Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good. Now, do you see what I see? Do you know what I know? Listen to what I say!I was going to suggest you read through verse 29.
Clearly, you are not reading the Word, because if you actually did instead of just making up what you want it to say, you'd realize that He wasn't talking about the Law at all.Again, the command has nothing whatever to do with clothing. Remember what Jesus asked people living under a literal interpretation of Mosaic Law under penalty of death. "Why worry about what you eat or what you wear" implying the subject isn't food or clothing.
for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.Ah, but you see, Yeshua clearly understood that the Law was literal, because He changed a number of things, such as raising the bar from not murdering to not hating, from literally counting steps on the Sabbath to the Sabbath being made for man, not the other way around, and others.But no. I do not mix pagan beliefs with what God taught. Do you celebrate Mithras birth on December 25th?
No?
Did you exchange gifts and "make merry" on that day, celebrating the birth of a triune mangod?
Yes? Are you Catholic, Protestant or any of the 30,000 denominations? Whats the difference?
Can you put a drop of poison in a cup and not contaminate the entire drink; vomit and go mad?
Seriously?He wasn't talking about the Law at all.
Ah, but you see, Yeshua clearly understood that the Law was literal,
You don't know what you're talking about.Seriously?
Jesus asking people why worry about what you eat or what you wear is precisely about the law.
If they didn't follow a compulsory interpretation of the law according to the talmud, what Jesus called the traditions of men, and worry about what to eat and what to wear, they were punished in a myriad of unkind ways.
Yeshua was bringing a change, or He wouldn't have had to spell it out.You clearly don't know what you are talking about. Jesus understood that the subject of kosher law , the flesh of one creature or another, whether clean or unclean, is about teaching, not food.
"Its not what goes into your mouth that defiles a person its what comes out of it."
Again, the blood of unclean creatures that do not ruminate is dripping from your lips.
Wash yourself clean you filthy animal, your sorcery no longer has any effect on anyone..
Right. Jesus was teaching a new way to understand and comply with the divine commands, the same way to follow the law that was originally taught by Moses that was lost to time after his death, the only way to understand and comply with the law that fulfills the promise of LIFE.Yeshua was bringing a change, or He wouldn't have had to spell it out.
Nope, Moses expected the people to follow the law literally. You could, but won't, try to support that statement beyond just repeating yourself that it's something completely different.Right. Jesus was teaching a new way to understand and comply with the divine commands, the same way to follow the law that was originally taught by Moses that was lost to time after his death, the only way to understand and comply with the law that fulfills the promise of LIFE.
The Law didn't change, the Covenant did. Please try to keep up.The only thing that changed about the law, the only thing that became obsolete after the revelation of Jesus, was the wrong way to follow the law, the same perverse way that you do.
When you try to apply an OT law and insist someone has to obey it, you need to follow all of the law perfectly, or it does you no good.If you had an inkling about what Jesus taught you would never have asked me if I mix fabrics.
I always do exactly as God commands. Just not in stupid way that you expect. The perverse way that you claim the law should be understood and followed is exactly what Jesus died opposingWhen you try to apply an OT law and insist someone has to obey it, you need to follow all of the law perfectly, or it does you no good.
Nope, Moses expected the people to follow the law literally
It's easy to say you do exactly as God commands when you interpret everything God says in ways to suit yourself instead of what He actually said.I always do exactly as God commands. Just not in stupid way that you expect. The perverse way that you claim the law should be understood and followed is exactly what Jesus died opposing
Yup, he taught them to follow the Law literally. It makes zero sense to write Law that isn't meant to be taken literally, but that's where you're at. I mean, it would be entertaining to watch you attempt to convince a judge that the law against parking in a handicapped spot is just a metaphor for the struggle of left-handed Hottentots and you shouldn't be fined for parking there."For I know that after my death you will utterly corrupt yourselves and turn aside from THE WAY that I taught you to follow [the law]." Deuteronomy 31:29
Of course, they did, because Yeshua showed them the way. Just so you know, He is the Way to God, there is no other. I did notice that you failed to deal with what we saw in Revelation, where Yeshua is leading the armies of heaven, carrying the name "Word of God" and title, "Lord of lords". Haven't you gone back to imagine new meanings for words to explain it away?Didn't you know that the earliest Christians called themselves followers of the way? Just go away
Right. He showed them that the words used in the law are figurative the subjects hidden and must be understood to be followed in the only right way that fulfills the promise of eternal life.Of course, they did, because Yeshua showed them the way. J
Why then did Moses write the Law in code so that everyone would follow it wrong for 1,500 years? You do realize that you are espousing the king of all conspiracy theories, right? Then, you expect us all to believe that God kept all this hidden for another 2,000 years until He revealed it all to you in a smoky haze on night in your drum circle in college.Right. He showed them that the words used in the law are figurative the subjects hidden and must be understood to be followed, the only way that fulfills the promise of eternal life. Simple.
Moses said that the instructions in the law were easy to understand and do. And what is so mysterious to you about referring to other people as lower beasts according to their behavior?Why then did Moses write the Law in code so that everyone would follow it wrong for 1,500 years?
I don't, that's something that, yet again, you just made up.Moses said that the instructions in the law were easy to understand and do. And what is so mysterious to you about referring to other people as lower beasts according to their behavior?
Because the Law is supposed to be the set of rules and regulations governing the Israelites' behavior. It was not written in code, it said, do not murder, do not steal, do not commit adultery. Plain and simple, no need to twist it or re-interpret it to allow you to do what you want.People of every nation, language, kingdom, and tribe have been comparing other people to lower beasts to either praise or insult ever since people could talk. How is that code above your grasp? Does this revelation shock you? God speaks through prophets in figurative language. Why would God when giving the Law speak through Moses a prophet in any other way? think. You can do it!
He taught them to follow the Law as it was written. There's no need for it to be in code. That's something you just made up.And yes, if Moses was right when he said the people would turn aside from the way he taught to follow law after his death then people were doing it wrong for 1500 years before Jesus was born.
Sorry, you're simply not credible.And Christians have been doing it wrong for 1699 years, ever since 325CE when Rome assimilated and perverted Christianity with their existing Mithraic beliefs and practices, the secret "MYSTERY RELIGION" of the Roman government and military that originated in Babylon.
Thats the way the cookie crumbles. Deal with it.
Jesus said " Satan was a murderer from the beginning" which is a reference to the talking serpent in the garden of Eden who literally didn't kill anyone. What he did was beguile A&E into defying the command of God by saying they would not die but would become like God, a lie.It was not written in code, it said, do not murder,
Nonsense. I am not the one twisting and perverting the plain meaning of the Law to mean things it does not. That would be you.Jesus said " Satan was a murderer from the beginning" which is a reference to the talking serpent in the garden of Eden who literally didn't kill anyone. What he did was beguile A&E into defying the command of God by saying they would not die but would become like God, a lie.
What actually happened is they were expelled from paradise, losing their sanity for life.
In the same way you are here trying to beguile people into setting aside divine law to worship a human being which makes you a murderer.
It's a law, which means it has to be clear as to what is expected and what earns punishment. Do you not understand that?Right. Its not code anymore than a talking serpent is code.
Do you know what Satan was doing between the time he was thrown out of heaven and the time the earth became without form and void?Your inability to grasp what any child playing in a schoolyard knows is very interesting, but stupid
I give up. Partying at the Copacabana?Do you know what Satan was doing between the time he was thrown out of heaven and the time the earth became without form and void?
You're trying to say that Yeshua wasn't saying what He was saying about Satan and the serpent he inhabited, so I simply asked if you had any real idea what you were talking about, and you came through with flying colors. You demonstrated yet again that you don't.I give up. Partying at the Copacabana?
If you ever have an intelligent question, ask someone else.
No. I am simply saying that the talking serpent in the story is a metaphor for a human archetype of which you are a perfect example and a direct descendant of that despicable human creature.You're trying to say that Yeshua wasn't saying what He was saying about Satan and the serpent he inhabited
I always find it extremely amusing that when a person doesn't comprehend something so simple as a talking serpent in a children's story they claim that I don't know what I am talking about instead of admitting that they just don't understand. Its actually more pitiful than amusing. Damnso I simply asked if you had any real idea what you were talking about, and you came through with flying colors. You demonstrated yet again that you don't.
And there you go, going juvenile again. When are you going to figure out it doesn't work?No. I am simply saying that the talking serpent in the story is a metaphor for a human archetype of which you are a perfect example and a direct descendant of that despicable human creature.
It's a legitimate question. You didn't like Yeshua calling Sata a murderer, so I merely asked if you had any idea what he was up to. You know, because like you know stuff, and reasons.Would you like for me to open your eyes to see how that is the truth, the very truth?
You asked, "do you know what Satan was doing between the time he was thrown out of heaven and the time the earth became without form and void" WTF! which only reveals your confusion.
Well, it's obvious you don't, because you insist every part of the Bible is written in code that no one until you came along was able to understand. So, no, you don't know what you're talking about.I always find it extremely amusing that when a person doesn't comprehend something so simple as a talking serpent in a children's story they claim that I don't know what I am talking about instead of admitting that they just don't understand. Its actually more pitiful than amusing. Damn
You forgot this part. See if you can spot the meaning behind the code:"This, he told me, is the curse which is going out over all of the land; for by the writing on one side every thief shall be swept clean away and by the writing on the other side every perjurer shall be swept clean away. I have sent it out, says the Lord God of Hosts, and it shall enter the house of the thief and the house of the man who has perjured himself in my name. It shall stay inside that house and demolish it, timbers, and stones, and all," Zechariah 5:3
"And as soon as Judas received the bread, (at the last supper) Satan entered him" John 13:27
It may seem to you like I am the one who is confused but, I assure you, it only seems that way.
So your position is that the talking serpent is not a metaphor for a human archetype that you so perfectly display in your pathetic attempt to beguile people into defying the law of God, and teaching others to do the same, which amounts to murder, like satan was a murderer...Got it.And there you go, going juvenile again.
Who said I didn't like Jesus calling Satan a murderer? And I already told you what he was up to. He beguiled A&E into defying the command of God by telling them they would not die but will become like God, a lie which amounts to murder since death is the consequence for defying the Law of God. Death, a curse that you so perfectly obviously and obliviously are under. Professor.It's a legitimate question. You didn't like Yeshua calling Sata a murderer, so I merely asked if you had any idea what he was up to
Your pathetic attempts to claim that Satan tempting Adam and Eve is about humans instead are quite amusing, and pathetic. Have I mentioned that they are pathetic?So your position is that the talking serpent is not a metaphor for a human archetype that you so perfectly display in your pathetic attempt to beguile people into defying the law of God, and teaching others to do the same, which amounts to murder, like satan was a murderer...Got it.
You do know that denying the truth does not make it a lie or make it disappear? Right?
Interesting, yet it wasn't him driving the serpent? Can you pick a horse and stay on it?Who said I didn't like Jesus calling Satan a murderer? And I already told you what he was up to. He beguiled A&E into defying the command of God by telling them they would not die but will become like God, a lie which amounts to murder since death is the consequence for defying the Law of God. Death a curse that you so perfectly obviously and obliviously are under. Professor.
Where do I claim "believers can defy the law of God"? And I will ask you again how you think you are escaping the Law when you mix the fabrics in your clothes. You seem to have a hard time with that one. And you still haven't dealt with Him leading the armies of heaven bearing the name "Word of God" and title "Lord of lords".its the exact same thing that you are saying and doing. You claim that believers can defy the law of God and worship Jesus and not die but will receive eternal life instead, an obvious satanic lie.
Tsk, tsk, still trying to make it about me. It hasn't worked yet and it's not working now.Simple. Easy enough for any 8 year old child to clearly see. Its not rocket science or mysterious.
How do you hope to escape the condemnation of the hell that you're already in? Tell more lies?
Damn. And You are trying to convince someone that I am confused? Copra sanctum!
