Israel Defines Humanity

[irosie91]

WRONG as the state can do what it wants.

Physically, they could do it illegally. Evidence unlawfully gathered may not be used in a German lawsuit, however. Even if it is presented, the judge must ignore it.

As for arguing with anyone as long as you dont allow RACISM or HOLOCAUST DENIAL to be part of it you are in the clear. But referring to Jews as zionist flashbulbs is extreme racism and you can be arrested for it

Not correct. "Racism" is not a statutory offense in Germany. Calling some moron zionist flashbulb has nothing to do with racism or anti-semitism or Holocaust denial, anyway.

good-----I like that-----chanting "rapist pig of mecca" is ok too

 

[Bleipriester]

1) That map is of the Ottoman Empire and was posted on a Turkish website. The last time I checked, the Turks weren't "Zionist flashbulbs".

Hey, it is not the Turks who try to prove there was no Palestine. You do!

2) Nothing in your rant refutes the fact Palestine never existed as a nation. Ever. When the Brits and French carved up the Ottoman Empire, the Brits revived the old names of Ottoman-administered regions, such as “Palestine”, “Syria” and “Iraq”. Palestine was in internationally administered territory, not a nation.

3) A year later, in 1917, the Balfour Declaration was made to establish a national homeland for Jewish people in Palestine. This declaration was incorporated into both the Treaty of Sèvres and the Mandate for Palestine. Nothing about a national homeland for Palestinians.

4) You're declaration that anyone who disagrees with you is a "Zionist flashbulb" is amusing because it is both illogical and has the maturity of a young teenager. It also has the tacit admission that you believe anyone who supports Israel to be a Zionist and, therefore, anyone who supports the Palestinians to be terrorists.

And? This is why there cannot be a Palestine?

No there can never be a palestine because the land is Jewish under INTERNATIONAL LAW, the same INTERNATIONAL LAW that created trans Jordan which is what should have been called palestine.

Nope. International law recognizes Israel within 1948 borders.

 

[Bleipriester]

WRONG as the state can do what it wants.

Physically, they could do it illegally. Evidence unlawfully gathered may not be used in a German lawsuit, however. Even if it is presented, the judge must ignore it.

As for arguing with anyone as long as you dont allow RACISM or HOLOCAUST DENIAL to be part of it you are in the clear. But referring to Jews as zionist flashbulbs is extreme racism and you can be arrested for it

Not correct. "Racism" is not a statutory offense in Germany. Calling some moron zionist flashbulb has nothing to do with racism or anti-semitism or Holocaust denial, anyway.

good-----I like that-----chanting "rapist pig of mecca" is ok too

Yes, it is. It is insult, though. Not persecuted unless upon privately issued request, normally (today, they launch massive silencing campaigns, searching homes of people who have written hate posts on facebook and putting them on trial, many posts are far beyond "rapist pig of mecca" , though, but demand a brutal death for refugees, for example).

 

[irosie91]

WRONG as the state can do what it wants.

Physically, they could do it illegally. Evidence unlawfully gathered may not be used in a German lawsuit, however. Even if it is presented, the judge must ignore it.

As for arguing with anyone as long as you dont allow RACISM or HOLOCAUST DENIAL to be part of it you are in the clear. But referring to Jews as zionist flashbulbs is extreme racism and you can be arrested for it

Not correct. "Racism" is not a statutory offense in Germany. Calling some moron zionist flashbulb has nothing to do with racism or anti-semitism or Holocaust denial, anyway.

good-----I like that-----chanting "rapist pig of mecca" is ok too

Yes, it is. It is insult, though. Not persecuted unless upon privately issued request, normally (today, they launch massive silencing campaigns, searching homes of people who have written hate posts on facebook and putting them on trial, many posts are far beyond "rapist pig of mecca" , though, but demand a brutal death for refugees, for example).

really? there are people seeking a violent death for refugees? in Germany?

 

[Bleipriester]

WRONG as the state can do what it wants.

Physically, they could do it illegally. Evidence unlawfully gathered may not be used in a German lawsuit, however. Even if it is presented, the judge must ignore it.

As for arguing with anyone as long as you dont allow RACISM or HOLOCAUST DENIAL to be part of it you are in the clear. But referring to Jews as zionist flashbulbs is extreme racism and you can be arrested for it

Not correct. "Racism" is not a statutory offense in Germany. Calling some moron zionist flashbulb has nothing to do with racism or anti-semitism or Holocaust denial, anyway.

good-----I like that-----chanting "rapist pig of mecca" is ok too

Yes, it is. It is insult, though. Not persecuted unless upon privately issued request, normally (today, they launch massive silencing campaigns, searching homes of people who have written hate posts on facebook and putting them on trial, many posts are far beyond "rapist pig of mecca" , though, but demand a brutal death for refugees, for example).

really? there are people seeking a violent death for refugees? in Germany?

It´s about facebook posts. The demand alone is a statutory offense in Germany, no matter if it is meant seriously or not.

 

[irosie91]

WRONG as the state can do what it wants.

Physically, they could do it illegally. Evidence unlawfully gathered may not be used in a German lawsuit, however. Even if it is presented, the judge must ignore it.

As for arguing with anyone as long as you dont allow RACISM or HOLOCAUST DENIAL to be part of it you are in the clear. But referring to Jews as zionist flashbulbs is extreme racism and you can be arrested for it

Not correct. "Racism" is not a statutory offense in Germany. Calling some moron zionist flashbulb has nothing to do with racism or anti-semitism or Holocaust denial, anyway.

good-----I like that-----chanting "rapist pig of mecca" is ok too

Yes, it is. It is insult, though. Not persecuted unless upon privately issued request, normally (today, they launch massive silencing campaigns, searching homes of people who have written hate posts on facebook and putting them on trial, many posts are far beyond "rapist pig of mecca" , though, but demand a brutal death for refugees, for example).

really? there are people seeking a violent death for refugees? in Germany?

It´s about facebook posts. The demand alone is a statutory offense in Germany, no matter if it is meant seriously or not.

oh. Is it ok to demand "DEATH FOR THOSE WHO INSULT MUHUMMAD" in a mosque? or the time honored
"death to......" << this or that ---? . it's ok in the USA and UK

 

[Bleipriester]

Physically, they could do it illegally. Evidence unlawfully gathered may not be used in a German lawsuit, however. Even if it is presented, the judge must ignore it.



Not correct. "Racism" is not a statutory offense in Germany. Calling some moron zionist flashbulb has nothing to do with racism or anti-semitism or Holocaust denial, anyway.

good-----I like that-----chanting "rapist pig of mecca" is ok too

Yes, it is. It is insult, though. Not persecuted unless upon privately issued request, normally (today, they launch massive silencing campaigns, searching homes of people who have written hate posts on facebook and putting them on trial, many posts are far beyond "rapist pig of mecca" , though, but demand a brutal death for refugees, for example).

really? there are people seeking a violent death for refugees? in Germany?

It´s about facebook posts. The demand alone is a statutory offense in Germany, no matter if it is meant seriously or not.

oh. Is it ok to demand "DEATH FOR THOSE WHO INSULT MUHUMMAD" in a mosque? or the time honored
"death to......" << this or that ---? . it's ok in the USA and UK

"Death to X" is, strictly speaking, not allowed. It is equal to a "public call for offenses" which is prohibited. It also could be considered an "incitement of people".

 

[Phoenall]

WRONG as the state can do what it wants.

Physically, they could do it illegally. Evidence unlawfully gathered may not be used in a German lawsuit, however. Even if it is presented, the judge must ignore it.

As for arguing with anyone as long as you dont allow RACISM or HOLOCAUST DENIAL to be part of it you are in the clear. But referring to Jews as zionist flashbulbs is extreme racism and you can be arrested for it

Not correct. "Racism" is not a statutory offense in Germany. Calling some moron zionist flashbulb has nothing to do with racism or anti-semitism or Holocaust denial, anyway.

There is a world of difference between a lawsuit and a state court. The state makes the laws and can change them as they wish. Holocaust denial is and by extension so is anti semitism as they are tied together. Shows how much you know as if it causes offence then it is racism/anti semitism

 

[Phoenall]

Look, arguing with Zionist flashbulbs is not prohibited in Germany. We are also not in the land of unlimited opportunities, they need a court´s decision in order intervene in someone´s privacy.

Of course it isn't. You can send money to ISIS and Hamas plus post your support for them on Facebook all you like in Germany. Amirite?

You should report Obama and his royal household to the CIA and NSA. They are aiding ISIS!
American aircraft dropped weapons to ISIS, says MP - Iraqi News

According to an islamonazi pallywood outlet, only a complete moron would believe them

So you consider "islamonazi pallywood outlets" reliable?

No but you do making you the moron

 

[Phoenall]

1) That map is of the Ottoman Empire and was posted on a Turkish website. The last time I checked, the Turks weren't "Zionist flashbulbs".

Hey, it is not the Turks who try to prove there was no Palestine. You do!

2) Nothing in your rant refutes the fact Palestine never existed as a nation. Ever. When the Brits and French carved up the Ottoman Empire, the Brits revived the old names of Ottoman-administered regions, such as “Palestine”, “Syria” and “Iraq”. Palestine was in internationally administered territory, not a nation.

3) A year later, in 1917, the Balfour Declaration was made to establish a national homeland for Jewish people in Palestine. This declaration was incorporated into both the Treaty of Sèvres and the Mandate for Palestine. Nothing about a national homeland for Palestinians.

4) You're declaration that anyone who disagrees with you is a "Zionist flashbulb" is amusing because it is both illogical and has the maturity of a young teenager. It also has the tacit admission that you believe anyone who supports Israel to be a Zionist and, therefore, anyone who supports the Palestinians to be terrorists.

And? This is why there cannot be a Palestine?

No there can never be a palestine because the land is Jewish under INTERNATIONAL LAW, the same INTERNATIONAL LAW that created trans Jordan which is what should have been called palestine.

Nope. International law recognizes Israel within 1948 borders.

What international law is that then ? As I have not heard of any such law in existence

 

[Bleipriester]

There is a world of difference between a lawsuit and a state court. The state makes the laws and can change them as they wish.

You have no idea about German law. The state cannot simply change the law. Changing a law requires a democratic process, for example a foregone court-ruling or a parliament´s decision.

Holocaust denial is and by extension so is anti semitism as they are tied together. Shows how much you know as if it causes offence then it is racism/anti semitism

Holocaust denial is a special law and basically violates the German basic law. However, anti-semitism is not a statutory offensive. Like racism, anti-semitism is nothing what you can do. Expressing racism or anti-semitism is not prohibited, as long as it does not violate general laws.

 

[Bleipriester]

1) That map is of the Ottoman Empire and was posted on a Turkish website. The last time I checked, the Turks weren't "Zionist flashbulbs".

Hey, it is not the Turks who try to prove there was no Palestine. You do!

2) Nothing in your rant refutes the fact Palestine never existed as a nation. Ever. When the Brits and French carved up the Ottoman Empire, the Brits revived the old names of Ottoman-administered regions, such as “Palestine”, “Syria” and “Iraq”. Palestine was in internationally administered territory, not a nation.

3) A year later, in 1917, the Balfour Declaration was made to establish a national homeland for Jewish people in Palestine. This declaration was incorporated into both the Treaty of Sèvres and the Mandate for Palestine. Nothing about a national homeland for Palestinians.

4) You're declaration that anyone who disagrees with you is a "Zionist flashbulb" is amusing because it is both illogical and has the maturity of a young teenager. It also has the tacit admission that you believe anyone who supports Israel to be a Zionist and, therefore, anyone who supports the Palestinians to be terrorists.

And? This is why there cannot be a Palestine?

No there can never be a palestine because the land is Jewish under INTERNATIONAL LAW, the same INTERNATIONAL LAW that created trans Jordan which is what should have been called palestine.

Nope. International law recognizes Israel within 1948 borders.

What international law is that then ? As I have not heard of any such law in existence

Zionist flashbulbs have never heard of international law, human rights or peaceful coexistence. When Israel invades, those don´t exist. When Israel blows up a Palestinian home, the flashbulbs remember international law and label this action lawful.

United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[irosie91]

good-----I like that-----chanting "rapist pig of mecca" is ok too

Yes, it is. It is insult, though. Not persecuted unless upon privately issued request, normally (today, they launch massive silencing campaigns, searching homes of people who have written hate posts on facebook and putting them on trial, many posts are far beyond "rapist pig of mecca" , though, but demand a brutal death for refugees, for example).

really? there are people seeking a violent death for refugees? in Germany?

It´s about facebook posts. The demand alone is a statutory offense in Germany, no matter if it is meant seriously or not.

oh. Is it ok to demand "DEATH FOR THOSE WHO INSULT MUHUMMAD" in a mosque? or the time honored
"death to......" << this or that ---? . it's ok in the USA and UK

"Death to X" is, strictly speaking, not allowed. It is equal to a "public call for offenses" which is prohibited. It also could be considered an "incitement of people".

oh-----then I assume that the german police or----government does not bother to do any surveillance of mosques. Would
saying it in Arabic be ok?

1) That map is of the Ottoman Empire and was posted on a Turkish website. The last time I checked, the Turks weren't "Zionist flashbulbs".

Hey, it is not the Turks who try to prove there was no Palestine. You do!

2) Nothing in your rant refutes the fact Palestine never existed as a nation. Ever. When the Brits and French carved up the Ottoman Empire, the Brits revived the old names of Ottoman-administered regions, such as “Palestine”, “Syria” and “Iraq”. Palestine was in internationally administered territory, not a nation.

3) A year later, in 1917, the Balfour Declaration was made to establish a national homeland for Jewish people in Palestine. This declaration was incorporated into both the Treaty of Sèvres and the Mandate for Palestine. Nothing about a national homeland for Palestinians.

4) You're declaration that anyone who disagrees with you is a "Zionist flashbulb" is amusing because it is both illogical and has the maturity of a young teenager. It also has the tacit admission that you believe anyone who supports Israel to be a Zionist and, therefore, anyone who supports the Palestinians to be terrorists.

And? This is why there cannot be a Palestine?

No there can never be a palestine because the land is Jewish under INTERNATIONAL LAW, the same INTERNATIONAL LAW that created trans Jordan which is what should have been called palestine.

Nope. International law recognizes Israel within 1948 borders.

What international law is that then ? As I have not heard of any such law in existence

International law is whatever an Islamo Nazi says it is. All of that which is Shariah Compliant is LEGAL by islamo Nazi
international law------including bombing trains----here and there-

 

[Bleipriester]

oh-----then I assume that the german police or----government does not bother to do any surveillance of mosques. Would
saying it in Arabic be ok?

No.

International law is whatever an Islamo Nazi says it is. All of that which is Shariah Compliant is LEGAL by islamo Nazi
international law------including bombing trains----here and there-

?

 

[irosie91]

oh-----then I assume that the german police or----government does not bother to do any surveillance of mosques. Would
saying it in Arabic be ok?

No.

International law is whatever an Islamo Nazi says it is. All of that which is Shariah Compliant is LEGAL by islamo Nazi
international law------including bombing trains----here and there-

?

"no" what? no one checks? For the record--the NUREMBURG LAWS 1935 were SHARIAH COMPLIANT --
thus LEGAL BY INTERNATIONAL LAW

 

[Bleipriester]

oh-----then I assume that the german police or----government does not bother to do any surveillance of mosques. Would
saying it in Arabic be ok?

No.

International law is whatever an Islamo Nazi says it is. All of that which is Shariah Compliant is LEGAL by islamo Nazi
international law------including bombing trains----here and there-

?

"no" what? no one checks? For the record--the NUREMBURG LAWS 1935 were SHARIAH COMPLIANT --
thus LEGAL BY INTERNATIONAL LAW

No, it would not be ok.

 

[irosie91]

oh-----then I assume that the german police or----government does not bother to do any surveillance of mosques. Would
saying it in Arabic be ok?

No.

International law is whatever an Islamo Nazi says it is. All of that which is Shariah Compliant is LEGAL by islamo Nazi
international law------including bombing trains----here and there-

?

"no" what? no one checks? For the record--the NUREMBURG LAWS 1935 were SHARIAH COMPLIANT --
thus LEGAL BY INTERNATIONAL LAW

No, it would not be ok.

what would not be "ok" and where? The Nuremburg laws are upheld in shariah compliant countries------are they consistent with "INTERNATIONAL LAWS"? Is this discussion confined to German laws?

 

[Bleipriester]

what would not be "ok" and where?

Not my problem when you cannot remember your own question.

The Nuremburg laws are upheld in shariah compliant countries------are they consistent with "INTERNATIONAL LAWS"? Is this discussion confined to German laws?

Apparently, you have no clue about the Nuremberg laws. In addition, the Nuremberg laws don´t apply in the today´s Germany.

 

[Divine Wind]

really? there are people seeking a violent death for refugees? in Germany?

It appears Blitzbirne wants it both ways; he can bitch about the "Zionists" (AKA Jews) all day, but it's wrong to say anything bad about Syria, Islamists, Palestinian terrorists or anything else he supports, including "Death to Jews" which those he supports often say.

 

[Divine Wind]

United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Obviously the Islamist Blitzbirnes didn't read their own link. As noted the in the link below, the Palestinian Arabs didn't accept the partition plan:
Milestones: 1945–1952 - Office of the Historian
" The Palestinian Arabs refused to recognize this arrangement, which they regarded as favorable to the Jews and unfair to the Arab population that would remain in Jewish territory under the partition. The United States sought a middle way by supporting the United Nations resolution, but also encouraging negotiations between Arabs and Jews in the Middle East."

They are also too stupid to know history. Example:
Israel abided by the proposed division of the Palestinian territories which the Palestinian Arabs refused to recognize. On 14MAY48 they declared independence. On 15MAY48, the combined Arab forces of Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria attacked Israel. As everyone who isn't a Blitzbirne knows, the Arabs lost the war and, along with it, the territory which the Palestinians had refused to recognize. After that, every time the Arabs attacked Israel the Arabs lost more territory along with losing the war.

Milestones: 1945–1952 - Office of the Historian
The Arab-Israeli War of 1948 broke out when five Arab nations invaded territory in the former Palestinian mandate immediately following the announcement of the independence of the state of Israel on May 14, 1948. In 1947, and again on May 14, 1948, the United States had offered de facto recognition of the Israeli Provisional Government, but during the war, the United States maintained an arms embargo against all belligerents.