WinterBorn
Diamond Member
- Moderator
- #81
So you meant walk away without a trial, cuz believe me, OJ walked even though he was guilty as hell and his entire defense was based on racism.I addressed your question. Yes, many people did suggest that we allow a violent criminal walk away, and they were mostly black.Remember OJ?What do you do differently to a violent criminal?I haven't seen anyone advocate for violent criminals to just walk away.
How about show where anyone has suggested that we allow violent criminals to walk away?
Was OJ allowed to walk away? Or was he tried and somehow aquitted? Though lord knows he murdered those two people.
I remember some black celebrating OJ's aquittal, but I don't remember anyone suggesting he be allowed to walk without a trial.
When the OP complains " If we are advocating allowing violent criminals just walk away..." then yes, that means being allowed to walk without a trial, or even being arrested. His first argument on that was talking about some 6'6" meth head fighting the cops.
I agree that OJ was guilty. But he was found not-guilty by a jury.