Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a small problem with the whole Hillary lies thing...
Poltifact has here as the most honest candidate left running.
John Kasich is a very close second but Bernie and Cruz are good bit behind and Trump is a complete joke in telling the truth....
This has been the same crap repeated daily... For all your outrage in the last decades about this woman you have got hell which you can actually prove.
We would lend you some credibility but we have seen the lies after lies you have said about Obama over the last 7 years. Your credibility is totally gone. If we believed you now we would expect the US to be under shria law, with no guns, compulsory gay sex with a big black man and abortions for everyone, cuba invading florida and turning commie... Actually the whole country gone commie...
No election because Obama has stated himself King...
So none of these things happend, which makes all ye rightwingers just full of shit...
So say what you like about Hillary we know you are full of shit...
--LOLAs for her statements on issues, Politifact, a Pulitzer prize-winning fact-checking organization, gives Clinton the best truth-telling record of any of the 2016 presidential candidates. She beats Sanders and Kasich and crushes Cruz and Trump, who has the biggest “pants on fire” rating and has told whoppers about basic economics that are embarrassing for anyone aiming to be president. (He falsely claimed GDP has dropped the last two quarters and claimed the national unemployment rate was as high as 35%).
This may shock you: Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest | Jill Abramson
I am going to make a prediction. I do it here because it isn't worthy of its own post. When the FBI reports its findings over Mrs. Tuzla's server, they will release the information on a Friday night or weekend.
You just wrote that a liberal progressive has decent ideas and policies for America.Ted cruz is also a sexual predator! Lets be honest.
BUT with decent ideas and policies for America. If he didn't have those he wouldn't be in second place!
Or is she merely mentally ill?
You decide. And money on whether any of the libs here bother to watch this.
She's not mentally ill at all
She's a liar like all politicians in democracies.....all of them with no exception
The sad thing is that she will be the next President of the USA (I'm so sure of that I could bet 1 million euros or dollars if you prefer)
Or is she merely mentally ill?
You decide. And money on whether any of the libs here bother to watch this.
She's not mentally ill at all
She's a liar like all politicians in democracies.....all of them with no exception
The sad thing is that she will be the next President of the USA (I'm so sure of that I could bet 1 million euros or dollars if you prefer)
She will not be. She has so many negatives she cannot get elected.
Bernie Sanders Has Benefited More From Super PAC Money Than His Democratic Rivals
By Rmuse on Mon, Feb 1st, 2016 at 3:23 pm
The Super Pac in question said they 'appreciate the irony' and would 'rather not be doing this' but they 'want to see Bernie as president'
If there is only one thing Americans the least bit familiar with neophyte Democrat Bernie Sanders (I-VT) are aware of, it is his abhorrence of Citizens United-driven super PAC and special interest money in politics. In fact, throughout the past week traversing Iowa, Senator Sanders never missed an occasion to slam the rise of money in the political process.
“It is a “system,” Sanders bellows loudly from the campaign stages, “that is corrupt and undermining American democracy.” Obviously, such a position informs that Senator Sanders is not and will never take a red cent from a special interest group; particularly not a super PAC.
Senator Sanders is right of course, but what is likely not right is that accompanying him through Iowa was a group of nurses whose “super PAC” has doled out close to $1 million on ads and other kinds of campaign support for Sanders. What should raise a “hypocrisy alert” is that this is the same candidate who incites liberal and EmoProg supporters with persistent calls to eradicate such outside groups from political campaigns. Out of deference to ‘feeltheBern’ acolytes’ sensibilities, it is better to raise an “inconsistency alert” to avoid being accused of being a Clinton, Wall Street, and Koch paid shill.
As a matter of pure uncontested fact, there has been more super PAC money spent thus far in express support of the Sanders campaign than for either one of his Democratic rivals. Let that sink in. That includes, by the way, former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records. And no, the FEC is not paid by the Clinton campaign, or Koch brothers, or Wall Street any more than this column is. Their job is to report who is contributing to the Sanders’ campaign based on information provided by the Sanders’ campaign and the super PAC according to FEC campaign finance reporting requirements.
The super PAC and group following the Sanders’ campaign in and around Iowa is National Nurses United. The group’s executive director, RoseAnn DeMoro said, regarding the super PAC’s largesse for Sanders, that “I do appreciate the irony. All things being equal, we would rather not be doing this. On the other hand, we want to see Bernie as president.”
Ms. DeMoro confuses “irony” with hypocrisy; or “inconsistency.” A super PAC funding, and the candidate accepting, super PAC and special interest money when the candidate perpetually slams special interest and super PAC money in politics is not “irony.” It is hypocrisy to regular people, inconsistency to some others. However, to Senator Sanders it is not even an inconsistency because he is not Hillary Clinton.
Some of Clinton’s supporters have suggested the term “hypocrisy” over the Sanders’ campaign taking “special interest money” from a super PAC. They also note that the Senator has never called National Nurses United to refrain from doling out special interest money to his campaign; something they are able to do thanks to Citizens United. If anything, Senator Sanders not only is not “shunning” special interest money as he pledged, he began openly thanking what he calls “one of his sponsors” publicly in campaign speeches; people in audiences like nurses.
A spokesman for the Clinton campaign, Brian Fallon, said, “This is one of the prime examples of Senator Sanders saying one thing and doing another. For months he has criticized super PACs and pledged to shun them in his campaign, but all along he has benefited from hundreds of thousands of dollars in independent expenditures from those very organizations.” In the case of National Nurses United, the number is a million dollars and an ornate bus shuttling around a retinue of “scrub-clad” nurses Senator Sanders refers to by name on stage in Iowa.
It is noteworthy that Senator Sander’s “inconsistent” rise to Super PAC pre-eminence is, in part, due to an unusual pairing of the Sanders campaign and Republican and ultra-conservative super PAC spending to attack Hillary Clinton. Of course the conservatives’ intent is simply to “elevate an avowed socialist.” One that Republicans, conservatives, and the Koch brothers believe will be easy to disparage in a general election. Don’t believe conservative PACs are helping Senator Sanders?
In just one recent ad from the influential Republican super PAC American Crossroads, the uber-conservative group spent a substantial amount of its and the Kochs’ $4.3 million against Clinton parroting a constant Sanders’ attack against Clinton for earning Wall Street speaking fees. There have been no small number of pundits who have suggested, not errantly according to the American Crossroads ad campaign, that a fair share of the attacks on Clinton from “alleged” liberals are being funded and promoted by uber-conservative groups.
If one looks at it from that perspective, Senator Sanders’ campaign is being funded and assisted by more than just one special interest super PAC, and at least one of them is run by Karl Rove.
There is nothing wrong with a campaign taking special interest money; at least not according to Citizens United ruling that Sanders abhors. However, there is an issue when a candidate fairly bases a key part of their campaign and appeal on “shunning” special interest and super PAC money; all while claiming it is funded by grass roots contributors and now Americans know by special interests and super PACs; even uber-conservative super PACs.
While some may call it hypocrisy, and others just an inconvenient inconsistency, maybe Senator Sanders wrongly agrees with the executive director of the super PAC funding his campaign and considers it something it is definitively not; irony.
You just wrote that a liberal progressive has decent ideas and policies for America.Ted cruz is also a sexual predator! Lets be honest.
BUT with decent ideas and policies for America. If he didn't have those he wouldn't be in second place!
What did you do with Vigilante?
Here is one of Bernie's PANTS ON FIRE, PINNOCHIO'S
Bernie Sanders Has Benefited More From Super PAC Money Than His Democratic Rivals
By Rmuse on Mon, Feb 1st, 2016 at 3:23 pm
The Super Pac in question said they 'appreciate the irony' and would 'rather not be doing this' but they 'want to see Bernie as president'
If there is only one thing Americans the least bit familiar with neophyte Democrat Bernie Sanders (I-VT) are aware of, it is his abhorrence of Citizens United-driven super PAC and special interest money in politics. In fact, throughout the past week traversing Iowa, Senator Sanders never missed an occasion to slam the rise of money in the political process.
“It is a “system,” Sanders bellows loudly from the campaign stages, “that is corrupt and undermining American democracy.” Obviously, such a position informs that Senator Sanders is not and will never take a red cent from a special interest group; particularly not a super PAC.
Senator Sanders is right of course, but what is likely not right is that accompanying him through Iowa was a group of nurses whose “super PAC” has doled out close to $1 million on ads and other kinds of campaign support for Sanders. What should raise a “hypocrisy alert” is that this is the same candidate who incites liberal and EmoProg supporters with persistent calls to eradicate such outside groups from political campaigns. Out of deference to ‘feeltheBern’ acolytes’ sensibilities, it is better to raise an “inconsistency alert” to avoid being accused of being a Clinton, Wall Street, and Koch paid shill.
As a matter of pure uncontested fact, there has been more super PAC money spent thus far in express support of the Sanders campaign than for either one of his Democratic rivals. Let that sink in. That includes, by the way, former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records. And no, the FEC is not paid by the Clinton campaign, or Koch brothers, or Wall Street any more than this column is. Their job is to report who is contributing to the Sanders’ campaign based on information provided by the Sanders’ campaign and the super PAC according to FEC campaign finance reporting requirements.
The super PAC and group following the Sanders’ campaign in and around Iowa is National Nurses United. The group’s executive director, RoseAnn DeMoro said, regarding the super PAC’s largesse for Sanders, that “I do appreciate the irony. All things being equal, we would rather not be doing this. On the other hand, we want to see Bernie as president.”
Ms. DeMoro confuses “irony” with hypocrisy; or “inconsistency.” A super PAC funding, and the candidate accepting, super PAC and special interest money when the candidate perpetually slams special interest and super PAC money in politics is not “irony.” It is hypocrisy to regular people, inconsistency to some others. However, to Senator Sanders it is not even an inconsistency because he is not Hillary Clinton.
Some of Clinton’s supporters have suggested the term “hypocrisy” over the Sanders’ campaign taking “special interest money” from a super PAC. They also note that the Senator has never called National Nurses United to refrain from doling out special interest money to his campaign; something they are able to do thanks to Citizens United. If anything, Senator Sanders not only is not “shunning” special interest money as he pledged, he began openly thanking what he calls “one of his sponsors” publicly in campaign speeches; people in audiences like nurses.
A spokesman for the Clinton campaign, Brian Fallon, said, “This is one of the prime examples of Senator Sanders saying one thing and doing another. For months he has criticized super PACs and pledged to shun them in his campaign, but all along he has benefited from hundreds of thousands of dollars in independent expenditures from those very organizations.” In the case of National Nurses United, the number is a million dollars and an ornate bus shuttling around a retinue of “scrub-clad” nurses Senator Sanders refers to by name on stage in Iowa.
AND then we find out that Republican Super Pacs are running ads that support Bernie...Karl Rove, the Koch Brothers...yepperooooo....has Bernie asked them to stop, of course not...
It is noteworthy that Senator Sander’s “inconsistent” rise to Super PAC pre-eminence is, in part, due to an unusual pairing of the Sanders campaign and Republican and ultra-conservative super PAC spending to attack Hillary Clinton. Of course the conservatives’ intent is simply to “elevate an avowed socialist.” One that Republicans, conservatives, and the Koch brothers believe will be easy to disparage in a general election. Don’t believe conservative PACs are helping Senator Sanders?
In just one recent ad from the influential Republican super PAC American Crossroads, the uber-conservative group spent a substantial amount of its and the Kochs’ $4.3 million against Clinton parroting a constant Sanders’ attack against Clinton for earning Wall Street speaking fees. There have been no small number of pundits who have suggested, not errantly according to the American Crossroads ad campaign, that a fair share of the attacks on Clinton from “alleged” liberals are being funded and promoted by uber-conservative groups.
If one looks at it from that perspective, Senator Sanders’ campaign is being funded and assisted by more than just one special interest super PAC, and at least one of them is run by Karl Rove.
There is nothing wrong with a campaign taking special interest money; at least not according to Citizens United ruling that Sanders abhors. However, there is an issue when a candidate fairly bases a key part of their campaign and appeal on “shunning” special interest and super PAC money; all while claiming it is funded by grass roots contributors and now Americans know by special interests and super PACs; even uber-conservative super PACs.
While some may call it hypocrisy, and others just an inconvenient inconsistency, maybe Senator Sanders wrongly agrees with the executive director of the super PAC funding his campaign and considers it something it is definitively not; irony.
Bernie Sanders Has Benefited More From Super PAC Money Than His Democratic Rivals
"Is Hillary The Biggest Liar in US Presidential History?"
The fails as a loaded question fallacy.
What the Hell? Did you get a new catch phrase and you are going to use it anytime a question is asked? Really?
do you still beat your dog?
Never did. See the truth is easy.
Actually nice try but you should have asked, when did you stop beating your dog.
As for the question being loaded. If I asked you if Richard Petty was the greatest race car driver of all time, is that a loaded question? No, because he was a race car driver and he won lots of races.
Asking if Mrs. Tuzla Clinton is the greatest liar ever is the same thing. We know for a fact that she lies and she lies freely. Take two examples. NAFTA, her and her useless husband pushed for NAFTA harder than anything in their presidency. (yes their presidency). Now she is acting as if she opposed it, yet the videos don't lie. Then there is her lying about her trip to Tuzla. Come on, she repeatedly said the same lie over the course of a year, until she was shown the video, and the video didn't lie. She laughed and smiled as she told the story, disgusting. She is a pathological liar that doesn't know how to lie.
you're spinning by parroting non lies and calling them lies, to suit your dishonest agenda.
Are you saying what she said about her visit to Tuzla was not an outright fabrication? If you are then I can understand your support for Mrs. Tuzla. You can watch the CBS video of the event, IT DIDN'T HAPPEN. She was trying to lie about combat creds. Follow the Serbia link in my signature line and learn that her lies have meaning, at least maybe to 250,000 people.
There is a small problem with the whole Hillary lies thing...
Poltifact has here as the most honest candidate left running.
John Kasich is a very close second but Bernie and Cruz are good bit behind and Trump is a complete joke in telling the truth....
This has been the same crap repeated daily... For all your outrage in the last decades about this woman you have got hell which you can actually prove.
We would lend you some credibility but we have seen the lies after lies you have said about Obama over the last 7 years. Your credibility is totally gone. If we believed you now we would expect the US to be under shria law, with no guns, compulsory gay sex with a big black man and abortions for everyone, cuba invading florida and turning commie... Actually the whole country gone commie...
No election because Obama has stated himself King...
So none of these things happend, which makes all ye rightwingers just full of shit...
So say what you like about Hillary we know you are full of shit...
So she has poltifact running cover. Even if true it is the enormity of her lies. Even if politifact is right, you as a person can think for themselves. There is a difference between getting something wrong or even using hyperbole to make a point. That is what most politicians do. But Mrs. Tuzla is different. Follow the links provided, see how she willfully lies. Laughing and smiling about sniper fire that never happened. A whole made up story sold to buy combat creds. She is an insult to all those who actually did serve.
There is a small problem with the whole Hillary lies thing...
Poltifact has here as the most honest candidate left running.
John Kasich is a very close second but Bernie and Cruz are good bit behind and Trump is a complete joke in telling the truth....
This has been the same crap repeated daily... For all your outrage in the last decades about this woman you have got hell which you can actually prove.
We would lend you some credibility but we have seen the lies after lies you have said about Obama over the last 7 years. Your credibility is totally gone. If we believed you now we would expect the US to be under shria law, with no guns, compulsory gay sex with a big black man and abortions for everyone, cuba invading florida and turning commie... Actually the whole country gone commie...
No election because Obama has stated himself King...
So none of these things happend, which makes all ye rightwingers just full of shit...
So say what you like about Hillary we know you are full of shit...
So she has poltifact running cover. Even if true it is the enormity of her lies. Even if politifact is right, you as a person can think for themselves. There is a difference between getting something wrong or even using hyperbole to make a point. That is what most politicians do. But Mrs. Tuzla is different. Follow the links provided, see how she willfully lies. Laughing and smiling about sniper fire that never happened. A whole made up story sold to buy combat creds. She is an insult to all those who actually did serve.
So the most harmful comment you have was something she said 8 years ago which had next to no effect on ordinary Americans lives...
That is the big Lie!!!
That is all you got...
Trump continuously lied since he has started... It took them months to find a true statement in this race...
You can't bring it to yourself... You are just wrong... Obama has positive approval rating (you were wrong), there is no major collapse of American society(again wrong)... I can go on for days explaining how many times you were wrong...
Politifact are impartial and they have taken the two top GOP candidates to task... You want to say Clinton lies, how about you start in your own house first...
"Is Hillary The Biggest Liar in US Presidential History?"
The fails as a loaded question fallacy.
What the Hell? Did you get a new catch phrase and you are going to use it anytime a question is asked? Really?
do you still beat your dog?
Never did. See the truth is easy.
Actually nice try but you should have asked, when did you stop beating your dog.
As for the question being loaded. If I asked you if Richard Petty was the greatest race car driver of all time, is that a loaded question? No, because he was a race car driver and he won lots of races.
Asking if Mrs. Tuzla Clinton is the greatest liar ever is the same thing. We know for a fact that she lies and she lies freely. Take two examples. NAFTA, her and her useless husband pushed for NAFTA harder than anything in their presidency. (yes their presidency). Now she is acting as if she opposed it, yet the videos don't lie. Then there is her lying about her trip to Tuzla. Come on, she repeatedly said the same lie over the course of a year, until she was shown the video, and the video didn't lie. She laughed and smiled as she told the story, disgusting. She is a pathological liar that doesn't know how to lie.
you're spinning by parroting non lies and calling them lies, to suit your dishonest agenda.
Are you saying what she said about her visit to Tuzla was not an outright fabrication? If you are then I can understand your support for Mrs. Tuzla. You can watch the CBS video of the event, IT DIDN'T HAPPEN. She was trying to lie about combat creds. Follow the Serbia link in my signature line and learn that her lies have meaning, at least maybe to 250,000 people.
i'm saying partisan hacks often spin comments and call them lies just to suit their dishonest agenda.
squawk sniper fire squawk squawk sniper fire sniper fire.. thaaat's a good parrot
"Now let me tell you what I can remember, OK -- because what I was told was that we had to land a certain way and move quickly because of the threat of sniper fire. So I misspoke -- I didn't say that in my book or other times but if I said something that made it seem as though there was actual fire -- that's not what I was told," she told the newspaper.
"I was told we had to land a certain way, we had to have our bulletproof stuff on because of the threat of sniper fire. I was also told that the greeting ceremony had been moved away from the tarmac but that there was this 8-year-old girl and, I can't, I can't rush by her, I've got to at least greet her -- so I greeted her, I took her stuff and then I left. Now that's my memory of it."
Clinton says she 'misspoke' about sniper fire - CNN.com
Is Hillary The Biggest Liar in US Presidential History?
Can you name a bigger liar in presidential history?Is Hillary The Biggest Liar in US Presidential History?
Now, see, if you had asked if Hillary is a big liar, that would be one thing. Hell, you could probably even make a case she's the biggest liar out of all the 2016 candidates.
But when you posit "biggest liar in US history", you're just stepping on your own face.
Hacks always have to over reach.
