Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, getting lost in the debate of how God speaks to us takes away from how to fix the roads. You've proven my point, no religion in policy. Where is this God that people love to say speaks to them? I got a few words I'd like to say to him in person.
Carter was a Sunday go to meetin' Jesus freak.
Critique him.
Why would he want to discuss someone from more than 30 years ago when he clearly would like to remain more contemporary?
Not for Mormon Mitt, he needs more scripture. Do we really need religion in our seperation of church and state government? Santorum can't stop preaching. He should be a pastor, not the president. Marriage is a religious conviction of morality. If your arguement is marriage is defined as a man and woman by a majority vote I can by that. It shouldn't be defined as a "what is right or wrong under God" law. That should be illegal in America. They never talk about the Christians having multiple wives in the Bible. How many did King Soleman have? Don't take bits and pieces of the Bible to start trying to explain why you won't allow gay marriage. Sin is sin but who am I to cast the first stone. Our forefathers made separation of church and state for a reason. American law is votes, not Proverbs.
Our forefathers made the issue that the government could not prescribe one particular religion. There was no prohibition of allowing religion to influence the conduct of government business. Given the attitudes of the Founders, a pretty good case can be made that all of their assumptions were that our legal system would be based on Christian-Judaic values.
I think prayers preceded most meetings of that time and that our loyalty oaths and swearing in at trial rely on religious underpinnings.
If you can find separation of Church and state in any of words of the Constitution, you are probably among those who also see the words that demand abortion occur.
I can find neither.
That aside, though, archaic and superstitious ideals that ostracize otherwise contributing members of the society run counter to the main thrusts of our American Societal ideals. The notion that property owning white men are the only people of record is bygone.
The coming notion is that penniless thugs need be organized into voting majorities to wrest the reward of the work from those with initiative.
The Founders would understand the drift from the religious fervor they felt, but would blanch at the notion that the indolent are being elevated due to the communist nature of our thinking today.
Not for Mormon Mitt, he needs more scripture. Do we really need religion in our seperation of church and state government? Santorum can't stop preaching. He should be a pastor, not the president. Marriage is a religious conviction of morality. If your arguement is marriage is defined as a man and woman by a majority vote I can by that. It shouldn't be defined as a "what is right or wrong under God" law. That should be illegal in America. They never talk about the Christians having multiple wives in the Bible. How many did King Soleman have? Don't take bits and pieces of the Bible to start trying to explain why you won't allow gay marriage. Sin is sin but who am I to cast the first stone. Our forefathers made separation of church and state for a reason. American law is votes, not Proverbs.
Our forefathers made the issue that the government could not prescribe one particular religion. There was no prohibition of allowing religion to influence the conduct of government business. Given the attitudes of the Founders, a pretty good case can be made that all of their assumptions were that our legal system would be based on Christian-Judaic values.
I think prayers preceded most meetings of that time and that our loyalty oaths and swearing in at trial rely on religious underpinnings.
If you can find separation of Church and state in any of words of the Constitution, you are probably among those who also see the words that demand abortion occur.
I can find neither.
That aside, though, archaic and superstitious ideals that ostracize otherwise contributing members of the society run counter to the main thrusts of our American Societal ideals. The notion that property owning white men are the only people of record is bygone.
The coming notion is that penniless thugs need be organized into voting majorities to wrest the reward of the work from those with initiative.
The Founders would understand the drift from the religious fervor they felt, but would blanch at the notion that the indolent are being elevated due to the communist nature of our thinking today.
Not for Mormon Mitt, he needs more scripture. Do we really need religion in our seperation of church and state government? Santorum can't stop preaching. He should be a pastor, not the president. Marriage is a religious conviction of morality. If your arguement is marriage is defined as a man and woman by a majority vote I can by that. It shouldn't be defined as a "what is right or wrong under God" law. That should be illegal in America. They never talk about the Christians having multiple wives in the Bible. How many did King Soleman have? Don't take bits and pieces of the Bible to start trying to explain why you won't allow gay marriage. Sin is sin but who am I to cast the first stone. Our forefathers made separation of church and state for a reason. American law is votes, not Proverbs.
Not for Mormon Mitt, he needs more scripture. Do we really need religion in our seperation of church and state government? Santorum can't stop preaching. He should be a pastor, not the president. Marriage is a religious conviction of morality. If your arguement is marriage is defined as a man and woman by a majority vote I can by that. It shouldn't be defined as a "what is right or wrong under God" law. That should be illegal in America. They never talk about the Christians having multiple wives in the Bible. How many did King Soleman have? Don't take bits and pieces of the Bible to start trying to explain why you won't allow gay marriage. Sin is sin but who am I to cast the first stone. Our forefathers made separation of church and state for a reason. American law is votes, not Proverbs.
Do you have a brain?
Not for Mormon Mitt, he needs more scripture. Do we really need religion in our seperation of church and state government? Santorum can't stop preaching. He should be a pastor, not the president. Marriage is a religious conviction of morality. If your arguement is marriage is defined as a man and woman by a majority vote I can by that. It shouldn't be defined as a "what is right or wrong under God" law. That should be illegal in America. They never talk about the Christians having multiple wives in the Bible. How many did King Soleman have? Don't take bits and pieces of the Bible to start trying to explain why you won't allow gay marriage. Sin is sin but who am I to cast the first stone. Our forefathers made separation of church and state for a reason. American law is votes, not Proverbs.
Do you have a brain?
Not for Mormon Mitt, he needs more scripture. Do we really need religion in our seperation of church and state government? Santorum can't stop preaching. He should be a pastor, not the president. Marriage is a religious conviction of morality. If your arguement is marriage is defined as a man and woman by a majority vote I can by that. It shouldn't be defined as a "what is right or wrong under God" law. That should be illegal in America. They never talk about the Christians having multiple wives in the Bible. How many did King Soleman have? Don't take bits and pieces of the Bible to start trying to explain why you won't allow gay marriage. Sin is sin but who am I to cast the first stone. Our forefathers made separation of church and state for a reason. American law is votes, not Proverbs.
Do you have a brain?
Have you read your avatar signature lately? My piece of awsomeness you love to highlight is nothing compared to that madness. You talk it but will you walk it?
Not for Mormon Mitt, he needs more scripture. Do we really need religion in our seperation of church and state government? Santorum can't stop preaching. He should be a pastor, not the president. Marriage is a religious conviction of morality. If your arguement is marriage is defined as a man and woman by a majority vote I can by that. It shouldn't be defined as a "what is right or wrong under God" law. That should be illegal in America. They never talk about the Christians having multiple wives in the Bible. How many did King Soleman have? Don't take bits and pieces of the Bible to start trying to explain why you won't allow gay marriage. Sin is sin but who am I to cast the first stone. Our forefathers made separation of church and state for a reason. American law is votes, not Proverbs.
Do you have a brain?
That is up to debate. Are we spirits or are we flesh and bone, or both? By faith not by sight right? You can't always trust what you see.
Do you have a brain?
That is up to debate. Are we spirits or are we flesh and bone, or both? By faith not by sight right? You can't always trust what you see.
If I trusted what I saw I would not ask if you have a brain, I would trust that, because you are posting, you have one.
That is up to debate. Are we spirits or are we flesh and bone, or both? By faith not by sight right? You can't always trust what you see.
If I trusted what I saw I would not ask if you have a brain, I would trust that, because you are posting, you have one.
What do you call that speech under your posts? It is called a signature on the control panel. I would beg to differ. It is the mere evidence of me posting that would suggest I do not have a brain. No person with a brain would give away such wisdom for free.lol
Not for Mormon Mitt, he needs more scripture. Do we really need religion in our seperation of church and state government? Santorum can't stop preaching. He should be a pastor, not the president. Marriage is a religious conviction of morality. If your arguement is marriage is defined as a man and woman by a majority vote I can by that. It shouldn't be defined as a "what is right or wrong under God" law. That should be illegal in America. They never talk about the Christians having multiple wives in the Bible. How many did King Soleman have? Don't take bits and pieces of the Bible to start trying to explain why you won't allow gay marriage. Sin is sin but who am I to cast the first stone. Our forefathers made separation of church and state for a reason. American law is votes, not Proverbs.
If I trusted what I saw I would not ask if you have a brain, I would trust that, because you are posting, you have one.
What do you call that speech under your posts? It is called a signature on the control panel. I would beg to differ. It is the mere evidence of me posting that would suggest I do not have a brain. No person with a brain would give away such wisdom for free.lol
Did you really just ask that? My avatar appears at the top left of all my posts, unless you have avatars turned off. It represents a fundamental paradox in quantum physics, so is probably beyond your understanding, but here is a really simple explanation of it.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCOE__N6v4o]Schrodingers Cat - YouTube[/ame]
As for the signature, which has nothing tio do with my avatar, it is a fundamental statement of individuality and self reliance, and comes from a science fiction novel.
Since, as I suspected, and you admitted, you do not have a brain you will not actually understand what I just posted. Feel free to posture and pretend that you are being witty, I will no longer reply to you directly, I will just occasionally post to mock you with the people on this board who actually have thoughts.
Not for Mormon Mitt, he needs more scripture. Do we really need religion in our seperation of church and state government? Santorum can't stop preaching. He should be a pastor, not the president. Marriage is a religious conviction of morality. If your arguement is marriage is defined as a man and woman by a majority vote I can by that. It shouldn't be defined as a "what is right or wrong under God" law. That should be illegal in America. They never talk about the Christians having multiple wives in the Bible. How many did King Soleman have? Don't take bits and pieces of the Bible to start trying to explain why you won't allow gay marriage. Sin is sin but who am I to cast the first stone. Our forefathers made separation of church and state for a reason. American law is votes, not Proverbs.
Yep, and all this time Votes and laws kept Marriage here, one Man, One Woman. Next Batter.
