material they stole to Wikileaks.

The DOJ report said there's no such evidence, moron. You need to quit listening to the congenital liar Adolph Schiffler.