Israel Defines Humanity

what would not be "ok" and where?
Not my problem when you cannot remember your own question.


The Nuremburg laws are upheld in shariah compliant countries------are they consistent with "INTERNATIONAL LAWS"? Is this discussion confined to German laws?
Apparently, you have no clue about the Nuremberg laws. In addition, the Nuremberg laws don´t apply in the today´s Germany.

that is true-----Germany gave them up----They REMAIN
part of the shariah laws. In the shariah shit hole in which
my hubby was born----LONG AGO. -----a country which---btw---also dabbled in Baathist shit in a disorganized way. ----the shariah laws which are the SAME as the Nuremburg laws---
are STILL ON THE BOOKS and-----would be enforced if there
were any jews left in that shit hole. It is so easy for you
to justify filth (fortunately there are no Christians or hindus or Zoroastrians there either----LEFT---the country did accomplish
the BAATHIST agenda---it is ALL MUSLIM)
 
Israel is also very highly educated and has universal health care

Israel’s life expectancy is 81.8 years, and health care costs per capita were calculated at $2,426 (or approximately NIS 8,800).

The rankings also noted that Israel has the longest life span in the Middle East and Africa, and that Israelis have the 12th longest retirement in the world (lasting 17.81 years).

By comparison, Americans have a life expectancy of 78.6 years and spend $8,608 (NIS 31,100) in health care costs per capita.

in addition

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in Israel are the most advanced in the Middle East and one of the most advanced in Asia.[1] Same-sex sexual activity was legalized in 1988, although the former law against sodomy had not been enforced since a court decision of 1963.Israel became the first in Asia to recognize unregistered cohabitation between same-sex couples, making it the only country in Asia to recognize any same-sex union thus far. Although same-sex marriages are not performed in the country, Israel recognizes same-sex marriages performed elsewhere, making it the first and only country in Asia to do so. Discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation was prohibited in 1992. Same-sex couples are allowed to jointly adopt after a court decision in 2008, while previously allowing stepchild adoptions and limited co-guardianship rights for non-biological parents. Gays and lesbians are also allowed to serve openly in the military.

both thing about the rightwing christer goyim hate here in America

Look at you trying to take accredit libtards with Israel's success. I imagine you had your employer give you that spiel.
 
As the old joke goes....how many Arabs does it take to change a lightbulb?
None....they sit in the dark and blame the Jews.




1. Not just the only bastion of freedom and democracy in the Middle East, but this tiny nation, surrounded by 7th century savages and nations led by power and money hungry dictators who care not a whit for their citizens, goes more than the extra mile to make life better for its enemies.
As a necessary protection from the homicide bombers and would-be 'martyrs'...

Israel-anti-terror-wall-1.jpg

Israel anti terror wall (1)



Israelis don't want the wall....each 2 meter wide section costs $8,000, and neither the Right, who see it as giving away greater Israel, nor the Left, who want to live peacefully with the Arabs, want it.


But, without the wall, the savages pour in...

Hamas_murder.jpg

How the West mocks its own anti-terrorism narrative - The Commentator



a. BTW....take another look at the picture of the wall...and take note of the city on the hill, to the right.
That city is what the western media refers to as 'a settlement.'

That's like calling Manhattan a settlement.

But they want to pollute the reality, and pretend that the cities that they demand turning over to the Palestinians is merely a temporary jerry-built refugee camp of Israelis.
It is not. It is a vibrant, thriving community rising up from the desert.
And it is permanent.




I'll get to that title, "Israel Defines Humanity" in a moment....

And it will be undeniable.
You obviously have NEVER been to Israel OR some ZIONIST JUNKIE
 
What is unusual about the fact the native Christians and Muslims of the area did not want to accept to be ruled by arriving European colonists in a gerrymandered division of the land they and their ancestors had lived on for a millenium or more?
 
There is a world of difference between a lawsuit and a state court. The state makes the laws and can change them as they wish.
You have no idea about German law. The state cannot simply change the law. Changing a law requires a democratic process, for example a foregone court-ruling or a parliament´s decision.


Holocaust denial is and by extension so is anti semitism as they are tied together. Shows how much you know as if it causes offence then it is racism/anti semitism
Holocaust denial is a special law and basically violates the German basic law. However, anti-semitism is not a statutory offensive. Like racism, anti-semitism is nothing what you can do. Expressing racism or anti-semitism is not prohibited, as long as it does not violate general laws.





That is right the ruling party says this is the new law and then votes on it, having the majority the law is passed.

Anything that can be seen as causing offense falls under Germany's laws and so can be used in a court of law. This is what the muslims use all the time to get support
 
1) That map is of the Ottoman Empire and was posted on a Turkish website. The last time I checked, the Turks weren't "Zionist flashbulbs".
Hey, it is not the Turks who try to prove there was no Palestine. You do!


2) Nothing in your rant refutes the fact Palestine never existed as a nation. Ever. When the Brits and French carved up the Ottoman Empire, the Brits revived the old names of Ottoman-administered regions, such as “Palestine”, “Syria” and “Iraq”. Palestine was in internationally administered territory, not a nation.

3) A year later, in 1917, the Balfour Declaration was made to establish a national homeland for Jewish people in Palestine. This declaration was incorporated into both the Treaty of Sèvres and the Mandate for Palestine. Nothing about a national homeland for Palestinians.

4) You're declaration that anyone who disagrees with you is a "Zionist flashbulb" is amusing because it is both illogical and has the maturity of a young teenager. It also has the tacit admission that you believe anyone who supports Israel to be a Zionist and, therefore, anyone who supports the Palestinians to be terrorists.
And? This is why there cannot be a Palestine?






No there can never be a palestine because the land is Jewish under INTERNATIONAL LAW, the same INTERNATIONAL LAW that created trans Jordan which is what should have been called palestine.
Nope. International law recognizes Israel within 1948 borders.






What international law is that then ? As I have not heard of any such law in existence
Zionist flashbulbs have never heard of international law, human rights or peaceful coexistence. When Israel invades, those don´t exist. When Israel blows up a Palestinian home, the flashbulbs remember international law and label this action lawful.

289px-UN_Palestine_Partition_Versions_1947.jpg


United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia







And the partition plan was against INTERNATIONAL LAW and so is invalid. The UN has no authority to carve up another nations land to appease the arab muslims.

I have heard of international law and cite it all the time, giving full details of date and law. When has Israel invaded without just cause then, give dates and instances. When hamas uses a house for any purpose it becomes a valid military target, this is detailed in the Geneva conventions.


It is you islamonazi propagandists that dont know what international laws are and try to create false ones all the time
 
As the old joke goes....how many Arabs does it take to change a lightbulb?
None....they sit in the dark and blame the Jews.




1. Not just the only bastion of freedom and democracy in the Middle East, but this tiny nation, surrounded by 7th century savages and nations led by power and money hungry dictators who care not a whit for their citizens, goes more than the extra mile to make life better for its enemies.
As a necessary protection from the homicide bombers and would-be 'martyrs'...

Israel-anti-terror-wall-1.jpg

Israel anti terror wall (1)



Israelis don't want the wall....each 2 meter wide section costs $8,000, and neither the Right, who see it as giving away greater Israel, nor the Left, who want to live peacefully with the Arabs, want it.


But, without the wall, the savages pour in...

Hamas_murder.jpg

How the West mocks its own anti-terrorism narrative - The Commentator



a. BTW....take another look at the picture of the wall...and take note of the city on the hill, to the right.
That city is what the western media refers to as 'a settlement.'

That's like calling Manhattan a settlement.

But they want to pollute the reality, and pretend that the cities that they demand turning over to the Palestinians is merely a temporary jerry-built refugee camp of Israelis.
It is not. It is a vibrant, thriving community rising up from the desert.
And it is permanent.




I'll get to that title, "Israel Defines Humanity" in a moment....

And it will be undeniable.
You obviously have NEVER been to Israel OR some ZIONIST JUNKIE






Has your ban been lifted then ?
 
What is unusual about the fact the native Christians and Muslims of the area did not want to accept to be ruled by arriving European colonists in a gerrymandered division of the land they and their ancestors had lived on for a millenium or more?







MORE LIES even though he has been shown the truth many times. Usual islamonazi propagandist claims they are hasbara lies.
 
really? there are people seeking a violent death for refugees? in Germany?
It appears Blitzbirne wants it both ways; he can bitch about the "Zionists" (AKA Jews) all day, but it's wrong to say anything bad about Syria, Islamists, Palestinian terrorists or anything else he supports, including "Death to Jews" which those he supports often say.
Look, guys, how this sucker invents support for Islamists, Palestinian terrorists just because I don´t agree to his lies.
 
Obviously the Islamist Blitzbirnes didn't read their own link. As noted the in the link below, the Palestinian Arabs didn't accept the partition plan:
Milestones: 1945–1952 - Office of the Historian
" The Palestinian Arabs refused to recognize this arrangement, which they regarded as favorable to the Jews and unfair to the Arab population that would remain in Jewish territory under the partition. The United States sought a middle way by supporting the United Nations resolution, but also encouraging negotiations between Arabs and Jews in the Middle East."

They are also too stupid to know history. Example:
Israel abided by the proposed division of the Palestinian territories which the Palestinian Arabs refused to recognize. On 14MAY48 they declared independence. On 15MAY48, the combined Arab forces of Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria attacked Israel. As everyone who isn't a Blitzbirne knows, the Arabs lost the war and, along with it, the territory which the Palestinians had refused to recognize. After that, every time the Arabs attacked Israel the Arabs lost more territory along with losing the war.

Milestones: 1945–1952 - Office of the Historian
The Arab-Israeli War of 1948 broke out when five Arab nations invaded territory in the former Palestinian mandate immediately following the announcement of the independence of the state of Israel on May 14, 1948. In 1947, and again on May 14, 1948, the United States had offered de facto recognition of the Israeli Provisional Government, but during the war, the United States maintained an arms embargo against all belligerents.

arab-israeli-war_1948.jpg
More lies by the flashbulb: It is his own link, not mine.
 
what would not be "ok" and where?
Not my problem when you cannot remember your own question.


The Nuremburg laws are upheld in shariah compliant countries------are they consistent with "INTERNATIONAL LAWS"? Is this discussion confined to German laws?
Apparently, you have no clue about the Nuremberg laws. In addition, the Nuremberg laws don´t apply in the today´s Germany.

that is true-----Germany gave them up----They REMAIN
part of the shariah laws. In the shariah shit hole in which
my hubby was born----LONG AGO. -----a country which---btw---also dabbled in Baathist shit in a disorganized way. ----the shariah laws which are the SAME as the Nuremburg laws---
are STILL ON THE BOOKS and-----would be enforced if there
were any jews left in that shit hole. It is so easy for you
to justify filth (fortunately there are no Christians or hindus or Zoroastrians there either----LEFT---the country did accomplish
the BAATHIST agenda---it is ALL MUSLIM)
Utter bullshit. Name us some clauses that have made it into Sharia law.
 
There is a world of difference between a lawsuit and a state court. The state makes the laws and can change them as they wish.
You have no idea about German law. The state cannot simply change the law. Changing a law requires a democratic process, for example a foregone court-ruling or a parliament´s decision.


Holocaust denial is and by extension so is anti semitism as they are tied together. Shows how much you know as if it causes offence then it is racism/anti semitism
Holocaust denial is a special law and basically violates the German basic law. However, anti-semitism is not a statutory offensive. Like racism, anti-semitism is nothing what you can do. Expressing racism or anti-semitism is not prohibited, as long as it does not violate general laws.





That is right the ruling party says this is the new law and then votes on it, having the majority the law is passed.

Anything that can be seen as causing offense falls under Germany's laws and so can be used in a court of law. This is what the muslims use all the time to get support
More nonsense. All laws must be in harmony with the basic law. Additionally, MPs are not bound to their party but to their conscience. You see there are some obstacles. I don´t know how they rule in your Zionist flashbulb enclave on your island but if the government will find out about it, they will certainly not be too happy.
 
What is unusual about the fact the native Christians and Muslims of the area did not want to accept to be ruled by arriving European colonists in a gerrymandered division of the land they and their ancestors had lived on for a millenium or more?

what is unusual about the fact that jews who lived in the middle east for 3000 years did not want to eat the shit and filth of the inquisition and shariah. Do you have specific TIME durations regarding land theft rape and murder. My very own hubby is right here----his community lived in an ARABIAN SHARIAH SHIT HOLE---for more than a thousand years------but that same community had lived in that land for about 1500 years BEFORE THE RAPIST PIG of arabia was born and for 1000 years before Christianity was invented---------are you suggesting that they should have continued to eat YOUR shit. Your Arabic garble does not belong in Palestine----it is the language of thieves and rapists and murderers----even today--you stink extends thruout the world----LOTS OF PEOPLE DO NOT WANT YOU. Your garble does not belong in south east asia----either------or in the USA or in Germany--COLONIALIST DOG
 
Hey, it is not the Turks who try to prove there was no Palestine. You do!


And? This is why there cannot be a Palestine?






No there can never be a palestine because the land is Jewish under INTERNATIONAL LAW, the same INTERNATIONAL LAW that created trans Jordan which is what should have been called palestine.
Nope. International law recognizes Israel within 1948 borders.






What international law is that then ? As I have not heard of any such law in existence
Zionist flashbulbs have never heard of international law, human rights or peaceful coexistence. When Israel invades, those don´t exist. When Israel blows up a Palestinian home, the flashbulbs remember international law and label this action lawful.

289px-UN_Palestine_Partition_Versions_1947.jpg


United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia







And the partition plan was against INTERNATIONAL LAW and so is invalid. The UN has no authority to carve up another nations land to appease the arab muslims.

I have heard of international law and cite it all the time, giving full details of date and law. When has Israel invaded without just cause then, give dates and instances. When hamas uses a house for any purpose it becomes a valid military target, this is detailed in the Geneva conventions.


It is you islamonazi propagandists that dont know what international laws are and try to create false ones all the time
So now there is International Law???? Flashbulb??? And yes, it is in accordance with it since there was no people to decide on this. Of course the ice is thin when it comes to who is the legitimate owner of a former colony but since the population excludes each other, an outside power has to decide in order to prevent an ongoing bloodbath.
 
what would not be "ok" and where?
Not my problem when you cannot remember your own question.


The Nuremburg laws are upheld in shariah compliant countries------are they consistent with "INTERNATIONAL LAWS"? Is this discussion confined to German laws?
Apparently, you have no clue about the Nuremberg laws. In addition, the Nuremberg laws don´t apply in the today´s Germany.

that is true-----Germany gave them up----They REMAIN
part of the shariah laws. In the shariah shit hole in which
my hubby was born----LONG AGO. -----a country which---btw---also dabbled in Baathist shit in a disorganized way. ----the shariah laws which are the SAME as the Nuremburg laws---
are STILL ON THE BOOKS and-----would be enforced if there
were any jews left in that shit hole. It is so easy for you
to justify filth (fortunately there are no Christians or hindus or Zoroastrians there either----LEFT---the country did accomplish
the BAATHIST agenda---it is ALL MUSLIM)
Utter bullshit. Name us some clauses that have made it into Sharia law.

so typical of islamo-nazis -----DISTORTIONS AND LIES. I did not say that your Nuremburg laws "made it into shariah"----I CORRECTLY SAID that the laws are either the very same or similar. Both disgusting filthy codes of laws are DERIVED from the same stink and filth----which happens to be ---the laws of the FIRST REICH----aka the "holy" roman empire under the stink of nazi pig Constantine----a hero of the Baathist nazi cult.
It interests me that you do not know your very own roots---(well----you seem to SAY you don't know)
 
what would not be "ok" and where?
Not my problem when you cannot remember your own question.


The Nuremburg laws are upheld in shariah compliant countries------are they consistent with "INTERNATIONAL LAWS"? Is this discussion confined to German laws?
Apparently, you have no clue about the Nuremberg laws. In addition, the Nuremberg laws don´t apply in the today´s Germany.

that is true-----Germany gave them up----They REMAIN
part of the shariah laws. In the shariah shit hole in which
my hubby was born----LONG AGO. -----a country which---btw---also dabbled in Baathist shit in a disorganized way. ----the shariah laws which are the SAME as the Nuremburg laws---
are STILL ON THE BOOKS and-----would be enforced if there
were any jews left in that shit hole. It is so easy for you
to justify filth (fortunately there are no Christians or hindus or Zoroastrians there either----LEFT---the country did accomplish
the BAATHIST agenda---it is ALL MUSLIM)
Utter bullshit. Name us some clauses that have made it into Sharia law.

so typical of islamo-nazis -----DISTORTIONS AND LIES. I did not say that your Nuremburg laws "made it into shariah"----I CORRECTLY SAID that the laws are either the very same or similar. Both disgusting filthy codes of laws are DERIVED from the same stink and filth----which happens to be ---the laws of the FIRST REICH----aka the "holy" roman empire under the stink of nazi pig Constantine----a hero of the Baathist nazi cult.
It interests me that you do not know your very own roots---(well----you seem to SAY you don't know)
Maybe, you can help us. Here is exclusively for you a copy of the Nuremberg law. No need to thank and praise me. So now, please tell us which of the law applies in HRE law, the Sharia law or "Baathist law".

ikh9z4nn.jpg


9bm69nj2.jpg
 
I have not done german for almost 50 years----NONE AT ALL---besides which ---your posted whatever it is---is blurry on my screen. In the filth of shariah law which was elaborated by arabs-------similarities to ancient proscriptions against jews ---which the fascist pig Constantine of the first reich (holy roman empire) Exclusion of "mixing--- included strict exclusion of marriage between jews and and Christians (the shariah shit version of that is muslims can marry jewish women---have kids---the kids must be muslim and any attempt by the jewish wife to teach the kids Judaism or practice the religion openly-- is a capital crime)
The Nuremburg code----outlawed "mixing" entirely.

Weapons ----proscribed for jews by Constantine, Shariah and
Nuremburg

Transportation----Nuremburg---proscribed public transportation or riding in gentile cars Constantine---proscribed horses and camels Shariah---proscribed horses and camels

Poll tax---both Constantine and Shariah----Nuremburg---pillage and forced labor

Markings on clothing----Constantine, Shariah and Nuremburg-------all used the color yellow for the identifying markings

etc etc etc
 
I have not done german for almost 50 years----NONE AT ALL---besides which ---your posted whatever it is---is blurry on my screen. In the filth of shariah law which was elaborated by arabs-------similarities to ancient proscriptions against jews ---which the fascist pig Constantine of the first reich (holy roman empire) Exclusion of "mixing--- included strict exclusion of marriage between jews and and Christians (the shariah shit version of that is muslims can marry jewish women---have kids---the kids must be muslim and any attempt by the jewish wife to teach the kids Judaism or practice the religion openly-- is a capital crime)
The Nuremburg code----outlawed "mixing" entirely.

Weapons ----proscribed for jews by Constantine, Shariah and
Nuremburg

Transportation----Nuremburg---proscribed public transportation or riding in gentile cars Constantine---proscribed horses and camels Shariah---proscribed horses and camels

Poll tax---both Constantine and Shariah----Nuremburg---pillage and forced labor

Markings on clothing----Constantine, Shariah and Nuremburg-------all used the color yellow for the identifying markings

etc etc etc
The right of the first page is hard to read but so it is.
 
There is a world of difference between a lawsuit and a state court. The state makes the laws and can change them as they wish.
You have no idea about German law. The state cannot simply change the law. Changing a law requires a democratic process, for example a foregone court-ruling or a parliament´s decision.


Holocaust denial is and by extension so is anti semitism as they are tied together. Shows how much you know as if it causes offence then it is racism/anti semitism
Holocaust denial is a special law and basically violates the German basic law. However, anti-semitism is not a statutory offensive. Like racism, anti-semitism is nothing what you can do. Expressing racism or anti-semitism is not prohibited, as long as it does not violate general laws.





That is right the ruling party says this is the new law and then votes on it, having the majority the law is passed.

Anything that can be seen as causing offense falls under Germany's laws and so can be used in a court of law. This is what the muslims use all the time to get support
More nonsense. All laws must be in harmony with the basic law. Additionally, MPs are not bound to their party but to their conscience. You see there are some obstacles. I don´t know how they rule in your Zionist flashbulb enclave on your island but if the government will find out about it, they will certainly not be too happy.






What basic law is that then, sharia ? The Government of Germany changed the laws stopping migrants from claiming welfare a full 6 months before the EU made it illegal to change laws stopping welfare to migrants. Just look it up as you wont accept anyones word
 

Forum List

Back
Top