Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
nobody's "asking" you to do anything but mind your own fucking business and keep your "religious" or "social" "sensibilities" out of government policy.
May we ask that you keep your non-biblical and non-religious "sensibilities" out of government policy or are you a proponent of double standards? The majority of America's founders were Christians and the Constitution was written with biblical standards in mind.
No, you may not. The founders overwhelmingly advanced secular LAW. Additionally, you might want to research that last supposition.
inasmuch as the behavioral profession no longer accepts the idea that homosexuality is a form of "dementia," what would you suggest is the motivation for one to behave in a manner which provokes hatred, derision, and exclusion? And while homosexuality is not a normal condition do you accept that it is a natural behavior? homosexual behavior in animals - wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
people have acted in ways that provoke hatred, derision and exclusion throughout history. There have been myriad ways this has happened. Rebellion in one form or another is probably the most prevalent reason.
Gays are far from the only people to engender hatred, derision or exclusion through their actions or attitudes.
many people don't like the sins of unnatural sick sexual perversion, murder and stealing either.
Inasmuch as the behavioral profession no longer accepts the idea that homosexuality is a form of "dementia," what would you suggest is the motivation for one to behave in a manner which provokes hatred, derision, and exclusion? And while homosexuality is not a normal condition do you accept that it is a natural behavior? Homosexual behavior in animals - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe hormonal enzyme imbalance you refer to has only been proven in about 30% of homos, and even than there wasn't a sufficient control group to ascertain with 100% certainty that the enzyme/hormones present were the cause of the sexual dementia, although it is likely true in about 30% of the cases.
People have acted in ways that provoke hatred, derision and exclusion throughout history. There have been myriad ways this has happened. Rebellion in one form or another is probably the most prevalent reason.
Gays are far from the only people to engender hatred, derision or exclusion through their actions or attitudes.
Before going further in this discussion I think I should clarify my position where homosexuality is concerned.It goes far beyond their sick, degenerate and unhealthy activities. It goes in recent years into the vile activities of Gay Activism - in particular their salivatious attempts to get at the Children , get into their heads and mold their World perceptions to suit the sick desires of their twisted little faggot minds .
Learn to read. It's a state issue.
It's not a state issue when equal protection issues are involved. That makes it a constitutional issue,
and the state laws are subject to constitutional scrutiny.
Are you for "equal protection" for members of NAMBLA? Would you be for "equal protection" for a man-and-his-goat? What about a 35 year old man and his consenting 14 year old girlfriend - equal protection?
It all boils down to where the line should be drawn. You want it drawn at a point that makes some sinful behavior "acceptable" while we believe in keeping it where it has always been.
My late wife was a clinical psychologist who, along with the vast majority of her colleagues, believed that innate homophobic disposition and intolerance often reveals anger toward one's own latent homosexual tendencies.
It's not a state issue when equal protection issues are involved. That makes it a constitutional issue,
and the state laws are subject to constitutional scrutiny.
Are you for "equal protection" for members of NAMBLA? Would you be for "equal protection" for a man-and-his-goat? What about a 35 year old man and his consenting 14 year old girlfriend - equal protection?
It all boils down to where the line should be drawn. You want it drawn at a point that makes some sinful behavior "acceptable" while we believe in keeping it where it has always been.
That's a circular argument. All sex outside of marriage, gay or straight, is considered 'sinful' by Christian measures of sin.
Heterosexual 'sinful' sex only becomes 'acceptable', as you call it, by marriage. But since you want to deny same sex couples the right to marriage,
you want to keep their sex 'sinful', and then, in circular fashion, you turn around and characterize proponents of same sex marriage as wanting to make 'sinful behaviour acceptable'.
Are you for "equal protection" for members of NAMBLA? Would you be for "equal protection" for a man-and-his-goat? What about a 35 year old man and his consenting 14 year old girlfriend - equal protection?
It all boils down to where the line should be drawn. You want it drawn at a point that makes some sinful behavior "acceptable" while we believe in keeping it where it has always been.
That's a circular argument. All sex outside of marriage, gay or straight, is considered 'sinful' by Christian measures of sin.
Heterosexual 'sinful' sex only becomes 'acceptable', as you call it, by marriage. But since you want to deny same sex couples the right to marriage,
you want to keep their sex 'sinful', and then, in circular fashion, you turn around and characterize proponents of same sex marriage as wanting to make 'sinful behaviour acceptable'.
Speaking from a biblical point of view, God specifically told mankind to "be fruitful and multiply" and He also made it clear that a man was to leave his parents and "cleave to his wife." He set the standard when he formed Eve to be Adam's wife.
So ... I'm simply following the basic tenets of the foundational portions of the written Word of God. As far as I know there were no regulations placed on how a man and his wife should express their affection for each other. The Bible does state that believers should do all things in moderation; with a sense of humility; and a sense of morality. The Apostle Paul stated that we should follow our conscience and to abstain from all appearance of evil.
The bottom line is that the historical definition of marriage has ALWAYS been between a man and a woman for the main purpose of creating families via procreation. The Bible also states that sexual relations between two men is "unnatural." I can only assume that it's considered unnatural because procreation isn't possible. It's also a great way to create and spread diseases considering the fact that certain bodily waste is literally nasty and full of harmful bacteria.
Which is why I usually laugh when somebodys says a psychologists says....My late wife was a clinical psychologist who, along with the vast majority of her colleagues, believed that innate homophobic disposition and intolerance often reveals anger toward one's own latent homosexual tendencies.
Queers are no less able to control their behaviour than Dwarves can control their height.
Happily, both groups can find jobs in the entertainment industry.
Which is why I usually laugh when somebodys says a psychologists says....My late wife was a clinical psychologist who, along with the vast majority of her colleagues, believed that innate homophobic disposition and intolerance often reveals anger toward one's own latent homosexual tendencies.
So a homobobe has homophobic tendencies? How much do they charge for that pearl of wisdom? It would be a better case study to figure out why so many label those who don't accept homosexuality as normal are phobic?
And why is it perfectly normal to be homosexual, supposedly from birth but deviant to be repulsed by it? And who says one can't be born that way? It's unintelligent and hypocritical.
You breeders would say that.One thing's for certain: there wouldn't be any "gays" on earth if not for the procreative actions of a man and a woman.
Before going further in this discussion I think I should clarify my position where homosexuality is concerned.It goes far beyond their sick, degenerate and unhealthy activities. It goes in recent years into the vile activities of Gay Activism - in particular their salivatious attempts to get at the Children , get into their heads and mold their World perceptions to suit the sick desires of their twisted little faggot minds .
There is a type of sexually aggressive, flamboyant, in-your-face homosexual, often referred to as "swish faggots," whom I find annoyingly repulsive and whom I avoid whenever possible. Aside from that category I have absolutely nothing against ordinary people who happen to be homosexual and who aside from that circumstance are perfectly normal human beings. I have known several such individuals all of whom I found to be exceptionally intelligent and creative and not at all deserving of the kind of persecution these people often are subjected to.
As far as the sexual preference of homosexuals is concerned, it simply is none of my business. And as far as the rather common misconception that homosexuality is linked to pedophilia, the statistical reality is the vast majority of pedophiles are otherwise ordinary heterosexual males, many of whom are married and some of whom molest their own children.
My late wife was a clinical psychologist who, along with the vast majority of her colleagues, believed that innate homophobic disposition and intolerance often reveals anger toward one's own latent homosexual tendencies.
There is a type of sexually aggressive, flamboyant, in-your-face homosexual, often referred to as "swish faggots," whom I find annoyingly repulsive and whom I avoid whenever possible. Aside from that category I have absolutely nothing against ordinary people who happen to be homosexual and who aside from that circumstance are perfectly normal human beings.
And as far as the rather common misconception that homosexuality is linked to pedophilia, the statistical reality is the vast majority of pedophiles are otherwise ordinary heterosexual males, many of whom are married and some of whom molest their own children.
Queers are no less able to control their behaviour than Dwarves can control their height.
Happily, both groups can find jobs in the entertainment industry.
LOL. I find your post amusing.
However, I do believe that folks can control their behavior. A straight man can control his urge to take a mistress; and alcoholic can avoid "taking that first drink"; and a homo can curb his actions where his particular sin is concerned.
You breeders would say that.One thing's for certain: there wouldn't be any "gays" on earth if not for the procreative actions of a man and a woman.
I once asked a gay Christian why God made gays. He had to think about it and finally said "to keep other gays happy".
