Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It say "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."Where in the constitution does it mention assault weapons?
I’m like looking, but can’t find the language…
These blatantly unconstitutional laws that blue state governors and legislatures are passing should have a penalty attached for taking up the courts time and budgets to overrule this obvious frivolity.It say "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
These Democrat bastards were infringing the hell out of the right and those Sheriffs were not going to allow that to happen in their counties.
A few idiot deranged anti gun nut Democrats can't just vote away the Bill of Rights.
Because of Bruen (and other rulings) the Court will undo what the shitheads did. However, in the meantime the Sherrifs aren't going to help the dipshits take away Constitutional rights.
Dude, where does the constitution specifically delineate assault weapons?It say "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
These Democrat bastards were infringing the hell out of the right and those Sheriffs were not going to allow that to happen in their counties.
A few idiot deranged anti gun nut Democrats can't just vote away the Bill of Rights.
Because of Bruen (and other rulings) the Court will undo what the shitheads did. However, in the meantime the Sherrifs aren't going to help the dipshits take away Constitutional rights.
Again, I’m looking at the constitution and it does not mention assault weapons.They're called "arms". Okay, you thought they were the things your hands are attached to, but there is another meaning.
They didn't say, "the right to bear muskets", or "the right to bear weapons that are not effective beyond a hundred yards or so and which take almost a minute to reload".
They said "arms", the things necessary to protect the security of a free state, by which they meant being able to prevail in war.
They wanted the people to be as well-armed as the government, coming as they did from a tradition which distrusted centralized government -- in their time, monarchies -- whose soldiers in their 'standing armies' were often foreign mercenaries.
This is not possible today. Joe Biden is correct. But that spirit is absolutely justified, and needs to be carried on in other ways.
I've asked this question before, and no one has answered, so I'll ask it again. When some friends of mine and I raised money (and delivered it in person) to help some men buy ammunition in a situation where they believed their government was oppressive and felt they needed to be able to defend themselves ... were we wrong to do so? Or should we always trust our governments?
What are you pissing you pants about?These blatantly unconstitutional laws that blue state governors and legislatures are passing should have a penalty attached for taking up the courts time and budgets to overrule this obvious frivolity.
Hey, I’m also looking for machine guns, are they in the constitution too?It say "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
These Democrat bastards were infringing the hell out of the right and those Sheriffs were not going to allow that to happen in their counties.
A few idiot deranged anti gun nut Democrats can't just vote away the Bill of Rights.
Because of Bruen (and other rulings) the Court will undo what the shitheads did. However, in the meantime the Sherrifs aren't going to help the dipshits take away Constitutional rights.
It say "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Yes, two separate countries is definitely the right idea. To get there will be very difficult.
If we're serious -- and not just giving our emotions an outlet while we see America destroyed from within -- we have to think about how to get this idea into general circulation.
One of the first steps is to undermine the idea of the sacredness of borders. Borders were made by men under one set of circumstances, and can be re-made under another. Let's start with proposing the idea that counties can transfer themselves to the adjoining state, if, say 75% of their voting population vote to do so, and if the adjoining state accepts.
Talking about two nations, we have to think about things like who inherits how much of the National Debt. Also National Defense: the model here is NORAD, a joint US/Canadian air and aero-space defense system.
The whole idea is that we will get along better if we separate -- we have a country, they have a country.
I am not a dude, you moron.Dude, where does the constitution specifically delineate assault weapons?
If the constitution does expressly point it out, it’s not protected.
There are a lot of things these stupid Moon Bats don't understand.Apparently he doesn't understand that so-called assault weapons are arms.
Great fucking ray wants Political apartheidI just keep thinking how great it would be to never have to put up with liberal bullshit ever again. If we had our own separate countries, that's the way it would be.
No more crying about armed citizens, magazine sizes, style of weapons. No more complaining we aren't green enough in spite of the trillions we already spent and are continuing to spend on that myth. No more debates on illegals. In their country they can open the flood gates and let all South Americans in for all we care. No more attacking our police. If they want social workers to do the job, they can do it in their own country.
But best of all, if we decided the side I live on as the conservative side, and all the Democrats had to move, my property value would double overnight.
Great fucking ray wants Political apartheid
Not even two months after my second shot I got covid, and it was a "worse case than average" according to my doctor. During that time I was latent with the virus and fully capable of infecting others. It didn't protect my wife from getting it either. She was also fully vaccinated and got covid a week after I did. In fact nearly all my coworkers got covid AFTER they were vaccinated. Some got it when unvaccinated and their experience was no worse or better than those of us who were vaccinated.actual translation
Your tiny mind is incapable of processing how my being vaccinated protects unvaccinated morons from the disease they so rightly deserve.
Your tiny mind is welcome.
You bet I do. Living in Cleveland there are two things I could never see again and never miss: snow and liberals.
The right hand column in the below link illustrates a VERY blue state. I am sorry to say.
Illinois - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Again, I’m looking at the constitution and it does not mention assault weapons.
Maybe you have a different version.
Machine gun?Ueah….Scalia already explained this in the Heller decision…….all bearable arms are protected…..the limits the Constitution allow are keeping guns from felons, the dangerously mentally I’ll and a few, very specific, sensitive places like government buildings….
Please do a little research before you post….
They’re not directly spelled out in document, so the right isn’t there.Apparently he doesn't understand that so-called assault weapons are arms.
Dude, where does the constitution specifically delineate assault weapons?
If the constitution does expressly point it out, it’s not protected.
