DudleySmith
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2020
- 21,705
- 15,472
- 2,288
Not your call to decide.
That's right, there are those big articles in all the papers telling us it's yours.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not your call to decide.
That's right, there are those big articles in all the papers telling us it's yours.
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers have authority by our law to screen people for expedited removal,.Go for it. Raise taxes to pay for these courts.
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers have authority by our law to screen people for expedited removal,.
Having said that, let us get back to the subject of the thread which is about the Illinois law not being in harmony with the Fourteenth Amendment's command which forbids state action, that abridges its citizens' privileges.
JWK
“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." ___ Justice Story
You should learn what terms mean before you try using them.Well, part of that problem is all the fake 'refugees' deliberately swamping the legal system and idiots enabling that abuse have pretty much discredited all such laws.
. . . get back to the subject of the thread which is about the Illinois law not being in harmony with the Fourteenth Amendment's command which forbids state action, that abridges its citizens' privileges.You should
You might as well try to apply that empty legal argument to H1B visas. You'd get the same result.. . . get back to the subject of the thread which is about the Illinois law not being in harmony with the Fourteenth Amendment's command which forbids state action, that abridges its citizens' privileges.
JWK
“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." ___ Justice Story
And before blowing your uniformed hot air and being a naysayer, perhaps you ought to take some time and educate yourself, maybe by studying Foley v Connelie, 435 U.S. 291 (1978), upholding a District Court's ruling, which approved New York’s law barring the appointment of aliens to its state police force.You might as well try to apply that empty legal argument to H1B visas. You'd get the same result.
And before blowing your uniformed hot air and being a naysayer, perhaps you ought to take some time and educate yourself, maybe by studying Foley v Connelie, 435 U.S. 291 (1978), upholding a District Court's ruling, which approved New York’s law barring the appointment of aliens to its state police force.
JWK
“In short, it would be as anomalous to conclude that citizens may be subjected to the broad discretionary powers of noncitizen police officers as it would be to say that judicial officers and jurors with power to judge citizens can be aliens.”___ Foley v. Connelie, 435 U.S. 291 (1978)
*Non-citizens*....we aren't talking about immigrants.That's a bit of a reach. Allowing immigrants to be police doesn't exclude citizens from being police.
?What state?
.*Non-citizens*....we aren't talking about immigrants.
They ain't White.Well reasoned post and a lot of words but what specifically in all that would prohibit non citizens from being in a state police force?
So, rather than a government job being a privilege you think it is a right?According to you but not according to Executive Order 10450--Security requirements for Government employment:
"WHEREAS the interests of the national security require that all persons privileged to be employed in the departments and agencies of the Government, shall be reliable, trustworthy, of good conduct and character, and of complete and unswerving loyalty to the United States; and
WHEREAS the American tradition that all persons should receive fair, impartial, and equitable treatment at the hands of the Government requires that all persons seeking the privilege of employment or privileged to be employed in the departments and agencies of the Government be adjudged by mutually consistent and no less than minimum standards and procedures among the departments and agencies governing the employment and retention in employment of persons in the Federal service . . . "
JWK
“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." - ___ Justice Story
Sweet Jeebers....
.
View attachment 814781
.
.
Foley v Connelie, mentioned above in the thread, already lays out the argument that employment by a state as a police officer falls within the category of a privileged type of State employment. The only remaining question is, does extending that privileged type of state employment to non-citizens, abridge a federally protected privilege of Citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment (“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.”) who are actively pursuing that type of employment?
It seems to be a self-evident fact that, for every non-citizen hired by the State of Illinois as a police officer, there is one less employment opportunity for the citizens of Illinois to be hired as a police officer, thereby creating an abridgment of a state created privileged occupation for Illinois’ citizens.
JWK
“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." ___ Justice Story
So, now you profess to be a mind reader, and simply make up crap, just like the rest of our domestic enemies and hate America crowd does.So, rather than a government job being a privilege you think it is a right?
How very Socialist of you.
Not only are you a communist but your language skills are almost 4th grade level.So, now you profess to be a mind reader, and simply make up crap, just like the rest of our domestic enemies and hate America crowd does.
Foley v Connelie, mentioned above in the thread, already lays out the argument that employment by a state as a police officer falls within the category of a privileged type of State employment. The only remaining question is, does extending that privileged type of state employment to non-citizens, abridge a federally protected privilege of Citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment (“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.”) who are actively pursuing that type of employment?
It seems to be a self-evident fact that, for every non-citizen hired by the State of Illinois as a police officer, there is one less employment opportunity for the citizens of Illinois to be hired as a police officer, thereby creating an abridgment of a state created privileged occupation for Illinois’ citizens.
JWK
“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." ___ Justice Story