- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #41
Another important issue for me is Environment.
Trump
On this - Trump loses me on some, but I agree with on others. The abuse of elephants in circus is well documented - these highly intelligent and endangered animals need our protection, not abuse. Asbestos got a bad rap? WTF? It's bad stuff.
- Eminent domain is something you need very strongly. (Feb 2016)
- Cut the EPA; what they do is a disgrace. (Oct 2015)
- Eminent domain pays more than fair market value. (Oct 2015)
- Eminent domain is a very useful tool for job creation. (Oct 2015)
- My sons love trophy hunting, but I'm not a believer. (Sep 2015)
- Won't go to circuses that cut elephants due to animal rights. (Mar 2015)
- Partner with environmentalists when undertaking projects. (Apr 2010)
- Good development enhances the environment. (Jan 2008)
- Asbestos got a bad rap from miners & mob-led movement. (Oct 1997)
- Asbestos got a bad rap from miners & mob-led movement. (Oct 1997)
- Humiliated NYC Mayor by finishing ice rink on time on budget. (Oct 1997)
- Bureaucratic land use reviews make projects unbuildable. (Oct 1997)
- FactCheck: Yes, hybrid family vehicles are available in US
Now - two things I agree on: "Good development (can) enhances the environment" and "Partner with environmentalists when undertaking projects". Often the most successful enviornmental protections come from partnering with ranchers, developers, etc to help them realize that there is value in preserving wetlands, or setting aside conservation areas and that it CAN be done in conjunction with their livelihoods - it does not have to be adversarial. Nature Conservancy is an organization that is strong in this, and which I support.
Clinton
- We need green energy jobs & to build on Paris Agreement. (Mar 2016)
- Federal takeover of Flint water supply if state can't fix it. (Feb 2016)
- FactCheck: No, Hillary didn't grant eminent domain to China. (Mar 2009)
- $5B for green-collar jobs in economic stimulus package. (Jan 2008)
- Voted against and consistently opposed to Yucca Mountain. (Jan 2008)
- A comprehensive energy plan as our Apollo moon shot. (Jan 2008)
- Advocate a cap and trade system. (Dec 2007)
- Better track kids’ products for exposures to toxic materials. (Dec 2007)
- Support green-collar job training. (Aug 2007)
- Launched EPA study of air quality at Ground Zero. (Jun 2007)
- Scored 100% on Humane Society Scorecard on animal protection. (Jan 2007)
- Stands for clean air and funding the EPA. (Sep 2000)
- Reduce air pollution to improve children’s health. (Jun 1998)
- Voted YES on including oil & gas smokestacks in mercury regulations. (Sep 2005)
- Remove PCBs from Hudson River by dredging 200 miles. (Apr 2001)
- Rated 89% by the LCV, indicating pro-environment votes. (Dec 2003)
- EPA must do better on mercury clean-up. (Apr 2004)
- Sponsored bill for tax credit to remove lead-based paint. (Nov 2005)
- Grants for beach water pollution under Clean Water Act. (Apr 2008)
- Inter-state compact for Great Lakes water resources. (Jul 2008)
- Strengthen prohibitions against animal fighting. (Jan 2007)
Clinton's record is lengthy - and much of it I support. Part of her record also ties in to children's issues - lead paint, Flint clean water etc. I would like to know more about how somethings would be paid for (dredging the Hudson) - but I agree with the positions. I would like to see all animal fighting prohibited.
I got some problems with the Clinton record here. Don't KNOW if Trump really knows anything about the issue other than what Sean Hannity tells him.
1) The largest current DANGEROUS enviro disaster in US was caused by FED govt at their nuclear weapons plants in the 60s/70s. There are THOUSANDS of leaking barrels of nuclear waste at Savannah River, Hanford and other sites. No clean-up plan on the horizon. This is why OPPOSING a national nuclear waste site that was PROMISED at Yucca Mtn is stupid. Almost as stupid as not planning for the BILLIONS of pounds of recycled and smash Lithium batteries from all the EVehicles that are being pushed.
2) Tossing money at Green Jobs has already been tried for 8 yrs. The Feds are lousy at picking market winners and losers and have lost TONS of tax money on their stupid bets. The problem there is that wind and solar are MATURE technologies, and do not require a lot of "general research" grants. They are now commodity items sold mainly on price. And in ADDITION that are not "alternatives" to reliable 24/7/365 power. When the nation is less scared by nuclear than they are by Global Warming -- I'll believe in efforts to reduce CO2. Because nuclear is the clearest path to that goal. IF -- indeed you want to believe the over-hyped 1980s GW projections that have constantly been being revised DOWNwards with little notice by the press and panicked herd.
The biggest issue with nuclear energy is what to do with the waste and it's a huge deterrent to expanding it. I don't oppose nuclear - in certain situations/locations it's the best choice. I agree though - we've got to get ahead of the curve on clean up for these various energy sources. Thing about Yucca is - residents oppose it. I don't blame them. I live in a state where Coal has long had a free hand in "waste disposal" and remediation. It's not a good record.
I think you can sell the public on nuclear if you can come up with a safe disposal system...but then, we're also still dealing with the nuclear affects of the earthquake on Japan.
![dunno :dunno: :dunno:](/styles/smilies/dunno.gif)