In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

[WinterBorn]

It is about equality, whether capital is involved or not.

it is about equality whether gender is involved or not, under Capitalism.

Yes, it is about equality. It is NOT about what some men do, and expecting women to do the same.

when it is about capital? why not; doesn't capital spend the same? and, if so, why not?

It about equality. Your attempts to muddy the waters by injecting the capitalism nonsense is a waste of time.

lol. you can't ignore the facts in arguments, story teller, only in stories.

How do you separate the Capitalism out of it?

Because equality does not care about whether or not you have money. A poor woman gets to choose and a rich woman gets to choose who lays their hands on their body.

 

[danielpalos]

it is about equality whether gender is involved or not, under Capitalism.

Yes, it is about equality. It is NOT about what some men do, and expecting women to do the same.

when it is about capital? why not; doesn't capital spend the same? and, if so, why not?

It about equality. Your attempts to muddy the waters by injecting the capitalism nonsense is a waste of time.

lol. you can't ignore the facts in arguments, story teller, only in stories.

How do you separate the Capitalism out of it?

Because equality does not care about whether or not you have money. A poor woman gets to choose and a rich woman gets to choose who lays their hands on their body.

yes, it does; under Capitalism. We subscribe to capitalism where "social worth" is related to capital wealth; why do You believe the right wing thinks the poor are simply not worth social welfare?

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes, it is about equality. It is NOT about what some men do, and expecting women to do the same.

when it is about capital? why not; doesn't capital spend the same? and, if so, why not?

It about equality. Your attempts to muddy the waters by injecting the capitalism nonsense is a waste of time.

lol. you can't ignore the facts in arguments, story teller, only in stories.

How do you separate the Capitalism out of it?

Because equality does not care about whether or not you have money. A poor woman gets to choose and a rich woman gets to choose who lays their hands on their body.

yes, it does; under Capitalism. We subscribe to capitalism where "social worth" is related to capital wealth; why do You believe the right wing thinks the poor are simply not worth social welfare?

So you think a poor woman doesn’t get to decide who touches her?

 

[danielpalos]

when it is about capital? why not; doesn't capital spend the same? and, if so, why not?

It about equality. Your attempts to muddy the waters by injecting the capitalism nonsense is a waste of time.

lol. you can't ignore the facts in arguments, story teller, only in stories.

How do you separate the Capitalism out of it?

Because equality does not care about whether or not you have money. A poor woman gets to choose and a rich woman gets to choose who lays their hands on their body.

yes, it does; under Capitalism. We subscribe to capitalism where "social worth" is related to capital wealth; why do You believe the right wing thinks the poor are simply not worth social welfare?

So you think a poor woman doesn’t get to decide who touches her?

i am saying poor women tend to complain they can't find any nice guys more.

 

[WinterBorn]

It about equality. Your attempts to muddy the waters by injecting the capitalism nonsense is a waste of time.

lol. you can't ignore the facts in arguments, story teller, only in stories.

How do you separate the Capitalism out of it?

Because equality does not care about whether or not you have money. A poor woman gets to choose and a rich woman gets to choose who lays their hands on their body.

yes, it does; under Capitalism. We subscribe to capitalism where "social worth" is related to capital wealth; why do You believe the right wing thinks the poor are simply not worth social welfare?

So you think a poor woman doesn’t get to decide who touches her?

i am saying poor women tend to complain they can't find any nice guys more.

So? Apparently nice guys they are compatible with are scarce. Just because a guy is nice doesn’t necessarily mean he is dating material.

And given that your idea of “equality” for women is that they act like hot dog men who will fuck anything, you are far from being a nice guy.

 

[danielpalos]

you claim that. you tell stories. it is about economics.

 

[WinterBorn]

you claim that. you tell stories. it is about economics.

I have posted truth. It is about women choosing who can lay hands on them. “Nice” May be something they want. But it is not the only thing.

And there are plenty of guys with little or no money getting great women.

 

[WinterBorn]

you claim that. you tell stories. it is about economics.

I claim that because it is the truth.

I will give you an example. When I am looking for a woman to date, I want a "nice" girl. I'm not looking for a virgin, but a "bad" girl in my age group is trouble and carries a lot of baggage.

If I meet a nice girl around my age, she still may not be someone I want to date. If she is a militant vegan, into easy listening music, high strung, or adverse to spending time outdoors, there is no point in starting anything. Also, if she is very skinny or morbidly obese or has bad teeth, I am not going to be attracted to her, even if she is a nice girl.

Any questions?

 

[BreezeWood]

Its about equality.

equality will never exist for a sexual relationship -

has anyone mentioned the result of a sexual relationship is anything but an equally shared outcome as the woman may face 9 months of pregnancy ... and is the basis why there is not equality in a relationship.

for the OP, they might have a point if abortion is taken into account there is more leeway for a shared relationship that women are not taking advantage of but still the burden is left to the female to make a decision the male will never have to make. and an underlying reason religious groups oppose passive sex / abortion is it makes sexual relationships more practical and threatens the hold they have on their marriage.

 

[danielpalos]

you claim that. you tell stories. it is about economics.

I have posted truth. It is about women choosing who can lay hands on them. “Nice” May be something they want. But it is not the only thing.

And there are plenty of guys with little or no money getting great women.

it is about, money doing the talking.

why don't I have to try, when I have enough money?

 

[danielpalos]

you claim that. you tell stories. it is about economics.

I claim that because it is the truth.

I will give you an example. When I am looking for a woman to date, I want a "nice" girl. I'm not looking for a virgin, but a "bad" girl in my age group is trouble and carries a lot of baggage.

If I meet a nice girl around my age, she still may not be someone I want to date. If she is a militant vegan, into easy listening music, high strung, or adverse to spending time outdoors, there is no point in starting anything. Also, if she is very skinny or morbidly obese or has bad teeth, I am not going to be attracted to her, even if she is a nice girl.

Any questions?

i can meet more nice girls when i have a petty cash fund for that purpose.

 

[harmonica]

it is normal now to be a WHORE
look at how they dress/talk/sing ''normally''--like whores
Britney looks so stupid for her age
this is the dumbest shit I've seen--''LOOK everyone, look at my asshole''

You think that this normal? Do you think that men who are willing to screw anything still breathing and then rise up from their sex beds to yell about "morality" are normal? Do you think that fundie men of all faiths who seek to "marry" a slave to fuck, cook, and make babies are normal? This all represents the wreck of heterosexuality. I, as a heterosexual female person, want to make heterosexuality a POSITIVE and loving experience for heterosexuals. I want to see heterosexuals forming loving relationships. This has absolutely nothing to do with LGBTs in any capacity.

I see so many men in business suits, who refuse to reveal themselves and their bodies. Why does this happen in heterosexuality? Women reveal themselves in suggestive clothing. Why is it that heterosexual men do not?

My laptop is out to be repaired. But I have pictures on it of heterosexual men who are so totally fit, and not wearing much. And they are so noteworthy in a sexual sense. You bring me pictures, but where are the pictures of the heterosexual men?

?? what?

 

[WinterBorn]

you claim that. you tell stories. it is about economics.

I have posted truth. It is about women choosing who can lay hands on them. “Nice” May be something they want. But it is not the only thing.

And there are plenty of guys with little or no money getting great women.

it is about, money doing the talking.

why don't I have to try, when I have enough money?

Sounds like you hire hookers when you have money.

You have been whining about the same thing for 2 or 3 years. Why are you so broke?

 

[danielpalos]

you claim that. you tell stories. it is about economics.

I have posted truth. It is about women choosing who can lay hands on them. “Nice” May be something they want. But it is not the only thing.

And there are plenty of guys with little or no money getting great women.

it is about, money doing the talking.

why don't I have to try, when I have enough money?

Sounds like you hire hookers when you have money.

You have been whining about the same thing for 2 or 3 years. Why are you so broke?

a longitudinal study?

ok. i will be man and not whine about it anymore.

if only,

i could find nice girls in modern times.

 

[WinterBorn]

you claim that. you tell stories. it is about economics.

I have posted truth. It is about women choosing who can lay hands on them. “Nice” May be something they want. But it is not the only thing.

And there are plenty of guys with little or no money getting great women.

it is about, money doing the talking.

why don't I have to try, when I have enough money?

Sounds like you hire hookers when you have money.

You have been whining about the same thing for 2 or 3 years. Why are you so broke?

a longitudinal study?

ok. i will be man and not whine about it anymore.

if only,

i could find nice girls in modern times.

You could find nice girls, if you tried. But you are determined to ignore the way things actually are. You want to make it about money. It isn't.

 

[danielpalos]

yes, it is. capital should do the heavy lifting not fools with low numbers and little practice.

 

[WinterBorn]

yes, it is. capital should do the heavy lifting not fools with low numbers and little practice.

If you make it about capital, it will be about capital. The answer there is find a way to earn more money. That, apparently, hasn't worked out for you.

Otherwise, just understand how things actually work. Men pursue women. Women have what you want. They aren't going to pursue you unless you are what they want. Not just a "nice guy", but attractive, congenial, hygienic, and funny. If you had those attributes, you would not have started all this "Why won't they make an appointment to let me massage them and play with their pussy?". If you won't pursue them, other men will. And those men get laid, while you makes posts on a forum about how equality in the nonporn sector is unfair.

The secret is to figure out what you have to offer. If you have nothing to offer, then guys who do will get it and you won't. And rightfully so.

 

[danielpalos]

they know how to make appointments.

 

[WinterBorn]

they know how to make appointments.

Yes they do. But obviously they won't make appointments unless they want to make one. Just because you want them to make one, does not make them want to make one.

 

[danielpalos]

they know how to make appointments.

Yes they do. But obviously they won't make appointments unless they want to make one. Just because you want them to make one, does not make them want to make one.

no kidding?

anyway; what do think of travel reimbursement, if you happen to find a nice nice, someplace else?