Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, okay.....
I will happily withdraw all my objections to gay marriage if you hypocrites will simply stand up for my fundamental constitutional right to marry these big dirty milkers!
I don't care. Didn't care before, still don't care. FILE YOUR CASE, bloviator.
Yeah, we realize that gays have no idea what that could cause, and really don't care cuz they got no skin in the future.
Oh look, more bloviating. You're filing when?
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
Clean bloodlines? Wow, you really do sound like the racist of yesteryear.
Pops, if sibling marriages ever come to pass, I'll happily concede that you were right all along and the slippery slope exists.
I'm 100% positive that you will never get that concession.
Marriage IS A CONSTITUTIONALLY protected right you simpleton. It's your argument that almost insures it.
Congratulations
You don't care if it happens or not. You've made that incredibly clear.
Name one other constitutionally protected civil right that excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Your arguments seem to have been a fraud from the beginning.
Yeah, we realize that gays have no idea what that could cause, and really don't care cuz they got no skin in the future.
Oh look, more bloviating. You're filing when?
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
Clean bloodlines? Wow, you really do sound like the racist of yesteryear.
Pops, if sibling marriages ever come to pass, I'll happily concede that you were right all along and the slippery slope exists.
I'm 100% positive that you will never get that concession.
Marriage IS A CONSTITUTIONALLY protected right you simpleton. It's your argument that almost insures it.
Congratulations
You don't care if it happens or not. You've made that incredibly clear.
Name one other constitutionally protected civil right that excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Your arguments seem to have been a fraud from the beginning.
Marriage excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Oh look, more bloviating. You're filing when?
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
You have verified what we all have suspected.
That you are a troll who just wants to discriminate against homosexuals.
Civil rights, constitutionally protected are afforded to all.
You nimrods created the problem with no way of denying the ability of ALL to Marry.
Many genetically defective children in the future will have you to thank.
As you keep saying- quoting you= citing you.
With no evidence to support your claims.
12 years of legal marriage in Massachusetts- and still no siblings marrying.
And gay couples are still getting married- and you nimrods are still but hurt about it.
12 years HUH, wow your prospective of how long the future is is bizarre. But when you got no nut in the game.....
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
You have verified what we all have suspected.
That you are a troll who just wants to discriminate against homosexuals.
Civil rights, constitutionally protected are afforded to all.
You nimrods created the problem with no way of denying the ability of ALL to Marry.
Many genetically defective children in the future will have you to thank.
As you keep saying- quoting you= citing you.
With no evidence to support your claims.
12 years of legal marriage in Massachusetts- and still no siblings marrying.
And gay couples are still getting married- and you nimrods are still but hurt about it.
12 years HUH, wow your prospective of how long the future is is bizarre. But when you got no nut in the game.....
12 years- and none of your predictions- citing you- quoting you- have come true.
LOL......
Oh look, more bloviating. You're filing when?
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
Clean bloodlines? Wow, you really do sound like the racist of yesteryear.
Pops, if sibling marriages ever come to pass, I'll happily concede that you were right all along and the slippery slope exists.
I'm 100% positive that you will never get that concession.
Marriage IS A CONSTITUTIONALLY protected right you simpleton. It's your argument that almost insures it.
Congratulations
You don't care if it happens or not. You've made that incredibly clear.
Name one other constitutionally protected civil right that excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Your arguments seem to have been a fraud from the beginning.
Marriage excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Yes, thanks. No one could marry a family member. Now go back to correcting grammar. It's what you do best.[/Q
No one could marry a sibling before Loving v. Virginia or before Obergefell- and no siblings can marry now
You have verified what we all have suspected.
That you are a troll who just wants to discriminate against homosexuals.
Civil rights, constitutionally protected are afforded to all.
You nimrods created the problem with no way of denying the ability of ALL to Marry.
Many genetically defective children in the future will have you to thank.
As you keep saying- quoting you= citing you.
With no evidence to support your claims.
12 years of legal marriage in Massachusetts- and still no siblings marrying.
And gay couples are still getting married- and you nimrods are still but hurt about it.
12 years HUH, wow your prospective of how long the future is is bizarre. But when you got no nut in the game.....
12 years- and none of your predictions- citing you- quoting you- have come true.
LOL......
The inflicted children thank you in advance asshole
I don't care. Didn't care before, still don't care. FILE YOUR CASE, bloviator.
Yeah, we realize that gays have no idea what that could cause, and really don't care cuz they got no skin in the future.
Oh look, more bloviating. You're filing when?
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
Clean bloodlines? Wow, you really do sound like the racist of yesteryear.
.
Only you assume such racism.
You could care less about genetically deformed children as long as you get to lick pussy.
Civil rights, constitutionally protected are afforded to all.
You nimrods created the problem with no way of denying the ability of ALL to Marry.
Many genetically defective children in the future will have you to thank.
As you keep saying- quoting you= citing you.
With no evidence to support your claims.
12 years of legal marriage in Massachusetts- and still no siblings marrying.
And gay couples are still getting married- and you nimrods are still but hurt about it.
12 years HUH, wow your prospective of how long the future is is bizarre. But when you got no nut in the game.....
12 years- and none of your predictions- citing you- quoting you- have come true.
LOL......
The inflicted children thank you in advance asshole
You\r imaginary afflicted children?
Yeah, we realize that gays have no idea what that could cause, and really don't care cuz they got no skin in the future.
Oh look, more bloviating. You're filing when?
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
Clean bloodlines? Wow, you really do sound like the racist of yesteryear.
.
Only you assume such racism.
You could care less about genetically deformed children as long as you get to lick pussy.
You dont' give a damn about any children- you just want to lick the assholes of your homophobe overlords.
Pops has such a convoluted attempt an argument.
He first claims that procreation is no longer relevant- but then also claims that there will be a quantifiable increase in genetic disorders.
But if there is a real threat of genetic disorders it would provide a rational for States to disqualify couples who can procreate from marrying.
States have done exactly that in the past and can still do so.
As you keep saying- quoting you= citing you.
With no evidence to support your claims.
12 years of legal marriage in Massachusetts- and still no siblings marrying.
And gay couples are still getting married- and you nimrods are still but hurt about it.
12 years HUH, wow your prospective of how long the future is is bizarre. But when you got no nut in the game.....
12 years- and none of your predictions- citing you- quoting you- have come true.
LOL......
The inflicted children thank you in advance asshole
You\r imaginary afflicted children?
Shows your callous disregard for human life.
But, again, gays have no skin in the game, so fuck the future, Right?
Why do you keep lying about that?Pops has such a convoluted attempt an argument.
He first claims that procreation is no longer relevant- but then also claims that there will be a quantifiable increase in genetic disorders.
But if there is a real threat of genetic disorders it would provide a rational for States to disqualify couples who can procreate from marrying.
States have done exactly that in the past and can still do so.
Ends justifying the means again, huh Perv?
States are not allowed to restrict constitutionally protected civil rights.
.
Oh look, more bloviating. You're filing when?
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
Clean bloodlines? Wow, you really do sound like the racist of yesteryear.
.
Only you assume such racism.
You could care less about genetically deformed children as long as you get to lick pussy.
You dont' give a damn about any children- you just want to lick the assholes of your homophobe overlords.
Quit using this forum to post your nasty fantasies, you perverted twat
Oh look, more bloviating. You're filing when?
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
Clean bloodlines? Wow, you really do sound like the racist of yesteryear.
Pops, if sibling marriages ever come to pass, I'll happily concede that you were right all along and the slippery slope exists.
I'm 100% positive that you will never get that concession.
Marriage IS A CONSTITUTIONALLY protected right you simpleton. It's your argument that almost insures it.
Congratulations
You don't care if it happens or not. You've made that incredibly clear.
Name one other constitutionally protected civil right that excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Your arguments seem to have been a fraud from the beginning.
Marriage excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Yes, thanks. No one could marry a family member. Now go back to correcting grammar. It's what you do best.
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
Clean bloodlines? Wow, you really do sound like the racist of yesteryear.
Pops, if sibling marriages ever come to pass, I'll happily concede that you were right all along and the slippery slope exists.
I'm 100% positive that you will never get that concession.
Marriage IS A CONSTITUTIONALLY protected right you simpleton. It's your argument that almost insures it.
Congratulations
You don't care if it happens or not. You've made that incredibly clear.
Name one other constitutionally protected civil right that excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Your arguments seem to have been a fraud from the beginning.
Marriage excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Yes, thanks. No one could marry a family member. Now go back to correcting grammar. It's what you do best.
Ah, so full participation means completely unregulated? If that's so, I can certainly name other rights which exclude everyone from full participation. Speech, gun ownership, religious practice, all are regulated.
Getting butthurt on behalf of Boss now? :LOL:
No bloviating. I spoke the truth. You verified what I've long suspected.
The ends justified the means.
Screw the attempt to keep track of clean bloodlines. A small group of vocal oddballs trumps the ability to insure genetically sound future generations.
Clean bloodlines? Wow, you really do sound like the racist of yesteryear.
Pops, if sibling marriages ever come to pass, I'll happily concede that you were right all along and the slippery slope exists.
I'm 100% positive that you will never get that concession.
Marriage IS A CONSTITUTIONALLY protected right you simpleton. It's your argument that almost insures it.
Congratulations
You don't care if it happens or not. You've made that incredibly clear.
Name one other constitutionally protected civil right that excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Your arguments seem to have been a fraud from the beginning.
Marriage excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Yes, thanks. No one could marry a family member. Now go back to correcting grammar. It's what you do best.
Ah, so full participation means completely unregulated? If that's so, I can certainly name other rights which exclude everyone from full participation. Speech, gun ownership, religious practice, all are regulated.
Getting butthurt on behalf of Boss now? :LOL:
Clean bloodlines? Wow, you really do sound like the racist of yesteryear.
Pops, if sibling marriages ever come to pass, I'll happily concede that you were right all along and the slippery slope exists.
I'm 100% positive that you will never get that concession.
Marriage IS A CONSTITUTIONALLY protected right you simpleton. It's your argument that almost insures it.
Congratulations
You don't care if it happens or not. You've made that incredibly clear.
Name one other constitutionally protected civil right that excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Your arguments seem to have been a fraud from the beginning.
Marriage excluded nearly everyone from full participation?
Yes, thanks. No one could marry a family member. Now go back to correcting grammar. It's what you do best.
Ah, so full participation means completely unregulated? If that's so, I can certainly name other rights which exclude everyone from full participation. Speech, gun ownership, religious practice, all are regulated.
Getting butthurt on behalf of Boss now? :LOL:
He is getting more and more frantic in his defense of incestuous marriage- oh wait- in his attack on incestuous marriage- oh wait- in his attack on Americans who are gay marrying.
