GLASNOST
Gold Member
I've been saying that for years but you keep saying that American soldiers are all heroes. Does this mean that you finally agree with me?People who shoot at others for any reason other than self defense are not "good guys"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've been saying that for years but you keep saying that American soldiers are all heroes. Does this mean that you finally agree with me?People who shoot at others for any reason other than self defense are not "good guys"
If you are going to tell me what I said use the quote functionI've been saying that for years but you keep saying that American soldiers are all heroes. Does this mean that you finally agree with me?People who shoot at others for any reason other than self defense are not "good guys"
Don't be shy. Anyway, here is your chance to be clear. Are they good guys or bad guys?If you are going to tell me what I said use the quote functionI've been saying that for years but you keep saying that American soldiers are all heroes. Does this mean that you finally agree with me?People who shoot at others for any reason other than self defense are not "good guys"
I never said any such thing
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
So you refuse to answer the question. Probably the smartest thing you've done on this thread so far.Both depending on the circumstances
Only idiots think the world is black or white
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
I answered the question you are too stupid to understand itSo you refuse to answer the question. Probably the smartest thing you've done on this thread so far.Both depending on the circumstances
Only idiots think the world is black or white
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
You don't understand that the 2nd amendment was meant to protect the citizens from their own government, not for hunting, or target practiceAmerica has a strong (socialist) standing army. There is no longer need for "militia" as stated in the Second Amendment.
In regard to weaponry, killing capacity. More people are killed with bats yearly than atom bombs but that does not mean a bat is more dangerous.
Just as there are a significant number of people who will always hate people of color .. NO ONE wants to disarm America That's just Republican clap trap Just trying to reduce the number of killings something it seems the NRA and Trump don't want to see
Just in passing While I like most of Beto's talk if he persists in his no gun talk he has ZERO chance of becoming the Dem rep
Biden has 40 years worth of experience in government an honest man a good man ,,all the qualities this scum in our WH now doesn't have
Biden has 40 years worth of experience in government an honest man a good man ,,all the qualities this scum in our WH now doesn't have
Sounds a lot like you're not Pro-Choice.Their loved ones don’t think so
Sniffed a lot of white children.Actually, as you know, Joe Biden has FIFTY YEARS of government service, never having had a real job. So, what has he accomplished?
America has a strong (socialist) standing army. There is no longer need for "militia" as stated in the Second Amendment.
Just as there are a significant number of people who will always hate people of color .. NO ONE wants to disarm America That's just Republican clap trap Just trying to reduce the number of killings something it seems the NRA and Trump don't want to see.
No, you are avoiding to answer the question ... not that I blame you because the question places you between a rock and a hard place. BTW, Calling me "stupid" is not the best way to conduct a discussion but if that's all you've got then you go for it!I answered the question you are too stupid to understand it
.. and my reply was ...Gee criminals shoot people who would have thought?
That reply angered you so I asked you if soldiers are good guys or bad guys. But you have no answer to that.Yes. Although most people are shot by "good guys" criminals are responsible for a small percentage as well.
... being as you can't have it both ways. Either "good guys" murder more than anyone else or .... American soldiers are not "good guys" after all. Which is it? Maybe you can answer the question this time?Gee criminals shoot people who would have thought?
Weapons, a Constitutional rightcars needed--weapons not..this is plain and simpleThere are restrictions on cars being “street legal”as stated, no need for itI don't have an Ar 15 because I have no use for a small caliber rodent gun.
That said I don't have to justify anything I do to you or anyone else as long as I am not breaking any laws or harming anyone in the process.
I had some idiot that said we don't need cars--hahahaha
comparing cars/POOLS/knives/etc to firearms = hahahahhahhaaha
No I think the question was "Why do you need a car that can exceed the posted speed limits?"
And even that question is irrelevant.
No one has to justify their choice of automobile to you or anyone else.
And that has nothing to do with the top speed does it?
Why do you need a car than can do 66 MPH?
That's right. Cars are produced to transport goods and people. Guns are produced to destroy things and kill.cars needed--weapons not..this is plain and simple
A simple amendment will change that before the ink is even dry.Weapons, a Constitutional right
Cars? Nope.
Have you never considered how stupid the 2nd. Amendment is?English grammar escapes you doesn't it?