LadyGunSlinger
Conservative Babe
- Feb 6, 2011
- 19,589
- 3,348
- 280
Politics: IRS got marching orders from at least two Democrat senators | CainTV
Corrupt DEMOCRAT party.
Corrupt DEMOCRAT party.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Politics: IRS got marching orders from at least two Democrat senators | CainTV
Corrupt DEMOCRAT party.
Politics: IRS got marching orders from at least two Democrat senators | CainTV
Corrupt DEMOCRAT party.
Once again..
If you Liberals can't tell the difference between wanting ONE organization investigated for violating the law and telling the IRS to investigate every organization of the opposite political view point is another.
Once again..
If you Liberals can't tell the difference between wanting ONE organization investigated for violating the law and telling the IRS to investigate every organization of the opposite political view point is another.
Yay duplicate thread.
When are they going to be presenting us with the evidence?
Politics: IRS got marching orders from at least two Democrat senators | CainTV
Corrupt DEMOCRAT party.
So damning."The Senate Finance Committee has jurisdiction over revenue matters, and the Committee is responsible for conducting oversight of the administration of the federal tax system, including matters involving tax-exempt organizations. The Committee has focused extensively over the past decade on whether tax-exempt groups have been used for lobbying or other financial or political gain."
Yeah, of course it wouldn't have to mention that to get the point across, because the point is that political groups aren't eligible for 501c4 status.In a letter still posted on his web site, and also signed by six other Democrat senators, Schumer called on the IRS to "prevent abuse of the tax code by political groups focused on federal election activities." Now, to be sure, the letter did not specifically mention the Tea Party, nor did it mention targeting conservatives in general. But I don't think it needed to do so in order to get its point across.