Is carnivorism ethical?

Meat eaters kill those animals that have served people for thousands of years with faith and truth, who were friends both in peace and in war, who shed their blood (horses) for us, and they do not kill vile predatory creatures that at least would have received for their deeds if they would be killed.
Why are predators vile?
 
Actually, I have. Have you?
William Clifford Roberts, MD and former Editor in Chief of The American Journal of Cardiology argued in a Letter from the Editor that humans are anatomically and physiologically herbivores. Herbivores, he says, have hands or hoofs, flat teeth, long intestines, sweat to cool the body, sip water (cheeks and lips facilitate the creation of a vacuum in the mouth), and get our vitamin C from our diet. Carnivores have claws, sharp teeth, short intestines, pant to cool themselves, lap up water (because they lack cheeks and lips), and make their own vitamin C.

Plants have tough cell walls made of fiber, sugar molecules bonded together, that provides protection and rigidity without using cholesterol. No mammal produces an enzyme that can digest fiber. Instead, herbivores developed a mobile jaw and flat teeth that slide past each other horizontally to chew their food and crush the cell wall, plus a long digestive tract to provide time to extract nutrients.

Carnivore’s food, animal cells, have a flexible, fat-based cell membrane embedded with cholesterol to give it some rigidity. Animal cells are easily digestible but the bones in animals are not, so carnivores have strong stomach acid and a short digestive tract. No chewing is necessary beyond reducing the size of the chunks enough to swallow because there’s no cell wall. As a result, carnivores like cats and omnivorous carnivores like the bear and dog can only move their jaw up and down; their molars slide past each other vertically like a pair of scissors.

Animals like rabbits, cows, and humans can easily move their lower jaw side to side, and most experts agree that humans have generalized herbivorous dentition that, if anything, is best suited for eating seeds.
 
Last edited:
Why did some species become domesticated?

Why the horse but not the zebra?

Why the goat but not the deer?

Why the dog and not the wolf?

There is a very good book on this subject titled, "Guns, Germs, and Steel", by Jared Diamond.

In it, he explains exactly that. Zebras are actually much more aggressive than pre-domesticated horses, and therefore harder to domesticate. Also, the production of domesticated wild plants typically precedes the domestication of animals, because a non-farming hunter-gatherer society doesn't have the fixed facilities required for large-animal domestication. Exceptions of this are typically already domesticated animals being adopted by nomadic societies. Horses by the American Indians, camels and goats by the Arabian Bedouin.

Deer have been domesticated as both food and draft animals but are typically too skittish and hard to domestic versus the auroch.

A dog IS a domesticated wolf.
 
we Have canine teeth. Why if all we are meant to eat is plants? So you are right and science is wrong?
No, we DONT have canine teeth

Contrary to popular belief, human canines are not for tearing and ripping meat. Instead, our ancestors used them to fight male rivals for mating rights. Over time, human species evolved smaller and smaller canines as we stopped using our teeth as weapons.Apr 5, 2021

Just because we call these "canine teeth" doesn't mean they are. They have NOTHING in common

5cc21657b14bf46a0a12e507.jpeg
 
William Clifford Roberts, MD and former Editor in Chief of The American Journal of Cardiology argued in a Letter from the Editor that humans are anatomically and physiologically herbivores. Herbivores, he says, have hands or hoofs, flat teeth, long intestines, sweat to cool the body, sip water (cheeks and lips facilitate the creation of a vacuum in the mouth), and get our vitamin C from our diet. Carnivores have claws, sharp teeth, short intestines, pant to cool themselves, lap up water (because they lack cheeks and lips), and make their own vitamin C.

He leaves out a third very important grouping: omnivores. We….much like swine..occupy that category.

We lack the efficient and complex digestive apparatus of true herbivores. We lack the teeth and jaw structure necessary for masticating tough fiberous plants and the GI system to process them efficiently, just as we lack the teeth and jaw structure to crack bones.

Unlike herbivores we have trouble getting certain nutrients, such as iron from plants. How we sweat and drink water has nothing to with what we eat. For example, hippos and rhinos, both herbivores, do not sweat. Rabbits, herbivores, lap water, they do not sip.

Plants have tough cell walls made of fiber, sugar molecules bonded together, that provides protection and rigidity without using cholesterol. No mammal produces an enzyme that can digest fiber. Instead, herbivores developed a mobile jaw and flat teeth that slide past each other horizontally to chew their food and crush the cell wall, plus a long digestive tract to provide time to extract nutrients.

We humans lack that. Our jaws and teeth are weak, and unlike herbivores like cattle, rabbits, horses, deer, sheep, goats etc. we lack key adaptations that allow us to efficiently extract nutrients not normally bioavailable: we do not chew. Cud’s, have multiple stomachs or specialized sections of intestine t hat act as fermentation systems to break down cellulose.

Carnivore’s food, animal cells, have a flexible, fat-based cell membrane embedded with cholesterol to give it some rigidity. Animal cells are easily digestible but the bones in animals are not, so carnivores have strong stomach acid and a short digestive tract. No chewing is necessary beyond reducing the size of the chunks enough to swallow because there’s no cell wall. As a result, carnivores like cats and omnivorous carnivores like the bear and dog can only move their jaw up and down; their molars slide past each other vertically like a pair of scissors.

That is correct.


Animals like rabbits, cows, and humans can easily move their lower jaw side to side, and most experts agree that humans have generalized herbivorous dentition that, if anything, is best suited for eating seeds.

Seeds, meat, fruit, some greens….(look at chimps)….when Raven/Coyote brought man fire…I.e. humanity learned to cook….many more plants and meats became bioavailable.

We are omnivore.

Here’s the issue I have with your argument….we are obviously not designed to be herbivores…so WHY use that as a rationale for becoming vegan?

If you you wanted to argue it as an ethical choice, I get it.

If you want to argue we (Americans) should eat LESS meat, I get it.

But don’t try to to claim we are really herbivores when our biology screams “omnivore!”.
 
There is a very good book on this subject titled, "Guns, Germs, and Steel", by Jared Diamond.

In it, he explains exactly that. Zebras are actually much more aggressive than pre-domesticated horses, and therefore harder to domesticate. Also, the production of domesticated wild plants typically precedes the domestication of animals, because a non-farming hunter-gatherer society doesn't have the fixed facilities required for large-animal domestication. Exceptions of this are typically already domesticated animals being adopted by nomadic societies. Horses by the American Indians, camels and goats by the Arabian Bedouin.

Deer have been domesticated as both food and draft animals but are typically too skittish and hard to domestic versus the auroch.

A dog IS a domesticated wolf.
I’ll look that up! This is a topic that fascinates me. One book I read was “Covenant of the Wild”, which I think says similar to what you describe. A dog is and isn’t a domesticated wolf. They diverged long ago from several different canine ancesters and structural differences such as weaker jaws were evident before true domestication. One prevailing theory is a canine ancester hung around human habitations where picking through refuse was quite nutritious and those with reduced flight/fight responses became successful at adapting to living among humans. A bit off topic, but, we are seeing this occurring even now as various wild species are becoming successful urban dwellers and losing their fear of human beings.

I’ll look up that book! :)
 
The zebra isnt found in Europe. Africans never developed beyond the Stone Age until the Europeans made contact
That isn’t true. Cattle, dogs, donkeys and guinea fowls were all domesticated in Africa
 
No we don't. Name them. See post 403

Both scientifically and Biblically, we were CREATED as plant eaters
 
In my opinion, this cannot be justified by logical means, because if you can eat someone else's meat, then someone else can eat your meat, therefore nothing prevents cannibalism. If you accept the point of view of a meat-eater, then you should not be indignant that someone ate your child.
beremennost-u-korov-kak-opredelit-skolko-dlitsya-i-kak-protekaet-30.jpg
Not only did you put that sentence together yourself, but you actually posted :auiqs.jpg: it.

I give precisely the same amount of fucks to theories of flat earthers as I do to the theories of militant plant eaters.

Go ahead. Guess how many fucks I give.
 
For those arguing for Satans version of "stewards" over God's creation, this is BIBLICAL STEWARDSHIP

 
People tend to lie to themselves to make themselves comfortable and to ease their conscience
 

Forum List

Back
Top