Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems you havent seen this yet
therightscoop.com
what video is that???progressive hunter, do you think that video is fake? Perhaps some CGI scam?
your perception of it is fake,,The one in #300 that you clicked fake news on.
Dude....I’m not understanding your point.
Court trials are a matter of public record in this country. Every trial can be reported on to the public. That transparency is what makes it trustworthy.
It has become a Republican mantra that Hillary got away with something so therefore, it is unfair to charge Trump for what he did. I personally disagree that she got away with anything, but either way, trump's case is based on his actions, and anything Hillary did or didn't do does not matter. What Biden did or didn't do with documants doesn't matter. What Mike Pence, Obama, GW Bush, or anybody else did doesn't matter. Trump is charged with breaking laws, and his case will be determined on his actions alone. The Artificial Intellegence site ChatGPT seems to agree with me,
Introducing ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I can provide information on the topic, but it's important to note that I cannot provide real-time legal analysis or information. However, I can give you a general perspective on the matter.
The legal case against former President Donald Trump would typically be based on specific charges or allegations brought against him, and it would be determined by the relevant laws, evidence, and legal procedures. The legal process is typically focused on the specific case at hand and is not directly influenced by unrelated matters or individuals who may or may not have faced legal issues in the past.
Whether Hillary Clinton "got away with something" or not is a separate matter from any legal case involving Donald Trump. Each case is evaluated based on its own merits, evidence, and applicable laws. Previous legal matters or perceptions about other individuals do not automatically impact the outcome of a different case.
In the United States, the legal system operates on the principle of due process, which means that each person is entitled to a fair and impartial legal proceeding that considers the specific facts and circumstances of their case. Legal cases are typically judged on their individual merits and are not influenced by unrelated matters.
It's important to consult legal experts or stay updated on current news from reputable sources for accurate and timely information regarding specific legal cases or ongoing proceedings involving Donald Trump or any other individuals.
No doubt.Of course you do.
Seems you havent seen this yet
How is that done?Dude....
The court of public opinion is that in which the mainstream media is used to influence all potential peers and jurors in real courts of law. That's the game today. Wake up.
How is that done?
By simply reporting on the case?
Court filings are public.
No shit "genius".Donald Trump is not on trial for J6, you fucking idiot.
As you "bring"............Gobbledygook?If you had anything you'd bring it.
Facts...................Try using them sometime.Same story with you leftard asswipes, ALL the time.
true, the clinton case is far more damningThe facts of the cases are not the same, you silly goober.
You didn’t get the sarcasm. It is not like you people believe in personal accountability and provide “facts”. You people just assume a position of intellectual authority.No doubt.
That’s how you dopes have always been.
The question is why don’t you see it?
Well, to be more accurate, in comparison to MAGAs, that position was assigned to us.You didn’t get the sarcasm. It is not like you people believe in personal accountability and provide “facts”. You people just assume a position of intellectual authority.
That is just comical. In all seriousness, your refute says it all that you people consider yourselves above personal accountability; though you love to hold your opponents accountable. In all, you come off as full-of-shit.Well, to be more accurate, in comparison to MAGAs, that position was assigned to us.
BULLSHITI see no evidence the right is interested in fair application of law. I see lots of evidence that the right wants to use the law for their own political purposes.
Please point to the specific remark that makes you think I, or my party, as a whole, are above personal accountability.That is just comical. In all seriousness, your refute says it all that you people consider yourselves above personal accountability; though you love to hold your opponents accountable. In all, you come off as full-of-shit.
You fucking idiot.Actual criminals do deserve to be locked up.
But you have to have actual evidence of actual crimes.
That’s where you run into problems. To people like you, actual evidence of actual crimes matters more or less depending if the person aligns with your political ideology.
