It's Mueller Time!

Nope....Not in any way.
" High crimes and misdemeanors" do not speak to actual statutes.
The other day the Democrats attempted to declare 'insulting / making fun of Democrats' and telling foreign-born terrorist-supporting anti-American anti-Semite Immigration Law-violating Democrats that if they hate this country so much they can leave at any time rose to the status of 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors'...

:rolleyes:


.
 
Obstruction, fool.
Which he did quite easily.


Session did not have a conflict. The report states as much.

So now answer the question.

Irrelevant to Trump's actions.
The purpose of the "unrecusal" was so Sessions could then limit the investigation. IOW, obstruction.

What actions?

There was full cooperation by The Administration with the investigation in to the Russian Collusion Hoax.

It's not like The President Burned 30,000 emails with Bleach Bit to cover his tracks for a non crime and event that never happened.

Contrast that with the treatment of Clinton who not only committed numerous felonies, but destroyed evidence and actually obstructed justice, and her treatment vs the vicious witch hunt and personal vendetta against The President.
What actions?
Jesus, dude. Can you not follow?

The actions of trying to get Sessions to "unrecuse".
CAN YOU SITE US CODE THAT WAS VIOLATED FOR ASKING AN ATTORNEY GENERAL TO UN-RECUSE HIMSELF FROM A HOAX INVESTIGATION IN TO NON EXISTENT RUSSIAN COLLUSION NON-CRIME?

WHAT CRIME IS THAT?

What was the purpose for Sessions to "unrecuse" himself?
 
Mueller caught lying.. Will he now get raids at his home like other caught liars

///////

House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., focused his questions on the former Special Counsel's findings that the investigation did not establish any conspiracy between President Trump and Russia. Collins asked Mueller if "conspiracy" and "collusion" were colloquially the same thing, and Mueller said no. Collins then quoted Mueller's own report, which Indicates the same .
Mueller's only purpose was to cover for The Collusion of Obama and Clinton with Russia when they formally paid them to interfere in our election via The Dirty Russian Dossier, and then to find some kind of leverage for The Democrat Party to give them a fighting chance in 2020 when they are going to be bludgeoned over this.
 
Session did not have a conflict. The report states as much.

So now answer the question.

Irrelevant to Trump's actions.
The purpose of the "unrecusal" was so Sessions could then limit the investigation. IOW, obstruction.

What actions?

There was full cooperation by The Administration with the investigation in to the Russian Collusion Hoax.

It's not like The President Burned 30,000 emails with Bleach Bit to cover his tracks for a non crime and event that never happened.

Contrast that with the treatment of Clinton who not only committed numerous felonies, but destroyed evidence and actually obstructed justice, and her treatment vs the vicious witch hunt and personal vendetta against The President.
What actions?
Jesus, dude. Can you not follow?

The actions of trying to get Sessions to "unrecuse".
CAN YOU SITE US CODE THAT WAS VIOLATED FOR ASKING AN ATTORNEY GENERAL TO UN-RECUSE HIMSELF FROM A HOAX INVESTIGATION IN TO NON EXISTENT RUSSIAN COLLUSION NON-CRIME?

WHAT CRIME IS THAT?

What was the purpose for Sessions to "unrecuse" himself?
Site US CODE that was Violated or STFU.

I asked and you deflected.

Nothing illegal or unethical about asking an AG to Un-Recuse himself and do his job.
 
Any doubts now that Mueller is part of the frame Trump coup?....

Why?
Because he's destroying the exoneration narrative?
What exoneration?

No need to exonerate anyone when there was not a single crime committed by The President according to The Mueller Report.
The Report on Bill Clinton by That Special Counsel listed 13 crimes.
Mueller's Report had ZERO.

How do you exonerate someone that a 400 page report stated committed ZERO crimes?
 
Irrelevant to Trump's actions.
The purpose of the "unrecusal" was so Sessions could then limit the investigation. IOW, obstruction.

What actions?

There was full cooperation by The Administration with the investigation in to the Russian Collusion Hoax.

It's not like The President Burned 30,000 emails with Bleach Bit to cover his tracks for a non crime and event that never happened.

Contrast that with the treatment of Clinton who not only committed numerous felonies, but destroyed evidence and actually obstructed justice, and her treatment vs the vicious witch hunt and personal vendetta against The President.
What actions?
Jesus, dude. Can you not follow?

The actions of trying to get Sessions to "unrecuse".
CAN YOU SITE US CODE THAT WAS VIOLATED FOR ASKING AN ATTORNEY GENERAL TO UN-RECUSE HIMSELF FROM A HOAX INVESTIGATION IN TO NON EXISTENT RUSSIAN COLLUSION NON-CRIME?

WHAT CRIME IS THAT?

What was the purpose for Sessions to "unrecuse" himself?
Site US CODE that was Violated or STFU.

I asked and you deflected.

Nothing illegal or unethical about asking an AG to Un-Recuse himself and do his job.

Especially when he never should have recused himself in the first place, as proven in the report.

Dead end on the Sessions thing, Lefties, try other shit.
 
What it comes down to is the prog-deep state. They initiated this entire thing based on false pretenses. While they found nothing, Mueller thought to throw the progs a bone, save some face of sorts. Combine that we get mixed messages when in the end, no collusion, no obstruction.
 
My take is this:

The R's are attacking the character of Mr Mueller

The D's are making the case for Obstruction of Justice.

The R's are making speeches for the biddable, the D's are asking questions on material facts within the report.
 

Forum List

Back
Top