InfoWars Ban: CNN, Democrats Successfully Lobby Big Tech To Censor Their Critics...

[ThisIsMe]

I know Democrats are applauding this, but this is very bad for everyone. Democrats are also currently preparing legislation which will result in a complete Government-takeover of the Internet. If they do win Congress back, we're all doomed.

[emoji38]

It's clear that the NRA and white supremicists and Jones can't find the capital to start their own social media platforms. (-:

You really shouldn't be cheering censorship. It's bad for you too.

It's not censorship when private citizens make choices in their own self-interests. It's illustrative that the Founders' beliefs still live.

So then you agree that those bakers should not have been sued for refusing to bake gay wedding cakes right? After all, they were private citizens making choices in their own self interest....

 

[ThisIsMe]

I know Democrats are applauding this, but this is very bad for everyone. Democrats are also currently preparing legislation which will result in a complete Government-takeover of the Internet. If they do win Congress back, we're all doomed.

[emoji38]

It's clear that the NRA and white supremicists and Jones can't find the capital to start their own social media platforms. (-:

You really shouldn't be cheering censorship. It's bad for you too.

You really should change your diaper. And while you're down there grow a pair to put in them.

Once again there ain't no "censorship" involved. If you started posting about disembowling kittens the site would probably ban you, and rightly so. It would be something they prefer not to be associated with, simple as that. That doesn't prevent you from doing it on your own website where you're already selling goat testicle operations; it simply takes USMB away as a tool to do it.

Yes!!! I'm so glad you agree. Businesses SHOULD be allowed to exercise their rights to serve or refuse service to people, based on their rights as PRIVATE business owners.

 

[Pilot1]

Maybe conservatives should be a protected class like Blacks, Women, Gays, etc. It seems that some animals are more equal than others.

 

[sartre play]

Felt really bad for the man that went to the pizza place with a gun to stop the sex ring in the basement of a pizza place that has no basement, & no sex ring. he had a wife & two little children, his life is ruined, and his wife & childern are harmed. this is not ok, what kind of week mind are effected by this kind of lie who are the people who buy into this? don't understand how an Alex Jones could gain an audience.

 

[MisterBeale]

Socialists are the most cowardly motherfuckers on the planet… They can’t tolerate anybody that disagrees with them....

Capitalist Youtube shuts down Alex Jones
Republican conclusion Socialists did this..

Capitalist Hollywood promotes Liberal values.
Republican conclusion Socialists did this..

Capitalists hire millions of illegal immigrants.
Republican conclusion Socialists did this..

Capitalists outsource millions of American jobs.
Republican conclusion Socialists did this.

Na, not really
Much more like national socialists, all for the good of the collective

I thought it was more along the lines of the Individual freedom of the minority, as in individual freedom for Gay Marriages, Muslim refugees, Illegal Mexicans, Black gang-bangers etc.

I’m an libertarian, All those issues are states issues not federal issues

Socialists are the most cowardly motherfuckers on the planet… They can’t tolerate anybody that disagrees with them....

Capitalist Youtube shuts down Alex Jones
Republican conclusion Socialists did this..

Capitalist Hollywood promotes Liberal values.
Republican conclusion Socialists did this..

Capitalists hire millions of illegal immigrants.
Republican conclusion Socialists did this..

Capitalists outsource millions of American jobs.
Republican conclusion Socialists did this.

Na, not really
Much more like national socialists, all for the good of the collective

I thought it was more along the lines of the Individual freedom of the minority, as in individual freedom for Gay Marriages, Muslim refugees, Illegal Mexicans, Black gang-bangers etc.

I’m an libertarian, All those issues are states issues not federal issues

Hardly an answer.

The Fascist answers are the best, as usual.

Regulate these Internet medias, like Youtube, Facebook, Instagram, so they don't promote Liberal values.

Regulate Hollywood, so they don't promote Liberal values.

Regulate businesses, so they don't hire Illegals.

Regulate the Porn industry, so they don't produce hard-core Porn filth.

Regulate businesses, so they don't outsource jobs.

Regulate the Music industry, so they don't produce Gangster rap filth.

Regulate the Abortion industry, so they don't produce Abortion.

Regulate the TV media, so they don't promote Liberal values.

I'm not sure, but I think that is what they want.

Problem, reaction, solution.

Senate Democrats Are Circulating Plans For Government Takeover Of The Internet
Senate Democrats Are Circulating Plans For Government Takeover Of The Internet

Senate Democrats Are Circulating Plans for Government Takeover of the Internet: Reason Roundup
Senate Democrats Are Circulating Plans for Government Takeover of the Internet: Reason Roundup

 

[busybee01]

Lol. CNN is vetted and respected world wide . Infowars has been exposed as liars many times over.

Oh, it’s also a scam where that tool sells all those fake products .

The Clinton news network Is really an opinion network...
Quit falling down the well

100% incorrect. But thanks for showing us who you are by not having the balls to call out Infowars for what it is.

Info wars/Alex Jones is absolutely harmless, just another opinion site. But then again progressives can’t tolerate anyone that disagrees with them, so what happened was not unexpected...

Infowars is a conduit for alt-right hate speech. He is not entitled to a platform to spew his hate.

Lol
The most hate filled are the progressives, second only to Muslims... He is harmless. Now run along back to your safe space

He is not harmless. He is a member of the alt-right.

 

[busybee01]

Infowars is a conduit for alt-right hate speech. He is not entitled to a platform to spew his hate

I find this much more hateful and dangerous....


and this
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/06/09/maher_im_hoping_for_a_crashing_economy_so_we_can_get_rid_of_trump_bring_on_the_recession.html

IT is fact. His rights are not being violated. Twitter and Facebook are not run by government. He is a part of the alt-right.

 

[busybee01]

Fascist behavior will not be rewarded at the ballot box.....why do libs forget that we have ways of getting informed outside of the fake news...?

Good, then you agree that YouTube managing its own accounts isn't "censoring" jack shit.

See if you can get that through to the OP and his ilk.

They'll get the message. They'll also get the anti-trust sledgehammer.

Anti-trust is not a political weapon. Anyone can compete if they desire.

 

[MisterBeale]

Limiting access to information is bad for you too. These types of bannings are Un-American.

Alex Jones is un-American.
If you support him then you must also believe that Sandy Hook was a hoax?
He's getting his ass sued and rightly so by those families who lost their kids.
Now THAT is American.

There's a good analogy. There's some wackball here who buys (and sells) that whole Sandy Hook Hoax song and dance. I put him on Ignore for that reason, because an asshat who would spit in the face of grieving parents disgusts me.

That doesn't mean I'm "censoring" the asshat selling the hoax. He still posts whatever diarrhea he posts; I just don't have to wade through it.

Jones is like Trump - First and foremost a snake oil salesman.
He worked overtime to get the boot - with increasingly hateful and violent rhetoric.
Now he will cash in - just like he does with everything else.
Apparently his fans love to be picked up by the feet and have the change shaken out of their pockets.

We need full access to even the information we don't like. It gives us a much better chance of achieving informed opinions and beliefs. These types of bannings are Un-American, and bad for all of us in the end.

So your computer is incapable of surfing to InfoBoors.com? What, did CNN send a tech to break into your house under cover of darkness to hack your browser?

As I noted before, and there's no way to wiggle out of this --- your quest has nothing to do with the content; you're just butthurt over the idea that not as many other people will see it.

That's THEIR business. Not yours.

While I agree with you on a philosophical level, I don't really think you have been paying attention completely with what has been going on.

Platforms such as Facebook, Apple iTunes, and YouTube own such a large part of market share, they have a real ability to influence the public opinion.

As such, they aren't merely just, "businesses" anymore, they have become de facto public utilities.

I have watched over the past decade many of my formerly independent minded friends become more radically left minded due to social media because they refuse to go outside of these platforms.

I am not one of these folks. I always go outside of the box because I know how these platforms work and I know how the major media companies and major tech companies work. I know how essential it is to find information from all sources. It shocks me to find that you believe that this is a beneficial development.

Alex Jones is not, and has not been the only victim of this blacklisting and shadow banning. If they can do this to him, they can do this to anyone, at anytime in the future. Now it is Alex Jones, and they use it for his unpopular speech, what happens when they start to use it against those who protest against a war against Iran? Will you be so happy to have those voices marginalized so they don't come up in searches in Google, or in videos on FB, iTunes, or YouTube?

The great thing about the internet was the unpopular POV made it to the masses, but now, only the corporate CFR, MSM establishment POV will be allowed. That is what is coming. And if you disagree with neoliberalism at home, or neoconservatism abroad? Your voice will once again be silenced.

Now That Facebook, YouTube And Apple Have Come For Alex Jones, They Will Start Coming After The Rest Of Us

Now That Facebook, YouTube And Apple Have Come For Alex Jones, They Will Start Coming After The Rest Of Us

". . . Right now, the global elite do not have control of the White House, but they have discovered a powerful new weapon in the tech companies. They are trying to use this new weapon to smash Alex Jones and other top conservative voices, and they are doing it with a tyrannical flair that is absolutely frightening. I think that it was quite appropriate that the official WikiLeaks Twitter account made a parallel between this purge and an old Star Wars movie…

The empire strikes back: Apple, Spotify, Facebook and Google/Youtube all purge Infowars/Alex Jones. Yes, Infowars has frequent nonsense, but also a state power critique. Which publisher in the world with millions of subscribers is next to be wiped out for cultural transgression?

And it is quite noteworthy that this comes almost exactly three months before the mid-term elections.

Do you think that is just a coincidence?

After all of the uproar about “election interference”, now the big tech companies are overtly doing it very publicly and in a way that nobody can misunderstand.

The biggest reason why they are lashing out at Alex Jones, Mike Adams and a whole host of other top conservative voices is because Donald Trump never would have gotten elected without them. I guess they figure that if they can start silencing some of those voices that they can turn future elections in their favor.

If it was just a few conservative voices that were being censored, that would be one thing. But the truth is that hundreds and hundreds of conservatives have had Facebook pages taken down, YouTube accounts terminated and Twitter accounts shadowbanned. I won’t repeat all of the information that I have previously published on this topic in this article. Instead, if you would like to learn more I would recommend checking out some of my previous articles…

• “This Is The Worst Purge Of Conservative Voices In The History Of The Internet”
• “Governments And Social Media Companies Are Collaborating To Censor Anyone That Would Dare To Question Mainstream Media Narratives”
• “The Big Social Media Companies Are Being Used As A Weapon To Advance The Agenda Of The New World Order”
• “The Censorship Is Real – EndOfTheAmericanDream.com Is Being Completely Blocked By Library Internet Filters”

In the end, this is not about Alex Jones.

This is about a once free society that is becoming more Orwellian with each passing day.

Now that they have come for Alex Jones, they aren’t going to stop.

It might not be tomorrow, but eventually they are going to come for you.

I would like to end this article with a few words from Dr. Michael Brown’s excellent article about all of this censorship…"

 

[Marion Morrison]

Fascist behavior will not be rewarded at the ballot box.....why do libs forget that we have ways of getting informed outside of the fake news...?

Good, then you agree that YouTube managing its own accounts isn't "censoring" jack shit.

See if you can get that through to the OP and his ilk.

They'll get the message. They'll also get the anti-trust sledgehammer.

Anti-trust is not a political weapon. Anyone can compete if they desire.

Apparently, you don't know much about anti-trust laws.

No, it's not a political weapon, it's a financial weapon to level the playing field.

Should have been used years ago on telecommunications companies, and Google and Apple.

Google and Apple are using their services as a political weapon.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Infowars is a conduit for alt-right hate speech. He is not entitled to a platform to spew his hate

I find this much more hateful and dangerous....


and this
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/06/09/maher_im_hoping_for_a_crashing_economy_so_we_can_get_rid_of_trump_bring_on_the_recession.html

IT is fact. His rights are not being violated. Twitter and Facebook are not run by government. He is a part of the alt-right.

Yes!! More and more they are coming out and admitting that private businesses should be allowed to operate as they see fit, even bakeries refusing to bake cakes for certain people. See! Public accomodation is not "all that" after all!

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Yeah...those Conservatives really need to stop shooting up Congressional baseball practices.
Shits getting crazy ain't it?

Just another law abiding gun owner. Right ?

Nope...just another crazy leftist such as yourself.
You dont own any firearms do you?
Pretty sure the feds should pay you a visit before the midterms if you do.

If he’s a crazy lefty he wouldn’t own a gun.

It’s you righties who say we all need guns to fight off an oppressive government. They guys just doing what you preach .

Lefties are all hypocrites

True or false . Righties day we need guns to fight off the government.

Absolutely !!!
See who wins when it comes to shooting back.

 

[MisterBeale]

Here is a legitimate progressive that gets it correct.

 

[Pogo]

Alex Jones is un-American.
If you support him then you must also believe that Sandy Hook was a hoax?
He's getting his ass sued and rightly so by those families who lost their kids.
Now THAT is American.

There's a good analogy. There's some wackball here who buys (and sells) that whole Sandy Hook Hoax song and dance. I put him on Ignore for that reason, because an asshat who would spit in the face of grieving parents disgusts me.

That doesn't mean I'm "censoring" the asshat selling the hoax. He still posts whatever diarrhea he posts; I just don't have to wade through it.

Jones is like Trump - First and foremost a snake oil salesman.
He worked overtime to get the boot - with increasingly hateful and violent rhetoric.
Now he will cash in - just like he does with everything else.
Apparently his fans love to be picked up by the feet and have the change shaken out of their pockets.

We need full access to even the information we don't like. It gives us a much better chance of achieving informed opinions and beliefs. These types of bannings are Un-American, and bad for all of us in the end.

So your computer is incapable of surfing to InfoBoors.com? What, did CNN send a tech to break into your house under cover of darkness to hack your browser?

As I noted before, and there's no way to wiggle out of this --- your quest has nothing to do with the content; you're just butthurt over the idea that not as many other people will see it.

That's THEIR business. Not yours.

While I agree with you on a philosophical level, I don't really think you have been paying attention completely with what has been going on.

Platforms such as Facebook, Apple iTunes, and YouTube own such a large part of market share, they have a real ability to influence the public opinion.

As such, they aren't merely just, "businesses" anymore, they have become de facto public utilities.

I have watched over the past decade many of my formerly independent minded friends become more radically left minded due to social media because they refuse to go outside of these platforms.

I am not one of these folks. I always go outside of the box because I know how these platforms work and I know how the major media companies and major tech companies work. I know how essential it is to find information from all sources. It shocks me to find that you believe that this is a beneficial development.

Hardly. I've never implied any such thing and I use zero of those toys myself, having considered them an abject waste of time from the beginning. But since you draw the comparison, television as propaganda tool should certainly receive the same criticism, shouldn't it?

But ultimately that's up to the viewer, the Nosebooker, the Twit, to winnow his/her info from the chaff. I don't hold an opinion on whether Alex John Brinkley Jones should be on YouTube or not. It's not my site. That's up to YouTube, simple as that. Or Fecesbook or television, whatever the medium.

I've been pointing out all day that this butthurt whining is not about Jones' content at all, but rather about controlling how many people might see it. Their diapers are chafed because without YouTube (apparently) nobody will know the wondrous insight of a grown man who sells grunting noises and primal screams so he can set up his John Brinkley routine (which doesn't say a lot for the strength of Brinkl... uh, Jones' argument, does it). So ultimately it's not about Alex Jones' voice; it's about their control freak designs on somebody else's platform; dictating how they (YouTube et al) may be allowed to use their own site.

It's the flip side of the coin of the Sean Spicer kerfuffle last week, where Spicer threatened to sue the Associated Press for passing on --- not originating but passing on -- an existing story of an incident where Spicey got accused. In that case Spicey wanted to control how much of the public would NOT get to read the story; in this case Jones' sycophants want to control how much of the public DOES. And in each case the info is already readily available for anyone who seeks it. In neither case is it about the content; it's all about control of what gets disseminated, by control freaks who simply do not have that privilege -- trying to dictate what may be released to, or suppressed from, the masses.

If some clown joined this site and started posting paeans to necrophilia, the site could and probably would ban him, and it would be within its rights to do so. Just because they provide a platform for discussion doesn't mean they have to tolerate literally anything on it; it's their site. Same thing with YouTube.

Alex Jones is not, and has not been the only victim of this blacklisting and shadow banning. If they can do this to him, they can do this to anyone, at anytime in the future. Now it is Alex Jones, and they use it for his unpopular speech, what happens when they start to use it against those who protest against a war against Iran? Will you be so happy to have those voices marginalized so they don't come up in searches in Google, or in videos on FB, iTunes, or YouTube?

The great thing about the internet was the unpopular POV made it to the masses, but now, only the corporate CFR, MSM establishment POV will be allowed. That is what is coming. And if you disagree with neoliberalism at home, or neoconservatism abroad? Your voice will once again be silenced.

Now That Facebook, YouTube And Apple Have Come For Alex Jones, They Will Start Coming After The Rest Of Us

Now That Facebook, YouTube And Apple Have Come For Alex Jones, They Will Start Coming After The Rest Of Us

". . . Right now, the global elite do not have control of the White House, but they have discovered a powerful new weapon in the tech companies. They are trying to use this new weapon to smash Alex Jones and other top conservative voices, and they are doing it with a tyrannical flair that is absolutely frightening. I think that it was quite appropriate that the official WikiLeaks Twitter account made a parallel between this purge and an old Star Wars movie…

The empire strikes back: Apple, Spotify, Facebook and Google/Youtube all purge Infowars/Alex Jones. Yes, Infowars has frequent nonsense, but also a state power critique. Which publisher in the world with millions of subscribers is next to be wiped out for cultural transgression?

And it is quite noteworthy that this comes almost exactly three months before the mid-term elections.

Do you think that is just a coincidence?

After all of the uproar about “election interference”, now the big tech companies are overtly doing it very publicly and in a way that nobody can misunderstand.

The biggest reason why they are lashing out at Alex Jones, Mike Adams and a whole host of other top conservative voices is because Donald Trump never would have gotten elected without them. I guess they figure that if they can start silencing some of those voices that they can turn future elections in their favor.

If it was just a few conservative voices that were being censored, that would be one thing. But the truth is that hundreds and hundreds of conservatives have had Facebook pages taken down, YouTube accounts terminated and Twitter accounts shadowbanned. I won’t repeat all of the information that I have previously published on this topic in this article. Instead, if you would like to learn more I would recommend checking out some of my previous articles…

• “This Is The Worst Purge Of Conservative Voices In The History Of The Internet”
• “Governments And Social Media Companies Are Collaborating To Censor Anyone That Would Dare To Question Mainstream Media Narratives”
• “The Big Social Media Companies Are Being Used As A Weapon To Advance The Agenda Of The New World Order”
• “The Censorship Is Real – EndOfTheAmericanDream.com Is Being Completely Blocked By Library Internet Filters”

In the end, this is not about Alex Jones.

This is about a once free society that is becoming more Orwellian with each passing day.

Now that they have come for Alex Jones, they aren’t going to stop.

It might not be tomorrow, but eventually they are going to come for you.

I would like to end this article with a few words from Dr. Michael Brown’s excellent article about all of this censorship…"

WAY too long; didn't read, sorry. Even I don't get that longwinded....

But as far as 'they're coming for (whoever)" --- how come the same wags are on the exact opposite side with the NFL kneelers? Irony, that....

 

[ThisIsMe]

Interesting, this is exactly why InfoWars was created in the first place. There is an Information War on, for your mind. I try to tell folks, no Communist/Democrat will ever stand for the Constitution. In fact, they despise it. This is just one more example of that. Don't like what they're saying? Have them banned. Hopefully this won't be allowed to stand. Gotta keep on fighting the bastards.


Big tech’s coordinated purge of InfoWars — which was hit by bans from Apple, Facebook, Spotify and YouTube in rapid succession — did not occur in a vacuum. On this issue, Silicon Valley bowed to CNN journalists and Democrat politicians who ceaselessly lobbied for the site to be censored.

It’s a sign of how the concentration of power in America has shifted from big government to big tech that politicians are now lobbying tech companies rather than the other way round, but that’s exactly what happened over the course of the past few months, as Democrats applied relentless pressure on Facebook and other Silicon Valley giants to censor InfoWars.

Chief among them was Democratic Congressman Ted Deutch (D-FL), who demanded that a Facebook representative “explain” their decision not to ban InfoWars at a House Judiciary Committee hearing on social media censorship last month. Calling Jones as “well-known conspiracy theorist” whose “brand is bullying,” Deutch also demanded Google’s representative explain how many strikes it would take for a channel on Google-owned YouTube to be deleted...

Read More:
InfoWars Ban - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

You don't know much about 'Big tech'...do you?

Spotify is NOT based in Silicone Valley. It's not even based in America. It's a Swedish corporation.

Spotify - Wikipedia


And so what if these corporations listened to their customers and gave whacko dude the boot? That is free enterprise.

They did not do this because of what politician's said. They did this to placate their customers. Guaranteed.

And again, that is free enterprise and I see nothing wrong with it.

Companies/corporations should be able include or exclude any video content they wish inside their corporations.

Or are you now saying that corporations should not be allowed to control the video content they project/post? Yes or no, please?

You’re missing the point, the hypocrisy of the left is on full display here

I got the point...I reject it.

This is free enterprise...period.

You just don't like whom they banned.

YouTube has banned LOTS of far lefties from it's site...TONS of them.

They banned him because Alex Jones disagrees with them, They will never tolerate anyone that disagrees with them. There’s nothing more cowardly than a progressive

You clearly do not watch YouTube much.

LOTS of people on YouTube post videos that knock/insult YouTube.


And, again, YouTube (which is owned by Google) can ban ANYONE THEY WANT. IT'S THEIR CORPORATION.

That is free enterprise.

You don't like it - don't use Google/YouTube.

That is your right as a consumer.

Folks, I'm not sure what to say here. There must be something going on in the democratic party, a revolution perhaps? So many are coming out in support of businesses exercising their rights to conduct operations as they see fit, as a private business.

Now we can move forward with a free market, that allows citizens to choose what they want, and private businesses to conduct business as they want, and the citizens can dictate which businesses thrive or fall, with their wallet.

 

[Marion Morrison]

There's a good analogy. There's some wackball here who buys (and sells) that whole Sandy Hook Hoax song and dance. I put him on Ignore for that reason, because an asshat who would spit in the face of grieving parents disgusts me.

That doesn't mean I'm "censoring" the asshat selling the hoax. He still posts whatever diarrhea he posts; I just don't have to wade through it.

Jones is like Trump - First and foremost a snake oil salesman.
He worked overtime to get the boot - with increasingly hateful and violent rhetoric.
Now he will cash in - just like he does with everything else.
Apparently his fans love to be picked up by the feet and have the change shaken out of their pockets.

We need full access to even the information we don't like. It gives us a much better chance of achieving informed opinions and beliefs. These types of bannings are Un-American, and bad for all of us in the end.

So your computer is incapable of surfing to InfoBoors.com? What, did CNN send a tech to break into your house under cover of darkness to hack your browser?

As I noted before, and there's no way to wiggle out of this --- your quest has nothing to do with the content; you're just butthurt over the idea that not as many other people will see it.

That's THEIR business. Not yours.

While I agree with you on a philosophical level, I don't really think you have been paying attention completely with what has been going on.

Platforms such as Facebook, Apple iTunes, and YouTube own such a large part of market share, they have a real ability to influence the public opinion.

As such, they aren't merely just, "businesses" anymore, they have become de facto public utilities.

I have watched over the past decade many of my formerly independent minded friends become more radically left minded due to social media because they refuse to go outside of these platforms.

I am not one of these folks. I always go outside of the box because I know how these platforms work and I know how the major media companies and major tech companies work. I know how essential it is to find information from all sources. It shocks me to find that you believe that this is a beneficial development.

Hardly. I've never implied any such thing and I use zero of those toys myself, having considered them an abject waste of time from the beginning. But since you draw the comparison, television as propaganda tool should certainly receive the same criticism, shouldn't it?

But ultimately that's up to the viewer, the Nosebooker, the Twit, to winnow his/her info from the chaff. I don't hold an opinion on whether Alex John Brinkley Jones should be on YouTube or not. It's not my site. That's up to YouTube, simple as that. Or Fecesbook or television, whatever the medium.

I've been pointing out all day that this butthurt whining is not about Jones' content at all, but rather about controlling how many people might see it. Their diapers are chafed because without YouTube (apparently) nobody will know the wondrous insight of a grown man who sells grunting noises and primal screams so he can set up his John Brinkley routine (which doesn't say a lot for the strength of Brinkl... uh, Jones' argument, does it). So ultimately it's not about Alex Jones' voice; it's about their control freak designs on somebody else's platform; dictating how they (YouTube et al) may be allowed to use their own site.

It's the flip side of the coin of the Sean Spicer kerfuffle last week, where Spicer threatened to sue the Associated Press for passing on --- not originating but passing on -- an existing story of an incident where Spicey got accused. In that case Spicey wanted to control how much of the public would NOT get to read the story; in this case Jones' sycophants want to control how much of the public DOES. And in each case the info is already readily available for anyone who seeks it.

If some clown joined this site and started posting paeans to necrophilia, the site could and probably would ban him, and it would be within its rights to do so. Just because they provide a platform for discussion doesn't mean they have to tolerate literally anything on it; it's their site. Same thing with YouTube.

Alex Jones is not, and has not been the only victim of this blacklisting and shadow banning. If they can do this to him, they can do this to anyone, at anytime in the future. Now it is Alex Jones, and they use it for his unpopular speech, what happens when they start to use it against those who protest against a war against Iran? Will you be so happy to have those voices marginalized so they don't come up in searches in Google, or in videos on FB, iTunes, or YouTube?

The great thing about the internet was the unpopular POV made it to the masses, but now, only the corporate CFR, MSM establishment POV will be allowed. That is what is coming. And if you disagree with neoliberalism at home, or neoconservatism abroad? Your voice will once again be silenced.

Now That Facebook, YouTube And Apple Have Come For Alex Jones, They Will Start Coming After The Rest Of Us

Now That Facebook, YouTube And Apple Have Come For Alex Jones, They Will Start Coming After The Rest Of Us

". . . Right now, the global elite do not have control of the White House, but they have discovered a powerful new weapon in the tech companies. They are trying to use this new weapon to smash Alex Jones and other top conservative voices, and they are doing it with a tyrannical flair that is absolutely frightening. I think that it was quite appropriate that the official WikiLeaks Twitter account made a parallel between this purge and an old Star Wars movie…

The empire strikes back: Apple, Spotify, Facebook and Google/Youtube all purge Infowars/Alex Jones. Yes, Infowars has frequent nonsense, but also a state power critique. Which publisher in the world with millions of subscribers is next to be wiped out for cultural transgression?

And it is quite noteworthy that this comes almost exactly three months before the mid-term elections.

Do you think that is just a coincidence?

After all of the uproar about “election interference”, now the big tech companies are overtly doing it very publicly and in a way that nobody can misunderstand.

The biggest reason why they are lashing out at Alex Jones, Mike Adams and a whole host of other top conservative voices is because Donald Trump never would have gotten elected without them. I guess they figure that if they can start silencing some of those voices that they can turn future elections in their favor.

If it was just a few conservative voices that were being censored, that would be one thing. But the truth is that hundreds and hundreds of conservatives have had Facebook pages taken down, YouTube accounts terminated and Twitter accounts shadowbanned. I won’t repeat all of the information that I have previously published on this topic in this article. Instead, if you would like to learn more I would recommend checking out some of my previous articles…

• “This Is The Worst Purge Of Conservative Voices In The History Of The Internet”
• “Governments And Social Media Companies Are Collaborating To Censor Anyone That Would Dare To Question Mainstream Media Narratives”
• “The Big Social Media Companies Are Being Used As A Weapon To Advance The Agenda Of The New World Order”
• “The Censorship Is Real – EndOfTheAmericanDream.com Is Being Completely Blocked By Library Internet Filters”

In the end, this is not about Alex Jones.

This is about a once free society that is becoming more Orwellian with each passing day.

Now that they have come for Alex Jones, they aren’t going to stop.

It might not be tomorrow, but eventually they are going to come for you.

I would like to end this article with a few words from Dr. Michael Brown’s excellent article about all of this censorship…"

WAY too long; didn't read, sorry. Even I don't get that longwinded....

But as far as 'they're coming for (whoever)" --- how come the same wags are on the exact opposite side with the NFL kneelers? Irony, that....

Translation: Pogo has TDS so bad, bad enough to become a fascist faggot.

 

[Pogo]

I know Democrats are applauding this, but this is very bad for everyone. Democrats are also currently preparing legislation which will result in a complete Government-takeover of the Internet. If they do win Congress back, we're all doomed.

[emoji38]

It's the truth. They are currently preparing the legislation for when or if they win Congress back. This censorship is bad for everyone. You shouldn't be cheering it.

Oh I'm not. I'm mocking your mockable post. That's why you put it there, isn't it?

Hate to break not-even-breaking news but some platform such as YouTube deciding how their service will be used and how it won't, ain't "censorship". Might want to take a trip to the Dollar Store and make a diaper run.

Lol, hold on here. In this very forum, not very long ago, we were debating gay people and bakeries, and public accomodation laws, and the left said that all businesses had to provide their service without exception to anyone and everyone. NOW that it benefits you, selective accomodation is ok?

I see how it is now....lol

Uh ----- no, you don't. You see, I'm an individual, not a direction. "The Borg" is a science fiction creation; it doesn't actually exist, nor does the world work that way. My stance never changed.

 

[Pogo]

Jones is like Trump - First and foremost a snake oil salesman.
He worked overtime to get the boot - with increasingly hateful and violent rhetoric.
Now he will cash in - just like he does with everything else.
Apparently his fans love to be picked up by the feet and have the change shaken out of their pockets.

We need full access to even the information we don't like. It gives us a much better chance of achieving informed opinions and beliefs. These types of bannings are Un-American, and bad for all of us in the end.

So your computer is incapable of surfing to InfoBoors.com? What, did CNN send a tech to break into your house under cover of darkness to hack your browser?

As I noted before, and there's no way to wiggle out of this --- your quest has nothing to do with the content; you're just butthurt over the idea that not as many other people will see it.

That's THEIR business. Not yours.

While I agree with you on a philosophical level, I don't really think you have been paying attention completely with what has been going on.

Platforms such as Facebook, Apple iTunes, and YouTube own such a large part of market share, they have a real ability to influence the public opinion.

As such, they aren't merely just, "businesses" anymore, they have become de facto public utilities.

I have watched over the past decade many of my formerly independent minded friends become more radically left minded due to social media because they refuse to go outside of these platforms.

I am not one of these folks. I always go outside of the box because I know how these platforms work and I know how the major media companies and major tech companies work. I know how essential it is to find information from all sources. It shocks me to find that you believe that this is a beneficial development.

Hardly. I've never implied any such thing and I use zero of those toys myself, having considered them an abject waste of time from the beginning. But since you draw the comparison, television as propaganda tool should certainly receive the same criticism, shouldn't it?

But ultimately that's up to the viewer, the Nosebooker, the Twit, to winnow his/her info from the chaff. I don't hold an opinion on whether Alex John Brinkley Jones should be on YouTube or not. It's not my site. That's up to YouTube, simple as that. Or Fecesbook or television, whatever the medium.

I've been pointing out all day that this butthurt whining is not about Jones' content at all, but rather about controlling how many people might see it. Their diapers are chafed because without YouTube (apparently) nobody will know the wondrous insight of a grown man who sells grunting noises and primal screams so he can set up his John Brinkley routine (which doesn't say a lot for the strength of Brinkl... uh, Jones' argument, does it). So ultimately it's not about Alex Jones' voice; it's about their control freak designs on somebody else's platform; dictating how they (YouTube et al) may be allowed to use their own site.

It's the flip side of the coin of the Sean Spicer kerfuffle last week, where Spicer threatened to sue the Associated Press for passing on --- not originating but passing on -- an existing story of an incident where Spicey got accused. In that case Spicey wanted to control how much of the public would NOT get to read the story; in this case Jones' sycophants want to control how much of the public DOES. And in each case the info is already readily available for anyone who seeks it.

If some clown joined this site and started posting paeans to necrophilia, the site could and probably would ban him, and it would be within its rights to do so. Just because they provide a platform for discussion doesn't mean they have to tolerate literally anything on it; it's their site. Same thing with YouTube.

Alex Jones is not, and has not been the only victim of this blacklisting and shadow banning. If they can do this to him, they can do this to anyone, at anytime in the future. Now it is Alex Jones, and they use it for his unpopular speech, what happens when they start to use it against those who protest against a war against Iran? Will you be so happy to have those voices marginalized so they don't come up in searches in Google, or in videos on FB, iTunes, or YouTube?

The great thing about the internet was the unpopular POV made it to the masses, but now, only the corporate CFR, MSM establishment POV will be allowed. That is what is coming. And if you disagree with neoliberalism at home, or neoconservatism abroad? Your voice will once again be silenced.

Now That Facebook, YouTube And Apple Have Come For Alex Jones, They Will Start Coming After The Rest Of Us

Now That Facebook, YouTube And Apple Have Come For Alex Jones, They Will Start Coming After The Rest Of Us

". . . Right now, the global elite do not have control of the White House, but they have discovered a powerful new weapon in the tech companies. They are trying to use this new weapon to smash Alex Jones and other top conservative voices, and they are doing it with a tyrannical flair that is absolutely frightening. I think that it was quite appropriate that the official WikiLeaks Twitter account made a parallel between this purge and an old Star Wars movie…

The empire strikes back: Apple, Spotify, Facebook and Google/Youtube all purge Infowars/Alex Jones. Yes, Infowars has frequent nonsense, but also a state power critique. Which publisher in the world with millions of subscribers is next to be wiped out for cultural transgression?

And it is quite noteworthy that this comes almost exactly three months before the mid-term elections.

Do you think that is just a coincidence?

After all of the uproar about “election interference”, now the big tech companies are overtly doing it very publicly and in a way that nobody can misunderstand.

The biggest reason why they are lashing out at Alex Jones, Mike Adams and a whole host of other top conservative voices is because Donald Trump never would have gotten elected without them. I guess they figure that if they can start silencing some of those voices that they can turn future elections in their favor.

If it was just a few conservative voices that were being censored, that would be one thing. But the truth is that hundreds and hundreds of conservatives have had Facebook pages taken down, YouTube accounts terminated and Twitter accounts shadowbanned. I won’t repeat all of the information that I have previously published on this topic in this article. Instead, if you would like to learn more I would recommend checking out some of my previous articles…

• “This Is The Worst Purge Of Conservative Voices In The History Of The Internet”
• “Governments And Social Media Companies Are Collaborating To Censor Anyone That Would Dare To Question Mainstream Media Narratives”
• “The Big Social Media Companies Are Being Used As A Weapon To Advance The Agenda Of The New World Order”
• “The Censorship Is Real – EndOfTheAmericanDream.com Is Being Completely Blocked By Library Internet Filters”

In the end, this is not about Alex Jones.

This is about a once free society that is becoming more Orwellian with each passing day.

Now that they have come for Alex Jones, they aren’t going to stop.

It might not be tomorrow, but eventually they are going to come for you.

I would like to end this article with a few words from Dr. Michael Brown’s excellent article about all of this censorship…"

WAY too long; didn't read, sorry. Even I don't get that longwinded....

But as far as 'they're coming for (whoever)" --- how come the same wags are on the exact opposite side with the NFL kneelers? Irony, that....

Translation: Pogo has TDS so bad, bad enough to become a fascist faggot.

Funny how all your posts invariably lead to faggotry. Like roads leading to Rome.

uh, not that there's anything wrong with that.

Boring though. But I guess that's life when you have no salient thoughts and your only goal is to come out on top in the monthly post count.

 

[Pogo]

Mark Warner wants the government to take over
His reasoning is that citizens are too dumb to fend for themselves.. His “proof” is that Trump won via dummies being duped by Russians and society as a whole must be protected from that

Link?

 

[Marion Morrison]

We need full access to even the information we don't like. It gives us a much better chance of achieving informed opinions and beliefs. These types of bannings are Un-American, and bad for all of us in the end.

So your computer is incapable of surfing to InfoBoors.com? What, did CNN send a tech to break into your house under cover of darkness to hack your browser?

As I noted before, and there's no way to wiggle out of this --- your quest has nothing to do with the content; you're just butthurt over the idea that not as many other people will see it.

That's THEIR business. Not yours.

While I agree with you on a philosophical level, I don't really think you have been paying attention completely with what has been going on.

Platforms such as Facebook, Apple iTunes, and YouTube own such a large part of market share, they have a real ability to influence the public opinion.

As such, they aren't merely just, "businesses" anymore, they have become de facto public utilities.

I have watched over the past decade many of my formerly independent minded friends become more radically left minded due to social media because they refuse to go outside of these platforms.

I am not one of these folks. I always go outside of the box because I know how these platforms work and I know how the major media companies and major tech companies work. I know how essential it is to find information from all sources. It shocks me to find that you believe that this is a beneficial development.

Hardly. I've never implied any such thing and I use zero of those toys myself, having considered them an abject waste of time from the beginning. But since you draw the comparison, television as propaganda tool should certainly receive the same criticism, shouldn't it?

But ultimately that's up to the viewer, the Nosebooker, the Twit, to winnow his/her info from the chaff. I don't hold an opinion on whether Alex John Brinkley Jones should be on YouTube or not. It's not my site. That's up to YouTube, simple as that. Or Fecesbook or television, whatever the medium.

I've been pointing out all day that this butthurt whining is not about Jones' content at all, but rather about controlling how many people might see it. Their diapers are chafed because without YouTube (apparently) nobody will know the wondrous insight of a grown man who sells grunting noises and primal screams so he can set up his John Brinkley routine (which doesn't say a lot for the strength of Brinkl... uh, Jones' argument, does it). So ultimately it's not about Alex Jones' voice; it's about their control freak designs on somebody else's platform; dictating how they (YouTube et al) may be allowed to use their own site.

It's the flip side of the coin of the Sean Spicer kerfuffle last week, where Spicer threatened to sue the Associated Press for passing on --- not originating but passing on -- an existing story of an incident where Spicey got accused. In that case Spicey wanted to control how much of the public would NOT get to read the story; in this case Jones' sycophants want to control how much of the public DOES. And in each case the info is already readily available for anyone who seeks it.

If some clown joined this site and started posting paeans to necrophilia, the site could and probably would ban him, and it would be within its rights to do so. Just because they provide a platform for discussion doesn't mean they have to tolerate literally anything on it; it's their site. Same thing with YouTube.

Alex Jones is not, and has not been the only victim of this blacklisting and shadow banning. If they can do this to him, they can do this to anyone, at anytime in the future. Now it is Alex Jones, and they use it for his unpopular speech, what happens when they start to use it against those who protest against a war against Iran? Will you be so happy to have those voices marginalized so they don't come up in searches in Google, or in videos on FB, iTunes, or YouTube?

The great thing about the internet was the unpopular POV made it to the masses, but now, only the corporate CFR, MSM establishment POV will be allowed. That is what is coming. And if you disagree with neoliberalism at home, or neoconservatism abroad? Your voice will once again be silenced.

Now That Facebook, YouTube And Apple Have Come For Alex Jones, They Will Start Coming After The Rest Of Us

Now That Facebook, YouTube And Apple Have Come For Alex Jones, They Will Start Coming After The Rest Of Us

". . . Right now, the global elite do not have control of the White House, but they have discovered a powerful new weapon in the tech companies. They are trying to use this new weapon to smash Alex Jones and other top conservative voices, and they are doing it with a tyrannical flair that is absolutely frightening. I think that it was quite appropriate that the official WikiLeaks Twitter account made a parallel between this purge and an old Star Wars movie…

The empire strikes back: Apple, Spotify, Facebook and Google/Youtube all purge Infowars/Alex Jones. Yes, Infowars has frequent nonsense, but also a state power critique. Which publisher in the world with millions of subscribers is next to be wiped out for cultural transgression?

And it is quite noteworthy that this comes almost exactly three months before the mid-term elections.

Do you think that is just a coincidence?

After all of the uproar about “election interference”, now the big tech companies are overtly doing it very publicly and in a way that nobody can misunderstand.

The biggest reason why they are lashing out at Alex Jones, Mike Adams and a whole host of other top conservative voices is because Donald Trump never would have gotten elected without them. I guess they figure that if they can start silencing some of those voices that they can turn future elections in their favor.

If it was just a few conservative voices that were being censored, that would be one thing. But the truth is that hundreds and hundreds of conservatives have had Facebook pages taken down, YouTube accounts terminated and Twitter accounts shadowbanned. I won’t repeat all of the information that I have previously published on this topic in this article. Instead, if you would like to learn more I would recommend checking out some of my previous articles…

• “This Is The Worst Purge Of Conservative Voices In The History Of The Internet”
• “Governments And Social Media Companies Are Collaborating To Censor Anyone That Would Dare To Question Mainstream Media Narratives”
• “The Big Social Media Companies Are Being Used As A Weapon To Advance The Agenda Of The New World Order”
• “The Censorship Is Real – EndOfTheAmericanDream.com Is Being Completely Blocked By Library Internet Filters”

In the end, this is not about Alex Jones.

This is about a once free society that is becoming more Orwellian with each passing day.

Now that they have come for Alex Jones, they aren’t going to stop.

It might not be tomorrow, but eventually they are going to come for you.

I would like to end this article with a few words from Dr. Michael Brown’s excellent article about all of this censorship…"

WAY too long; didn't read, sorry. Even I don't get that longwinded....

But as far as 'they're coming for (whoever)" --- how come the same wags are on the exact opposite side with the NFL kneelers? Irony, that....

Translation: Pogo has TDS so bad, bad enough to become a fascist faggot.

Funny how all your posts invariably lead to faggotry. Like roads leading to Rome.

uh, not that there's anything wrong with that.

Boring though. But I guess that's life when you have no salient thoughts and your only goal is to come out on top in the monthly post count.

Yeah, I guess you got tired of sucking dick years ago.

My point is that you are slyly supporting censorship. This is one of the worst days on the internet.

That RIPA/HIPA shit has nothing on this.