Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites

Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites

No Americans permitted under final nuclear deal

U.S. and Iranian officials confirmed Thursday that no American nuclear inspectors will be permitted to enter the country’s contested nuclear site under the parameters of a deal reached with world powers this week, according to multiple statements by American and Iranian officials.

Under the tenants of the final nuclear deal reached this week in Vienna, only countries with normal diplomatic relations with Iran will be permitted to participate in inspections teams organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The revelation of this caveat has attracted concern from some analysts who maintain that only American experts can be trusted to verify that Iran is not cheating on the deal and operating clandestine nuclear facilities.

The admission is the latest in a series of apparent concessions made by the United States to Iran under the deal. Other portions of the agreement include a promise by the United States to help Iran combat nuclear sabotage and threats to its program.

“Iran will increase the number of designated IAEA inspectors to the range of 130-150 within 9 months from the date of the implementation of the JCPOA, and will generally allow the designation of inspectors from nations that have diplomatic relations with Iran, consistent with its laws and regulations,” the deal states, according to text released by the Russians and Iranians.

Susan Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser, confirmed this in an interview with CNN.


Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites Washington Free Beacon

We knew something like this was coming, didn't we?
Hopefully Congress will not approve this deal.
There is no guarantee of accountability.

Congress doesn't have to "approve" the deal.

They can disapprove of the deal, but that will take a 2/3s majority to override Obama's veto.

The Constitution provides that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur"

Silly far left drones!
 
We did not "broker" this deal, we were one of 7 parties involved in the direct negotiations, on behalf the 164 member-states of the IAEA.

Why is it "suspicious" that Iran would not want inspectors from a country that it considers, and is considered by an enemy?
Okay, we were the lead principle for this deal, I"m sorry you don't consider us the principle broker, but we are. In My opinion, the other nations were simply along for the photo ops....

In any case, we have a stakeholder interest in this deal and a right to be included in the inspections. However, why should we even maintain this deal if the other side considers us an enemy?

A bad deal, all the way around.

They get everything they wanted...

We get told to fuck off.....

What could possibly be wrong with it?

We were not the "lead principle" for this deal. I don't know where you're pulling this shit from. We were in no higher a position at the table than any of the P5+1, your "opinion" that they were there for the fun of it notwithstanding.

As for "stakeholders" in the deal, we have less of an active stake it this than hundreds of other IAEA countries who would actually be in theoretical danger should Iran get a bomb.

Your post seems to suffer from a frequently seen issue in this country - the United States is not the center of the Universe, and the rest of the world doesn't revolve around us.

Russia, China, Pakistan, India, England, France, Germany - all of them have more to worry about than us from a nuclear Iran.
But...but...we're Mericans

Sorry top the far left drones like you, they are "White" Hispanics..
White Hispanics can be 'Merican' too.


Actually, a white Hispanic is a hero to the RWs for murdering a black kid in Florida.

Just sayin ...
 
We were not the "lead principle" for this deal. I don't know where you're pulling this shit from. We were in no higher a position at the table than any of the P5+1, your "opinion" that they were there for the fun of it notwithstanding.

As for "stakeholders" in the deal, we have less of an active stake it this than hundreds of other IAEA countries who would actually be in theoretical danger should Iran get a bomb.

Your post seems to suffer from a frequently seen issue in this country - the United States is not the center of the Universe, and the rest of the world doesn't revolve around us.

Russia, China, Pakistan, India, England, France, Germany - all of them have more to worry about than us from a nuclear Iran.
And the far left drones forget that Israel has the most to worry about. Russia, China and Pakistan do not have that much to worry about..

Israel doesn't get a seat at the table because they're not members of IAEA, because of their illegal nuclear weapons.
Illegal, huh? How so?.....

Technically, Israel's weapons aren't "illegal", because they're one of the only countries in the world that has refused to sign the NPT.

But their weapons are illegal to 164 countries in the world.
Technically Israel doesn't confirm or deny its nuclear weapons, even though they obviously exist: Nuclear weapons and Israel - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
In a December 2006 interview, Israeli Prime MinisterEhud Olmert stated that Iran aspires "to have a nuclear weapon as America, France, Israel and Russia".[189] Olmert's office later said that the quote was taken out of context; in other parts of the interview, Olmert refused to confirm or deny Israel's nuclear weapon status.[190]

It's pretty well known world-wide.
 
Okay, we were the lead principle for this deal, I"m sorry you don't consider us the principle broker, but we are. In My opinion, the other nations were simply along for the photo ops....

In any case, we have a stakeholder interest in this deal and a right to be included in the inspections. However, why should we even maintain this deal if the other side considers us an enemy?

A bad deal, all the way around.

They get everything they wanted...

We get told to fuck off.....

What could possibly be wrong with it?

We were not the "lead principle" for this deal. I don't know where you're pulling this shit from. We were in no higher a position at the table than any of the P5+1, your "opinion" that they were there for the fun of it notwithstanding.

As for "stakeholders" in the deal, we have less of an active stake it this than hundreds of other IAEA countries who would actually be in theoretical danger should Iran get a bomb.

Your post seems to suffer from a frequently seen issue in this country - the United States is not the center of the Universe, and the rest of the world doesn't revolve around us.

Russia, China, Pakistan, India, England, France, Germany - all of them have more to worry about than us from a nuclear Iran.
But...but...we're Mericans

Sorry top the far left drones like you, they are "White" Hispanics..
White Hispanics can be 'Merican' too.

And you prove why you are a far left drone, next the far left will be claiming "white" Arabs..
You sound pretty illiterate. You should leave the swamps you live in and experience the world. Of course there are white Arabs. How retarded are you?
 
We have the military option at any time. A week ago, ten years ago, ten years from now.

The only thing that changed is Iran will be getting rid of almost all of its weapons grade nuclear material and inspectors will check on their facilities regularly. If they are cheating they will pay the price.

Republicans ONLY hate this deal because they don't now foreign policy and could never negotiate a deal. That's it.

So yes Republicans, cry for us. But please do so in California, they need the water.

No..we hate this deal for it's obvious flaws.

:lol:

It's pretty hard to take your statements seriously, since you guys have "hated" the deal for years now - long before you actually knew anything about it.

You hate it because you've been told to hate it. At this point it's silly for you to even pretend it has anything to do with the deal itself.
Drinking tonight?

I've not been told to hate anything, by anyone......not now, not ever....

However, I do recall that the standard was that Iran was NOT to have any nuclear material...no nuclear enrichment equipment....and NO BOMB.....

This was the standard back in 1980.....and it was ONE of the reasons we put sanctions on Iran to begin with......To get them to stop....

Now......we just threw our hands in the air and capitulated to the Mullahs....

Great deal we have there...

Bush & Condoleezza Rice told Iran they could keep centrifuges & use them to enrich uranium. Obama is not the one who caved to Iran.


And now, 47 Republicans have told them they can have any nukes they want.

11760092_10153094108441275_7552762534533935737_n.jpg

And yet many Democrats also oppose this bad deal. Yet the far left does not want to mention that..
 
Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites

No Americans permitted under final nuclear deal

U.S. and Iranian officials confirmed Thursday that no American nuclear inspectors will be permitted to enter the country’s contested nuclear site under the parameters of a deal reached with world powers this week, according to multiple statements by American and Iranian officials.

Under the tenants of the final nuclear deal reached this week in Vienna, only countries with normal diplomatic relations with Iran will be permitted to participate in inspections teams organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The revelation of this caveat has attracted concern from some analysts who maintain that only American experts can be trusted to verify that Iran is not cheating on the deal and operating clandestine nuclear facilities.

The admission is the latest in a series of apparent concessions made by the United States to Iran under the deal. Other portions of the agreement include a promise by the United States to help Iran combat nuclear sabotage and threats to its program.

“Iran will increase the number of designated IAEA inspectors to the range of 130-150 within 9 months from the date of the implementation of the JCPOA, and will generally allow the designation of inspectors from nations that have diplomatic relations with Iran, consistent with its laws and regulations,” the deal states, according to text released by the Russians and Iranians.

Susan Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser, confirmed this in an interview with CNN.


Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites Washington Free Beacon

We knew something like this was coming, didn't we?

That's because the agreement is between Iran and Six (06) Nations, not just the United States. International Inspectors will be allowed access to any Iran Government Nuclear Research Facility.

The 64-Day Rule applies to Military Bases only.

The United States is only ONE (01) Signatory to the Iran deal. Under the current ageement(s) between th 5+1 and Iran, the United Nations will investigaory powers, not just one nation.

That is Cons do not ever understand, it is not JUST ONE COUNTRY DEALING IRAN BUT SIX....FOR THOSE WHO ARE DEAD FROM THE NECK UP AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE NUMBER 6 THAT IS NUMBER THAT ONE GREATER THAN FIVE AND ONE LESS THAN SEVEN.
Who gives a shit.. The deal SUCKS...
 
Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites

No Americans permitted under final nuclear deal

U.S. and Iranian officials confirmed Thursday that no American nuclear inspectors will be permitted to enter the country’s contested nuclear site under the parameters of a deal reached with world powers this week, according to multiple statements by American and Iranian officials.

Under the tenants of the final nuclear deal reached this week in Vienna, only countries with normal diplomatic relations with Iran will be permitted to participate in inspections teams organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The revelation of this caveat has attracted concern from some analysts who maintain that only American experts can be trusted to verify that Iran is not cheating on the deal and operating clandestine nuclear facilities.

The admission is the latest in a series of apparent concessions made by the United States to Iran under the deal. Other portions of the agreement include a promise by the United States to help Iran combat nuclear sabotage and threats to its program.

“Iran will increase the number of designated IAEA inspectors to the range of 130-150 within 9 months from the date of the implementation of the JCPOA, and will generally allow the designation of inspectors from nations that have diplomatic relations with Iran, consistent with its laws and regulations,” the deal states, according to text released by the Russians and Iranians.

Susan Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser, confirmed this in an interview with CNN.


Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites Washington Free Beacon

We knew something like this was coming, didn't we?
Hopefully Congress will not approve this deal.
There is no guarantee of accountability.

Congress doesn't have to "approve" the deal.

They can disapprove of the deal, but that will take a 2/3s majority to override Obama's veto.

The Constitution provides that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur"

Silly far left drones!

:lol:

We've already been over this - your armchair Constitutional "analysis" doesn't overrule hundreds of years of precedent going all the way back to the founding fathers.

You'll see, in the next few weeks.
 
We were not the "lead principle" for this deal. I don't know where you're pulling this shit from. We were in no higher a position at the table than any of the P5+1, your "opinion" that they were there for the fun of it notwithstanding.

As for "stakeholders" in the deal, we have less of an active stake it this than hundreds of other IAEA countries who would actually be in theoretical danger should Iran get a bomb.

Your post seems to suffer from a frequently seen issue in this country - the United States is not the center of the Universe, and the rest of the world doesn't revolve around us.

Russia, China, Pakistan, India, England, France, Germany - all of them have more to worry about than us from a nuclear Iran.
And the far left drones forget that Israel has the most to worry about. Russia, China and Pakistan do not have that much to worry about..

Israel doesn't get a seat at the table because they're not members of IAEA, because of their illegal nuclear weapons.
Illegal, huh? How so?.....

Many far left drones think that Israel has illegal nuclear weapons, yet no one has been able to prove it. Although you can thank the French for them having Nuclear Power..
And the far left drones forget that Israel has the most to worry about. Russia, China and Pakistan do not have that much to worry about..

Israel doesn't get a seat at the table because they're not members of IAEA, because of their illegal nuclear weapons.
Illegal, huh? How so?.....

Technically, Israel's weapons aren't "illegal", because they're one of the only countries in the world that has refused to sign the NPT.

But their weapons are illegal to 164 countries in the world.
Technically Israel doesn't confirm or deny its nuclear weapons, even though they obviously exist: Nuclear weapons and Israel - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
In a December 2006 interview, Israeli Prime MinisterEhud Olmert stated that Iran aspires "to have a nuclear weapon as America, France, Israel and Russia".[189] Olmert's office later said that the quote was taken out of context; in other parts of the interview, Olmert refused to confirm or deny Israel's nuclear weapon status.[190]

It's pretty well known world-wide.

No it is conspiracy theory not based in fact and shows that you are a far left drone..
 
We were not the "lead principle" for this deal. I don't know where you're pulling this shit from. We were in no higher a position at the table than any of the P5+1, your "opinion" that they were there for the fun of it notwithstanding.

As for "stakeholders" in the deal, we have less of an active stake it this than hundreds of other IAEA countries who would actually be in theoretical danger should Iran get a bomb.

Your post seems to suffer from a frequently seen issue in this country - the United States is not the center of the Universe, and the rest of the world doesn't revolve around us.

Russia, China, Pakistan, India, England, France, Germany - all of them have more to worry about than us from a nuclear Iran.
But...but...we're Mericans

Sorry top the far left drones like you, they are "White" Hispanics..
White Hispanics can be 'Merican' too.

And you prove why you are a far left drone, next the far left will be claiming "white" Arabs..
You sound pretty illiterate. You should leave the swamps you live in and experience the world. Of course there are white Arabs. How retarded are you?

The irony impaired far left drones and their comments!
 
We have the military option at any time. A week ago, ten years ago, ten years from now.

The only thing that changed is Iran will be getting rid of almost all of its weapons grade nuclear material and inspectors will check on their facilities regularly. If they are cheating they will pay the price.

Republicans ONLY hate this deal because they don't now foreign policy and could never negotiate a deal. That's it.

So yes Republicans, cry for us. But please do so in California, they need the water.

No..we hate this deal for it's obvious flaws.

:lol:

It's pretty hard to take your statements seriously, since you guys have "hated" the deal for years now - long before you actually knew anything about it.

You hate it because you've been told to hate it. At this point it's silly for you to even pretend it has anything to do with the deal itself.
Drinking tonight?

I've not been told to hate anything, by anyone......not now, not ever....

However, I do recall that the standard was that Iran was NOT to have any nuclear material...no nuclear enrichment equipment....and NO BOMB.....

This was the standard back in 1980.....and it was ONE of the reasons we put sanctions on Iran to begin with......To get them to stop....

Now......we just threw our hands in the air and capitulated to the Mullahs....

Great deal we have there...

Bush & Condoleezza Rice told Iran they could keep centrifuges & use them to enrich uranium. Obama is not the one who caved to Iran.


And now, 47 Republicans have told them they can have any nukes they want.

11760092_10153094108441275_7552762534533935737_n.jpg

47 RINOS may have....
 
And the far left drones forget that Israel has the most to worry about. Russia, China and Pakistan do not have that much to worry about..

Israel doesn't get a seat at the table because they're not members of IAEA, because of their illegal nuclear weapons.
Illegal, huh? How so?.....

Many far left drones think that Israel has illegal nuclear weapons, yet no one has been able to prove it. Although you can thank the French for them having Nuclear Power..
Israel doesn't get a seat at the table because they're not members of IAEA, because of their illegal nuclear weapons.
Illegal, huh? How so?.....

Technically, Israel's weapons aren't "illegal", because they're one of the only countries in the world that has refused to sign the NPT.

But their weapons are illegal to 164 countries in the world.
Technically Israel doesn't confirm or deny its nuclear weapons, even though they obviously exist: Nuclear weapons and Israel - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
In a December 2006 interview, Israeli Prime MinisterEhud Olmert stated that Iran aspires "to have a nuclear weapon as America, France, Israel and Russia".[189] Olmert's office later said that the quote was taken out of context; in other parts of the interview, Olmert refused to confirm or deny Israel's nuclear weapon status.[190]

It's pretty well known world-wide.

No it is conspiracy theory not based in fact and shows that you are a far left drone..

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

If you actually believe that, I really don't know what to tell you. Do you believe that Putin was fairly elected, too?
 
But...but...we're Mericans

Sorry top the far left drones like you, they are "White" Hispanics..
White Hispanics can be 'Merican' too.

And you prove why you are a far left drone, next the far left will be claiming "white" Arabs..
You sound pretty illiterate. You should leave the swamps you live in and experience the world. Of course there are white Arabs. How retarded are you?

The irony impaired far left drones and their comments!
Youre the one that thinks Arabs cant be white but think ancient Egyptians were white.
 
We do not need to be there. The Ayatollah already told us his country has never and will never try to develop a nuclear bomb. Why not believe that and leave these heroic people to build a system to keep them warm during the frigid Iranian winters.ALLAHU AKBAR.
 
Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites

No Americans permitted under final nuclear deal

U.S. and Iranian officials confirmed Thursday that no American nuclear inspectors will be permitted to enter the country’s contested nuclear site under the parameters of a deal reached with world powers this week, according to multiple statements by American and Iranian officials.

Under the tenants of the final nuclear deal reached this week in Vienna, only countries with normal diplomatic relations with Iran will be permitted to participate in inspections teams organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The revelation of this caveat has attracted concern from some analysts who maintain that only American experts can be trusted to verify that Iran is not cheating on the deal and operating clandestine nuclear facilities.

The admission is the latest in a series of apparent concessions made by the United States to Iran under the deal. Other portions of the agreement include a promise by the United States to help Iran combat nuclear sabotage and threats to its program.

“Iran will increase the number of designated IAEA inspectors to the range of 130-150 within 9 months from the date of the implementation of the JCPOA, and will generally allow the designation of inspectors from nations that have diplomatic relations with Iran, consistent with its laws and regulations,” the deal states, according to text released by the Russians and Iranians.

Susan Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser, confirmed this in an interview with CNN.


Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites Washington Free Beacon

We knew something like this was coming, didn't we?
Hopefully Congress will not approve this deal.
There is no guarantee of accountability.

Congress doesn't have to "approve" the deal.

They can disapprove of the deal, but that will take a 2/3s majority to override Obama's veto.

The Constitution provides that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur"

Silly far left drones!

:lol:

We've already been over this - your armchair Constitutional "analysis" doesn't overrule hundreds of years of precedent going all the way back to the founding fathers.

You'll see, in the next few weeks.

Wrong again far left drone..

60+ days..
 
Sorry top the far left drones like you, they are "White" Hispanics..
White Hispanics can be 'Merican' too.

And you prove why you are a far left drone, next the far left will be claiming "white" Arabs..
You sound pretty illiterate. You should leave the swamps you live in and experience the world. Of course there are white Arabs. How retarded are you?

The irony impaired far left drones and their comments!
Youre the one that thinks Arabs cant be white but think ancient Egyptians were white.

Nope just showing the flawed far left logic at how you can only see "white" when the far left tells you to..

Thanks for proving that you are a true racist! But that comes with being a far left drone..
 
Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites

No Americans permitted under final nuclear deal

U.S. and Iranian officials confirmed Thursday that no American nuclear inspectors will be permitted to enter the country’s contested nuclear site under the parameters of a deal reached with world powers this week, according to multiple statements by American and Iranian officials.

Under the tenants of the final nuclear deal reached this week in Vienna, only countries with normal diplomatic relations with Iran will be permitted to participate in inspections teams organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The revelation of this caveat has attracted concern from some analysts who maintain that only American experts can be trusted to verify that Iran is not cheating on the deal and operating clandestine nuclear facilities.

The admission is the latest in a series of apparent concessions made by the United States to Iran under the deal. Other portions of the agreement include a promise by the United States to help Iran combat nuclear sabotage and threats to its program.

“Iran will increase the number of designated IAEA inspectors to the range of 130-150 within 9 months from the date of the implementation of the JCPOA, and will generally allow the designation of inspectors from nations that have diplomatic relations with Iran, consistent with its laws and regulations,” the deal states, according to text released by the Russians and Iranians.

Susan Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser, confirmed this in an interview with CNN.


Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites Washington Free Beacon

We knew something like this was coming, didn't we?
Hopefully Congress will not approve this deal.
There is no guarantee of accountability.

Congress doesn't have to "approve" the deal.

They can disapprove of the deal, but that will take a 2/3s majority to override Obama's veto.

The Constitution provides that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur"

Silly far left drones!

:lol:

We've already been over this - your armchair Constitutional "analysis" doesn't overrule hundreds of years of precedent going all the way back to the founding fathers.

You'll see, in the next few weeks.

Wrong again far left drone..

60+ days..

:lol:

You're splitting hairs over "60 days" vs. "a few weeks"?

Seriously, this is all you've got?
 
White Hispanics can be 'Merican' too.

And you prove why you are a far left drone, next the far left will be claiming "white" Arabs..
You sound pretty illiterate. You should leave the swamps you live in and experience the world. Of course there are white Arabs. How retarded are you?

The irony impaired far left drones and their comments!
Youre the one that thinks Arabs cant be white but think ancient Egyptians were white.

Nope just showing the flawed far left logic at how you can only see "white" when the far left tells you to..

Thanks for proving that you are a true racist! But that comes with being a far left drone..
Flawed logic is you thinking Arabs cant be white. You know they have some with pale skin, blonde hair, and blue eyes right?
 
Is it me or does it strike anyone else as odd that Americans think they have the right to inspect someone else?
Believe me, it's you.
Where do they get this belief and do they think it contributes to the hatred many countries have towards the US?
Do you know what the IAEA is?

Do you know that it's not only made up of Americans?

I know that, that's been my point all along. That's what makes the point of this thread irrelevant.
 
Is it me or does it strike anyone else as odd that Americans think they have the right to inspect someone else?
Believe me, it's you.
Where do they get this belief and do they think it contributes to the hatred many countries have towards the US?
Do you know what the IAEA is?

Do you know that it's not only made up of Americans?
Of course I do. I wasnt asking about the IAEA. I was asking about americans. Thats why I said americans instead of the IAEA.
 

Forum List

Back
Top