Just so I'm clear... are you saying that America is doing pretty well?I mean, what is incorrect about her statements?
LAURA INGRAHAM (HOST): People would argue that the whole world, and I would, that the whole world has been reshaped by people taking other people's land. I mean, it's called conquest....
They want to live in a fake world. As Trump always says, "You don't get do-overs." No do-overs, that's it. There was an argument, sometime -- I think it was the 1980s. There was a quote, you won, we lost, that's that. Describing world politics, we won, you lost, that's that. That's just the way it is.
Laura Ingraham on reparations: "It's called conquest ... we won, you lost, that's that"
Laura Ingraham Slams 'Preposterous' Reparations Calls: 'No Do-Overs. That's It.'
Nothing really incorrect about that. "Fairness" exists in the liberal mind only. Nature isn't fair. There are no "reparations" from the Crocodiles to the Wildebeest. That's it.
havent you called for
I mean, what is incorrect about her statements?
LAURA INGRAHAM (HOST): People would argue that the whole world, and I would, that the whole world has been reshaped by people taking other people's land. I mean, it's called conquest....
They want to live in a fake world. As Trump always says, "You don't get do-overs." No do-overs, that's it. There was an argument, sometime -- I think it was the 1980s. There was a quote, you won, we lost, that's that. Describing world politics, we won, you lost, that's that. That's just the way it is.
Laura Ingraham on reparations: "It's called conquest ... we won, you lost, that's that"
Laura Ingraham Slams 'Preposterous' Reparations Calls: 'No Do-Overs. That's It.'
Nothing really incorrect about that. "Fairness" exists in the liberal mind only. Nature isn't fair. There are no "reparations" from the Crocodiles to the Wildebeest. That's it.
You say that fair does not exist, and I agree. Yet you post about fair trade all the time.
Why is that?
If your IQ wasn't 12, you'd already understand that "fair trade" is just an euphemism for BALANCED trade. And that does not necessarily mean perfect 50/50, but whatever works best for both parties. Obviously, our trade with China is working GREAT for them, not so great for us.
Not so great for us?
we have a UE rate under 4%
we have more jobs than people to fill them
we are in the longest period of economic expansion in the history of the country
we had record setting financial markets (till the trade war started)
we are in the longest period of positive job growth in the history of our country.
all of that happened under the current trade deals.
Which of those things are bad?