Its called NATURE!!!!

[otto105]

I'm having my way with you girls.

Hilarious

Did trumpy grab your pussy.

 

[ding]

Hilarious

Did trumpy grab your pussy.

"...In the global climate models (GCMs) most of the warming that has taken place since 1950 is attributed to human activity. Historically, however, there have been large climatic variations.Temperature reconstructions indicate that there is a ‘warming’ trend that seems to have been going on for as long as approximately 400 years. Prior to the last 250 years or so, such a trend could only be due to natural causes..."

 

[otto105]

"...In the global climate models (GCMs) most of the warming that has taken place since 1950 is attributed to human activity. Historically, however, there have been large climatic variations.Temperature reconstructions indicate that there is a ‘warming’ trend that seems to have been going on for as long as approximately 400 years. Prior to the last 250 years or so, such a trend could only be due to natural causes..."

Hilarious

You and your idiotic denial of science.

 

[Crick]

"...In the global climate models (GCMs) most of the warming that has taken place since 1950 is attributed to human activity. Historically, however, there have been large climatic variations.Temperature reconstructions indicate that there is a ‘warming’ trend that seems to have been going on for as long as approximately 400 years. Prior to the last 250 years or so, such a trend could only be due to natural causes..."

Why are you using a 29 year old graph? And why are you using the local temperatures of a Greenland ice core to represent global temperatures?

Holocene Climatic Optimum

The Holocene Climate Optimum (HCO) was a warm period during roughly the interval 9,000 to 5,000 years BP, with a thermal maximum around 8000 years BP. It has also been known by many other names, such as Altithermal, Climatic Optimum, Holocene Megathermal, Holocene Optimum, Holocene Thermal...

encyclopedia.pub

Milankovitch Cycles and Climate Change

www.climatedata.info

Note the direction of Milankovitch forcing on solar insolation at the far right end of the graph. Note the correlation between the peak of Milankovitch forcing and the HCO. That refutes your entire hypothesis. The glacial-interglacial cycles is headed towards cooler temperatures, not warmer and certainly not at the radical rate at which CO2 and temperature are currently increasing.

 

[ding]

Why are you using a 29 year old graph? And why are you using the local temperatures of a Greenland ice core to represent global temperatures?

View attachment 955462

Holocene Climatic Optimum

The Holocene Climate Optimum (HCO) was a warm period during roughly the interval 9,000 to 5,000 years BP, with a thermal maximum around 8000 years BP. It has also been known by many other names, such as Altithermal, Climatic Optimum, Holocene Megathermal, Holocene Optimum, Holocene Thermal...

encyclopedia.pub

View attachment 955471

Milankovitch Cycles and Climate Change

www.climatedata.info

Note the direction of Milankovitch forcing on solar insolation at the far right end of the graph. Note the correlation between the peak of Milankovitch forcing and the HCO. That refutes your entire hypothesis. The glacial-interglacial cycles is headed towards cooler temperatures, not warmer and certainly not at the radical rate at which CO2 and temperature are currently increasing.

So then you believe CO2 saved the planet from a glacial period?

 

[ding]

why are you using the local temperatures of a Greenland ice core to represent global temperatures?

Because no other location on the planet is more representative of climate changes than the Arctic.

 

[ding]

Why are you using a 29 year old graph? And why are you using the local temperatures of a Greenland ice core to represent global temperatures?

View attachment 955462

Holocene Climatic Optimum

The Holocene Climate Optimum (HCO) was a warm period during roughly the interval 9,000 to 5,000 years BP, with a thermal maximum around 8000 years BP. It has also been known by many other names, such as Altithermal, Climatic Optimum, Holocene Megathermal, Holocene Optimum, Holocene Thermal...

encyclopedia.pub

View attachment 955471

Milankovitch Cycles and Climate Change

www.climatedata.info

Note the direction of Milankovitch forcing on solar insolation at the far right end of the graph. Note the correlation between the peak of Milankovitch forcing and the HCO. That refutes your entire hypothesis. The glacial-interglacial cycles is headed towards cooler temperatures, not warmer and certainly not at the radical rate at which CO2 and temperature are currently increasing.

How much do you believe orbital cycles change surface temperature? Do you have a link for that?

Because it's well known that heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic raises temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere above what they would be without that heat circulation.

 

[otto105]

Convict ding


Just stop. Nobody buys your stupid denier shit.

 

[ding]

Convict ding


Just stop. Nobody buys your stupid denier shit.

My obligation is satisfied when I present the information and data.
What other decide to believe is up to them.

 

[ding]

Why are you using a 29 year old graph?

Feel free to present ice core data from the Arctic that you agree with.

 

[ding]

Crick

Not really a perfect correlation but according to this you must believe that CO2 saved the planet from extensive northern hemisphere continental glaciation, right?

You are comparing orbital radiative forcing to GLACIAL cycles, right? According to your graph the planet should be in a glacial period if there was a correlation to orbital forcing, right?

 

[otto105]

My obligation is satisfied when I present the information and data.
What other decide to believe is up to them.

When does that happen?

 

[ding]

When does that happen?

Every time I post.

 

[otto105]

Every time I post.

Hilarious

 

[ding]

Hilarious

Almost as hilarious as you not knowing how much feedback they are adding to the radiative forcing of CO2.

 

[ding]

#winning

 

[otto105]

Almost as hilarious as you not knowing how much feedback they are adding to the radiative forcing of CO2.

Hilarious that you believe your bullshit.

Got any scientific organizations that will back it?

 

[otto105]

#winning

Felon status

 

[ding]

Hilarious that you believe your bullshit.

Got any scientific organizations that will back it?

The planet being 2C COLDER with 26 ft SHALLLOWER seas and 120 ppm MORE CO2 backs me up.

 

[ding]

Felon status

I like having my way with you. It's like playing with a cat.