As long as we are talking about unions, let's discuss how jobs are moving to right to work states. Employers are more willing to hire people if they are secure in the idea that they can let go of workers who are sub par.
Unions were great when they had actual rights they needed to fight for. Like a 40 hour work week. Or a vacation every now and then. Or bathroom breaks. Today unions are obsolete and have only lowered production while raising costs.
If I could get away with hiring slave labor I'd do it too. Are you trying to make the point that corporations should be able to fuck people over with impunity? If you are then you've done a fine job but if you're trying to make the case that right to work is somehow superior to union shops you've done no such thing.
Do you really think that the observation that businesses move to areas with lower costs is ground breaking? Even more important, do you think that businesses moving to areas with lower costs is a good thing? I know some of you are going to knee-jerk your response to that question but please try to think just a little bit before you answer.
WHy do you think businesses "fuck people" by offering them jobs? If they were fucking people, the people wouldn't take the job. They'd take the job that didnt fuck them.
I realize lib-world view is that ordinary people are incapable of figuring out what their best interests are. But that is a lie.
Businesses cutting costs are good for everyone. It creates more efficiency, benefitting consumers and producers alike. Didnt you take Econ 101? No, probably not.