Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, no shit, dope.
Tell that to Trump. That's his dopey narrative. Not mine.
Little advice stupid fuck, pick up your teeth and ooze off to your safe space. Stop sticking your mouth in the path of his on coming foot, you fucking retard.
I found this narrative in the trash? I think you lost it.
Totally discredited.
What a fucking retard.
It's obvious you haven't either.It's clear not only did Mueller not write the "Mueller Report", he never even read it!
A frail old man, unable to remember things, stumbling, refusing to answer basic questions...I said it in 2017 and Mueller confirmed it today — All you pundits and moderates and lame Dems who told the public to put their faith in the esteemed Robert Mueller — just STFU from now on
Haha! This is funny and soon to be a classic!
Too late.You're a smart guy, why don't you read the report? That's not what it says.126 undisclosed meetings. "I love it". Flynn lied, manafort lied, gates lied, papadoulos lied, Cohen lied... All intelligence agencies and the report all agree Russia weighed in on tRump's side... tRump just recently said if offered information my a foreign government he would take it... WikiLeaks coordinated email dumps...Yes, a fact finder could infer that a defendant taking steps to obstruct an investigation did so because the defendant was guilt -- OF THE UNDERLYING CRIME.Justice. The investigation.What are you obstructing if you’re not guilty?
BTW, obstructing an investigation can be considered a tacit admission of guilt.
If, however, there is no underlying crime, that is also probative as to whether the defendant, acting to end the investigation, had corrupt intent. It really make the case for LACK of corrupt intent when ending a wasteful investigation into NON-crimes is your job---like the President.
.
How much more do you need?
2 yrs
$25mil
No conspiracy no obstruction
How much more do you need?
Even CNN says the Republicans won
Derp....But, even if he did, the obstructive act is not enough. They have to prove it was done with corrupt intent.To stifle a lawful investigation. How can you not puzzle that out for yourself?What was the corrupt intent?
But the investigation wasn't stifled in the least. President Trump didn't stop anyone from testifying, provided all of the documents requested.
He didn't fire anyone, even though it was his right to do so, and firing Mueller or anyone else would not have stopped the Witch Hunt.
Action to end a bullshit investigation into NON-CRIMES would be the duty of a president, which pretty much negates any corrupt intent.
.
A frail old man, unable to remember things, stumbling, refusing to answer basic questions...I said it in 2017 and Mueller confirmed it today — All you pundits and moderates and lame Dems who told the public to put their faith in the esteemed Robert Mueller — just STFU from now on
Haha! This is funny and soon to be a classic!
Of course it's much better for you dopes to laugh at the man rather than address the substance that completely destroyed your narratives. The true tell of a childish loser.
The case is closed.
Mueller is restricted to his report.
Drama, Emotional Political Theater
Truly nothing to see here worthwhile
What did Mueller say that discredited anyone?You're an absolute idiot for trying to keep this train wreck going. Nothing came from this today that was good for you. All it did was enforce how fucking stupid you unhinged idiots really are.Only in your underwear is the Obstruction DUPE.
Now go lick your wounds and come back in 2024 and try again.
Seriously?
You're the one on the defensive, dope. Mueller just publicly validated everything I've said from the beginnning.
TAKE THE LOSS.
Mueller discredited your entire narrative established by Barr. You are reduced to attacking his appearance and demeanor rather than the substance of the report. The truth is now out there straight from Mueller.
You took a hit whether you recognize it yet or not.
I’ll wait for the quotes.Derp...What did Mueller say that discredited anyone?
I’ll wait for the quotes.
FYI-she was here as the lawyer for some Russian Corporation being tried for money laundering or fraud.... the Southern District might have been the prosecutors that charged the Russian firm if memory serves....Veselnitskaya didn't have what she promised. The questions that should be asked are how did she get into the country for that meeting?
When Don jr got the email for the Russian meeting set up with Veselnitskaya from his promoter friend, junior tried to move up the meeting earlier, and that promoter guy (can't remember his name) answered back to him via this email chain, that she could not meet earlier, she had to be in a Court hearing for her clients....
You're claiming that Mueller brought Glenn Simpson in and questioned him about his meetings with Natalia Veselnitskaya before and after the Trump Tower meeting? Would you care to explain why neither Simpson nor Fusion GPS is mentioned in in connection with the Mueller report despite the meeting being the focus of 14 pages of the Mueller Report? Would you like to explain this testimony given by Mueller?
"At the hearing, Chabot asked Mueller a simple question. Chabot referred Mueller to page 103 of Volume 2 of his final report, in which he describes “the firm that produced the Steele reporting,” but does not name the firm. Chabot asked Mueller: “The name of that firm was Fusion GPS, is that correct?”
Mueller, who has appeared confused at numerous questions so far during this hearing, looked at his binder, which contained a copy of his report, and asked: “And you’re on page 103?”
Chabot asked the same question again.
“When you talk about the firm that produced the Steele reporting. The name of the firm that produced that was Fusion GPS. Is that correct?" Chabot asked.
Mueller responded: “I’m not familiar with that.”"
Think about that for a moment! The man who spent the better part of two years investigating collusion to influence the election doesn't seem to know who Fusion GPS is and what it is that they DID leading up to that election!!! I mean SERIOUSLY? Did those words really come out of Robert Mueller's mouth? This is the man who we're supposed to believe is above reproach?
What I heard him say was that the Steele business was being investigated by other departments.
If there is some problem with 'oranges' and Dossiers and etc., you need to get your investigations finished and your congressional hearings lined up. Show us the evidence.
Mueller wasn't hired to do that part for you. Have Trump appoint a special prosecutor for crying out loud.
What was Mueller hired to do? Investigate possible collusion? So you've got the Trump Tower meeting between Veselnitskaya and Trump Jr which you on the left are ADAMENT constitutes collusion...correct? So by all means INVESTIGATE that meeting! Get to the bottom of who set it up! Find out who it was in the Obama State Department who gave Veselnitskaya the special visa she used to get into the country for that meeting! Find out what it was that Glenn Simpson spoke to her about when they met the day before the Tower meeting and the day after the Tower meeting! Find out who it was that leaked the story of that meeting to the media right after it took place! If Mueller was tasked with finding out if any collusion took place leading up to that election then shouldn't he be non-partisan in that investigation? Why is he only looking into the meeting itself and ignoring every other thing that was taking place behind the scenes in relation to that meeting? Why should another special prosecutor have to be appointed to investigate people other than Trump when it's rather obvious that it was the Clinton Campaign that was guilty of collusion with foreign entities to sway the election?
Mueller said there was no collusion or conspiracy between Trump & the Russians. It sounds like the meeting ended up being a nothing berder, despite Juniors fondest hopes. Why does he need to keep digging?
Because it looks like the "meeting" was nothing more than a set up by the Clinton campaign, NYB! It totally was a "nothing burger"...the meeting itself was over in no time at all when it turned out that Veselnitskaya didn't have what she promised. The questions that should be asked are how did she get into the country for that meeting? She needed to get a special visa from the Obama State Department for that to happen. So who was it that approved that and what was the reason given for doing so? What possible reason would she have had to meet with Glenn Simpson from Fusion GPS (the company that Hillary Clinton was paying big bucks to in order to smear Trump with Richard Steele's "dossiers") the day before that Trump Tower meeting and the day after the meeting? There are WAY too many suspicious things going on surrounding the Trump Tower meeting! I don't see how any non partial investigator could look into the meeting and NOT ask the questions I've just asked!
Those questions ARE being asked. Barr is looking into this. If this is so critical, Barr should hurry his fat ass up so we can get some hearings scheduled. Pronto. You act like it's just all been dismissed by the justice department. Not so.
Comey, ya dumbass.When did Trump fire Rosenstein?
Goddamn, this is like talking to children.
Since you're a toddler soiling his diaper because you got your ass handed to you again, just STFU. Damn, slapping you around is REALLY easy. By the way moron, Trump has the power to fire Comey for any reason. Refusal to do his job was a pretty good one. Comey was never in charge of this investigation. It started AFTER Trump removed the piece of garbage (which the idiots like you wanted done anyway).
LOL...Trump has the power to fire Comey for any reason.
Too late.You're a smart guy, why don't you read the report? That's not what it says.126 undisclosed meetings. "I love it". Flynn lied, manafort lied, gates lied, papadoulos lied, Cohen lied... All intelligence agencies and the report all agree Russia weighed in on tRump's side... tRump just recently said if offered information my a foreign government he would take it... WikiLeaks coordinated email dumps...Yes, a fact finder could infer that a defendant taking steps to obstruct an investigation did so because the defendant was guilt -- OF THE UNDERLYING CRIME.Justice. The investigation.
BTW, obstructing an investigation can be considered a tacit admission of guilt.
If, however, there is no underlying crime, that is also probative as to whether the defendant, acting to end the investigation, had corrupt intent. It really make the case for LACK of corrupt intent when ending a wasteful investigation into NON-crimes is your job---like the President.
.
How much more do you need?
2 yrs
$25mil
No conspiracy no obstruction
How much more do you need?
Even CNN says the Republicans won
They've become rhetorical kamikazes. They've passed the the failsafe point and no longer have enough fuel to get back.
Comey, ya dumbass.When did Trump fire Rosenstein?
Goddamn, this is like talking to children.
Since you're a toddler soiling his diaper because you got your ass handed to you again, just STFU. Damn, slapping you around is REALLY easy. By the way moron, Trump has the power to fire Comey for any reason. Refusal to do his job was a pretty good one. Comey was never in charge of this investigation. It started AFTER Trump removed the piece of garbage (which the idiots like you wanted done anyway).LOL...Trump has the power to fire Comey for any reason.
Sure he does, dope. Trump just chose a reason that was also obstruction of justice.
So, Mueller ignored overt Russian influence in favor of what turned out to be a big bag of NOTHING?Where does the report say that he interviewed Steele? Page number please.Mueller looked like a feeble old man who had no idea what was going on. The report states he interviewed Steele,yet he has no idea who Fusion GPS is and wouldn't answer any questions pertaining to Steele? He came off as incompetent and not knowing what was in "his" report. A bad day for Mueller and the Dems.
Yep. That's what I want the DoJ to explore.
.
So, Mueller ignored overt Russian influence in favor of what turned out to be a big bag of NOTHING?
Yep. That's what I want the DoJ to explore.
Hate less and think more, and you will look stupid less often.Derp....
Subjects of an investigation don't obstruct that investigation with the intent of aiding the investigators, dope.
Mueller not only did not read the report he did not write the report.Too late.You're a smart guy, why don't you read the report? That's not what it says.126 undisclosed meetings. "I love it". Flynn lied, manafort lied, gates lied, papadoulos lied, Cohen lied... All intelligence agencies and the report all agree Russia weighed in on tRump's side... tRump just recently said if offered information my a foreign government he would take it... WikiLeaks coordinated email dumps...Yes, a fact finder could infer that a defendant taking steps to obstruct an investigation did so because the defendant was guilt -- OF THE UNDERLYING CRIME.
If, however, there is no underlying crime, that is also probative as to whether the defendant, acting to end the investigation, had corrupt intent. It really make the case for LACK of corrupt intent when ending a wasteful investigation into NON-crimes is your job---like the President.
.
How much more do you need?
2 yrs
$25mil
No conspiracy no obstruction
How much more do you need?
Even CNN says the Republicans won
They've become rhetorical kamikazes. They've passed the the failsafe point and no longer have enough fuel to get back.
That comment did not make any sense. Mueller himself didn’t even read the report.
Too late.You're a smart guy, why don't you read the report? That's not what it says.126 undisclosed meetings. "I love it". Flynn lied, manafort lied, gates lied, papadoulos lied, Cohen lied... All intelligence agencies and the report all agree Russia weighed in on tRump's side... tRump just recently said if offered information my a foreign government he would take it... WikiLeaks coordinated email dumps...Yes, a fact finder could infer that a defendant taking steps to obstruct an investigation did so because the defendant was guilt -- OF THE UNDERLYING CRIME.
If, however, there is no underlying crime, that is also probative as to whether the defendant, acting to end the investigation, had corrupt intent. It really make the case for LACK of corrupt intent when ending a wasteful investigation into NON-crimes is your job---like the President.
.
How much more do you need?
2 yrs
$25mil
No conspiracy no obstruction
How much more do you need?
Even CNN says the Republicans won
They've become rhetorical kamikazes. They've passed the the failsafe point and no longer have enough fuel to get back.
That comment did not make any sense. Mueller himself didn’t even read the report.
