It is not getting better

[JustAGuy1]

What an idiotic talking point. Just so stupid.

That's all you have? Why would he buy those homes if they were going to be under water Darkie?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That's all you have?

That's all I need. What response do you think your unevidenced and unargued brain sharts deserve? Just dismissal and mocking laughter. That is sufficient.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So all you have is a spoonfed blurb you don't understand? I have a feeling that's not going to present an actual challenge to a robust scientific theory.

A robust theory from Nobel Prize winner Michael Mann?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

A robust theory from Nobel Prize winner Michael Mann?

No. What an odd error on your part.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No. What an odd error on your part.

Let me know when you get up to speed on the thread.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Let me know when you get up to speed on the thread.

Let me know when you have upended AGW theory using a blurb you don't understand from a paid denier blog.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Let me know when you have upended AGW theory using a blurb you don't understand from a paid denier blog.

Why do you feel I'm trying to do that? What denier blog?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yes. Northern hemisphere ice core data says you are lying.

δ18O from the GISP2 ice core for the past 10,000 years

The past is the key to the future: Temperature history of the past 10,000 years – Archiv Klimanachrichten

archiv.klimanachrichten.de

Here’s where the Warmers ends the debate by showing the experiments demonstrating 120ppm increase in CO2 raising temperature 1.5 degrees!

Go!

 

[mamooth]

Here’s where the Warmers ends the debate by showing the experiments demonstrating 120ppm increase in CO2 raising temperature 1.5 degrees!

Go!

Done before, many times. Each time, you just soiled yourself and ran. Hence, "piss off, troll" is the only answer you get now.

Piss off, troll.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Done before, many times. Each time, you just soiled yourself and ran. Hence, "piss off, troll" is the only answer you get now.

Piss off, troll.

Never done; not once, not ever!

A model done by Bernie Madoff’s accountant is not proof

 

[jc456]

Done before, many times. Each time, you just soiled yourself and ran. Hence, "piss off, troll" is the only answer you get now.

Piss off, troll.

Where?

 

[EMH]

is warming far faster than predicted

Whenever you see the Co2 FRAUD use this language, laugh...

It shows how pathetically desperate they are...

 

[skookerasbil]

Oh God....not this shit again.

This guy has been posting up the exact same fakery dating back to 2010.

But here's the thing...

Unlike many in here pushing a climate change agenda, he's a true believer......and has been wrong 100% of the time.
For 13 years!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Oh God....not this shit again.

This guy has been posting up the exact same fakery dating back to 2010.

But here's the thing...

Unlike many in here pushing a climate change agenda, he's a true believer......and has been wrong 100% of the time.
For 13 years!!

I think the CO2 finally got him.

 

[HikerGuy83]

View attachment 740012

Can you supply what you are referencing.

I have found articles that say that Antartica was gaining while the Arctic was losing.

I also found some that said that Antartica was losing.

I don't have time to chase it too far, so I was hoping you might be able to help out.

 

[EMH]

Let me know when you have upended AGW theory using a blurb you don't understand from a paid denier blog.

Let us know when you and your fudgebaking heroes can explain a map of the Arctic...

The warmers need to explain the Arctic Circle's ice pattern, and how Co2 is responsible...

The map is clear. 7% of Earth ice is on Greenland. Why is there ice on Greenland south of the Arctic Circle, and no ice north of the Arctic Circle on Alaska? Co2 and sun do not explain this. The only explanation is the Greenland is within 600 miles of the pole at the top, and hence...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[EMH]

Can you supply what you are referencing.

I have found articles that say that Antartica was gaining while the Arctic was losing.

I also found some that said that Antartica was losing.

I don't have time to chase it too far, so I was hoping you might be able to help out.

What you need to know is this.

EVERY YEAR both Greenland and Antarctica grow another ice layer, which we get data from in ice cores. There is no LIQUID WATER on Antarctica, so how is it "melting?"

Greenland's ice south of Arctic Circle melts in the summer, grows back in the winter, and is not retreating. Where the Vikings were farming 700 years ago is now buried under 600 layers of annual ice...

 

[jc456]

View attachment 817013

I think the CO2 finally got him.

This video will crack you up!!!!

 

[HikerGuy83]

What you need to know is this.

EVERY YEAR both Greenland and Antarctica grow another ice layer, which we get data from in ice cores. There is no LIQUID WATER on Antarctica, so how is it "melting?"

Greenland's ice south of Arctic Circle melts in the summer, grows back in the winter, and is not retreating. Where the Vikings were farming 700 years ago is now buried under 600 layers of annual ice...

I don't doubt what you say is true.

But I'd still like some clarity arou

 

[EMH]

I don't doubt what you say is true.

But I'd still like some clarity arou

Want clarity on the climate issue?

Got it!!!

Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice. What are the parameters of climate that can change? Ocean levels Atmospheric...

www.usmessageboard.com

The warmers need to explain the Arctic Circle's ice pattern, and how Co2 is responsible...

The map is clear. 7% of Earth ice is on Greenland. Why is there ice on Greenland south of the Arctic Circle, and no ice north of the Arctic Circle on Alaska? Co2 and sun do not explain this. The only explanation is the Greenland is within 600 miles of the pole at the top, and hence...

www.usmessageboard.com

The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago

McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure... We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old...

www.usmessageboard.com

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com