Nope, no motive it all. Considering he'd already told half a dozen other sources he was born in Hawaii.There was no motive for Obama to say he was born in Kenya.The absence of motive
Exactly, there is no motive for the Publisher to make up that he was born in Kenya and there is no motive for the Publisher to make up anywhere he was born but to simply ask him. Which is why Obama again in the completely logical source of the statement. His father was a Muslim raised Communist atheist and his mother an America hating communist sympathizer and Obama was and is a pretensions elitist snob with no regard for the truth.
In 1991, he was not thinking of politics and had no reason not to say he was born in Kenya like his father. By 1995 he had to be thinking of political office since he was about to run and put his correct place of birth in his autobiography hoping his lie had blown over
Correction, there was little motive. That is the sort of thing that proves compulsive liars, they lie for virtually no reason, it isn't an argument for you. And there was no motive for anyone else to do it
No one had a motive to make up he was born in Kenya either.
However, Miriam had a motive to fact check it, it was her job. Why didn't she?
If Obama didn't make it up, the Publisher had no motive to not just explain what happened, why didn't they?
All roads go back to the original birther, Obama. Patient zero of the birther movement
Sigh- and once again. Lies.
First of all- there is no evidence that anyone ever intentionally stated that Barack Obama Jr. was born in Kenya.
Miriem Goderich described it as her error:
This was nothing more than a fact checking error by me
Why did she make an error? All humans make errors
That is why we all know this phrase: To err is human; to forgive, divine.
Miriem Goderich did explain what happened in a manner sufficient to everyone not suffering from ODS.
And then you come back to your most base lie:
original birther, Obama. Patient zero of the birther movement
Two lies in one- the first part 'original birther' is a lie because even you acknowledge you don't know that every time you ask us to speculate about the answers you don't know.
But more damning is the second lie.
'Patient zero' refers to the source of infection. Meaning you say that this phrase in this obscure brochure was the source of the Birther movement.
And of course that is just another of your lies. Birthers did not find out about this pamphlet until May 2012- more than 4 years after the 'birth' of the Birther movement.
So unless you are also fantasizing about a time machine- this claim of yours is just another of your string of lies.
Last edited: