rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 284,534
- 155,796
- 2,615
- Thread starter
- #221
He demanded personal favors
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Impeachable offense? Try Bribery
- Thread starter rightwinger
- Start date
And Zelensky, one of the principles on the call, said he wasn't pressured, so where was the bribe?
Zelensky is still dependent on US aid that TRUMP controls to fight off the Russian invasion
I wouldn't count on his statements too much
Really, he seemed very relaxed when he made that statement. Also the money was released without Ukraine doing anything other than assuring Trump that they were trying to root out corruption.
And why are the commies in congress holding up legislation that would provide another 250 million in aid to Ukraine for this FY?
.
He demanded personal favorsWith that “though” ....Trump made military aid contingent on being granted personal favors/———/ Only in your screwball, twisted, Trump hating mind./——/ Post the exact language in the Transcript where anyone was offered a bribe.
When Trump says ......He needs a favor “though”
Though makes the military aid dependent on the favor
No. He made military aid contingent on proof that Ukraine is battling corruption. What you just said was what Biden did and he admitted that on live TV.
He asked for a personal favor but never said if you don't do it you don't get weapons. If he did, like Biden did, then there is a problem, I agree with you. He would not be the first but that practice has to stop. 60 Minutes did a whole thing on Pelosi doing this and making millions.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
He demanded personal favorsWith that “though” ....Trump made military aid contingent on being granted personal favors/———/ Only in your screwball, twisted, Trump hating mind.When Trump says ......He needs a favor “though”
Though makes the military aid dependent on the favor
No. He made military aid contingent on proof that Ukraine is battling corruption. What you just said was what Biden did and he admitted that on live TV.
He asked for a personal favor but never said if you don't do it you don't get weapons. If he did, like Biden did, then there is a problem, I agree with you. He would not be the first but that practice has to stop. 60 Minutes did a whole thing on Pelosi doing this and making millions.
Exposing Dem corruption is a favor to the entire nation...…..
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 284,534
- 155,796
- 2,615
- Thread starter
- #226
That would s where the testimony of his aids comes into play. Trump told them to deal with Giuliani and some of his staff to work out the detailsHe demanded personal favorsWith that “though” ....Trump made military aid contingent on being granted personal favors/———/ Only in your screwball, twisted, Trump hating mind.When Trump says ......He needs a favor “though”
Though makes the military aid dependent on the favor
No. He made military aid contingent on proof that Ukraine is battling corruption. What you just said was what Biden did and he admitted that on live TV.
He asked for a personal favor but never said if you don't do it you don't get weapons. If he did, like Biden did, then there is a problem, I agree with you. He would not be the first but that practice has to stop. 60 Minutes did a whole thing on Pelosi doing this and making millions.
The staff made it clear that if you want access to Trump, you have to provide information. Does not look good
That would s where the testimony of his aids comes into play. Trump told them to deal with Giuliani and some of his staff to work out the detailsHe demanded personal favorsWith that “though” ....Trump made military aid contingent on being granted personal favors/———/ Only in your screwball, twisted, Trump hating mind.
No. He made military aid contingent on proof that Ukraine is battling corruption. What you just said was what Biden did and he admitted that on live TV.
He asked for a personal favor but never said if you don't do it you don't get weapons. If he did, like Biden did, then there is a problem, I agree with you. He would not be the first but that practice has to stop. 60 Minutes did a whole thing on Pelosi doing this and making millions.
The staff made it clear that if you want access to Trump, you have to provide information. Does not look good
Access to Trump? What does that even mean?
JGalt
Diamond Member
- Mar 9, 2011
- 71,666
- 86,805
- 3,635
With that “though” ....Trump made military aid contingent on being granted personal favors/———/ Only in your screwball, twisted, Trump hating mind./——/ Post the exact language in the Transcript where anyone was offered a bribe.The phone call amounted to an attempted bribery/----/ Now that's funny. If Mueller had anything why drop it and go for impeachment for making a phone call?
View attachment 287044
An impeachable offense
When Trump says ......He needs a favor “though”
Though makes the military aid dependent on the favor
It wasn't a "personal favor." Trump is the nation's top law-enforcement officer and he was merely enforcing a mutual agreement between the US and Ukraine, to investigate corruption.
You don't think what Joe and Hunter Biden did is corrupt?
/——-/ Being a fair minded liberal, you must agree with the charges against Shytface:We shall seeIn your opinion. Many disagree.The phone call amounted to an attempted bribery/----/ Now that's funny. If Mueller had anything why drop it and go for impeachment for making a phone call?Nice try/----/ "It left it up to Congress to make the decision and provided specific evidence"
So what was Mueller doing for 2 1/2 years if not looking for evidence?
What is Mueller investigating? - americanthinker.com
What is Mueller investigating?
The purpose of a special counsel is to investigate if a federal crime was committed. There has been no charge or allegation that Trump or his campaign workers violated any federal law. The authorization by Assistant Attorney General Rosenstein to Mueller read:
View attachment 287038
Has nothing to do with what was in the final report
View attachment 287044
An impeachable offense
GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz files ethics complaint against Schiff, cites 'unprofessional and divisive' conduct
GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz files ethics complaint against Schiff, cites 'unprofessional and divisive' conduct
kwc57
BOHICA Obama
So did Biden as VP representing Obama ya hoser. Hint, that is how diplomatic negotiations actually work. You come to an agreement on something that is a win win for both sides and the carrot the US uses is financial aid. Always has been, always will be. Woe to the next Dem President as they are going to be saddled with this new "impeachable" offense right out of the gate.Trump specifically demanded “favors” in return for discussing military aid
Rather than favors that are in the interests of the United States, he demanded information that could be used against a political rival for his personal gain
The very definition of bribery
kwc57
BOHICA Obama
The same reason Dems like sending private citizens like Bill Richardson to negotiate on behalf of the President. Do liberals wake up in a new world everyday totally oblivious to DC business as usual?Do me a favor-does not say PERSONAL-it was on behalf of the US. Is not bribery-look up the definition, and unprecedented no-it goes on all the time with US presidents-FDR used it with Vichy France in WWII.ActuallyThat happens with every administration. LOL. You’re so uneducated.Trump specifically demanded “favors” in return for discussing military aid
Rather than favors that are in the interests of the United States, he demanded information that could be used against a political rival for his personal gain
The very definition of bribery
Trumps demands for a personal favor in return for military aid is outright bribery and unprecedented
Nice try
If it was on behalf of the US, Why was Rudy G, Trumps PERSONAL Lawyer, in charge of negotiating ??
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 284,534
- 155,796
- 2,615
- Thread starter
- #232
Do you need a Dictionary?That would s where the testimony of his aids comes into play. Trump told them to deal with Giuliani and some of his staff to work out the detailsHe demanded personal favorsWith that “though” ....Trump made military aid contingent on being granted personal favors
No. He made military aid contingent on proof that Ukraine is battling corruption. What you just said was what Biden did and he admitted that on live TV.
He asked for a personal favor but never said if you don't do it you don't get weapons. If he did, like Biden did, then there is a problem, I agree with you. He would not be the first but that practice has to stop. 60 Minutes did a whole thing on Pelosi doing this and making millions.
The staff made it clear that if you want access to Trump, you have to provide information. Does not look good
Access to Trump? What does that even mean?
Yeah. One for your speak.Do you need a Dictionary?That would s where the testimony of his aids comes into play. Trump told them to deal with Giuliani and some of his staff to work out the detailsHe demanded personal favorsNo. He made military aid contingent on proof that Ukraine is battling corruption. What you just said was what Biden did and he admitted that on live TV.
He asked for a personal favor but never said if you don't do it you don't get weapons. If he did, like Biden did, then there is a problem, I agree with you. He would not be the first but that practice has to stop. 60 Minutes did a whole thing on Pelosi doing this and making millions.
The staff made it clear that if you want access to Trump, you have to provide information. Does not look good
Access to Trump? What does that even mean?
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 284,534
- 155,796
- 2,615
- Thread starter
- #234
So did Biden as VP representing Obama ya hoser. Hint, that is how diplomatic negotiations actually work. You come to an agreement on something that is a win win for both sides and the carrot the US uses is financial aid. Always has been, always will be. Woe to the next Dem President as they are going to be saddled with this new "impeachable" offense right out of the gate.Trump specifically demanded “favors” in return for discussing military aid
Rather than favors that are in the interests of the United States, he demanded information that could be used against a political rival for his personal gain
The very definition of bribery
You have it correct
It is supposed to be win win for both sides
One of the sides is not supposed to be Trumps personal interests
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
That would s where the testimony of his aids comes into play. Trump told them to deal with Giuliani and some of his staff to work out the detailsHe demanded personal favorsWith that “though” ....Trump made military aid contingent on being granted personal favors
No. He made military aid contingent on proof that Ukraine is battling corruption. What you just said was what Biden did and he admitted that on live TV.
He asked for a personal favor but never said if you don't do it you don't get weapons. If he did, like Biden did, then there is a problem, I agree with you. He would not be the first but that practice has to stop. 60 Minutes did a whole thing on Pelosi doing this and making millions.
The staff made it clear that if you want access to Trump, you have to provide information. Does not look good
Access to Trump? What does that even mean?
That's when a foreign government makes a donation to the Clinton Slush...err...Foundation to get a meeting with the Secretary of State.....
How does it help his personal interests?So did Biden as VP representing Obama ya hoser. Hint, that is how diplomatic negotiations actually work. You come to an agreement on something that is a win win for both sides and the carrot the US uses is financial aid. Always has been, always will be. Woe to the next Dem President as they are going to be saddled with this new "impeachable" offense right out of the gate.Trump specifically demanded “favors” in return for discussing military aid
Rather than favors that are in the interests of the United States, he demanded information that could be used against a political rival for his personal gain
The very definition of bribery
You have it correct
It is supposed to be win win for both sides
One of the sides is not supposed to be Trumps personal interests
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 284,534
- 155,796
- 2,615
- Thread starter
- #237
How does it help his personal interests?So did Biden as VP representing Obama ya hoser. Hint, that is how diplomatic negotiations actually work. You come to an agreement on something that is a win win for both sides and the carrot the US uses is financial aid. Always has been, always will be. Woe to the next Dem President as they are going to be saddled with this new "impeachable" offense right out of the gate.Trump specifically demanded “favors” in return for discussing military aid
Rather than favors that are in the interests of the United States, he demanded information that could be used against a political rival for his personal gain
The very definition of bribery
You have it correct
It is supposed to be win win for both sides
One of the sides is not supposed to be Trumps personal interests
Like getting himself re-elected
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
How does it help his personal interests?So did Biden as VP representing Obama ya hoser. Hint, that is how diplomatic negotiations actually work. You come to an agreement on something that is a win win for both sides and the carrot the US uses is financial aid. Always has been, always will be. Woe to the next Dem President as they are going to be saddled with this new "impeachable" offense right out of the gate.Trump specifically demanded “favors” in return for discussing military aid
Rather than favors that are in the interests of the United States, he demanded information that could be used against a political rival for his personal gain
The very definition of bribery
You have it correct
It is supposed to be win win for both sides
One of the sides is not supposed to be Trumps personal interests
Like getting himself re-elected
Exactly!
If exposing Dem corruption gets a Republican elected, it shouldn't be allowed.
2020, Keep Dem corruption hidden!!!
Looks like a winning slogan.
That’s up to the voters. Nothing he does short of faking votes guarantees that.How does it help his personal interests?So did Biden as VP representing Obama ya hoser. Hint, that is how diplomatic negotiations actually work. You come to an agreement on something that is a win win for both sides and the carrot the US uses is financial aid. Always has been, always will be. Woe to the next Dem President as they are going to be saddled with this new "impeachable" offense right out of the gate.Trump specifically demanded “favors” in return for discussing military aid
Rather than favors that are in the interests of the United States, he demanded information that could be used against a political rival for his personal gain
The very definition of bribery
You have it correct
It is supposed to be win win for both sides
One of the sides is not supposed to be Trumps personal interests
Like getting himself re-elected
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 284,534
- 155,796
- 2,615
- Thread starter
- #240
Trump controls the Justice Dept and AG Barr does his biddingHow does it help his personal interests?So did Biden as VP representing Obama ya hoser. Hint, that is how diplomatic negotiations actually work. You come to an agreement on something that is a win win for both sides and the carrot the US uses is financial aid. Always has been, always will be. Woe to the next Dem President as they are going to be saddled with this new "impeachable" offense right out of the gate.Trump specifically demanded “favors” in return for discussing military aid
Rather than favors that are in the interests of the United States, he demanded information that could be used against a political rival for his personal gain
The very definition of bribery
You have it correct
It is supposed to be win win for both sides
One of the sides is not supposed to be Trumps personal interests
Like getting himself re-elected
Exactly!
If exposing Dem corruption gets a Republican elected, it shouldn't be allowed.
2020, Keep Dem corruption hidden!!!
Looks like a winning slogan.
What is he waiting for?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 204
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 229
- Replies
- 264
- Views
- 5K
- Replies
- 90
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 31
- Views
- 609
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 282
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 71
- Replies
- 45
- Views
- 136
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8404
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 478
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-