georgephillip
Diamond Member
Western democracies including the US and Israel engage regularly in mass terrorism, as the citizens of Afghanistan, Iraq and Gaza are well aware. Appealing the decision of one racist agency to the purview of another racist agency is not unusual since Israeli racism directed at Palestinians forms the legal bedrock of the Jewish state.Israel's occupation of Palestine is a problem everyone is waking to.What the hell are you talking about ?
Executions like this happening all over the Arab world ... Are they also the result of the 'Zionists experiment' ?
I would not be surprised if you say they are ? It's seems Arab countries like to pin their problems on Israel.
Our market is down - blame Israel , Our people are poor - blame Israel , Justin Bieber still alive - blame Israel ...
"Administrative detention is a nebulous and vindictive measure used by the occupation against our young men and women. It is one of the cruel legacies of the old British mandate in Palestine.
"Today, in the absence of any deterrent or condemnation from the international community, Israel uses it with increasing frequency against university students and lecturers, young professionals and even elected parliamentarians.
"Some 300 are being held. It is part of an immoral policy used to keep Palestinians in a state of perpetual poverty and underdevelopment.
"When a military commander issues an order for administrative detention, no evidence is produced. No charges are brought against the victims, and the occupation has no obligation to give reasons for the detention.
"This is by no means a legal mechanism. It is simply an arbitrary draconian measure used to inflict psychological and physical harm on its victims. When they are fortunate enough to be brought before a judge, he can detain them for periods of six months that can be extended indefinitely..."
My husband, Khadar Adnan, has shed light on Israel's disregard for human rights | Randa Musa | Comment is free | The Guardian
It must be stressful being married to a terrorist, but her article is not quite truthful.
The legal basis for Israel's use of Administrative Detention is the British Mandate 1945 Law on Authority in States of Emergency' as amended in 1979. Administrative detention is often used in cases where the available evidence consists of information obtained by the security services (particularly the Shin Bet), and where a trial would reveal sensitive security information, such as the identities of informers or infiltrators.
Although it is most commonly applied to alleged Palestinian militants and their accomplices, it has also been applied to Jewish Israeli citizens, including Jewish right-wing public-figures and activists (e.g. in the aftermath of the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin).
Within Israel, the Defense Minister has the authority to issue Administrative Detention orders for up to 6 months in cases where there is a reasonable chance that the person harms the security of the state. The same Minister has the authority to renew such orders. Likewise, the Chief of the General Staff can issue such orders, but valid for only 48 hours. Law enforcement authorities have to show cause within 48 hours (in a hearing behind closed doors). Administrative Detention orders can be appealed to the District Court and, if denied there, to the Supreme Court of Israel. The District Court can annul such orders if it finds the administrative detention occurred for reasons other than security (e.g., common crimes, or the exercise of freedom of expression). Overall supervisory authority on the application of the relevant law rests with the Minister of Justice.
Within the West Bank and Gaza Strip, any local army commander can issue an administrative detention order, and the order can be appealed at the local military court, or, if denied there, at the Supreme Court. Here too, an administrative detention order is valid for at most six months, but can be renewed by the appropriate authority. Israel refers its use of administrative detention in the occupied territories to Article 78 of the Fourth Geneva Convention 1949, which states that "If the Occupying Power considers it necessary, for imperative reasons of security, to take safety measures concerning protected persons, it may, at the most, subject them to assigned residence or to internment."
Administrative detention - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So anyone held on administrative detention has the right to appeal this decision all the way up to the Supreme Court which will require the government to show valid cause for the detention and that national security would be threatened by bringing the case to trial. The law is controversial, but not all that unusual. Many western democracies, including the US, Australia, Canada, Ireland and Sweden, have administrative detention laws in cases involving illegal immigration or terrorism.