IMF- US growth over 3% rest of 2014, needs infrastructure jobs, training, tax reform

''The Fund said it expected the economy to pick up steam in 2015 and maintain stronger growth rates.

But there remain long term challenges, the Fund warned, in order to sustain growth above 2%.

Due to the ageing population the country needs to undertake significant reforms including tax and immigration changes and more investment in infrastructure and job training.

There should be better provision of childcare assistance to enable parents to rejoin the workforce in future, the report suggested.

The Fund also said the US should focus more resources on the poorest pockets of the population to ensure "economic and social stability".''

In other word pass Dem bills DUH...
 
Here is our only source of new jobs over the past 6 years...

employ.png


And your clown Obama wants these industries dead and buried.

Tsk Tsk...
 
Oil jobs pale in number compared to all private sector jobs. Silly graph, for Pub dupes only. But thanks for 4 1/2 years of mindless obstruction, phony crises, and 24/7 fear mongering from the new bs GOP...
 
Oil jobs pale in number compared to all private sector jobs. Silly graph, for Pub dupes only. But thanks for 4 1/2 years of mindless obstruction, phony crises, and 24/7 fear mongering from the new bs GOP...

Now you're arguing with the EIA ? :lol:
 
Just look at the meltdown that started before Obama, and the Obama recovery despite GOP horseshytte...
 
Oil jobs pale in number compared to all private sector jobs. Silly graph, for Pub dupes only. But thanks for 4 1/2 years of mindless obstruction, phony crises, and 24/7 fear mongering from the new bs GOP...

Without energy there is no economy. An economy can't make it on unicorn farts, wind, and solar.
 
Here is our only source of new jobs over the past 6 years...

employ.png


And your clown Obama wants these industries dead and buried.

Tsk Tsk...


You do realize that 40% of 190,000 << 1% of 146,595,000

You can do the math without help, right?

the full article is at

Oil and gas industry employment growing much faster than total private sector employment - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

what do they call that, using numbers in a mislead manner?

Bulshit? Lying?
 
Here is our only source of new jobs over the past 6 years...

[ EDITOR WOULDN'T ALLOW ME TO POST GRAPH ]

And your clown Obama wants these industries dead and buried.

Tsk Tsk...

I really, really don't think you understand what that graph represents!

From the brown trace labeled "all private sector employment" the other traces are the data EXTRACTED from it and are subsets of the TOTAL EMPLOYMENT identified by that brown trace. The graph merely displays the growth of the oil industry in several areas over that period; nothing more and nothing less.
 
Here is our only source of new jobs over the past 6 years...

employ.png


And your clown Obama wants these industries dead and buried.

Tsk Tsk...



You do realize that 40% of 190,000 << 1% of 146,595,000

the full article is at

Oil and gas industry employment growing much faster than total private sector employment - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

what do they call that using statistics in a misleading manner?

Bullshit? Lying?

Here is the graph linked from the eia page.

jobpercent.png


Not hard

So, why didn't you just link the article and graph from the eia page?

Hiding something perhaps? Like the actual numbers? Maybe the context? A conclusion in the article that you don't like?

I gotta ask, if you are so convinced you are right, why do you need to hide the original article?

Why would we ever expect oil and gas to increase less than the total private sector jobs? New jobs require more energy. That is how our economy works.
 
Last edited:
''The Fund said it expected the economy to pick up steam in 2015 and maintain stronger growth rates.

But there remain long term challenges, the Fund warned, in order to sustain growth above 2%.

Due to the ageing population the country needs to undertake significant reforms including tax and immigration changes and more investment in infrastructure and job training.

There should be better provision of childcare assistance to enable parents to rejoin the workforce in future, the report suggested.

The Fund also said the US should focus more resources on the poorest pockets of the population to ensure "economic and social stability".''

In other word pass Dem bills DUH...

In other words we need to spend like fucking crazy.... :D
 

Forum List

Back
Top