Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also the report said that although they couldn’t prove that Trump obstructed, they couldn’t exonerate him.
Any 1st year law school student knows that NOT GUILTY IS NOT THE SAME AS INNOCENT.
The DOJ does not prove people innocent, only guilty or not guilty based on the evidence at hand.
What a crock of shit to say they couldn’t EXONERATE TRUMP.
MUELLER HAS ESTABLISHED A NEW STANDARD OF JUSTICE IN THE UNITED States!
Wrong, you fucking moron. Mueller was appointed after Trump fired Comey.but the obstruction mentions in the Mueller report were for the Mueller investigation.So he obstructed the investigation before it had even started?Page 273:
The evidence shows that the President was focused on the Russia investigation's
implications for his presidency and, specifically, on dispelling any suggestion that he was under
investigation or had links to Russia. in early March, the President attempted to prevent Sessions's
recusal, even after being told that Sessions was following DOJ conflict-of-interest rules.
You're an idiot.
The FBI investigation started in July of 2016, dope.
Really?
The firing of Comey was done during the Mueller investigation, dope?
It was an illegal witch hunt.
That was proven.
And.......?missing emails, server off government land.Yep, period!!! Dumbass libs.Nope.
What was the crime that precipitated years of Benghazi investigations, dope?
Then by your logic.....it was an illegal investigation as none of that was proven and there were no charges.
He also stated he had not sent anything for a later time as well.Mueller put an end to the FALSE NARRATIVE that Dems / snowflakes have been clinging to, that were it not for the OLC. After 1st saying it was true, Mueller then added his correction:
"“I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning," Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
As has been pointed out accurately over and over again ZERO FINDING OF GUILT = INNOCENT in any court!
Mueller issues clarification, takes back bombshell statement about indicting Trump
.
Also the report said that although they couldn’t prove that Trump obstructed, they couldn’t exonerate him.
Any 1st year law school student knows that NOT GUILTY IS NOT THE SAME AS INNOCENT.
The DOJ does not prove people innocent, only guilty or not guilty based on the evidence at hand.
What a crock of shit to say they couldn’t EXONERATE TRUMP.
MUELLER HAS ESTABLISHED A NEW STANDARD OF JUSTICE IN THE UNITED States!
Better than that-
Turner then asked if the special counsel could have powers greater than the Attorney General, which Mueller said they could not.
"Mr. Mueller, does the Attorney General have the power or authority to exonerate?" he said as he grabbed various books. "And what I'm putting up here is the United States code. This is where the Attorney General gets his power. And the constitution, and the annotated cases of these, which we've searched.
"We even went to your law school, because I went to Case Western but I thought maybe your law school teaches it differently, and we got the criminal law textbook from your law school."
Mueller, who graduated from University of Virginia School of Law, sat silently as Turner continued....
Turner asked if Mueller thought Barr thought there was an "office of exoneration" in the Department of Justice, to which Mueller said, "that's not what I said."
Turner later pointed to a large, print out of a shot from CNN earlier Wednesday with a chyron that read, "MUELLER: TRUMP WAS NOT EXONERATED."
"What you know is that this can't say, 'Mueller exonerated Trump,' because you don't have the power or authority to exonerate Trump," Turner said. "You have no more power to declare him exonerated (or not, me) than you have the power to declare him Anderson Cooper."
GOP lawmaker takes out textbook, tells Mueller he doesn't have 'power to exonerate'
Have you ever had a favorite TV show? And you watched every episode? For years? And then it ended? But you didn't like how the story ended? At all? And you wished you could talk to the star of the show and ask why it didn't end the way you wanted?
That's how many members of Congress were feeling, today.
Collins: “at any time during the investigation was your investigation curtailed, stopped or hindered?”
Mueller: “No”
So........Mueller admits there was no obstruction!!!!!!!!!!
What the fuck, lefties? You people are fucking insane.
Still, they might be able to know you are watching on youtube and secretly add that to the ratings. Heavy duty foil will stop that.Good for you. You don't want to get mind-poisoned. It can happen in an instant.What are they saying on CNN and MSLSD?
How are they spinning this disaster? No way are they being honest about how bad it was for the Dimms!
I refuse to tune in. I’ll watch YouTube clips but at don’t tune in to CNN and PMSNBC
Do you have your computer lined with foil so they can't accidentally mind poison you when you go to youtube? Use the heavy duty kind. It's safer.
Derp. I don’t want to give them ratings. I said I watch the clips on YouTube. Is you memory that bad?
I said: “I’ll watch YouTube clips but at don’t tune in to CNN and PMSNBC”
Nice try smartass.
......you people really show your immaturity, not to mention your hate of democracy, by STILL crying over who won the electionTrump is an incompetent gasbag but unfortunately that is not an impeachable offense.
exonerated...AGAIN!
this Mueller hearing imploded on the Dems in absolutely glorious fashion!
i think Mueller for his service...but my gosh has there been anyone more less prepared than him today
Still, they might be able to know you are watching on youtube and secretly add that to the ratings. Heavy duty foil will stop that.Good for you. You don't want to get mind-poisoned. It can happen in an instant.What are they saying on CNN and MSLSD?
How are they spinning this disaster? No way are they being honest about how bad it was for the Dimms!
I refuse to tune in. I’ll watch YouTube clips but at don’t tune in to CNN and PMSNBC
Do you have your computer lined with foil so they can't accidentally mind poison you when you go to youtube? Use the heavy duty kind. It's safer.
Derp. I don’t want to give them ratings. I said I watch the clips on YouTube. Is you memory that bad?
I said: “I’ll watch YouTube clips but at don’t tune in to CNN and PMSNBC”
Nice try smartass.
......you people really show your immaturity, not to mention your hate of democracy, by STILL crying over who won the electionTrump is an incompetent gasbag but unfortunately that is not an impeachable offense.
You aren't young anymore cowboy. It's not 1940. We aren't going back.It is very clear that you are at least 70 and likely closer to 80, if you think little girls go to public bathrooms by themselves. Not in my entire lifetime that is more than 30 years. You are just too old to know better. Dotard.Who is letting little girls go to a public bathroom by themselves?It’s now the age of you losing your job for telling a man to not follow a little girl into the ladies bathroom.When does this crap show end....anyone know?
Only a dumbass idiot dotard would ever do that. People who actually have little girls NEVER let them go alone into a public bathroom. Gawd. Dumb. Ass.
And btw - women, you know the humans who actually USE the ladies room? We have seen cross dressers in women's rooms for years. Decades. If no woman has ever seen that, she just wasn't paying attention.
Hold up, rly? How many decades are you are old?
My guess is sub-3. Or less.
And why are you watching these pretend little girls go into the bathroom anyway? Creepy. You are worrying way too much about little girl bathroom issues. Their parents will look after them in the public bathroom.
What was your point again, leftist n00b shill?
When I was young, there were no pretend little girls. Either you were a girl, or you were a boy.
It's not complicated, really. 1 in around 2200 is a hermaphrodite, let's cross that bridge when we come to it.
Oh, just quit. Just quit. Both of you. That case had nothing to do with Trump. Nothing.Thanks, depotoo. I missed this; their contacts are described pretty thoroughly in that first link you gave me, and I don't see how it changes any of the facts of the Prevezon case that I described. You are talking about something entirely different.Oh, please, OldLady. You and I have been here too long for you to claim that. Obviously you can’t be right if you don’t follow all the evidence. And, if you’d been following the evidence you would know that-I'll speak as I want, thanks. My words are meant to reveal my tone, and it is not because I think I'm "losing." It is because I'm right.Bull. Only in your wildest dreams. You pick and choose as you please.You don't want to go there with me, depotoo, because that case--US v. Prevezon Holdings, stinks of corruption, and I am pretty damned sure Trump was involved in getting that case "settled" instead of taken to court.
It was a juicy Manhattan money laundering case involving a huge tax fraud scam by the Russian government. Yes, Attorney V was the lawyer for Prevezon which is why she was allowed back into the country. The whistle blower on the Russian tax fraud scheme had been thrown in prison by the Russians and beaten to death, which is why the US put sanctions on Russia called the Magnitsky Act (that was the whistle blower's name). Veselya-whatever-her- name-is was spending most of her time here lobbying to have that Magnitsky Act removed, although she was approaching it as an "adoption" issue because the sanctions somehow impacted adoptions. For some reason, those sanctions really bothered someone in Moscow and they sent Attorney V to do their dirty work for them.
Whatever happened in that meeting in June 2016 between that Russian tool and the Trump campaign led to the case being settled as soon as Trump had been put in the catbird seat and could get his puppets in place. It was only one week before the case was set to go to trial, and the US Attorney's office was loaded for bear. The US Attorney, Preet Bahara, had spent years collecting the ammunition against Prevezon and when Trump was inaugurated, he personally called Bahara, told him he was doing a great job and asked him to stay on. Two months later he fired him and a month after that, the Prevezon case was settled. The Russians were shocked that they were offered to settle at all, and not for such a low amount. They snapped it up.
I got a lot more where that came from if you want it. That case stinks to the high heavens. You want to let that sleeping dog lie if you have any regard for the Republicans or Trump.
Veselnitskaya is nothing but Putin's spy and she was indicted in January for obstruction of justice in the Prevezon case, as well. She was up to her neck in dirty dealings, and no doubt so was Trump.
Were you aware she also met with Fusion GPS before and after that Trump meeting? So, she is allowed back in the US by the then Dem DOJ, just in time for this meeting, and just happened to be seen with Dems before the meeting, as well as met with Fusion GPS before and after that meeting. All coincidental in your mind, right?
And yet, no charges were brought against the Trump team regarding that meeting, even though they had surveillance within that meeting. Funny that.
It was a setup from the get-go that failed. Period. Sadly for the Dems, trying to set him up.
By the way, you really need to get your temper under control when things don’t go your way. Your words reveal your tone every time.
I had not heard about her meeting with Fusion GPS. You want to share a link with me on that? I'd appreciate it. As for meeting with Democrats, yeah, she was actively lobbying Congress to get rid of those sanctions. So that doesn't surprise me.
Fusion GPS’ Glenn Simpson Dined With Russian Lawyer Before & After Her Meeting at Trump Tower
Fusion GPS official met with Russian operative before and after Trump Jr. sit-down
I just want to thank you for your entire series of posts about Prevezon case, which Jeff Sessions settled personally, after firing Preet Bahara. Why did Sessions handle this case personally?
Why are Trump, the Republican Party, and the Russian trolls now trying to smear, slander and investigate the US Attorney who has caused the most trouble for corrupt Russian mobsters in the city of New York, putting many Russian criminals in jail, or on planes back to Russia? Ohr has made a lot of enemies in the Russian government and now he's being labelled by Trump, as the most corrupt prosecutor in America. Did Putin make him do it?
Posters here continue to say that Democrats are seeing Russians everywhere, but scratch a Trump enemies list, and you find they're also enemies of Russia, and the ones at the top of Trump's enemies list are guys like Mueller, and Ohr who have done the most damage to Russia, and guys like Christopher Steele who have exposed those connections, as well as Fusion GPS.
Anyone in the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA who had any part of the decision making process to pursue these investigations was fired by Trump as soon as he took office. Trump has accused all of these people who have served their country with distinction, valor, and for civil service pay, of lying and plotting against him. This is the same Donald Trump, who has lied in public and in private his entire adult life, who lied about Trump Tower Moscow, who lied about contacts with Russians, who knew that Russian hackers had the DNC emails, who has been charged with crimes of racial discrimination, illegal campaign contributions, fraud, has admitted to bribing publica officials for personal gain, and has gone bankrupt 7 times while bragging about how much money he walked away with, calling all of the heads of the American Security Agencies sworn to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, liars.
Still, they might be able to know you are watching on youtube and secretly add that to the ratings. Heavy duty foil will stop that.Good for you. You don't want to get mind-poisoned. It can happen in an instant.What are they saying on CNN and MSLSD?
How are they spinning this disaster? No way are they being honest about how bad it was for the Dimms!
I refuse to tune in. I’ll watch YouTube clips but at don’t tune in to CNN and PMSNBC
Do you have your computer lined with foil so they can't accidentally mind poison you when you go to youtube? Use the heavy duty kind. It's safer.
Derp. I don’t want to give them ratings. I said I watch the clips on YouTube. Is you memory that bad?
I said: “I’ll watch YouTube clips but at don’t tune in to CNN and PMSNBC”
Nice try smartass.
So you don’t know how the corporate media is spinning this utter disaster for Dimms.
Mueller confirmed there was no obstruction, and the report says there was no conspiracy to rig the election.
This pipe dream for Dimms is over.
