Is the GOP intentionally preventing a recovery?

[Soggy in NOLA]

Link?

Link to what? Look up the Tax schedules yourself and then the allowable deductions.

Link to where you got the 49% figure.

Typical Lib... expects to be spoon fed everything. Get off your lazy ass and go look it up.

 

[Synthaholic]

Why does one group owe 30+% and another group owe 0%?

Because poor people don't have money? Seems pretty simple to me, but then again, you're a wingnut who only understands basic mathematics.

You're telling me that 175,000,000 Americans are poor? Wow.. who knew?

Where did I say that?

 

[Synthaholic]

Fail. Your claim that it's from a comedy routine is therefore unsubstantiated and dismissed.

Maher is a hate-filled lefty loon. No wonder you identify so much with him.

No, your claim that it is not from a comedy routine - from a comedian - is therefore unsubstantiated and dismissed.

Go find me the air date and I'll look for a youtube.

I made no such claim. Stop lying.

But then, if you stopped lying, you'd never post.

Oh, then you agree that I am totally, 100% correct that it is a screenshot from a comedy routine?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

But not military entitlements, right?

Benefits paid to active and retired military are not entitlements. However, EIC payments to people like you are.

How are they not entitlements?

Typically, entitlements are laws based on concepts of principle ("rights") which are themselves based in concepts of social equality or enfranchisement.

Seroisuly, how fucking stupid are you?

 

[Synthaholic]

Link to what? Look up the Tax schedules yourself and then the allowable deductions.

Link to where you got the 49% figure.

Typical Lib... expects to be spoon fed everything. Get off your lazy ass and go look it up.

He made an outrageous claim - it's up to him to back up his nonsense.

And it's up to you to blindly believe him.

 

[Synthaholic]

Benefits paid to active and retired military are not entitlements. However, EIC payments to people like you are.

How are they not entitlements?

Typically, entitlements are laws based on concepts of principle ("rights") which are themselves based in concepts of social equality or enfranchisement.

Seroisuly, how fucking stupid are you?

Entitlements are laws?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Link to where you got the 49% figure.

Typical Lib... expects to be spoon fed everything. Get off your lazy ass and go look it up.

He made an outrageous claim - it's up to him to back up his nonsense.

And it's up to you to blindly believe him.

Everything you have posted have been outrageous claims.. and you have backed up none of it as of yet.

 

[DontBeStupid]

Link to where you got the 49% figure.

Typical Lib... expects to be spoon fed everything. Get off your lazy ass and go look it up.

He made an outrageous claim - it's up to him to back up his nonsense.

You're wasting your time. They will never provide links or back up to wild-eyed claims they make about taxation or the economy. It wouldn't fit in their view of the world.

You'll have better luck convincing a rock it can hula.

 

[Synthaholic]

Typical Lib... expects to be spoon fed everything. Get off your lazy ass and go look it up.

He made an outrageous claim - it's up to him to back up his nonsense.

And it's up to you to blindly believe him.

Everything you have posted have been outrageous claims.. and you have backed up none of it as of yet.

I backed up what I said with Maddow's fact-filled segment.

What did you do?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

How are they not entitlements?

Typically, entitlements are laws based on concepts of principle ("rights") which are themselves based in concepts of social equality or enfranchisement.

Seroisuly, how fucking stupid are you?

Entitlements are laws?

A "right" is itself an entitlement associated with a moral or social principle, such that an "entitlement" is a provision made in accordance with legal framework of a society.

I'm growing weary of paying your way AND doing your research.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

He made an outrageous claim - it's up to him to back up his nonsense.

And it's up to you to blindly believe him.

Everything you have posted have been outrageous claims.. and you have backed up none of it as of yet.

I backed up what I said with Maddow's fact-filled segment.

What did you do?

An opinion-based rant is not factual.

FAIL.

 

[Synthaholic]

Typical Lib... expects to be spoon fed everything. Get off your lazy ass and go look it up.

He made an outrageous claim - it's up to him to back up his nonsense.

You're wasting your time. They will never provide links or back up to wild-eyed claims they make about taxation or the economy. It wouldn't fit in their view of the world.

You'll have better luck convincing a rock it can hula.

It's why conservatism has failed and continues to fail.

Facts and reality have a strong Liberal bias.

 

[Synthaholic]

Everything you have posted have been outrageous claims.. and you have backed up none of it as of yet.

I backed up what I said with Maddow's fact-filled segment.

What did you do?

An opinion-based rant is not factual.

FAIL.

And you refuse to show what is not fact in that piece.

And you know why? Because you didn't even watch it!

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

He made an outrageous claim - it's up to him to back up his nonsense.

You're wasting your time. They will never provide links or back up to wild-eyed claims they make about taxation or the economy. It wouldn't fit in their view of the world.

You'll have better luck convincing a rock it can hula.

It's why conservatism has failed and continues to fail.

Facts and reality have a strong Liberal bias.

Realty? What do you Marxist Nanny-Staters know of reality?

Palease.

Call me when your tax bill creeps up above $0.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Fucking liberal parasites...

 

[bripat9643]

You know that isn't true. Economists credit the stimulus with saving the economy, that isn't in dispute I'm afraid.

You mean some shills on the government payroll credit the stimulus with saving the economy. Real economists say he is wrecking the economy.

As for a "do nothing" Congress, that also simply isn't true.

• Made college loans more affordable
  
• The Cash for Clunkers program to help the auto industry
  
• New consumer protections for credit-card users
  
• Making it easier for women to challenge pay discrimination
  
• Increasing federal regulation of tobacco products
  
• Cracking down on waste in Pentagon weapons acquisition
  
• Making attacks based on sexual orientation a federal hate crime
  
• Giving businesses tax incentives to hire unemployed workers
  
• Tax credits for first-time homeowners
  
• Repealed DADT
  
• Health Care Reform

Cough . . . cough. Sensible people don't want government doing any of that. Each item is either counter productive or none of the government's business.

What have the Repugs been doing? Not helping people, that's for sure.

They passed a budget, for one thing. Saddling people with debt doesn't help them.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because poor people don't have money? Seems pretty simple to me, but then again, you're a wingnut who only understands basic mathematics.

You're telling me that 175,000,000 Americans are poor? Wow.. who knew?

Where did I say that?

Yes, "We've got enough fucking morons here", but enough about you and the rest of the liberals.

 

[bripat9643]

If cutting government spending will create jobs, let's cut a few hundred billion out of defense,

and after we see the layoffs in the PRIVATE SECTOR of the defense industry, let's see where the jobs magically materialize somewhere else to make up those job losses and then some.

That's really going to happen? Are you sure?

We already did that. It was called "the peace dividend." Because the Soviet Union disappeared, we were able to cut the defense budget by a couple hundred billion during the Clinton administration.

What were the results?

 

[DontBeStupid]

Real economists say he is wrecking the economy.

Name some.

 

[bripat9643]

They don't really want to cut government spending Carb. They want to cut government spending that helps the poor out of their predictments. They gleefully ask for public investments when it makes a private concern outstandingly wealthy. In other words..socialism for the rich..corporatism for everyone else.

Of course they don't realize that cutting education for their fellow Americans dooms this nation into become a third world backwater with a big army.

And we all know how long that lasts..

Your messiah voted for TARP, dipstick. He voted for ethanol subsidies, tariffs and hundreds of other subsidies for big business.