Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indeed. yet whenever anyone suggests cuts, the left is all aghast that anyone would want to cut one of their vote-buying programs.Every little bit helps, is the GOP argument.And just how much money do you think that will generate?It's only higher tax rates on the very rich.
FAIL.
Before he began disagreeing with your talking point worldview?Yes, he used to be funny. Used to be.Yeah, Maher really looks like he's out for laughs there, doesn't he?
Tell you what -- why don't you find the "comedy routine" that's from? We'd all like to have a laugh.
I used to like Maher, before he turned into a typical, pissed off unhinged left-wing loon.
Link?How would spending less not reduce the deficit? Seriously, are you high or something?
How would taxing the rich more not reduce the deficit? Seriously, are you high or something?
How is not taxing the bottom 49% helping to reduce the deficit?
Fail. Your claim that it's from a comedy routine is therefore unsubstantiated and dismissed.Fuck you. Find your own damn links. I watched it live.So where's the comedy routine? Link, boy. Now.Yes, he does!
It's not confiscation, it's taxation. And it's not their money if it is owed in taxes.How would taxing the rich more not reduce the deficit? Seriously, are you high or something?
How would you and your like-minded sheeple paying something, anything not help?
Like I said, start paying your fair share and cut spending, then get back to me on confiscating more of other people's money.
Notice how the left is avoiding that line of reasoning
Not really. But that's what you're told to mindlessly parrot, so there you go.Before he began disagreeing with your talking point worldview?Yes, he used to be funny. Used to be.I used to like Maher, before he turned into a typical, pissed off unhinged left-wing loon.
Wingnuts hate anyone who disagrees with them.
Link?How would taxing the rich more not reduce the deficit? Seriously, are you high or something?
How is not taxing the bottom 49% helping to reduce the deficit?
Indeed. yet whenever anyone suggests cuts, the left is all aghast that anyone would want to cut one of their vote-buying programs.Every little bit helps, is the GOP argument.And just how much money do you think that will generate?
I'll agree to increasing tax rates across the board if you agree to cutting entitlements across the board.
It's not confiscation, it's taxation. And it's not their money if it is owed in taxes.How would you and your like-minded sheeple paying something, anything not help?
Like I said, start paying your fair share and cut spending, then get back to me on confiscating more of other people's money.
Notice how the left is avoiding that line of reasoning
Link?How would taxing the rich more not reduce the deficit? Seriously, are you high or something?
How is not taxing the bottom 49% helping to reduce the deficit?
Fail. Your claim that it's from a comedy routine is therefore unsubstantiated and dismissed.Fuck you. Find your own damn links. I watched it live.So where's the comedy routine? Link, boy. Now.
Maher is a hate-filled lefty loon. No wonder you identify so much with him.
That's all that wingnuts understand.
Indeed. yet whenever anyone suggests cuts, the left is all aghast that anyone would want to cut one of their vote-buying programs.Every little bit helps, is the GOP argument.
I'll agree to increasing tax rates across the board if you agree to cutting entitlements across the board.
But not military entitlements, right?
Because poor people don't have money? Seems pretty simple to me, but then again, you're a wingnut who only understands basic mathematics.It's not confiscation, it's taxation. And it's not their money if it is owed in taxes.Notice how the left is avoiding that line of reasoning
Why does one group owe 30+% and another group owe 0%?
That's all that wingnuts understand.
Link to where you got the 49% figure.Link?How is not taxing the bottom 49% helping to reduce the deficit?
Link to what? Look up the Tax schedules yourself and then the allowable deductions.
What does "across the board" mean to you, dumbass?Indeed. yet whenever anyone suggests cuts, the left is all aghast that anyone would want to cut one of their vote-buying programs.Every little bit helps, is the GOP argument.
I'll agree to increasing tax rates across the board if you agree to cutting entitlements across the board.
But not military entitlements, right?
Because poor people don't have money? Seems pretty simple to me, but then again, you're a wingnut who only understands basic mathematics.It's not confiscation, it's taxation. And it's not their money if it is owed in taxes.
Why does one group owe 30+% and another group owe 0%?
Indeed. yet whenever anyone suggests cuts, the left is all aghast that anyone would want to cut one of their vote-buying programs.
I'll agree to increasing tax rates across the board if you agree to cutting entitlements across the board.
But not military entitlements, right?
Benefits paid to active and retired military are not entitlements. However, EIC payments to people like you are.
I made no such claim. Stop lying.Fail. Your claim that it's from a comedy routine is therefore unsubstantiated and dismissed.Fuck you. Find your own damn links. I watched it live.
Maher is a hate-filled lefty loon. No wonder you identify so much with him.
No, your claim that it is not from a comedy routine - from a comedian - is therefore unsubstantiated and dismissed.
Go find me the air date and I'll look for a youtube.
