Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,460
- 15,583
- 2,180
And most historians agree that the South would have been treated more kindly after the war had Lincoln lived, like a brother come home rather than conquered territory. It's sad how things turned out, but there can be no doubt Lincoln had a lead ball with his name on it after all the death, suffering, and destruction he inflicted on the American continent.It's interesting to know how you would like to treat your fellow Americans.
Is everybody seeing this?
Lookit bripat make warm fuzzies for a man - and that man's co-conspirators - who killed a US President.
If I didn't know any better, I'd say you approve of presidential assassination.
My attitude towards the man who assassinated Lincoln would be exactly the same as if he had assassinated Hitler, and for the exact same reason.
Lincoln was a tyrant and a mass murderer. He deserved to hang for his war crimes, along with all his generals.
^ Bripat announces again his approval of presidential assassination.
I hope the NSA is keeping an eye on you.
I don't approve a presidential assassination solely because it doesn't work. It only makes the one assassinated into a saint, and then his agenda becomes even more virulent.
The suffering and death is laid at the feet of those in rebellion: the South. Their logical basis of secession was irrational. They had no authority to secede. And they attacked US troops to open the war.
Every step to war is laid at the feet of the south. The United States rightly put down a rebellion within its territory. As it had every authority to do.