It's Trump's trial. What Hillary, or anybody else did doesn't matter.

[SeaMajor7]

The camps will be online sometime in August.
Better gear up.

Sure thing, Bear Huggy.
Just another hustle.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That asswipe Comey is teaching ethics now, can you believe that shit?

It don’t add up!
Reality kicks your ass every day , huh.

 

[progressive hunter]

But we know others didn’t walk on more serious charges as they were never charged.

do you know dogs can fly and pigs have human babies??

 

[Hutch Starskey]

"Whataboutism" is the foundation of our justice system: Equal treatment under the law. Leftists thought they could obfuscate it by inventing a clever word to dismiss us with.

Once again, Leftist were wrong

No. Whaddaboutism is a tactic used by children who haven’t learned yet that they are responsible for their own actions.

 

[progressive hunter]

No. Whaddaboutism is a tactic used by children who haven’t learned yet that they are responsible for their own actions.

and yet you still do nothing but that,,

 

[Hutch Starskey]

do you know dogs can fly and pigs have human babies??

I have no idea what that is meant to mean.

 

[progressive hunter]

I have no idea what that is meant to mean.

ditto,,,

 

[Hutch Starskey]

and yet you still do nothing but that,,

I do?
Interesting.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

my guess is youre not sure if you have jock itch or clamitia,,

You got da clamitcha?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

the system has gotten so corrupt and discombobulated its hard to understand any part of it or even have a rational discussion on it,,

almost like thats been the plan all along

Almost like you never really understood it at all.

 

[Billiejeens]

He’s far less biased than you. Comey’s legal analysis was correct.

Anyone that would support Comey with his string of unethical and corrupt acts, can't be reasoned with.

 

[Billiejeens]

Yeah, yeah. Heard this dozens of times before. It always ends the same way. With nothing.
Starting over with the “lock her up” promise from 2016 is the perfect example of futility.

“Behghazi” - fizzle
“But her emails”- fizzle
“just wait until Durham is done” -fizzle
“ Hunter’s laptop” - fizzle

I don't think that you're making the point that you think that you're making.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

She was EXCUSED of her CORRUPTION!!!!!!!!

So you were told anyway.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I don't think that you're making the point that you think that you're making.

I am. You just don’t understand it because you don’t know that you’re being lied to.

 

[SeaMajor7]

So you were told anyway.

Yes, by Comey.
Remember that?
That was awesome.

 

[Invisibleflash]

It has become a Republican mantra that Hillary got away with something so therefore, it is unfair to charge Trump for what he did. I personally disagree that she got away with anything, but either way, trump's case is based on his actions, and anything Hillary did or didn't do does not matter. What Biden did or didn't do with documants doesn't matter. What Mike Pence, Obama, GW Bush, or anybody else did doesn't matter. Trump is charged with breaking laws, and his case will be determined on his actions alone. The Artificial Intellegence site ChatGPT seems to agree with me,

Introducing ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I can provide information on the topic, but it's important to note that I cannot provide real-time legal analysis or information. However, I can give you a general perspective on the matter.


The legal case against former President Donald Trump would typically be based on specific charges or allegations brought against him, and it would be determined by the relevant laws, evidence, and legal procedures. The legal process is typically focused on the specific case at hand and is not directly influenced by unrelated matters or individuals who may or may not have faced legal issues in the past.


Whether Hillary Clinton "got away with something" or not is a separate matter from any legal case involving Donald Trump. Each case is evaluated based on its own merits, evidence, and applicable laws. Previous legal matters or perceptions about other individuals do not automatically impact the outcome of a different case.


In the United States, the legal system operates on the principle of due process, which means that each person is entitled to a fair and impartial legal proceeding that considers the specific facts and circumstances of their case. Legal cases are typically judged on their individual merits and are not influenced by unrelated matters.


It's important to consult legal experts or stay updated on current news from reputable sources for accurate and timely information regarding specific legal cases or ongoing proceedings involving Donald Trump or any other individuals.

In the United States, the legal system operates on the principle of due process, which means that each person is entitled to a fair and impartial legal proceeding...


Bub...in the US of A we don't have that anymore. Be honest. Dems and reps all have the laws applied differently depending on the party that controls the D.A., city and state.

Can you be honest, bub??

If what I said was not true...why on earth would it matter if a SCOTUS justice was dem or rep? Be honest for once in your life...bub!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Again, when people see inconsistent interpretation and enforcement of the law, skepticism arises. Who is getting even?

I see inconsistent interpretations and application of facts. Not law.

 

[struth]

It has become a Republican mantra that Hillary got away with something so therefore, it is unfair to charge Trump for what he did. I personally disagree that she got away with anything, but either way, trump's case is based on his actions, and anything Hillary did or didn't do does not matter. What Biden did or didn't do with documants doesn't matter. What Mike Pence, Obama, GW Bush, or anybody else did doesn't matter. Trump is charged with breaking laws, and his case will be determined on his actions alone. The Artificial Intellegence site ChatGPT seems to agree with me,

Introducing ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I can provide information on the topic, but it's important to note that I cannot provide real-time legal analysis or information. However, I can give you a general perspective on the matter.


The legal case against former President Donald Trump would typically be based on specific charges or allegations brought against him, and it would be determined by the relevant laws, evidence, and legal procedures. The legal process is typically focused on the specific case at hand and is not directly influenced by unrelated matters or individuals who may or may not have faced legal issues in the past.


Whether Hillary Clinton "got away with something" or not is a separate matter from any legal case involving Donald Trump. Each case is evaluated based on its own merits, evidence, and applicable laws. Previous legal matters or perceptions about other individuals do not automatically impact the outcome of a different case.


In the United States, the legal system operates on the principle of due process, which means that each person is entitled to a fair and impartial legal proceeding that considers the specific facts and circumstances of their case. Legal cases are typically judged on their individual merits and are not influenced by unrelated matters.


It's important to consult legal experts or stay updated on current news from reputable sources for accurate and timely information regarding specific legal cases or ongoing proceedings involving Donald Trump or any other individuals.

Of course Clinton's case and others are relevant and certainly something the defense can bring up to the jury to highlight, specially with Clinton, how according to the DOJ, no reasonable prosecutor would have brought the case.

 

[progressive hunter]

Almost like you never really understood it at all.

nothing you say is understandable,,,

 

[BackAgain]

It also fails to note that “gross negligence” has not been charged in civilian criminal court.

Why Intent, Not Gross Negligence, is the Standard in Clinton Case

On July 5, FBI Director James Comey announced that he was not going to recommend the filing of criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her use of a

warontherocks.com

To charge Clinton with 18 USC 793f would be an unprecedented use of the law. That’s literally the opposite of the equal application of the law that you claim to want.

Snap out of it. You’re all over the place. She was the fuckin’ Secretary of State, you moron.