Sure, but you are arguing with me about it like you have a horse in the race.It is logical for me to ask you what knowledge you have to support your belief.Apparently you are unable to make the leap in logic that if you have no knowledge and no belief that it is illogical for you to be arguing with those that do. Therefore, your actions prove you are not agnostic.Apparently, you don't understand what agnosticism is.You don't sound agnostic.I'm intellectually sympathetic to your non-belief about god fantasies as worshipped in today's religions.Most people think of "god" as a being who resembles them, hangs out in a place called "heaven" and passes harsh judgements on us.
...
Nearly all religions have three things in common: 1. They believe in a god. 2. Only their religions is right. 3. Fear.
...
I do not subscribe to any religious dogma any more than I subscribe to any political dogma. I believe there is a force of energy that is so great it can create things from nothing, including the human life form.
Your position is relatively reasonable, but you must admit, "force of energy" is a very general concept that also has a problem with origins.
Therefore, without ANY knowledge about original energy sources and their transformation to various masses, we can only be agnostic about whether a "god" exists.
Here is a simplified explanation that even you should understand:
No knowledge = no belief.
So tell us your knowledge.
Fantasy does not count.