Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well we see what a failure Obama was with Libya....his "brothers" are not wanted there! This thing with Syria seems to be pretty important to Obama. Why? They know chemicals were used, but have that given us proof of who actually used it? Obama says they know....my problem is, i don't trust him!
So what have they done to us?
Sadaam killed thousands of his own people....yet he was no threat to us.
What's the difference?
obama's president and he's pushing it, he's got to protect his Muslim brothers.
Well we see what a failure Obama was with Libya....his "brothers" are not wanted there! This thing with Syria seems to be pretty important to Obama. Why? They know chemicals were used, but have that given us proof of who actually used it? Obama says they know....my problem is, i don't trust him!
Syria actually does have WMD's. How ironic is that?
I wonder where they got them.
Well we see what a failure Obama was with Libya....his "brothers" are not wanted there! This thing with Syria seems to be pretty important to Obama. Why? They know chemicals were used, but have that given us proof of who actually used it? Obama says they know....my problem is, i don't trust him!
The reason that Obama is so hot on this is that the chemical weapons came from Saddam's WMD programs. Obama is desperate to destroy the evidence before the shameful democrats and their lackey press are exposed as the liars we all know them to be.
Indeed. It is the Senate that tries the recommendation (Jury if you will), to impeach on advice from the House. 2/3rds yea are required for a POTUS to become impeached.If the President goes to war without getting an OK from Congress...."I will make it my business to impeach him!!!"
Joe Biden
1. "Chuck Todd: Obama Avoiding Congress Because Isolationists May Block Attack on Syria"
NBC News Chief White House Correspondent Chuck Todd told the hosts of MSNBCs The Cycle warned that President Barack Obama may believe that seeking congressional authorization to attack Syria in the coming days would be counterproductive. "
Chuck Todd: Obama Avoiding Congress Because ?Isolationists? May Block Attack on Syria | Mediaite
Meanwhile, on the other side of the moon.....
"About.....face!"
2. "November 29, 2007 5:03 PM
PORTSMOUTH Presidential hopeful Delaware Sen. Joe Biden stated unequivocally that he will move to impeach President Bush if he bombs Iran without first gaining congressional approval.
Biden spoke in front of a crowd of approximately 100 at a candidate forum held Thursday at Seacoast Media Group. The forum focused on the Iraq war and foreign policy. When an audience member expressed fear of a war with Iran, Biden said he does not typically engage in threats, but had no qualms about issuing a direct warning to the Oval Office.
Related content
Video:
"The president has no authority to unilaterally attack Iran, and if he does, as Foreign Relations Committee chairman, I will move to impeach," said Biden, whose words were followed by a raucous applause from the local audience.
Biden said he is in the process of meeting with constitutional law experts to prepare a legal memorandum saying as much and intends to send it to the president."
Biden: Impeachment if Bush bombs Iran | SeacoastOnline.com
In a related story.....
3. "Another indication of the subservience of the communists to a foreign government can be seen during WWII. At the behest of the Commintern, as the archives reveals, the American Peace Mobilization committee was formed in April of 41. Its function was to support the Soviet line, bring progressives aboard, protest against the lend-lease program to aid Britain they paraded in front of the White House, chanting FDR is a fascist, hes starting a war! They managed to dupe the easiest group to dupe: progressive pastors. The NYTimes article at the time said Clergyman Group Opposes War Aid!
a. In mid-protest, on June 22, 1941, they became pro-war! The Germans had broken their agreement with the Soviets, and invaded Russia! Suddenly the group was for lend-lease, and FDR wasnt a fascist and they changed their name to American Peoples Mobilization."
Dr. Paul Kengor, Hoover Institution, Stanford DUPES: How America's Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century"
What is most funny is that the fucking moron Biden knows so little about our form of government that he wasn't even aware that as a Senator he had ZERO power to impeach....
Only the House can draw up an impeachment. What a buffoon - what a perfect example of this failure of an administration.
Well we see what a failure Obama was with Libya....his "brothers" are not wanted there! This thing with Syria seems to be pretty important to Obama. Why? They know chemicals were used, but have that given us proof of who actually used it? Obama says they know....my problem is, i don't trust him!
The reason that Obama is so hot on this is that the chemical weapons came from Saddam's WMD programs. Obama is desperate to destroy the evidence before the shameful democrats and their lackey press are exposed as the liars we all know them to be.
There were reports that is where those weapons went.
obama says
Gotta get them into the Middle class somehow...what he never considers is how to keep them there or if they are interested in staying there (much less be there) And nevermind Barry is destroying the goose that pays for it for he has choked it off enough that it has stopped producing 'gold eggs', and produces shit. We are living it.obama says
Yeah, we "get it" Barry. You have spent trillions of dollars buying them off, one batch at a time....
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541-1548)[1] is a federal law intended to check the president's power to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of Congress. The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by declaration of war by Congress, "statutory authorization," or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."
The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto. The War Powers Resolution has been violated in the past by President Reagan in regards to the aid to the Contras in Nicaragua and by President Clinton in 1999, during the bombing campaign in Kosovo. All incidents have had congressional disapproval, but none have had any successful legal actions taken against the president for violations. All presidents since 1973 have declared their belief that the act is unconstitutional.
let's not forget about that "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States" part.The dude who started this thread is obviously clueless about the law:
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541-1548)[1] is a federal law intended to check the president's power to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of Congress. The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by declaration of war by Congress, "statutory authorization," or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."
The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto. The War Powers Resolution has been violated in the past by President Reagan in regards to the aid to the Contras in Nicaragua and by President Clinton in 1999, during the bombing campaign in Kosovo. All incidents have had congressional disapproval, but none have had any successful legal actions taken against the president for violations. All presidents since 1973 have declared their belief that the act is unconstitutional.
Basically we define a "war" as 61 days or longer.
Kind of stupid, but it's the law.
"...(3) a national emergency created by an attack upon the United States..."
Have the Syrians used chemical-weapons gas on American Soil or against Americans overseas?
And it hasn't.let's not forget about that "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States" part.The dude who started this thread is obviously clueless about the law:
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541-1548)[1] is a federal law intended to check the president's power to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of Congress. The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by declaration of war by Congress, "statutory authorization," or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."
The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto. The War Powers Resolution has been violated in the past by President Reagan in regards to the aid to the Contras in Nicaragua and by President Clinton in 1999, during the bombing campaign in Kosovo. All incidents have had congressional disapproval, but none have had any successful legal actions taken against the president for violations. All presidents since 1973 have declared their belief that the act is unconstitutional.
Basically we define a "war" as 61 days or longer.
Kind of stupid, but it's the law.
(c) The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
I haven't done this shit in a long time. I frankly don't want to do this now but this is crazy.
Your president is insane and demanding another world leader step aside or you are going to attack them.
Stop this shit. Your President is insane.
lol coming from you this is utterly meaningless.
Obama may be wrong in attacking, but he is not insane. You really think its him pulling the trigger?
