Pop23
Gold Member
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
Clean bloodlines? Wow, you really do sound like the racist of yesteryear.
Pops, if sibling marriages ever come to pass, I'll happily concede that you were right all along and the slippery slope exists.
I'm 100% positive that you will never get that concession.
Marriage IS A CONSTITUTIONALLY protected right you simpleton. It's your argument that almost insures it.
Congratulations
You don't care if it happens or not. You've made that incredibly clear.
Name one other constitutionally protected civil right that excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Your arguments seem to have been a fraud from the beginning.
Marriage excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Yes, thanks. No one could marry a family member. Now go back to correcting grammar. It's what you do best.
Ah, so full participation means completely unregulated? If that's so, I can certainly name other rights which exclude everyone from full participation. Speech, gun ownership, religious practice, all are regulated.
Getting butthurt on behalf of Boss now? :LOL:
So the state gets to choose which Gods are worshiped? The state can determine which words can be used? Can they also tell you that you must speak?
One can't yell fire in a crowded theater - but only when they yell it to inflict terror, if there is a fire, it's not restricted.
So? Please tell me the compelling state interest to deny entrance into a contracted partnership, by family members into a relationship that does not make sex a qualification