danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Jan 24, 2015
- 73,961
- 5,055
Nothing but diversion?Terms of the Contract of Carriage which Dao agreed to when he bought his ticket.What exigency was there to forcibly remove a passenger, under our form of Capitalism, besides the "bottom line"?No. Why would I want to be a fucking politician or a fucking lawyer?Are you, "running for Congress"? They cannot tell the difference between the common offense and the common defense.
There was no exigency requiring that passenger be forcibly removed; only the "bottom line".
Disagreed, as I've pointed out, but unlike you, I won't rush to judgment, browbeat people with an uninformed and completely wrong opinion. I'm content to let this play out over the summer.
Just so we're clear and more fucking morons don't go high and left with exaggerated claims, I disagree with the way the O'hare aviation officer handled this. There were better and smarter ways to get Dao off the aircraft.
What exigency was there to forcibly remove a passenger, under our form of Capitalism, besides the "bottom line"?
Force majeure is generally intended to include occurrences beyond the reasonable control of a party, and therefore would not cover: ...