Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
USMB should start a new Forum called the "I Hate America" forum.
This is bullshit
Improving what is broken is a sign of love buddy.
What I hate, as a Canadian, is having my respect and even perhaps love for the Americans I have known, being forced to be deteriorated by what may well be an immoral fool by the name of Trump.
Regards
DL
“Immoral fool”
For working diligently for America’s Best?
Yes. Now residing in cages. Soon to be in residential schools near a town near you.
Oh happy days, sing with me now, Oh happy daaaaays
Regards
DL
How would your “moral” president protect the interests of taxpayers, the citizenry and keep America from being overrun by the worlds filth?
you just dont realize redistribution first requires theft do you???so you want to steal from one person at the point of a gun and give it to someone it doesnt belong to,,,Taxation determines what poverty levels will exist within it’s demographic form. It controls the graph shown below. Governments control taxation and thus control poverty levels directly.
You're so far from solving ANYTHING with this approach.. Redistribution of money NEVER fixes the underlying problems of poverty... Having a FUNCTIONAL govt at city/state/fed levels that PRIORITIZES it's duties does..
It's education, health care, crime, addiction, and mental disorders that affect poverty... Making folks "comfortable" in poverty is NOT humane.. Getting them functional and making better decisions does....
Exactly. That takes a redistribution of resources, which is what I am all in for.
That redistribution fixes the problems so you might look at your conclusion of the opposite being good.
Regards
DL
wouldnt that make you a thief???
Do I?
Quote where I said that please.
I think I would answer yes but see your wording as you lying by inference.
Regards
DL
thats not a burden ,,,thats an abuse,,,and also a different subject,,they have no more duties to society than the poor do, which is to not be a burden to your neighbor,,,
The rich have already unduly burdened the poor with their gun control policies and their precious NICS shitlist.
you just dont realize redistribution first requires theft do you???so you want to steal from one person at the point of a gun and give it to someone it doesnt belong to,,,You're so far from solving ANYTHING with this approach.. Redistribution of money NEVER fixes the underlying problems of poverty... Having a FUNCTIONAL govt at city/state/fed levels that PRIORITIZES it's duties does..
It's education, health care, crime, addiction, and mental disorders that affect poverty... Making folks "comfortable" in poverty is NOT humane.. Getting them functional and making better decisions does....
Exactly. That takes a redistribution of resources, which is what I am all in for.
That redistribution fixes the problems so you might look at your conclusion of the opposite being good.
Regards
DL
wouldnt that make you a thief???
Do I?
Quote where I said that please.
I think I would answer yes but see your wording as you lying by inference.
Regards
DL
Goof.
Trump did his last gift to the rich with taxes, not with theft. Right?
Then again, he did help to impose more poverty, and if that is immoral to you, you might say that Trump is a thief, as he stole from the poor to give to the rich.
Regards
DL
Way to twist my words into exactly the opposite of what I said.When you're a proponent of looting one group of people in order to feather the nests of other people, you're as far removed from morality as you can get.And do remember that this is a moral question. Don't be shy.
Covetousness is a sin, not a virtue.
Good moral thinking.
We agree that the rich are immoral in their thinking and unethical in their actions.
Regards
DL
Allowing people to keep what is theirs in the first place isn't a "gift" goof....To do so presumes that all of everyone's accumulated wealth belongs first to The State....That is the core tenet of Marxism.Goof.
Trump did his last gift to the rich with taxes, not with theft. Right?
Then again, he did help to impose more poverty, and if that is immoral to you, you might say that Trump is a thief, as he stole from the poor to give to the rich.
Regards
DL
you just dont realize redistribution first requires theft do you???so you want to steal from one person at the point of a gun and give it to someone it doesnt belong to,,,You're so far from solving ANYTHING with this approach.. Redistribution of money NEVER fixes the underlying problems of poverty... Having a FUNCTIONAL govt at city/state/fed levels that PRIORITIZES it's duties does..
It's education, health care, crime, addiction, and mental disorders that affect poverty... Making folks "comfortable" in poverty is NOT humane.. Getting them functional and making better decisions does....
Exactly. That takes a redistribution of resources, which is what I am all in for.
That redistribution fixes the problems so you might look at your conclusion of the opposite being good.
Regards
DL
wouldnt that make you a thief???
Do I?
Quote where I said that please.
I think I would answer yes but see your wording as you lying by inference.
Regards
DL
Goof.
Trump did his last gift to the rich with taxes, not with theft. Right?
Then again, he did help to impose more poverty, and if that is immoral to you, you might say that Trump is a thief, as he stole from the poor to give to the rich.
Regards
DL
one of his problems is hes mixing morals and government,,,they are two separate things all together,,,Allowing people to keep what is theirs in the first place isn't a "gift" goof....To do so presumes that all of everyone's accumulated wealth belongs first to The State....That is the core tenet of Marxism.Goof.
Trump did his last gift to the rich with taxes, not with theft. Right?
Then again, he did help to impose more poverty, and if that is immoral to you, you might say that Trump is a thief, as he stole from the poor to give to the rich.
Regards
DL
You sitting in judgement of what allegedly constitutes "morality" is as absurd as it gets.
You'll have that with worshipers of The State, from which all blessings flow for the Marxist.one of his problems is hes mixing morals and government,,,they are two separate things all together,,,Allowing people to keep what is theirs in the first place isn't a "gift" goof....To do so presumes that all of everyone's accumulated wealth belongs first to The State....That is the core tenet of Marxism.Goof.
Trump did his last gift to the rich with taxes, not with theft. Right?
Then again, he did help to impose more poverty, and if that is immoral to you, you might say that Trump is a thief, as he stole from the poor to give to the rich.
Regards
DL
You sitting in judgement of what allegedly constitutes "morality" is as absurd as it gets.
government has to by its very existence abandon morals and act almost as god when all they are is a bunch of people,,
USMB should start a new Forum called the "I Hate America" forum.
This is bullshit
Improving what is broken is a sign of love buddy.
What I hate, as a Canadian, is having my respect and even perhaps love for the Americans I have known, being forced to be deteriorated by what may well be an immoral fool by the name of Trump.
Regards
DL
“Immoral fool”
For working diligently for America’s Best?
Yes. Now residing in cages. Soon to be in residential schools near a town near you.
Oh happy days, sing with me now, Oh happy daaaaays
Regards
DL
How would your “moral” president protect the interests of taxpayers, the citizenry and keep America from being overrun by the worlds filth?
Give a moral look to the socio economic demographic pyramid with a fair tax law and reap those vast rewards.
On immigration.
Mirror the U.S. policies to Canada's well working system with a bit of your added blocks to the chosen few. That and follow the French on religious laws.
Trump was elected for security and fairness to the little guy. That is the way to do his job.
Regards
DL
You'll have that with worshipers of The State, from which all blessings flow for the Marxist.one of his problems is hes mixing morals and government,,,they are two separate things all together,,,Allowing people to keep what is theirs in the first place isn't a "gift" goof....To do so presumes that all of everyone's accumulated wealth belongs first to The State....That is the core tenet of Marxism.Goof.
Trump did his last gift to the rich with taxes, not with theft. Right?
Then again, he did help to impose more poverty, and if that is immoral to you, you might say that Trump is a thief, as he stole from the poor to give to the rich.
Regards
DL
You sitting in judgement of what allegedly constitutes "morality" is as absurd as it gets.
government has to by its very existence abandon morals and act almost as god when all they are is a bunch of people,,
Taxation determines what poverty levels will exist within it’s demographic form. It controls the graph shown below. Governments control taxation and thus control poverty levels directly.
You're so far from solving ANYTHING with this approach.. Redistribution of money NEVER fixes the underlying problems of poverty... Having a FUNCTIONAL govt at city/state/fed levels that PRIORITIZES it's duties does..
It's education, health care, crime, addiction, and mental disorders that affect poverty... Making folks "comfortable" in poverty is NOT humane.. Getting them functional and making better decisions does....
Exactly. That takes a redistribution of resources, which is what I am all in for.
That redistribution fixes the problems so you might look at your conclusion of the opposite being good.
Regards
DL
Is it moral for our governments to impose poverty on us?
Taxation determines what poverty levels will exist within it’s demographic form. It controls the graph shown below. Governments control taxation and thus control poverty levels directly.
Imagine if you will, the real truth of that taxation, if used correctly, to move the wealth shown in this graph wherever it wants to, with minimal effect on the whole. The fact is, experts say that such a reality would be a win win for everyone.
https://www.upworthy.com/9-out-of-10-americans-are-completely-wrong-about-this-mind-blowing-fact-2
Not how little of a change would be needed to reach the ideal.
Wise and moral people throughout history, as well as most religious movements, put poverty as the number one enemy to man’s first priority, which is security.
For perhaps the first time in history, we have the wealth where we could end poverty quite easily, --- just with our collective loose change.
It would seem to me that governments are not acting ethically and should be chastised.
I guess that George Carlin, a wise person, was correct in what he said of what Americans cannot feel in their anal orifices. I apply the same condition to the vast majority of the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-14SllPPLxY
If true that we are being willfully ignorant, and do not even care about each other to insure we live in a moral environment, then our owners have succeeded in cowering man’s moral nature to a state of subservience. We have given up our freedom. If we ever had any.
We have all accepted to be slaves. Shame on us all.
We do not live in a Democracy. We live in a Hypocrisy.
We can easily rid ourselves of poverty.
Should we?
Morality says yes.
Will we do the right thing?
Not till hell freezes over.
Regards
DL
Look at the graph my friend and tell me if it looks like the poor are the thieves or if it looks like the rich are.
you just dont realize redistribution first requires theft do you???so you want to steal from one person at the point of a gun and give it to someone it doesnt belong to,,,You're so far from solving ANYTHING with this approach.. Redistribution of money NEVER fixes the underlying problems of poverty... Having a FUNCTIONAL govt at city/state/fed levels that PRIORITIZES it's duties does..
It's education, health care, crime, addiction, and mental disorders that affect poverty... Making folks "comfortable" in poverty is NOT humane.. Getting them functional and making better decisions does....
Exactly. That takes a redistribution of resources, which is what I am all in for.
That redistribution fixes the problems so you might look at your conclusion of the opposite being good.
Regards
DL
wouldnt that make you a thief???
Do I?
Quote where I said that please.
I think I would answer yes but see your wording as you lying by inference.
Regards
DL
Goof.
Trump did his last gift to the rich with taxes, not with theft. Right?
Then again, he did help to impose more poverty, and if that is immoral to you, you might say that Trump is a thief, as he stole from the poor to give to the rich.
Regards
DL
Way to twist my words into exactly the opposite of what I said.When you're a proponent of looting one group of people in order to feather the nests of other people, you're as far removed from morality as you can get.And do remember that this is a moral question. Don't be shy.
Covetousness is a sin, not a virtue.
Good moral thinking.
We agree that the rich are immoral in their thinking and unethical in their actions.
Regards
DL
You're a Randian antagonist come to life.....Not to mention a fucking bigot to boot.
What's this We shit?Is it moral for our governments to impose poverty on us?
Taxation determines what poverty levels will exist within it’s demographic form. It controls the graph shown below. Governments control taxation and thus control poverty levels directly.
Imagine if you will, the real truth of that taxation, if used correctly, to move the wealth shown in this graph wherever it wants to, with minimal effect on the whole. The fact is, experts say that such a reality would be a win win for everyone.
https://www.upworthy.com/9-out-of-10-americans-are-completely-wrong-about-this-mind-blowing-fact-2
Not how little of a change would be needed to reach the ideal.
Wise and moral people throughout history, as well as most religious movements, put poverty as the number one enemy to man’s first priority, which is security.
For perhaps the first time in history, we have the wealth where we could end poverty quite easily, --- just with our collective loose change.
It would seem to me that governments are not acting ethically and should be chastised.
I guess that George Carlin, a wise person, was correct in what he said of what Americans cannot feel in their anal orifices. I apply the same condition to the vast majority of the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-14SllPPLxY
If true that we are being willfully ignorant, and do not even care about each other to insure we live in a moral environment, then our owners have succeeded in cowering man’s moral nature to a state of subservience. We have given up our freedom. If we ever had any.
We have all accepted to be slaves. Shame on us all.
We do not live in a Democracy. We live in a Hypocrisy.
We can easily rid ourselves of poverty.
Should we?
Morality says yes.
Will we do the right thing?
Not till hell freezes over.
Regards
DL
Profit is theft.Look at the graph my friend and tell me if it looks like the poor are the thieves or if it looks like the rich are.
This is just damaged thinking.. What has Bill Gates or the CEO of Glaxo-SmithCline STOLEN from anyone? Name a rich person who has "mugged you"... They are rich because they TOOK major RISK to provide goods and services to millions of people... You want a piece of their action??? TAKE THEIR RISKS..
Go pay $7.95 for a stock trade and BECOME an "owner"... That's what rational people do that BELIEVE enough in a program or product to invest real cash OR most of the time you have in life to a company....
