Pop23
Gold Member
Of course they don't ( give me a friggin break )
Why you may ask? ( and I know you will )
Polygamy is now illegal!
When it's no longer illegal, these boiler plate arrangements can easily be modified to fill in the blanks.
Progressive thinkers sure don't think progressively.
Your right, you can't even begin to duplicate the rights, responsibilities, and benefits of Civil Marriage for close to the $50 bucks. Let alone the MASSIVE expansion of government required to then deal with N Men: N Women spousal relationships and N Parents : N Children issues. Something not needed since the 1 Spouse : 1 Spouse relationship is already well established in the family code.
Thanks for agreeing.
>>>>
You deflect then claim my agreement
You have become a disappointment WW.
I said: "And they sure as hell don't do it for the 50 bucks it cost for a Civil Marriage license."
You said: "Of course they don't ( give me a friggin break )"
There is no way in hell that a business partnership or LLC can duplicated all the rights, responsibilities, and benefits of Civil Marriage for $50 bucks - for those that can be duplicated, some can't.
>>>>
The question is polygamy and how the government could handle the paperwork to handle the relationships within such, not the expense to do so.
You deflect in order that it would appear I agree.
The relationships are not much different than my example showed.
The post that I responded to said there was no reason to opposed Polygamy, not true I provided one.
My explanation was a function of government, YOU jumped in the the business partner/LLC deflection - that was not something I brought up.
The relationship between family members (and the government when such relationships have legal bearing) are much different then business partnerships and LLC's as many aspects of the spousal relationship cannot be duplicated through a business license. The cost of setting up such a business partnership relationship can be thousands of dollars on the low end and millions on the high end for a large LLC.
It would take a massive expansion of family code law to deal with families where there are 3, 6, 9, 50, 100... adults all married to each other in terms of rights, property, and children in such a situation. The structure to deal with two adults in a legal family relationship where one did not exist before already exists - it would take no expansion of government.
Therefore there is a secular, non-morality reason for limiting the legal recognition of such relationships - something that was said does not exist.
>>>>
That's funny
You come up with a long litany of reasons polygamy is a non starter and give all kinds of things that need to change, and I show you that a format indeed exists that can be used, and is used that addresses very complex relationships, and you respond that it, the template would need to be modified?
Duh, big guy, THAT HAPPENS EVERY TIME LAWS CHANGE! This surprises you?
Good lord
Should we NOT have gone to the moon because it was complicated?
And what nerve you have basing a large amount of your objection on how to handle children in these relationship. Remember, it is YOUR contention that procreation should play no part in this discussion.
I am not in favor of either polygamy or incestuous marriage, but your arguments in favor of same gender marriage works deliciously well for both.
To deny it is frivolous and silly.