RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
- May 6, 2007
- 56,051
- 18,144
Already answered your question you are just to STUPID to understand it. Again for the slow and STUPID I support any method that meets the requirements of the State Constitution. So I am against the 3 Districts in NC forced on us by the federal Government. You have them in you pictures.It is easy to look up and even easier to see that the democrats used the claim that blacks were under represented to force ILLEGAL by State law districts on States. Remind me how you have complained about that since the 1990's?You realize the districts you just listed were ALL created by the democrats to ensure blacks won a seat unfairly? Every one of those were created by the Federal Government interfering in State business.So long as State Constitutions are not violated I have no problem with HOW a State chooses to create districts, remind me how upset you are with the districts created by the Federal Government to force black districts?
If you are replying to me- I will say I am against all gerrymandering- regardless of the reason.
![]()
I think gerrymandering is an assault on all voters- by intentionally diluting the votes of those not belonging to the party in power.
But I can see why there are those who don't care about votes being diluted.
Frankly I don't know if that is true or not- and I don't care.
I do care in particular with the gerrymandering of districts by either party to dis-enfranchise those of the other party.
Do you?
LOL- poor little snowflake. You won't even answer about whether you love gerrymandering- or you oppose gerrymandering.
I will just put you down as a snowflake who loooooves gerrymandering because you want to ensure your party stays in power- regardless of the votes.